Supersize Me C/D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So I saw this last night and I quite liked. Morgan Spurlock is really charming and the movie is pretty stern indictment without becoming overly preachy or condescending. The part on school lunch programs and gym cuts is just fucking horrifying.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2004 04:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I want to see this, it looks interesting.

Nellie (nellskies), Monday, 10 May 2004 04:44 (twenty-one years ago)

i had a lot of problems with it, but admittedly the movie would have had to be MUCH longer to address everything that was neglected or left out.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 10 May 2004 05:00 (twenty-one years ago)

america itself just really needs to be ripped a shiny new goatse.cx-sized gaping anus.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 10 May 2004 05:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Well it's not meant to be comprehensive. But I think it made it's central argument (Eating this stuff is REALLY REALLY not a good idea and the fast food companies are trying their best to convince you this is not the case) pretty compellingly.

I wholeheartedly agree that America needs to wake the fuck up.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2004 05:07 (twenty-one years ago)

some thoughts (via aim):

jbr: here's my big criticism of this whole thing...
jbr: there's so much more to it than just the fast food industry
jbr: and that sounds blindingly obvious, but it's really true
ckb: correct
jbr: it's the culture as a whole: it's car culture and suburban sprawl and expensive gyms keeping people from exercising, it's the way certain ethnic groups and classes have been taught to eat throughout history, it's the fact that there's food EVERYWHERE you go and you can't escape it
jbr: america just needs to be brought down in full
ckb: OTMFM
jbr: the other big problem with the movie was the guy's claim that eating at mcdonald's every day (or multiple times in a week) will make us all incredibly sick the way it did him -- ignoring the fact that chronic fast food eaters have established a physical tolerance it's taken them years to build up and it's usually only health nuts like him who get seriously ill when there's a very sudden change in diet. "a very sudden change in diet" killed karen carpenter, after she'd lived with anorexia for years and it was only fatal after she managed to get healthy again.
jbr: the body is resilient and can handle a fuck of a lot but not everything all at once.
ckb: mmhmmm
ckb: it's the similar situation with drug users, etc.
ckb: arrr... i'm probably going to be really annoyed by the movie
jbr: i think you will be
jbr: its heart is in the right place but sometimes it isn't -- sometimes it's just fat-mockery for its own sake
ckb: ugh
ckb: obesity is the last thing that is fair game to make fun of
jbr: uh huh
jbr: it's basically "i don't like the way you look so i'm going to use SCIENCE (cue oohs and ahhs) to make you feel like shit about yourself"
ckb: sigh
ckb: and it lumps all the stereotypes together
ckb: mcdonalds is bad. all fat people eat fast food., etc. etc.
jbr: i haven't eaten in mcdonald's in probably a year and a half. i hardly ever eat fast food.
ckb: in-and-out-burger is my last pseudo-fast food
ckb: and even then it's only once a month
jbr: once every six months i'll have white castle or taco bell or something
jbr: but i don't make a habit out of it
jbr: if i drink soda, it's almost always diet
jbr: the movie assumes that all people who drink soda drink regular
jbr: oh, another thing...
ckb: yah?
jbr: the movie talked about french fries being the only option for a value meal but i don't think it ever brought up the "dollar menu" that a lot of mcdonald's (and other fast food places) have, which sells "junior" sized items (junior cheeseburgers, etc) for a dollar each, giving people mix 'n' match options that don't have to include fries
jbr: i dunno if mcdonald's has phased that out or what, but it would definitely have been worth spurlock's time to look into

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 10 May 2004 05:22 (twenty-one years ago)

1. The first part of that is OTM, but obv that's a much much broader movie.
2. I don't get the invalidity of his experiment. Obv it's EXTREME, but it's also clear that eating fast food is basically doing the same thing to a lot of people, just over a longer period of time (conveniently disguising these effects until they get just a little older.)
3. I didn't see the fat mockery. There are a lot of obese people in the movie, but I didn't see the movie as observing them in a particularly cruel way. And obesity is more than a body image problem, it's a national health problem and needs to be treated as such and yes that means that attention is going to be focused on overweight people and it will be in a somewhat negative way. Frankly I think it beats ignoring it.
4. McDonald's is bad. It's bad for you. It's a bad company.
5. Crap food and a lack of exercise are the primary reason why people in this country are obese. Those aren't stereotypes those are facts.
6. I don't think the movie makes any assumptions about people who drink soda.
7. Diet soda is also bad for you.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2004 05:48 (twenty-one years ago)

8. I know Wendy's and Jack in the Box have/had the dollar menu thing. I'm not sure McDonalds does/did, but obv even if they do almost everything on those menus are also very unhealthy too (most of the salads are as bad as the hamburgers at these places.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2004 06:08 (twenty-one years ago)

"Although Spurlock concedes "my experiment may have been a little extreme," he notes that some people do eat at McDonald's regularly, even daily. But despite the plethora of calorie-packed dishes offered by McDonald's, he easily could have eaten three meals a day there without gaining weight.

For instance, an Egg McMuffin, orange juice, and coffee for breakfast; a grilled chicken bacon ranch salad and iced tea for lunch; and a double cheeseburger, medium fries, and diet Coke for dinner totalfewer than 1,800 calories, well under the 2,500 Spurlock's doctor says he needed to maintain his starting weight of 185 pounds. By contrast, Spurlock says he consumed some 5,000 calories a day, while deliberately avoiding physical activity."

- http://www.reason.com/sullum/050704.shtml

christhamrin (christhamrin), Monday, 10 May 2004 06:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I guess I'm pretty horrible for laughing at this, but I couldn't help but notice that McDonald's new CEO has colorectal cancer. Of course, this is the guy who is the replacement for the CEO who died of a heart attack last month.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:14 (twenty-one years ago)

i have responses for alex and more thoughts about the movie... will post later this afternoon.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)

For instance, an Egg McMuffin, orange juice, and coffee for breakfast; a grilled chicken bacon ranch salad and iced tea for lunch; and a double cheeseburger, medium fries, and diet Coke for dinner totalfewer than 1,800 calories, well under the 2,500 Spurlock's doctor says he needed to maintain his starting weight of 185 pounds. By contrast, Spurlock says he consumed some 5,000 calories a day, while deliberately avoiding physical activity."

a good point, but how many people at fast food restaurants do you see eating salads and forgoing the fries/mozz sticks/extra portion of chicken nuggets? also, what about the fat/cholesterol/sodium content of a chicken bacon ranch salad, french fries, dbl cheeseburger, etc?

lauren (laurenp), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the experiment is completely invalid in the sense that even though lots of people eat at McDonald's a lot, I doubt that many people eat EVERY SINGLE MEAL THREE TIMES A DAY at McDonald's, let alone supersizing EVERY SINGLE MEAL.

I eat at Burger King at least three times a week and have done so for the past two and a half years. I never (and I mean NEVER) have time to put together home-cooked meals for myself, so I eat out probably 95% of the time. Over the past two and a half years, I have lost 20 pounds and am actually closer to my pre-college fitness level than I have been since I got married. I have never had any serious health issues.

Blaming the fast food industry is a big fucking copout that frees people from the responsibility of managing their diets.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Quite frankly, I have about as much sympathy for people who say, "Oh, the fast food industry is making me fat and unhealthy" as I do for people who say "Oh, listening to all of that death metal made me dismember my dead friend and wear his testicles as earrings".

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:34 (twenty-one years ago)

well is the whole idea of the movie to present a managed diet?

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Given that I don't really know what the aim of the movie is I accept that my criticism could very well be groundless (and I do want to see it) but if it's presented as "LOOK WHAT THE EVIL FAST FOOD PEOPLE ARE DOING TO US" I will encourage the film to eat a supersized dick.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:37 (twenty-one years ago)

hahaha, okay. I wanna see it, it seems like it's not really so much an "experiment" as such.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:39 (twenty-one years ago)

it's interesting that we never learn what spurlock's eating habits were before he starts the experiment, or what his level of health and fitness is like before he's fit enough to brag about being in perfect health and have it validated by doctors. did he get in shape specifically for the project, or was his health always that stunningly perfect? and once he went off his vegan detox thing at the end, what did he go back to eating?

ok, i really do have to leave now.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you exercise a lot Dan, or are you just lucky?

The whole idea of the movie does rub me thing wrong way, in a "living a clearly unhealthy lifestyle is very bad for you shocker!" sort of way.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:43 (twenty-one years ago)

well yeah, but it might be worth remembering that not everyone gets the same educational opportunities we do...

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:46 (twenty-one years ago)

so this movie is educating whom exactly?

(i'm going now, i swear)

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I dunno! Whomever sees it, I guess. My point was that it shouldn't always be taken as a given that "everybody knows" something (in this case that eating a lot of junk food isn't that good for you).

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I do agree that if the movie is just marketed to people who already live healthy lifestyles, the point is kinda moot.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you exercise a lot Dan, or are you just lucky?

I don't exercise at all and haven't gotten any regular exercise since I was 18. I also don't eat particularly well. Basically, I eat in moderation; my lifestyle is very sedentary so there's absolutely no need for me to eat all that much. Granted, if I ever do get off of my ass and start exercising, you can bet that I will start eating more because I don't want to be Short Negro Jack Skellington.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:55 (twenty-one years ago)

But that's a brilliant Wu Tang name.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the experiment is completely invalid in the sense that even though lots of people eat at McDonald's a lot, I doubt that many people eat EVERY SINGLE MEAL THREE TIMES A DAY at McDonald's, let alone supersizing EVERY SINGLE MEAL.

that wasn't at all the point.

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I think my problem is that it's very hard for me to refrain from eating much unless I'm getting some regular exercise (as I found out when I started actually exercising after nine months of completely sedentary living).

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Mark, then what was the point? That's the only aspect of the movie the media is focusing on.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:02 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean, the movie itself is being marketed as "LOOK LOOK LOOK AMERICA FAST FOOD ISN'T HEALTHY", which I'm sorry bt given the media saturation of various diets, health crazes and nutritional information, if you haven't figured that out by now then you are either living somewhere with absolutely no media access (and therefore also no fast food) or are amazingly, mind-bogglingly ignorant.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Also: [...] I don't really know what the aim of the movie is I accept that my criticism could very well be groundless

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd take the latter.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean there are a lot of amazingly, mind-bogglingly ignorant people in this country. I'm confronted by that everytime I read the news. That said, it's not right to blame ignorance solely on the individual. As I stated on the Iraq prison abuse thread, a vast cross-section of the country's population is not afforded anything resembling a good education.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:11 (twenty-one years ago)

How does the film compare to Dave Chappelle's "WackArnolds" sketch?

j.lu (j.lu), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Conversely, it is not McDonald's responsibility to keep Joe Public from eating 60 Big Macs a month.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree, but McDonald's isn't exactly going to say no to someone buying their product, er food.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)

dan, you're treating the discourse on this as a binary when it's not. you said above that you eat burger king regularly, and you also seem to know that it IS unhealthy. aren't you remotely interested in a discussion on the disconnect between those two things?

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)

He only super-sized like 4 meals I think. (And only when prompted at the register.) I think it's safe to assume he was pretty helath conscious prior to the experiment, his girl being a vegetarian chef and all.

if you haven't figured that out by now then you are either living somewhere with absolutely no media access (and therefore also no fast food) or are amazingly, mind-bogglingly ignorant.

That still leaves: then why are people still eating so much of it? Why is American obesity still on the rise? Just how bad is McDonald's for you? The "I already knew it was bad for you, duh" is a bit of an unfair dismissal.

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Dan Perry OTM. Totally paternalistic bollocks. This sounds like a 90 minute road safety thing. Look both ways before you eat children!

NRQ, Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Look both ways before you eat children!

The images this calls to mind are suspect and varied.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:21 (twenty-one years ago)

god, I could go for some general tso's children right now.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:23 (twenty-one years ago)

The entire point is "eat in moderation". Unless you have food allergies, how much you eat is just as important as what you eat, if not more.

You will note that I never actually said that eating at Burger King or McDonald's is unhealthy; what I said was eating three supersized meals a day at McDonald's while shunning exercise is unhealthy. Similarly, eating a pound of oranges every day is healthy, or eating nothing but lettuce is unhealthy. I'm not the one making this into a binary issue (or, if I am, the binary is between "eating like an idiot" and "eating in moderation").

xpost Okay, if dude was primarily vegetarian before doing this, then this is even more invalid; radically shocking your body by slamming into a completely different diet, particularly if you're shifting exclusively towards foods you don't normally eat, is going to cause your body to have a fit.

That still leaves: then why are people still eating so much of it?

Because PEOPLE OVEREAT.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:23 (twenty-one years ago)

The "I already knew it was bad for you, duh" is a bit of an unfair dismissal.

So?

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)

So you wanna step outside, burger boy?

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it's also because they don't know WHY fast food is bad, and when faced with a blanket statement like 'all mcdonalds is bad' they just disbelieve or give up. I don't think people read labels or know that processed foods lack fiber and shock your system into producing a ton of insulin, or what partially hydrogenated fats are all about, etc etc.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)

haha dan you just said it 20 posts back! wtf?!

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I REWRITE HISTORY!

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)

We've always been at work with EurMcDonalds.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:31 (twenty-one years ago)

History is a Big Mac slamming down onto a human face FOREVER.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Looking back, I see that my brevity is again undermining me.

My entire point is "Moderation is the key". Eating nothing but McDonald's is worse for you than eating nothing but salad, but unless you are super-diligent about the composition of your salad that diet isn't particularly healthy for you, either (or are we going to assume that the stick-thin look sweeping Hollywood at the moment is actually healthy?).

What I meant above was really "LOOK AMERICA EATING NOTHING BUT MCDONALD'S IS UNHEALTHY".

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:33 (twenty-one years ago)

To be fair I had all these very same cynical reactions to the "experiment" but in the context of it being used to further stir discussion about the dangers of fast food, I think it does some good.

Side note: nothing annoys me more then when "documentaries" use man-on-the-street interviews to make their point.

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

one problem with the film was the conservative assumption that we should all have healthy home-cooked meals like when mums didn't work (as i doubt spurlock's did), and the concomitant idea that home cooking *is* healthy. of course, much of the stuff people do eat at home -- diet food, ready-meals, microwave meals -- is complete shit.

HKM, Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)

haha OTM - i cook at home all the time but i actually have a pot of MSG next to the cooker.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)

As I said, McDonalds is a choice. Just like a deep fried mars bar is a choice. They are not forced upon us.
Choose to smoke, choose not to smoke. Choose to ride a motorbike, choose not to ride a motorbike. It's easy really, I think it's called free will.

Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:14 (twenty-one years ago)

up to a point -- there are a lot of cultural things you can say that about, and i'm not buying it. i don't think free will is a total delusion, but -- well the choice of cigs was a bad idea. they're addictive! as is McDs, some say.

HKM, Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah OTM. I mean, I eat healthier at home than when I'm out (and Spurlock obviously does too) but that doesn't mean everyone does/would. I do think family mealtimes are potentially great and very important lessons can be learned there, but what are you gonna do, turn back the clock to the 1950s and FORCE parents (ie mothers) to cook three meals from scratch every day?

xpost

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Rumpy, just because we have free choice, does that mean that it's not necessary to scrutinise companies like McDonalds who wield such a lot of power?

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Clearly not, but at the same time that doesn't mean that said scrutiny automatically abdicates people from personal responsibility.
The fact that it's "mostly" McDonald's fault doesn't mean it isn't also "partly" the consumers' fault.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh agreed. I don't know if it's even 'mostly'. I just think that the factors *influencing* our choices are interesting and potentially disturbing.

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I completely agree with that.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)

The ginger headed clown doesn't influence my decisions any more than the giant pirate outside the chip shop, or the huge plastic ice cream cone outside the sweet shop.

Of course McDonalds is a huge company which carries a lot of clout, but there are plenty of people who for some reason don't fall under it's magic spell.

Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)

i want to stop eating it

teh pow! (blueski), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:43 (twenty-one years ago)

you want to stop lovin' it

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Is the temptation too great? I'm getting terrible cravings for a Big Mac meal and a cheeseburger now....

Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:46 (twenty-one years ago)

four years pass...

RIP waistline of 5 years ago ;_;

(NB: I eat less fast food now than I did 5 years ago)

nosotros niggamos (HI DERE), Tuesday, 3 February 2009 18:51 (seventeen years ago)

Haha has had his revenge. That was probably Calum?

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 3 February 2009 18:55 (seventeen years ago)

Haha maybe!

I just realized I'm complaining because I've gone from a 32 to a 34 so maybe I should shut up.

nosotros niggamos (HI DERE), Tuesday, 3 February 2009 18:56 (seventeen years ago)

It's when your waist exceeds your inside leg measurement that the problems really start...

snoball, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 19:50 (seventeen years ago)

did anyone see the horrible osama doc he made

s1ocki, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 19:53 (seventeen years ago)

He's gotten significantly less charming over the years.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 19:54 (seventeen years ago)

He was charming at one point?

i'm shy (Abbott), Tuesday, 3 February 2009 20:12 (seventeen years ago)

when he was almost dying from mcdonald's food

as much dandelion as you can put in there (latebloomer), Tuesday, 3 February 2009 20:14 (seventeen years ago)

He was channeling the Grimace!

i'm shy (Abbott), Tuesday, 3 February 2009 20:16 (seventeen years ago)

two months pass...

he lost me at "Mac Shacks"

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 08:31 (sixteen years ago)

his girlfriend is so annnoying!!!

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 08:33 (sixteen years ago)

i am not cut out for this movie maybe. i hate to listen to and watch people eat, let alone kiss a burger before biting into it

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 08:49 (sixteen years ago)

who kisses a burger irl

Phillip That That That BIG-HOOS!!! (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Sunday, 5 April 2009 08:53 (sixteen years ago)

ok and vomiting

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 08:55 (sixteen years ago)

and to top it all, a jared fogle cameo

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 08:59 (sixteen years ago)

this movie always seemed so gross to me

i think mermaids are real (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 5 April 2009 09:01 (sixteen years ago)

i mean of course the point is mcdonalds is gross but the whole thing is just leaving me thinking NO, YOU ARE GROSS!!!

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 09:36 (sixteen years ago)

admittedly i am feeling pretty froggy

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 09:36 (sixteen years ago)

mcfroggy

i think mermaids are real (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 5 April 2009 09:37 (sixteen years ago)

hey dude why dont u harass a lunchlady

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 10:29 (sixteen years ago)

i do ilke "strung out on ham" though

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 10:40 (sixteen years ago)

in sum: DNW this movie, but rereading the Old Testament part of this thread: DNW that even more

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 11:56 (sixteen years ago)

<3

light turns red *hardy neanderthal guffaw* (latebloomer), Sunday, 5 April 2009 14:14 (sixteen years ago)

McDud

Nurse Detrius (Eric H.), Sunday, 5 April 2009 14:30 (sixteen years ago)

The part on school lunch programs and gym cuts is just fucking horrifying.

This is the only remotely interesting part of the movie and it's so frustrating that it's not delved into at length.

Nurse Detrius (Eric H.), Sunday, 5 April 2009 14:31 (sixteen years ago)

sequel didn't get enough love

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1111833/

Just one thing I was thinking about as I was getting on the copter (J0hn D.), Sunday, 5 April 2009 14:55 (sixteen years ago)

will watch

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)

will direct and star in part III

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)

super high me was lolsome, especially the weed-based "church" dude visits.

light turns red *hardy neanderthal guffaw* (latebloomer), Sunday, 5 April 2009 23:36 (sixteen years ago)

I thought the gym cuts part was alarmist, but I think gym in general is overrated. Maybe it's different for kids who grow up in cities, but I definitely got more exercise playing outside on my own time as a kid than in gym class, and I am quite unconvinced that it's our only bulwark against THE PLAGUE OF OBESITY, especially given how easy it is to stand around and do nothing. I had to spend a full 10% of my hours in high school in gym class, which was twice the state requirement, and they increased it the year after I graduated. And when you keep in mind that lunch hour took up the same amount of time...that's a lot of time not spent studying. But hey, it's a public health issue, so we can definitely prioritize it over funding arts education or improving academic offerings, right?

I can't disagree about the school lunches being really unhealthy, but I sort of feel like their treatment was missing part of the point too. When Spurlock was pointing out the girls eating only french fries and a coke, I thought the french fries being available wasn't the only problem, the fact that the girls were limiting themselves to ONLY french fries was another. Offering only apples instead of fries would mean they'd eat only an apple for lunch. Teenage girls freak out about what they eat, and obesity prevention should not be the main focus of what we're trying to pass on through schools. (In general, I didn't like the tone the film took toward obesity. I was horrified by the interview with the person (doctor?) who said we should be able to publically scold and humiliate fat people the way we do smokers. I don't even think it's polite to do that to smokers.)

Ok, just watched that yesterday! Good to get it off my chest.

Maria, Monday, 6 April 2009 00:21 (sixteen years ago)

well to be fair that doctor did say that he felt "fuck you" was an appropriate response to someone publically scolding a smoker

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Monday, 6 April 2009 00:29 (sixteen years ago)

DUD

Someone Still Loves You Evan and Jaron (Tape Store), Monday, 6 April 2009 00:52 (sixteen years ago)

fifteen years pass...

RIP Morgan Spurlock

Cemetry Gaetz (DJP), Friday, 24 May 2024 15:24 (one year ago)

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/24/entertainment/morgan-spurlock-death?cid=ios_app

Cemetry Gaetz (DJP), Friday, 24 May 2024 15:25 (one year ago)

I was reading just yesterday about how the liver damage he had at the end of Super Size Me was likely due to to alcoholism - he confessed to being an alcoholic for 20 years in his metoo statement, but says he's tee-total in the documentary

This is Dance Anthems, have some respect (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Friday, 24 May 2024 15:34 (one year ago)

yeah a lot of shady shit surrounding this guy, think he did try to change at the end though

frogbs, Friday, 24 May 2024 17:27 (one year ago)

interesting to see this upthread:

The part on school lunch programs and gym cuts is just fucking horrifying.

This is the only remotely interesting part of the movie and it's so frustrating that it's not delved into at length.

― Nurse Detrius (Eric H.), Sunday, April 5, 2009 9:31 AM (fifteen years ago) bookmarkflaglink

fun fact: my grandparents were actually kind of involved in this, they ran a citywide program once to swap out school lunches with healthy food from their bakery and then studied what happened to the kids test scores and attention spans, they got the results they were looking for and it became a big news story for us in the 90s, and as a result there was a lot of stuff involving them that was filmed for the movie. my grandpa bought a bunch of tickets for family and friends to see this on opening night only to see nearly all of it had been cut, outside of one phone call I think

I also liked this post:

mcfroggy

frogbs, Friday, 24 May 2024 17:30 (one year ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.