http://www.ocweekly.com/ink/04/35/moxley-exclusive.php
I have been via www.crabwalk.com. it's just unbelievable.
― Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:24 (twenty-one years ago)
resounding dud.
― x Jeremy (Atila the Honeybun), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― dyson (dyson), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Always Winter Never Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)
"The boys had every reason to believe she consented: she orchestrated it."
This is said by a lawyer? May all these lawyers have nightmares!
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― 24 hours with the King of Snake. (SNAKE!) (ex machina), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:34 (twenty-one years ago)
Gotta agree. Carries the Freedom of Info Act way too far. At least, the reporter had sense not to publish the girl's name, for fuck's sake.
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:34 (twenty-one years ago)
Once on the pool table, Doe is again visibly unconscious. Her legs are spread, and Haidl zooms in for a close-up of Doe’s genitals. He sticks his finger in and out of her vagina; she has no reaction. Wearing a red cap backwards, Spann mugs for the camera. Doe’s face is shown, her eyes shut. She is motionless. Haidl returns for more shots of Doe’s vagina. One of the defendants says, "Let me take your spot" and someone replies, "No. No. Fuck that! Fuck that!"
is in any way justified in this article.
― x Jeremy (Atila the Honeybun), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:37 (twenty-one years ago)
And as for that defense lawyer... that he can get away with calling her a "slut" IN THE TRIAL and a "fucking whore" DURING it is just fucking WRONG. WRONNNNG.
― Trayce (trayce), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:39 (twenty-one years ago)
I should note that you are looking at a slice of OC hell like none other in this article. I'm not here to defend Moxley but I am not surprised either.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― 24 hours with the King of Snake. (SNAKE!) (ex machina), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:39 (twenty-one years ago)
Heh. The LA Weekly, excuse me.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:40 (twenty-one years ago)
No kidding. R. Scott Moxley writes like a faux liberal fratboy. At least in this article anyway.
― martin m. (mushrush), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― ferg (Ferg), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― ferg (Ferg), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kim (Kim), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― martin m. (mushrush), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― x Jeremy (Atila the Honeybun), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:52 (twenty-one years ago)
Like I said, "A SLICE OF OC HELL LIKE NONE OTHER." Not that idiotic misogynistic bullshit is limited to here alone, of course, but this is precisely what I would expect of assholes like this to do if they were from around here, especially when one of the accused has family connections to the local law enforcement. And if you want to include Moxley's coverage in that, there ya go.
"Welcome to the OC, bitch" doesn't sound so cute now, does it?
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian Johnson (orion), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sengai, Monday, 17 May 2004 23:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― x Jeremy (Atila the Honeybun), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matos W.K. (M Matos), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 17 May 2004 23:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matos W.K. (M Matos), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 00:01 (twenty-one years ago)
Information about contacting the attorneys (I plan on leaving nasty voice mail messages) as well as filing complaints with the bar association.
― Ian Johnson (orion), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 00:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 00:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 00:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 00:12 (twenty-one years ago)
There's always the option to take a shit in his mailbox.
― martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian Johnson (orion), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 00:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― ferg (Ferg), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 00:36 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm honestly surprised that the majority of the responses here are shock at the article. This is the third piece on this story I've read in that paper and I have yet to have that reaction.
Make you uncomfortable? good. I think graphic details like this should be shared b/c saying "he raped the victim" isn't enough to describe the horror one person inflicts on another. People need to squirm and be disgusted. . .maybe it will change the attitudes so many people have about assault and abuse.
Getting upset over this journalist is failing to put your anger where it really belongs, the absolute profanity being committed by the defense. Is this unusual in sex crimes prosecution? nah. it's just gotten some ink in this case.
― Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 00:42 (twenty-one years ago)
we're reacting to the article not INSTEAD OF reacting to the defense arguments... the two things seem almost part of the same process don't they?
btw link above says:
"Not only do these attorneys imply that women who dress or act a certain way deserve to be raped, thus setting a dangerous precedent for the rights of rape victims who are seeking justice, they are also in clear violation of California's Rape Shield Law. This law states that a rape victim's prior sexual history cannot be used against them to undermine their credibility in court."
i thought so.
― amateurist, Tuesday, 18 May 2004 00:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 25 March 2005 20:26 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 25 March 2005 20:27 (twenty years ago)
quite frankly i would not be shocked if these men get nothing more than probation. because it happens every single fucking day in sexual assault/abuse cases, and in this case they're well connected. the only thing that indicates there's some hope in an actual appropriate sentence and not an "appropriate sentence" in the case is the fact that the one kid seems to be a repeat offender who has been being held for quite a long period now because he can't keep his hands the hell off the ladies.
some things don't have as much grey as some of us would like to believe. vigilante justice is an appealing fantasy (though "I hope they get sodomized" is kind of weird to me mainly because why waste the time on it, just give them a well fucking beating) to many because of what i've just said: who the hell determines what is appropriate in the justice system? an idea of popular justice is a bad thing, everyone in the world would get executed immediately, but otoh i'm not sure what kind of standards our judicial system is actually upholding.
― Allyzay Subservient 50s-Type (allyzay), Friday, 25 March 2005 20:29 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Feeding Tube vs Firecracker ARGH (Dan Perry), Friday, 25 March 2005 20:31 (twenty years ago)
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 25 March 2005 20:44 (twenty years ago)
― donut debonair (donut), Friday, 25 March 2005 21:19 (twenty years ago)
― donut debonair (donut), Friday, 25 March 2005 21:21 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 25 March 2005 21:35 (twenty years ago)
"I know you were deadlocked the first time but we're hoping the intervening 16 months have given you a fresh perspective."
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 25 March 2005 21:36 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 25 March 2005 23:24 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 25 March 2005 23:28 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 25 March 2005 23:29 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 25 March 2005 23:31 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 25 March 2005 23:32 (twenty years ago)
sl0ck1, while I find the defense lawyers' approach absolutely loathsome and reprehensible, was it illegal or low enough for them to be barred? I'm hardly a legal expert, so I'll defer to the lawyers here.
I suppose the plaintiffs COULD sue the lawyers for emotional trauma, though -- given the extremity of the abuse.
― donut debonair (donut), Friday, 25 March 2005 23:37 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of I MIGHT Buy Those Sorry Motherfuckers a Blatz (Dan Perry), Saturday, 26 March 2005 00:28 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 26 March 2005 03:07 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 9 March 2006 23:20 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 10 March 2006 06:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Knute Rockne, All American (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 10 March 2006 07:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 10 March 2006 07:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Friday, 10 March 2006 15:57 (nineteen years ago)
the lawyers and PIs involved in the case should also be in the house when it is sucked into hell. Actually I think what I would prefer is that they all get acute radiation sickness and die piece by piece over a period of 9-12 months.
― TOMBOT, Friday, 10 March 2006 16:04 (nineteen years ago)
― TOMBOT, Friday, 10 March 2006 16:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan (With Tuning Forks) Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:14 (nineteen years ago)
OTM.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:16 (nineteen years ago)
http://a248.e.akamai.net/7/800/14845/1138408168/oasc04.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Creatives/TheVoice/oc-askamexican-promo/ask-a-mexican-box-revised.gif
― Dan (What Personal Ad?) Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan (Because I Didn't) Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:22 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish da notorious teletabby (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan (I Could Be Wrong) Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:27 (nineteen years ago)
(xpost: HAhahahahaha "I was so mad about that picture of the pudgy middle-aged guy wearing makeup that I had to go shoot a cheerleader.")
― Dan (Mind Of Mencia Without Context) Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish da notorious teletabby (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:29 (nineteen years ago)
And now they've got you talking and thinking about something you never knew about before! THE POWER OF MARKETING! (Look, when I first saw it two years back I was all 'whuh?,' but I figured out almost immediately it was Gustavo doing it and it all made sense. Context, people! And if you're not reading the article link I provided then go there and read the man's own words!)
HAhahahahaha "I was so mad about that picture of the pudgy middle-aged guy wearing makeup that I had to go shoot a cheerleader."
Next John Waters film right there!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan (Seriously, Who????????) Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:39 (nineteen years ago)
PRESTO YOU HAVE A BUSHY MUSTACHE
― Dan (Almost The Exact Opposite Of Rocket Science) Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:41 (nineteen years ago)
"Unfortunate Moustaches:" A picture thread
― kingfish da notorious teletabby (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:45 (nineteen years ago)
I'll grant you that and figure you'll grant me where I'm coming from in turn.
Also, I asked this elsewhere but WHO NEEDS INSTRUCTION ON HOW TO GROW A MUSTACHE????????
Orange County, as I'm sure all sides will agree, is a curious place.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 March 2006 18:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 11 March 2006 01:43 (nineteen years ago)
Haidl’s attorney, Al Stokke, went after Jane Doe, denying that her emotional stress could be positively linked to the attack. He criticized a prosecutor’s request that the three not be segregated from the general prison population as “without question, the most outrageous position I have ever seen.” It was tantamount, he said, to “calling for their murder.”
Oh, I weep.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 11 March 2006 01:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 11 March 2006 01:48 (nineteen years ago)
― R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: (ex machina), Saturday, 11 March 2006 01:59 (nineteen years ago)
Tougher than the rest.
http://www.ocweekly.com/2012-04-26/news/jane-doe-greg-haidl-gang-rape/
Besides God and her parents, she credits her emergence to Schroeder and Shirley Mangio, a veteran courthouse victim advocate at Community Service Program Inc. "Shirley has really motivated me," says Doe. "The way she was there for me as a mentor, second mother and a best friend made me want to do that for other women."In March, Doe became a certified victim's advocate and crisis-intervention counselor. She volunteers at least 18 hours per month at Project Sister Family Services in Los Angeles County. Counseling other victims is therapeutic."After a sexual assault, women think it's their fault," she explains. "They think they did something wrong. But I tell my victims they had nothing to do with it. Yes, they may have made a poor decision to go somewhere, but the assault was not their fault. There could be a naked prostitute standing on the corner, and that does not give men the right to rape her."She already knows the central message of her speech at the upcoming victims' march."I want to send hope and to inspire other sexual assault victims," she says. "I want women to know that they can go to the depths of hell and still make it out."
In March, Doe became a certified victim's advocate and crisis-intervention counselor. She volunteers at least 18 hours per month at Project Sister Family Services in Los Angeles County. Counseling other victims is therapeutic.
"After a sexual assault, women think it's their fault," she explains. "They think they did something wrong. But I tell my victims they had nothing to do with it. Yes, they may have made a poor decision to go somewhere, but the assault was not their fault. There could be a naked prostitute standing on the corner, and that does not give men the right to rape her."
She already knows the central message of her speech at the upcoming victims' march.
"I want to send hope and to inspire other sexual assault victims," she says. "I want women to know that they can go to the depths of hell and still make it out."
Related story:
http://www.ocregister.com/news/jane-351103-doe-haidl.html
The three served their sentences and are on parole, but happily the State Supreme Court told 'em to fuck off when it came to anything being overturned or removed from their record so I hope they're enjoying their slow motion comeuppance all the more. Last known news I found about 'em:
http://www.ktla.com/news/landing/ktla-greg-haidl,0,1950024.story
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 26 April 2012 15:41 (thirteen years ago)
Carona is now a 66-month resident of a federal prison in Colorado following a corruption conviction. Jaramillo is out of custody, but only after serving both state and federal prison stints that would have been longer if he hadn't ratted out Carona. Haidl, who was caught writing off his son's legal defense as a fraudulent tax deduction, made out the best; after agreeing to surreptitiously wear a government body wire to record Carona discussing coverup efforts, he avoided prison and today enjoys mansion life in Las Vegas and Newport Coast.
Sheesh... Talk about bittersweet.
― Reality Check Cashing Services (Elvis Telecom), Thursday, 26 April 2012 17:51 (thirteen years ago)