― dave q, Sunday, 6 June 2004 01:14 (twenty years ago) link
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 6 June 2004 01:39 (twenty years ago) link
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 6 June 2004 01:40 (twenty years ago) link
My bank makes half the funds available immediately for an ATM deposit, but that's only been on smaller amounts ($200-400).
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Sunday, 6 June 2004 01:53 (twenty years ago) link
But the 'other' thing is .. (here's a story):
I made a deposit for 5004.00 last year. I had a check for 5000 and a check for 4. Two checks. I included a deposit slip in the envelope with two checks listed on it. I listed both checks on the envelope also. At the ATM, I accidentally forgot to enter the digits on the right of the decimal point .. so the machine saw it as 50.04. Oops.. but no big deal, right? They'll catch that when they post the checks. Nope! Somehow they posted one as 50.00 and one as .04 .. And that's how they cleared the bank.
So it was on me to get the error corrected, meanwhile, the 5 large that I need for something has vaporized.
Ahh, but here's where the little guy wins ... My wife had written that $5000 check out of another account. So we were just moving it from one bank to another. And the bank that fucked up, just wrote it off - they corrected the deposit for me but didn't contact the issuing bank. We told them about it twice, and they never seemed interested .. So, now a year later, I am willing to accept that the whole thing is over, and that $5k is ours to buy pennywhistles and moonpies.
But the point of the story was going to be .. if I had deposited a check for $50 and accidentally said it was a $500 check, what do you think would have happened? mmmm hmmm.
― dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 7 June 2004 11:04 (twenty years ago) link
― kephm, Monday, 7 June 2004 14:21 (twenty years ago) link
TORONTO (CP) - The Royal Bank of Canada says its clients' account balances should be up to date by the opening of business on Monday morning.
"Our transaction processing is essentially up to date and we are finally back to a more normal schedule," Marty Lippert, a bank spokesman, said Sunday in a release. "However, the delays we experienced throughout much of last week have prevented some other financial institutions from updating their own client accounts," Lippert said.
"Now that those institutions have the information they need, they will be able to update their records according to their own processing schedules."
Royal Bank, the country's largest, revealed last Wednesday that it had fallen behind in processing millions of transactions due to a problem that occurred Monday during a routine software upgrade of one of its systems.
By last Thursday, tens of thousands of employees in several provinces learned that their direct-deposit paycheques hadn't arrived on schedule due to the delay in processing transactions.
"Our clients and a great many other Canadians have shown incredible patience and understanding and we apologize for the inconvenience and hardship this disruption has caused them," Gordon Nixon, the bank's president, said Sunday.
"We will not consider this disruption behind us until its consequences have been resolved for every client regardless of the institution with which they bank," Nixon said.
The bank has said it is taking steps to help offset the impact of the disruption on clients, including a commitment to refund any overdraft charges or fees incurred as a result of the disruption.
Royal Bank has also agreed to reimburse other Canadian financial institutions for certain costs their clients have incurred due to the disruption.
Royal Bank customers experiencing any further difficulties are asked to contact their branch, the bank said.
― Huk-El (Horace Mann), Monday, 7 June 2004 14:31 (twenty years ago) link
Has anyone ever tried this?Aparently lots of people try this.
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 7 June 2004 14:34 (twenty years ago) link
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 7 June 2004 14:37 (twenty years ago) link
― Huk-El (Horace Mann), Monday, 7 June 2004 14:40 (twenty years ago) link
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 7 June 2004 14:42 (twenty years ago) link
― cutty (mcutt), Monday, 7 June 2004 14:47 (twenty years ago) link
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 7 June 2004 15:11 (twenty years ago) link
― ___ (___), Monday, 7 June 2004 15:12 (twenty years ago) link