This is the thread where we discuss political ramifications, effectivness of direct action, motives of the protestors etc etc.
― Johnney B (Johnney B), Friday, 4 June 2004 10:27 (twenty years ago) link
― Johnney B (Johnney B), Friday, 4 June 2004 10:28 (twenty years ago) link
The justification that it is an anti-pollution tax is sometimes made. But not a lot of effort is going into developing and marketing cleaner alternatives. Whilst Bp and Sh3ll are doing their bit, it isn't that much (BP spent more on rebranding than it does per annum on hydrogen fuel cell reesarch). Exx0n M0bil, the world's largest oil company, spends nothing at all.
― MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 4 June 2004 10:33 (twenty years ago) link
― Pete (Pete), Friday, 4 June 2004 10:33 (twenty years ago) link
Just switch all your petrosleds to rape seed oil and be done with it.
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 10:36 (twenty years ago) link
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Friday, 4 June 2004 10:55 (twenty years ago) link
Meanwhile, the fact that people are protesting the building of wind farms is so utterly preposterous it leaves me speechless. Would they honestly rather live next door to a nuclear power station?
― Jason J, Friday, 4 June 2004 10:58 (twenty years ago) link
― DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:05 (twenty years ago) link
― Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:08 (twenty years ago) link
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:09 (twenty years ago) link
Now it's the fishermen and the shipping with ships people protesting windfarms! The former coz they are "noisy" and drive away the fish (oh not half as noisy as noisy fishing boats and nothing drives away fish like an oil spill) and the latter coz they "interfere with shipping lanes and could cause accidents!".
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:11 (twenty years ago) link
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:12 (twenty years ago) link
― Ricardo (RickyT), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:13 (twenty years ago) link
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:14 (twenty years ago) link
― Dave B (daveb), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:15 (twenty years ago) link
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:16 (twenty years ago) link
― Ricardo (RickyT), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:17 (twenty years ago) link
I see the fuel protesters to some extent as being afraid of change, and wanting things to remain as they are, in this case, able to take advantage of the (in my experience illusory) "freedom" that car pwnage and heavy usage appears to offer. "I need my car" yadda yadda This is surely a dangerously short-sighted outlook though? I mean, once oil prodcution peaks and starts to decline, my god are we all going to be FUCKED. Perhaps best to save yer money by cutting down on un-neccesary car usage and ownage, rather than moaning abt the price of fuel. Campaign against the fact many facilities, shops etc are being situated in such a way that using them w/o a car is at best highly inconvenient.
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:27 (twenty years ago) link
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:34 (twenty years ago) link
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:36 (twenty years ago) link
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:37 (twenty years ago) link
― Ricardo (RickyT), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:37 (twenty years ago) link
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:39 (twenty years ago) link
― Ricardo (RickyT), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:41 (twenty years ago) link
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:42 (twenty years ago) link
(xpost to dave)
― don (don), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:45 (twenty years ago) link
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:46 (twenty years ago) link
― MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:47 (twenty years ago) link
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:48 (twenty years ago) link
as for high gas prices (and only that) leading people to be environmentally safer, does that work well? maybe temporarily. as markH brought up, for all the taxes on oil, how much real government subsidized research into *clean* sources of alternative energy are there? it's kind of ludicrous. meanwhile, can you say that a hybrid car is really worth it on solely an economic basis (ie, if you gave two shits about the environment and only got one because oil prices are high?) these things are still considerably higher priced than regular car and the difference may never actually pay off. that said, i'd sure as hell like to have one.
finally, this offshore wind farm thing is are ludicrous. capewind are they really in the way? these fuckers are placed 1/3rd of a mile apart and on a shoal. how much fishing can you do on a shoal anyway?
― AaronK (AaronK), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:51 (twenty years ago) link
As for Petrol prices. Oil gets more expensive. Therefore Petrol gets more expensive.
So people complain. What is the point? It is the way it works! Things get more expensive when there isn't enough to go around...
Aaron - there is less of it. I can't remember the figures of how much is left, but with China growing as it is they reckon about 30 years (I will check with a guy round the corner). But if they bring less out of the ground, there is less about. So the price goes up. The ability of OPEC to manipulate the price by production is the only legal cartel, and just proves how much of a commodity oil is.
― ___ (___), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:56 (twenty years ago) link
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:57 (twenty years ago) link
― MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 4 June 2004 11:58 (twenty years ago) link
― MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:01 (twenty years ago) link
i don't understand the anti-wind farm people at all, it seems that "ooh, but there'll be a swishing noise all day" is their major complaint...
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:02 (twenty years ago) link
― Ricardo (RickyT), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:02 (twenty years ago) link
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:04 (twenty years ago) link
― rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:05 (twenty years ago) link
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:05 (twenty years ago) link
― Dave Amos, Friday, 4 June 2004 12:05 (twenty years ago) link
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:08 (twenty years ago) link
It also reminds me of one of my long mysteries. I saw two magpies, which is joy. Then one flew in front of a bus and got splatted, leaving one, and sorrow. So do I get sorrow or joy? This has bothered me on and off since the event four years ago.
― ___ (___), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:09 (twenty years ago) link
― NickB (NickB), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:10 (twenty years ago) link
― MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:12 (twenty years ago) link
― ___ (___), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:13 (twenty years ago) link
― MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:14 (twenty years ago) link
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:17 (twenty years ago) link
― Dave Amos, Friday, 4 June 2004 12:18 (twenty years ago) link
― MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:20 (twenty years ago) link
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:21 (twenty years ago) link
Look what happened to Elvis!
― NickB (NickB), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:22 (twenty years ago) link
― Ricardo (RickyT), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:29 (twenty years ago) link
― ___ (___), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:29 (twenty years ago) link
― Dave Amos, Friday, 4 June 2004 12:30 (twenty years ago) link
― koogs (koogs), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:34 (twenty years ago) link
Herman Melville would not be happy.
― MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:34 (twenty years ago) link
― MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:35 (twenty years ago) link
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:37 (twenty years ago) link
― Pete (Pete), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:39 (twenty years ago) link
― MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:39 (twenty years ago) link
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:40 (twenty years ago) link
― Ed (dali), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:41 (twenty years ago) link
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:50 (twenty years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:55 (twenty years ago) link
It's called Dupont Circle.
― j.lu (j.lu), Friday, 4 June 2004 12:59 (twenty years ago) link
― Ed (dali), Friday, 4 June 2004 13:00 (twenty years ago) link
okay, < /pedant > (for now)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 4 June 2004 13:02 (twenty years ago) link
I'm always dubious about Malthusian musings on reserve capacity though. There were many, many articles of this same flavor written in the 1970s. And alot of these doomsday scenarios are coming from the same people (i.e., exploration geologists at big oil companies) who want to open up ANWR to drilling, etc. Obviously these are things we should be thinking about very seriously, but you have to take all the breathlessness with a grain of salt.
― rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Friday, 4 June 2004 13:45 (twenty years ago) link
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 June 2004 13:47 (twenty years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 4 June 2004 13:49 (twenty years ago) link
― rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Friday, 4 June 2004 13:54 (twenty years ago) link
Anyway, I haven't been there since last summer but according to people I know that have, almost every oil-bearing hole in West Texas is working right now, unsurprisingly.
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 4 June 2004 13:56 (twenty years ago) link
Just imnagine though if everyone in the states drove a car that was twice as efficient (not difficult) or heated or cooled their homes a couple of degrees less. And those are just the easy solutions. OK so they require a paradigm shift in attitudes but the US has had enoguh of those over the last century.
Once you start getting into alternaticve fueld vehicles, renewables and building that are more than just glass boxes, that have cooling, heating and ventilation built into the design the possibilities are limitless.
― Ed (dali), Friday, 4 June 2004 13:59 (twenty years ago) link
By the way, I'm wondering when the big Midwest states switch gasoline blends. I assume this has already happened for summer, but when do they switch back to winter blends? October?
― rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:00 (twenty years ago) link
damnation!
― Dave Amos, Friday, 4 June 2004 14:01 (twenty years ago) link
dunno, I thought Chicago had RFG all year 'round. Didn't that big refinery downstate get blazed in a winter month?
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:02 (twenty years ago) link
for a moment there i thought ANWR was "interweb speak" for anywhere...
Alaskan North West Region?
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:03 (twenty years ago) link
― t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:03 (twenty years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:03 (twenty years ago) link
― Ed (dali), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:04 (twenty years ago) link
do you buy anything made from a petrochemical process? do you buy food?
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:04 (twenty years ago) link
ween ourselves off it as much as possible. use less, reuse where possible (irish plastic bag tax = good idea), recycle what we can (lbhf council collect types 1, 2 and 3 from the doorstep) and just use alternatives like glass or paper (!)
kate, i didn't laugh but i did smile. and whales are mammals.
― koogs (koogs), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:04 (twenty years ago) link
― rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:05 (twenty years ago) link
(thanks stence)
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:06 (twenty years ago) link
― Ed (dali), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:06 (twenty years ago) link
― t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:07 (twenty years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:09 (twenty years ago) link
Currently fully taxed vegetable oil based fuel in the UK is 75p a litre vs 93p for diesel.
― Ed (dali), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:09 (twenty years ago) link
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:11 (twenty years ago) link
― Ed (dali), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:12 (twenty years ago) link
― Possibly Kate Again (kate), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:15 (twenty years ago) link
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:16 (twenty years ago) link
There are lots of stories about people fueling their cars with used cooking oil that restaurants normally pay to have hauled off and disposed in an ecologically sound way. However, if many more people were to start using this fuel source these sources would soon be exhausted.
― j.lu (j.lu), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:26 (twenty years ago) link
only to a point. Kinda reminds me of ethanol subsidies for Iowa, without using the tech for full advantage.
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 4 June 2004 14:27 (twenty years ago) link
And here we go again... http://www.guardian.co.uk/transport/Story/0,,2225276,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=11
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 10 December 2007 14:24 (seventeen years ago) link
We are not aiming to bring the government to its knees, as we did in 2000
Did they ?
― Ste, Monday, 10 December 2007 14:41 (seventeen years ago) link
Arseholes
― Tom D., Monday, 10 December 2007 14:42 (seventeen years ago) link
well, it's not as good as bringing them to their knees, admittedly.
― darraghmac, Monday, 10 December 2007 14:52 (seventeen years ago) link
Check out the beautifully crafted website (with snow!) http://www.transaction-2007.com/
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 10 December 2007 14:53 (seventeen years ago) link
cute
― Ste, Monday, 10 December 2007 14:55 (seventeen years ago) link
*SEVEN* years ago that was?!!
― pisces, Monday, 10 December 2007 14:55 (seventeen years ago) link
way back in the day, when Fragma, Madison Avenue and Black Legend ruled the airwaves
― blueski, Monday, 10 December 2007 14:58 (seventeen years ago) link