Supernatural and other interesting things

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Do we live in a world of ESP, Ghosts, Monsters, Alien Abductions, Atlantis, God /afterlife, or has science basically invalidated all such things?

Mike Hanle y, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Mike, you should rent 'The Kingdom.'

turner, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm? storyID=192300&thesection=news&thesubsect%20ion=general&reportID=16

Mike Hanle y, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

FTC attacks claims for alleged anti-snoring throat spray (Snorenz). The principal marketers of Snorenz, a throat spray claimed to eliminate snoring, have settled FTC charges that they lacked adequate substantiation for their claims. The consent agreements include the manufacturer (Med Gen, Inc., of Boca Raton, Florida, and its principal, Paul Kravitz) and an infomercial maker (that Tru-Vantage International, LLC, based in Niles, Illinois). The agreements forbid the parties from making unsubstantiated claims that Snorenz or any other food, drug, or dietary supplement reduces or eliminates snoring or eliminates, reduces, or mitigates the symptoms of sleep apnea. Snorenz is a throat spray consisting of oils and vitamins. Snorenz was promoted through 30-minute infomercials produced first by Tru- Vantage International and later by Med Gen itself. The product claims also appeared on its labels, on Med Gen's website, and on many other Web sites. [Promoters of dietary supplement that purports to treat snoring agree to settle FTC charges. FTC news release, March 29, 2001]

Mike Hanle y, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/candida.html

Mike Hanle y, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i am not superstitious. that said, i don't have blind faith in science either.

di, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

why don't you have "blind faith " in science? Are you talking about the SCientific method or scientists themselves? DO you think you can surmise truths about the world better than hundreds of proffesional investigators?

Mike Hanle y, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

blind faith in science would mean that every other day we would have to revise our opijion on whether or not red wine in moderation convesys health benefits.

Menelaus Darcy, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The only science I know of is that which is conveyed to me through channels with ulterior motives. So in a sense all my faith in science has to be blind. why is blind faith in science a Good thing when blind faith in religion, aliens esp etc not?

Menelaus Darcy, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i just know that scientists and doctors don't always get it right. i dislike the whole mythologising of science, the idea that it is more objective and true than everything else. i also don't like vivisection. i don't think that medicine and the other sciences are above critique. i don't reject science, because in many instances i rely on it. but i never just unthinkingly accept all ot it, thats what i mean by not having blind faith in it.

di, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

thanx mene, you hit the nail on the head.

di, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

you two don't understand what science IS. You are confusing MEDIA reports of science with scientific data. By its onw nature, science is self checking and skeptical, unlike the church.

Mike Hanle y, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

that may be the scientific ideal, no-one can ever achieve that though. science is practised by people and people fuck up. not only that, but claims to objectivity are preposterous, every scientist has their own beliefs that they are pushing.

di, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

or not necessarily pushing, but are influenced by.

di, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Mike H. - can I ask you do you think this which is kind of what I think:

As a pure idea, people general see Science as equivalent to draining the world of spiritual 'meaning' which is equivalent to trying not to add human value to things:

"Blind, Science is working the useless ground.
Mad, faith is living the dream of its cult."
(Fernando Pessoa, Christmas)

It's true that science will be muddled up with ideology in practice, but as an ideal, it operates in the opposite way? I mean, scientific skepticism is anti-ideological, and in a good way, inhuman? I think the trope of 'blind science' used in this poem is interesting because the usual blind figure is justice, who is supposed to not be swayed by emotion, but be fair.

maryann, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Science is discovering some pretty supernatural things.

Nude Spock, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

science is is just a whole lot of as yet unfalsified ideas. who the hell wants to be an empiricist anyway?

How do you get your data on science Hanle y? do all the tests yourself?

Menelaus Darcy, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Do we live in a world of ESP, Ghosts, Monsters, Alien Abductions, Atlantis, God /afterlife, or has science basically invalidated all such things?

Ya know, I'm not sure science has invalidated any of the above. If you're of the belief that you only believe what you can see, you're kind of screwed when you jump into the quantum realm, since a lot of new science assumes a number of things that you can't see. For instance, each thing is made of something else until finally you get to the teensiest tiniest bit of stuff that flips back and forth between thing and not-thing. As for ESP, there's plenty of evidence to support it. Find it yourself. Ghosts? You mean living dead people's souls? Don't know how science would go about researching that. Go to a number of seances until you dismiss the idea of a ghost as something never manifested by charlatans? Monsters? Like what-- chupacabra? Alien abductions? Oh yeah, science has really been researching this openly and actively. It is common knowledge that everyone on earth has been given the full truth regarding aliens. (sarcasm). Atlantis can't be said to not exist until the entire earth has been explored, including all the waters we've never been able to explore yet. God and the afterlife. Hmmm. Scientists aren't even sure what life is while it's alive yet, other than functioning biological entities. Brain science is in it's infancy stage and brain scientists are very interested in out of body experiences and the brain states of those who have altered their brain chemistry through spiritual means. And what is God, anyway? An old man in the clouds with a beard who invented a specific religion and only talks to certain holy men? The bullheaded view that God doesn't exist because we can't see it, but we believe it to be a specific creator deity is old news. The God in question now is an all-encompasing everything entity of intelligence & chaos, neither good or bad, similar to ideas expressed in ALL religions, specific to none.

Nude Spock, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Personally, I believe there is more to the world and the universe than simple facts, processes, chemical reactions etc. Or at least, I want there to be, and even if I'm deluding myself, it doesn't matter. I believe there is some kind of existence beyond this one.

james, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

the supernatural = bunk cuz every time I start a thread on it no one contributes QED ps i have never seen a ghost but i had a out- of-body experience aged c.13 where i went forward in time to some bad sex with my 1st g/f a few yrs later (this is TRUE!! i think)

mark s, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Look, it makes humans feel better and happier to believe there is a nice afterlife, freindly ghosts, magical things...we WANT to belive these things because it makes us feel good. But where is the proof for any of it? You trust science to make your car work, make the doctor help you, eat foods with safe preservatives...why don't you trust it to make the world an explained place? What if there is nO presence watching over us, no afterlife, no ghosts or spirits. Is the world really that much worse for it? Can't people just have faith in humans?

Mike Hanle y, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"I could prove God statistically. Take the human body alone - the chances that all the functions of an individual would just happen is a statistical monstrosity." - George H. Gallup, American pollster (1901-1984).

Just because it seems amazing doesnt mean its not true . People used to laugh at the idea that the earth was round. Also notice he doesnt actually GIVE the statistical proof.

Mike Hanle y, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Are you aware that in Africa TODAy people are often burned to death publicly because they are acused of being witches? This is the product of a society where mob rules over reason, supernatural over science.

Mike Hanle y, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

blind faith in science would mean that every other day we would have to revise our opijion on whether or not red wine in moderation convesys health benefits.

But we do this anyway. The day you drink the red wine it does, the day after it doesn't.

Tom, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Exactly ; Science changes all the time but this is good, it means we are constantly reviewing the facts, gathering data. THere can be no dogma in the laws of nature unless natures reveals such.

Mike Hanle y, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

What current scientific endeavor are you most interested in?

Nude Spock, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Also re: science changing

Isn't the thing about science that it's quite willing to change, it's like "This is how the universe works...oh, hold on, that's wrong, THIS is how the universe works...oh, no wait a minute...etc" where as all this spooky stuff (ie religious/supernatural type stuff) is less willing to change, prefering to stick its fingers in its ears and shout "Lalala I can't hear you"

jamesmichaelward, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But, James, I don't get what people's opinions on spooky stuff has to do with whether or not spooky stuff actually exists. La la la I can't hear you has nothing to do with whether or not thought can exist outside a body, whether that thought be a ghost, spooky demon monster or god himself. We haven't created machines that can detect thoughts yet, only brain wave patterns.

Nude Spock, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Well it seems very implausible to me that a mind or conscioussness can exist out side of a body, knwoing what we do about the intergral relationship between brain structure and personality.

Mike Hanle y, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But Mike, what about the CHICKEN BEARS? How do you and your kerazy "scientific method" account for them? Huh? Huh?

Yeah, I thought so.

Kim, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Hey, mike, please answer my new "What do you think" thread. I'd be very interested to know some of the specifics about what you believe. Not to tear them apart, trust me, just to read and think about.

Nude Spock, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But, I'd like to point out that scientists who've been studying the universe repeatedly comment on the "intelligence" and "perfection"... does this mean it's a thinking entity? Well, if you mean an individual godhead figure that does things intentionally to influence the lives of miniscule bipeds on planet earth, I doubt it, but if you mean the organization of chaos intelligence of interlocking parts that hold up the entire structure of reality, then most scientists researching the universe agree it is intelligent. The nonlocal universe even suggests this intelligence is the cause for evolution of all things within the universe, right down to the creation of the chemical-elemental systems of organization.

Nude Spock, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Hm. I keep thinking of Douglas Adams saying that if you ask yourself 'what is the most important organ of the body' you answer 'the BRANE' and then you have to ask yourself what organ of the body answered your question.

Mike I didn't see this thred before I started the perhaps more narrowly defined "superstition" one. Why are we all asking the same question at once???? SPOOKY

Tracer Hand, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

not spooky, coincidence

Mike Hanle y, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

three years pass...
Part of my property management job involves compiling a schedule of condition of various houses prior to letting them, and I had to go to a very old (late 1600s) cottage last Friday, where I chatted away as usual into my hand-held dictaphone thingy describing the curtains and carpets etc.

I was all alone there, and when I got to the sitting room I suddenly felt really cold and uneasy, although it was a pleasant-enough room. I couldn't wait to get out.

When I returned to the office on Friday afternoon, I typed up the tape I had made. You could hear me wittering on about the furnishings etc in the sitting room, and suddenly there was this quiet but rather menacing male voice repeatedly saying "get out", as though someone was standing very close behind me in that room.

I expect there's some perfectly logical explanation for it, but I've been shaken up about that all weekend.

C J (C J), Monday, 15 August 2005 08:28 (nineteen years ago)

yah! that's creepy.

Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 15 August 2005 08:35 (nineteen years ago)

I'd be surprised if ghosts from the past actually knew how to use a dictaphone.

NickB (NickB), Monday, 15 August 2005 08:39 (nineteen years ago)

man, you've not seen 'The Fog' ?

Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 15 August 2005 08:40 (nineteen years ago)

Argh, that's a bit EVP!

Could you hear the voice shouting "get out" when you were actually there?

Mrs. Cranky (From Crankytown) (kate), Monday, 15 August 2005 08:42 (nineteen years ago)

the fog by james herbert?

jimmy glass (electricsound), Monday, 15 August 2005 08:44 (nineteen years ago)

the fog movie, by john carpenter, not the herbert book.

Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 15 August 2005 08:48 (nineteen years ago)

More "White Noise" than "The Fog" to be honest.

Mrs. Cranky (From Crankytown) (kate), Monday, 15 August 2005 08:49 (nineteen years ago)

you shd put up an mp3 of this, CJ.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Monday, 15 August 2005 08:50 (nineteen years ago)

(there's just a spooky bit where a mariner's voice starts growling on about albatrosses, on a radio promo tape)

xxpost

Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 15 August 2005 08:51 (nineteen years ago)

No, I couldn't hear anything at all when I was there (apart from a few creaky floorboards and the like). It was as though the tape had picked up a sound in the room which I hadn't heard. It could have been a faulty tape, or maybe some prior noise on the tape which had never erased properly (that happens sometimes), or it could have been creaky noises which sounded like a voice. Scared me, when I replayed the tape though!

C J (C J), Monday, 15 August 2005 08:51 (nineteen years ago)

ooh yes! I could post it here (I took the tape home, so will have to do it when I get home tonight)

C J (C J), Monday, 15 August 2005 08:53 (nineteen years ago)

You need to go back at night with a camcorder.

NickB (NickB), Monday, 15 August 2005 08:55 (nineteen years ago)

This is classic EVP - Electronic Voice Phenomenon:

http://aaevp.com/

My ex-boyfriend has spent his entire life trying to debunk any kind of supernatural associations. All kinds of things can be responsible - poorly shielded equipment picking up radio signals, CB transmitters nearby, static, glitches of radio chatter bouncing off the atmosphere.

Though it is more fun/spooky to think of it as being voices of the dead!

Mrs. Cranky (From Crankytown) (kate), Monday, 15 August 2005 08:57 (nineteen years ago)

exactly, why make life less fun.

Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 15 August 2005 09:01 (nineteen years ago)

CJ WHERE'S THE TAPE

Frankist, Tuesday, 16 August 2005 06:25 (nineteen years ago)

GRR MAH GRAN'S FLANGE GRRRR RUFF RUFF MEOW

GARU-g-kit (g-kit), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 06:27 (nineteen years ago)

My ex-boyfriend has spent his entire life trying to debunk any kind of supernatural associations. All kinds of things can be responsible - poorly shielded equipment picking up radio signals, CB transmitters nearby, static, glitches of radio chatter bouncing off the atmosphere. It's finer to be skeptical, but see it's this I don't understand. Why go out of your way to try and deny or rationalize away anything that might be metaphysical...because it threatens the paradigms of your world-view? It's just as anoying (and close-minded) as those medieval church fathers who were fully opposedto any rational/observable explanations about Nature. It's just that Nature in its multifarious aspects is so much more complex than our sensual measurements of it, it's not an either/or. The perfectly "logical" explanation could be that there is something wrong with the tape..._or_ that there is a spirit there; why is "logic" not applicable when we are discussing entitites that aren't physical? If one wanted to, they could develop their intuition and communicate w/ the ghost directly, assure it that you do not mean it harm and don't want to invade its home...or I guess just wait until next time it wants to communicate with you. Your own feelings told you at the moment you felt cold and uneasy that there is something strange w/ the room. I don't understand why you have to deny your own subjective experience here, since the accepted status quo on physical reality right now is different.

Vichitravirya XI (Vichitravirya XI), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 07:10 (nineteen years ago)

This was a huge problem within our relationship. He was a more DOGMATIC atheist/"rationalist" than most of the religious types I'd met in my life. I just gave up even trying to talk to him about it.

Mrs. Cranky (From Crankytown) (kate), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 07:12 (nineteen years ago)

Do you believe in a difference between skepticism and scepticism?

(I'm not dogmatic, more catmatic)

(but *not* catamitic, before anyone asks)

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 07:14 (nineteen years ago)

TOYNBEE IDEA / IN KubricK's 2001 / RESURRECT DEAD / ON PLANET JUPiTER.

I'm Hi, Jared Fogle (ex machina), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 07:17 (nineteen years ago)

I read an interesting article (sorry I can't remember where) describing how in several cases where 'supernatural' phenomena like apparitions had been reported, there were waves being generated at just below the range that the human ear can pick up. The waves can vibrate the fluid in the eye making people think they can see things. In all the cases where this was found, the waves could be traced to mechanical equipment like air conditioning units or car engines.

I don't mean this applies in CJ's case, which sounds creepy. I'm totally open to the idea that we don't/can't measure everything. But I don't believe it's useful to say we shouldn't try to investigate and simply act like we can't ever understand. This isn't 'rationalising away'. Why should it be 'away'? Why the accusation that by attempting to understand, we're denying our subjective experience? We use our brains to process information. Why should we suppress that?

beanz (beanz), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 07:40 (nineteen years ago)

Haha I sound like a 'lunatic' "on this thread." Forget the intuition part, it's too hard to explain what I might have meant, or not. I'd just keep your eyes and ears open but not worry about this. Yet.

Just don't waste any $ on a "professional debunker" either..

Vichitravirya XI (Vichitravirya XI), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 07:43 (nineteen years ago)

That was an x-post. Beanz, its fine to initially search for explanations, but if you are _repeatedly_ discounting your personal or subjective ones in an attempt to accede to the standard line, as Kate's post alluded to, then I think it's a problem. We are always told "follow your heart / listen to your feelings," when it comes to emotional considerations in modern psychiatry, then why must we abandon our personal instincts if we aren't harming others when it comes to spirituality? Of course the issue of "sanity" becomes predominant then, and that's a thorny semantic-philosophical argumnt that we've fallen in before. (I come from a background where all consciousness/experience is subjective anyway, so this is almost moot). I just think that, as in the example you used, there is a lot of retro-active "explaining away" that is happening. You mentioned waves appearing that "make people think" they see things...but where do these waves come from, and why are they present when one has such supernatural experiences? Maybe they constitute part of the observable physical phenomena that exiists when a spirit is being heard. We are able to break the physicality down into nuts and bolts, but still not going to the cause of the situation, the why, and explain how it related to subjective consciousness. But maybe that is outide the domain of empiricism, and that's fine.

Vichitravirya XI (Vichitravirya XI), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 08:00 (nineteen years ago)

There's no real need to go round debunking all "supernatural" phenomena - it's all so massively unconvincing anyway, what's the point.

Trust in Science, ya get me?

http://www.channel4.com/bigbrother/media/latest-pics/day57/d57_2200_science01_g.jpg

David Merryweather Goes To Far (scarlet), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 08:06 (nineteen years ago)

This is a quote but the html checker didn't like my italics for some reason:

You mentioned waves appearing that "make people think" they see things...but where do these waves come from, and why are they present when one has such supernatural experiences?

/quote (maybe it was the ghost in the machine, the server letting me know it's conscious)

Maybe I didn't express myself clearly. The waves came from vibrating or oscillating machinery, such as an air conditioning unit. The waves were present when the phenomena were reported because they were causing them. When the air con was turned off, the vibrating stopped. The waves aren't mysterious, they're measurable changes in the environment identical to sound waves except for the frequency and maybe amplitude.

quote: Maybe they constitute part of the observable physical phenomena that exiists when a spirit is being heard. /quote

Only if you're suggesting a ghost turned on the air conditioning to make people see it.

I'm not saying everything can be explained in terms which we can fully grasp given our current level of understanding the universe. But why wilfully ignore a real explanation? This was a clear example of people being mistaken, not retroactively explaining something away.

beanz (beanz), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 08:26 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.