If Stephen Hawkings was getting really abusive towards you for no reason at all, would you sock him in the face?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
He believes in vivisection, remember, so he's not very nice...

CRW (CRW), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 13:42 (twenty years ago) link

I think he could reasonably be abusive to you for misspelling his name.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 13:44 (twenty years ago) link

Or just because you're a cock.

NA (Nick A.), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 13:46 (twenty years ago) link

His level of suffering is greater than the animals because of his giant pulsating brayne

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 14:11 (twenty years ago) link

i am also not very nice, so, in a superficial peradox, no

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 14:37 (twenty years ago) link

Let's be reasonable here, shall we? Stephen Hawking is in no condition to sock me back, so it would be unfair and ungentlemanly of me to sock him. Instead, I would merely taunt him about his physical incapacity until he cried like a girl.

Aimless (Aimless), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 15:35 (twenty years ago) link

Oops, didn't mean to put Hawkings.

CRW (CRW), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 15:42 (twenty years ago) link

not really very funny as it's been widely reprted that he may be getting duffed up on a regualr basis anyway

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 15:46 (twenty years ago) link

Well it's a CRW thread, you expect it to be funny?

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 15:47 (twenty years ago) link

who's been duffing him up? was it Imelda Davies? that's awful tho.

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 15:51 (twenty years ago) link

No it's his wife apparently, a suspected case of Munchausen-by-proxy or somehing like that. But he has denied it.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 17:01 (twenty years ago) link

I'd sock him, especially if he socked me, with all his might, trying to do me harm, he should expect the same in return. Plus, I'd probably sock him on principle just for that vivisection thing.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 17:03 (twenty years ago) link

Oops, didn't mean to put Hawkings.
-- CRW (...), June 1st, 2004 4:42 PM. (later)

it should have been

If Stephen Hawkingscalum was getting really abusive towards you for no reason at all, would you sock him in the face?


ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 17:04 (twenty years ago) link

haha fuck

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 17:05 (twenty years ago) link

Oops, didn't mean to put Hawkings.
-- CRW (...), June 1st, 2004 4:42 PM. (later)

it should have been

If Stephen Hawkingscalum was getting really abusive towards you for no reason at all, would you sock him in the face?

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 17:06 (twenty years ago) link

haha fuck

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 17:07 (twenty years ago) link

i cant believe there's an animated gif of an umgah on ilx, and no one seemed to notice it.

phil-two (phil-two), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 17:08 (twenty years ago) link

it should have been

If Stephen Hawkings was getting really abusive towards you for no reason at all, would you sock himcalum in the face? pls.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 17:09 (twenty years ago) link

boomshakalakalaka
boomshakalakalaka
boomshakalakalaka
boom

captain gay, Wednesday, 2 June 2004 04:32 (twenty years ago) link

Hawking's got a big boxing glove on an extending arm attached to his chair*, so be careful.

(*according to The Simpsons, might not be true)

Onimo (GerryNemo), Wednesday, 2 June 2004 09:03 (twenty years ago) link

haha the people still getting worked up at calum are possibly even more entertaining than these thread titles (which would be hard)

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 2 June 2004 09:56 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.