Is there ANYTHING men can do on purpose to be sexy?
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)
Well, it's either that or continually profess your love of and expertise at the gentle and noble art of cunnilingus.
― Johnney B, Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― leon vincent, Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:47 (twenty-two years ago)
Where is the fault in my logic?
― Johnney B, Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Robbie Lumsden (Wallace Stevens HQ), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― don (don), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:58 (twenty-two years ago)
I don't know the answer to the question, sorry.
― Cathy (Cathy), Saturday, 8 May 2004 15:59 (twenty-two years ago)
potentially it's just there cause it rhymes.
― Robbie Lumsden (Wallace Stevens HQ), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:00 (twenty-two years ago)
why the face?
Oh, I see, Robbie.
― Cathy (Cathy), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)
I either meant to have the closing bracket, instead, or I am having mood swings and bouts of amnesia.
― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)
what does it mean?
― Robbie Lumsden (Wallace Stevens HQ), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Robbie Lumsden (Wallace Stevens HQ), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:10 (twenty-two years ago)
Actions speak louder than words.
― tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:10 (twenty-two years ago)
No.
― christhamrin (christhamrin), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Robbie Lumsden (Wallace Stevens HQ), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Cathy (Cathy), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Robbie Lumsden (Wallace Stevens HQ), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Cathy (Cathy), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― harry p, Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― C J (C J), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Robbie Lumsden (Wallace Stevens HQ), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― C J (C J), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― C J (C J), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― C J (C J), Saturday, 8 May 2004 16:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― mouse, Saturday, 8 May 2004 18:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 8 May 2004 18:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― mouse, Saturday, 8 May 2004 18:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Saturday, 8 May 2004 18:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Saturday, 8 May 2004 18:20 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.kuci.org/~brianm/ile/negra.jpg
― donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 9 May 2004 09:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Sunday, 9 May 2004 09:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Sunday, 9 May 2004 09:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 9 May 2004 09:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Johnney B, Sunday, 9 May 2004 09:30 (twenty-two years ago)
Yes, tho of course they might also ellicit a "aww, he's trying to be sexy, that's so cute!" response from some chix0rs. Trying to be sexy the traditional way = the new not knowing you're being sexy? (I have no idea wtf I'm talking about)
― Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Sunday, 9 May 2004 09:38 (twenty-two years ago)
Obviously, trying SOMETHING that isn't horrifically freaky or harmful is better than doing nothing at all, however dorky or cheesy it is.
― donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 9 May 2004 09:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 9 May 2004 09:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 9 May 2004 09:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 9 May 2004 09:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 9 May 2004 09:52 (twenty-two years ago)
there are also a lot of women out there.
So, it's kinda futile to make such a huge fucking science out of it. As long a guy can learn from his mistakes (a mistake being doing something horrificaly freaky and harmful as I mention above.. like creating a bad reputation), then what's a guy to do? Just do his thing and hopefully a gal will come along and like his thing. (intentially set up for a saucy VengaDan rejoinder)
My point is: women are different. men are different. trying to figure out the opposite sex is kinda futile, because not all of one sex are ever the same. Just try to have fun being single, be a little adventurous if need be, and who knows what will happen. (this isn't addressed to you, specifically, Ro, this is just a general "you" I'm talking about.)
― donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 9 May 2004 10:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― ipsofacto (ipsofacto), Sunday, 9 May 2004 10:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 9 May 2004 10:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― ipsofacto (ipsofacto), Sunday, 9 May 2004 10:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Sunday, 9 May 2004 10:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 9 May 2004 10:16 (twenty-two years ago)
x-post
― ipsofacto (ipsofacto), Sunday, 9 May 2004 10:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 9 May 2004 10:17 (twenty-two years ago)
xxxxxpost yeah
― ken c (ken c), Sunday, 9 May 2004 11:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ashton Kutcher (tracerhand), Sunday, 9 May 2004 11:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― le v, Sunday, 9 May 2004 12:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Sunday, 9 May 2004 12:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― truism, Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― penelope_111, Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― penelope_111, Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Paul (scifisoul), Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:45 (twenty-two years ago)
wtf??
― ken c (ken c), Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)
a naked woman, on the other hand, when viewed from certain angles, is just... fanny.
― ken c (ken c), Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― C J (C J), Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― le v, Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― penelope_111, Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Sunday, 9 May 2004 13:59 (twenty-two years ago)
Never mind.
― C J (C J), Sunday, 9 May 2004 14:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Sunday, 9 May 2004 14:03 (twenty-two years ago)
Also the Obstetrical meaning of 'Crown' then becomes soooo unpalatable that i choose not to accept that interpretation.
― Robbie Lumsden (Wallace Stevens HQ), Sunday, 9 May 2004 17:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Sunday, 9 May 2004 18:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― C J (C J), Sunday, 9 May 2004 18:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 9 May 2004 18:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― C J (C J), Sunday, 9 May 2004 18:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― uh (eetface), Sunday, 9 May 2004 18:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― C J (C J), Sunday, 9 May 2004 18:22 (twenty-two years ago)