I'm NOT just talking about the 70s-80s progs. MATCH OF THE 90s was somewhat similar (down to the credits, those sudden freeze frames with text over them - which I loved); the other night's Wimbledon prog, too, tonight's Madonna prog. I get a sense of an attempt at a (slightly?) new kind of pop-culture history, more rooted and fan-based... but is it all too glib and formulaic?
― the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
No, pinefox, you're getting confused, you're thinking of C4's Top Ten. The beauty of the I Love The 80s series was that hardly anyone actually involved in the events ever appeared on it. That way, you don't need many researchers, you don't have to ship people in from other countries, and you don't even have to get your facts right, because no one will argue. You just entice some minor slebs by telling them they can keep the vivid orange shirts, sit them in front of an abstract background and flash idiot boards at them, and in just a couple of days you've got 20 hours of primetime TV, and no one knows the difference.
more rooted and fan-based
Jamie Theakston pretending to remember stuff - fan based? They've got I Love The 90s planned for this summer. How long is it before Newsnight gets renamed "I Love The Now", with Kate Thornton giggling "That Barry George, me and my mates used to have such a big crush on him".
So, I Love Last Tuesday programs: Dud, for letting self appointed expert on everything Stuart Maconie on TV, because all he ever says is "Everyone thought [Insert some appalling band/film/TV show] were rubbish, but actually they were really great."
The general concept: Could be classic, Top Ten was great until they ran out of things to do, and I'd really love to see a I Love The 1880s, because stuff must have happened, right? And I'm sure Phil Jupitus would still have plenty of anecdotes, and Peter Kaye would be able to hum the theme tune.
― Graham, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Your answer also seems to imply that all accounts of, let's say, 'the recent past as history' are bad (eg: a history of the 1990s is a bad idea). I don't think I agree with that.
― the pinefox, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― gareth, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
My problem with I Love The 90s is that the 80s series didn't teach me much that I didn't know (And I wasn't born until '83), so this series will probably feature reminiscing about Take That and The Spice Girls. There are lots of interesting news stories and fads that get forgotten quickly, but the I Love format never covers them.
The format in general is great, but only when they actually have people that were involved, or were actually fans. It's the valuing celebrity viewpoints above normal people that bothers me, it seems like a new thing. I don't want Craig David as spokesperson for my generation. And I agree with everything Gareth says.
― Graham, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― the pinefox, Sunday, 19 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Did anyone see the advertisements on VH-1 for the American version of I Love The 80s? It looks so awful.
― Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 13 December 2002 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 13 December 2002 16:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― the pinefox, Monday, 30 December 2002 12:42 (twenty-two years ago)