― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Menelaus Darcy, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ed, Sunday, 4 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mascara, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― katie, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
However, if someone tells me they have even a passing interest in the evil that is astrology, I have to count to ten and try oh so hard not to shout...
― Mark C, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― gareth, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― alix, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nude Spock, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nick, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sterling Clover, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― james, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
The Modern Grate Theorum is one that has spontaneously erupted across the world. Its concept is simple:- one grate is neutral, two grates are lucky, three grates are unlucky. When it comes to a larger number of grates, however, opinion is divided. Some opine that all grates grouped in numbers over three are neutral, and to be ignored. The majority rule that if it is a number divisible by two, it is counted as however many twos appear, and the same with threes. But then what of the six collection? Of course, you can hold your breath as you walk over it, and convince yourself it is three lucky groupings, but it is just as likely to be a set of two that shake down bad luck. And what of this scenario- a grouping of three of the half-grate types? Does each half-grate count as one, thus creating the afore-mentioned bewilderment of a six, or must they be added together to create normal grate size, thus becoming one set of three? Does one risk the dangers of these puzzles merely for a slice of luck? And, of course, the enduring appeal of the belief in the Modern Grate Theorem is the unquantifiability of luck. If one walks over the two grate proposition yet no instant of what could conceivably be called 'luck' arranges itself in the path of the day, the reassurance that you have narrowly escaped a monster piece of bad luck can always be found. Similarly, if you are fool enough, or merely lack the observance to avoid passing your feet over a three grate organisation, but despite this the day is one that could be regarded as good, the sour knowledge that it is not as good as it would otherwise have been will consistently arrive at the forefront of your mind.
― emil.y, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sean, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 26 June 2004 22:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 26 June 2004 22:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 26 June 2004 22:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 26 June 2004 22:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 26 June 2004 22:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 26 June 2004 22:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 26 June 2004 22:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 26 June 2004 22:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 26 June 2004 22:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 26 June 2004 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 27 June 2004 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Sunday, 27 June 2004 00:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― andrew l. r. (allocryptic), Sunday, 27 June 2004 01:38 (twenty-one years ago)
That's what I think it is: our brains are programmed to try to find correlations between EVERYTHING
― oops (Oops), Sunday, 27 June 2004 06:28 (twenty-one years ago)
the numbers at the very bottom are freaking me out right now. I'm not especially superstitious except when confronted with, uh spooky shit that comes from straight from the smoky bowels of existence, and this after I just had a long freaky discussion with a numerologically-inclined relative over Christmas dinner, guess my resistance is low. I'm not a metal dude so there is nothing to appreciate here. Pls to explain.
― tremendoid (tremendoid), Sunday, 14 January 2007 10:18 (eighteen years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Sunday, 14 January 2007 19:18 (eighteen years ago)
The playlist of the beast.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 14 January 2007 19:22 (eighteen years ago)
I took a huge box of promo CDs to Amoeba once and the guy was running the numbers....said "and that'll be -- YIKES -- $666 in credit. Do you want that or do you want to pull one disc out so the number will be different?" (I left it in.)
― do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Sunday, 14 January 2007 19:26 (eighteen years ago)
Same goes for our license plates, though they did raise a stink in Craighead County when the letters D-W-I started getting randomly assigned to people.
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Sunday, 14 January 2007 19:35 (eighteen years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 14 January 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)
― Abbott (Abbott), Monday, 15 January 2007 00:22 (eighteen years ago)
― Abbott (Abbott), Monday, 15 January 2007 00:23 (eighteen years ago)
― Abbott (Abbott), Monday, 15 January 2007 00:27 (eighteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Monday, 15 January 2007 00:31 (eighteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Monday, 15 January 2007 00:32 (eighteen years ago)
and 1.8("18", numerologists seem to fudge numbers that way) days was the kicker, though I guess you wouldn't file that under your ocd. I left it as is and this morning there was a few more files showing, dunno what happened.
― tremendoid (tremendoid), Monday, 15 January 2007 00:50 (eighteen years ago)
― do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Monday, 15 January 2007 00:57 (eighteen years ago)
― indian rope trick (bean), Monday, 15 January 2007 04:05 (eighteen years ago)
― max (maxreax), Monday, 15 January 2007 04:19 (eighteen years ago)