Famous

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Did you want to be? Did you think you would be? Do you still want to be? And do you still think you might be? If your answer to the first question was yes and your answer to the last is no then how did you cope with that?

And - here's a really loaded question - who on these forums has the best chance?

Tom, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I absolutely wanted to be. Giving more detail is a little embarassing though.

Sean, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I never really wanted to be famous as a kid. I was so morbid as a teenager that I really didn't think there would a world or anything (damn that teen angst!). Now, I wouldn't mind being famous in certain circles. I wouldn't mind being as famous as Momus. I have a feeling that I will acquire a certain level of fame (call it renewed self- belief and/or self-delusion).

Any number of people could become famous around here. Not Britney famous, though. (I think I dodged that well)

james, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm still delighted Suzy remembers my name.

And I was going for "I'm with the band" cred with the indie gurlies when I was talking to Kate at the Lollies gig. Erm... yeah.

Graham, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I didn't care if I was famous, just as long as I was wealthy. And I still think that, and I'm pretty sure that I will be wealthy, on a relatively soon schedule.

Loaded question answer: Ian White, he'll probably become some sort of director or screenwriter or something.

Ally, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I will likely acquire if not fame then, ahem, notoriety.

Sterling Clover, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't care too much for being famous, I would rather be respected by people I like. Perhaps the two can be achieved simultaneously.

I think Momus has the best chance of continuing to be famous, however the most famous person who isn't a pop star on this board could be.....Tom.

I was called 'The Famous Ally C' the other night though. How odd.

Ally C, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I will likely acquire if not fame then, ahem, notoriety

Well, Wheeler already claimed infamy so I guess notoriety is next best thing.

Ally, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes. No. Yes. Maybe.

Fame carries a lot of shit with it. The indiscriminating adoring fans that love every bowel you make, and the indiscriminating bashers that think every body pore of you whiffs of "asshole". Well, at least you get to know who your real friends are, quickly.

A lower key fame -- far less than mainstream fame, but known in small remote circles across the world -- would make me really happy, if it were at all possible.

Brian MacDonald, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This is a weird one. Regular IL* people will know stuff about me, such as being published early and being begged by publishers for books. Some of me wonders that it might be just cocktail talk, 'cos I do have confidence issues despite the bravado I often display here. I'm in a lucky position as my family trust me carte blanche to go forth and interpret various incidents, because they aren't writers. When I was coming home from a party on Sunday the cab driver was grilling me and I said I got to go to all these functions; he said it must be cool to meet all the celebrities and I replied, 'no, they get to meet me.'

I also went through a phase of watching friends and acquaintances get their 15 minutes, with varying degrees of success. I have at least two exes that are famous (or cult) and I have a really informed perspective on how that makes people behave (men have it easier because so many of them can get helpmeets). Or how it can attract the kind of sycophant I actively despise. There is a tendency these days in the classes with leisure time: they can afford to pursue art as a lifestyle thing, whereas anyone who is actually invested with talent and oddity from the begining is coming from a different place. And feels conflicted about what to do and how to express it.

Gonna get big: Nitsuh, some Dunedin lot, Kate, plus others who may be rich and/or behind the scenes operators. And just a hunch but go, Maria, go!

suzy, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Artistic talent and qualifications for fame are two different axes, I think. To become famous for 'artistic' things you have to be just good enough to attract attention and just bad enough to reward a low attention span. So to pick out anyone on this board would be as much insult as compliment.

When I was young I always wanted to be famous for things I could never possibly ever do, like be a footballer or a spaceman.

Tom, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It's a bit of a weird one. I certainly never wanted to be famous, but there again, I've always wanted to be able to live off doing what I love. Unfortunately, those things I love really aren't likely to sustain me- can anyone really see a poxy lo-fi band hitting the big time? Nuh-uh... And my writing is crappy, and my electronica stuff is completely amateur and half the time not even finished...

So, yeah, I'm already a failed wastrel.

emil.y, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Most people are fodder. Very few change the consciousness of humanity. I am one of them. And also rather drunk. See you in the 21st Century cockfarmers ahoy!

Johnathan, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Whoever gets famous here has to help the rest of us. Simple, really. ;-)

Sure, who hasn't minded fame or at least a dreamy concept of it? But I think Ally pointed out that the trappings aren't the key thing so much as the comforts. I suspect the rest of my days will be at the least comfortable, so I don't mind the relative lack of fame or anything, especially when friends and good wishes matter more. The random messages I get from people noticing my AMG reviews work well enough for me right now. :-)

Ned Raggett, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I've never wanted to be truly famous, but I'd like to be a cult figure for something or other, or at least be an infamous behind-the- scenes dude manipulating everything in a Malcolm McLaren style. She's only been on the boards once (so she qualifies), but I think that the divine LC has a chance of being famous in some way, with any luck in her chosen profession as director/general theatre bod.

DG, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

My earliest ambition was either to be famous for writing or simply published. The desire for fame quickly faded and now my writing is so bad and infrequent that I don't know if I'll ever publish anything, but I've got years to go, eh? I don't want to be famous as much as I'd like to be entertainingly flamboyant or eccentric.

I don't know enough to predict who will be famous. I think I'll pick on Nude Spock, then.

Maria, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

you're all the st.lunatics to my nelly.

ethan, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I want to be famous like ZsaZsa gabor, for absolutely no reason whatsoever.

Menelaus Darcy, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes. Yes. No. Yes. Me.

Al, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I am going to be a teenage mutant ninja turtle when i grow up. I decided that when i was seven years old and I'm not backing down now...

Timothy, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't want fame but I do want to influence people anonymously.

toraneko, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes. Yes. Yes, but in a different sort of way from what I wanted as a kid. Probably not.

When I was a kid I wanted to be famous like Madonna, and even though my desired standard of fame has decreased significantly I don't think I have quite coped with it yet. I'm still chasing my dreams, some of my dreams have changed, but most of them haven't and it just so happens that a spin off/occupational hazard/fact of attaining these dreams is fame.

I'm wondering though: how many people here think that the reason they haven't become a superstar (I use that word because there seems to be a lot of musicians around) is because they are actually scared of what would happen if they did suddenly become a superstar?

Also, how many of us have famous friends? Am I a groupie because I have famous friends but am not famous myself?

Mascara, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes, Yes, wouldn't mind, probably not. It's not a huge disappointment.

I have a friend who is nationally 'famous' (would be recognized by a large % of the british public, but probably not internationally) and it causes quite a bit of stress and hassle in itself. I'm not sure it's for me.

Dr. C, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

when i was in high school making midi beats, a lot of my wide-eyed peers always thought that I was through the door and would grow up to be the anti-Moby or something to that effect. Now, I don't think that will happen, but it'd be nice. I still work on music when I can and I'm sure one day I won't be content just distributing a few copies to my friends. I'm still young and stupid so it seems there's still a good chance for fame. Never know.....

Honda, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I have tons of famous friends, but most of these are in a cult way. It's kind of inevitable that I would, purely because of what I do for a living and the length of time I've been doing this in London. And in many cases I knew them before they got famous. Most of my famous friends are artists, writers or musicians with a smattering of presenters. A few of them are former work colleagues.

The groupie issue is, shall we say, a bone of contention between me and one or two of my friends, who partake of groupies. I have never written a fan letter in my life, nor have I approached a famous person intentionally for sex. It's utterly deluded to do so and would be really gross because I'm all for equality in relationships and I've seen some fairly outrageous examples of abuse of power when the relationship isn't, or one of the people in it tries to 'pull rank'. One guy tried this on me once, and got the ear-bashing of his life in front of his friends.

And just one note. Groupies almost never get more famous than their object of lust. I am very fond of saying to friends that it's only possible to sleep your way to the middle.

suzy, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Is there a link between the old Tory description of socialism as the 'politics of envy' and the habit fans of famous people have of attributing any criticism of their adored to jealousy?

Tom, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i think i've achieved all the fame i'm ever likely to with the limited coverage of my band in the music/other press (album out yesterday BTW PLUG PLUG). i'm glad i'm not one of the singers though as they tend to get all the attention and that would embarrass me to within an inch of my life. there are devoted tompaulin fans believe it or not - people who travel to come to gigs and who know all the words, which is scary. i don't really want to be any more famous than i am now though, which isn't that famous anyway.

at all tomorrow's parties last year an acquaintance who really REALLY irritates me, and who previously wouldn't talk to me as i'm not part of the london indie cool set came up to me and was suddenly all friendly as she said "you're really famous now aren't you?" that really scared me.

katie, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Who are the London indie cool set?

I've become as famous as I currently want to be, i.e. if you google my name my page comes up first, the only measure of fame that truly matters.

Tom, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

london indie cool set = sixties wannabe girls and boys. i am too scruffy for them.

katie, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Tom is famous in my bathroom for being on Radio4's Pick Of The Week last week. (The Bowie programme, obviously) I think he was introduced as a renowned internet music journalist, but maybe I added the adjective in my imagination.

David, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

YES! I are being with Katie on this and I shun them utterly. They are no fun, dance with eyes rolled to ceiling and ming massively. I the scruffbag stand behind them and pull faces. Hahahaha, hahahah, HAHAHA hHAHAHAHHAHAHAA!!!

And thanks to this thread I have FAMOUS by them Magnetic Fields stuck in my head. I think I shall become a famous CHEF and make OATMEAL COOKIES. Actually, I would really like some paté and toast right now. Maybe I will be famous for my duck paté. I also want to be a GRATE BASSIST for BASS is ACE but I do not want to be hugely famous for it, I just wanna be like the Delta 5ive.

Sarah, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Katie, those are not cool people, they are just punters who've convinced themselves that being on the guest list = they've ARRIVED.

You've reminded me why I got really sick and bored of music scene stuff. During Britpop a few of my pals totally started to believe their own hype and lost perspective about things like this, and suddenly all these people who had the swivelhead quality of junior-high cliques were in their lives. Cocaine was part of the equation, of course. Yuck.

suzy, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

london indie cool set = sixties wannabe girls and boys.

Are they the ones with the slanty fringes?

Mascara, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Pick of the week!! Blimey! My Mum actually listens to that of her own accord.

Tom, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Sorry Mr Moore not wishing to denigrate POTW but I was saying that unlike the orig. Bowie prog where obviously I said hey Mum listen in, this time she would have heard me w/o prompting.

Tom, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i don't know any famous people (although i have read that there are a number of famous people who live in London)

gareth, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

(NB As the thread's gone that way I'd better point out I was joking about The Lollies thing)

Graham, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I've always wanted big mainstream pop fame and I mostly still dream of it: the *not good-looking* revelation was a hard moment. Sometimes I know I WILL get famous anyway because if music or words haven't done it by 45, I'll kill a load of people. The loaded q: surely no- one here (except me) will become super-famous in the mainstream because *that sort* of person wouldn't be caught dead posting here.

chris, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think Chris is right. I like your album by the way, not what I was expecting at all.

I think I'll either end up being a) this famous or less for ever or b) extremely famous for somthing. I think I'm past the point of being able to be moderately famous. Of course a) implies that I have some sort of fame now, which is doubtful. Bu hey, see weakness thread ref. arrogance.

Andrew Williams, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

OK, be prepared for a long blast on this one.

Did I want to be famous? No, not at first. Fame, or rather, INFAMY, was something that was thrust upon me from a very early age simply for being the only weirdo in a very small community. Time and time again, having a big mouth and large opinions will guarantee that more people know who you are than you know who they are, which is the potty training version of fame.

Things like the internet and the indie music scene are just a giant extension of a small village full of gossips. Did I have any choice but to go on the stage? I felt like I was already placed on a stage by other peoples opinions from the day that a 12 year old weirdo with an English accent, a funny haircut and a Warhol fixation moved into a tiny village.

So the first time that I, very drunkenly, at the age of 16 or something, crawled onto the stage of someone else's gig, picked up the microphone and started sing-ranting my head off, and suddenly everyone in the nightclub turned around and stared, not with the thought that I was an idiot weirdo, but thinking they wanted to BE that girl on the stage... people started treating me differently that day. I never thought I would be famous, but I ended up that way almost by mistake.

Do I want to be famous now? Fuck yes. Fame is the ultimate FUCK YOU to everyone who has ever screwed you over. Fame is the FUCK YOU to the kids who slammed you into lockers in high school, when suddenly instead of making fun of your haircut, they're walking around with your haircut. Fame is the ultimate FUCK YOU to ex lovers and ex friends who have betrayed you.

My current band was formed as revenge, plain and simple. Several years ago, someone I loved dearly and trusted more than anyone in the world betrayed me in an earth-shattering and life-changing way. So I formed a band with the express purpose of writing a song which would make her feel as small as she made me feel. The day that she heard that song on some college radio station, and wrote me in a fury, I knew that my goal had been accomplished. And it's still happening now. I wrote a song last night that was so vitriolic it could strip paint off the wall, and boy did it feel good.

I know that in the grand scheme, I've still accomplished nothing. A couple of songs on the radio, a couple of inches of various press, and a couple of tours. But everything that we accomplish, which I never *DREAMED* in a million years that we ever would, is just another FUCK YOU in the face of those who wished me ill. I'm fucking ugly, I can't sing, I can't write, I've got very little discernable musical talent, but I'm up there and they're NOT.

I had the drive and actually MADE IT HAPPEN while they just sat in their hipster pads and complained. I don't have to recconcile or cope with failure, because goddammit, at least I fucking worked my ass off and TRIED, instead of sitting around leaching off other people's fame and thinking I was god cause I got on a guest list.

Is that fucked up? Yes, it probably really is. I know that the more famous you become, the more fucked up you get by it. Fame doesn't solve any problems, it only compounds them. I know that if I ever achieve the sort of fame that I want, (yes, Bowie-casualty alert) it would probably destroy me. But then again, I don't think I really was born with much of a chance of ever being happy and normal and content, so I will settle for being emotionally damaged, but still creative and FUCK YOU famous. I want it anyway, because even if it does destroy me, it's still the best FUCK YOU that there is in the world.

As to who on this board will succeed... I don't have a clue. Whoever actually WANTS it enough to WORK for it. You look back at high school yearbooks, and invariably the "Person most likely to succeed" is selling insurance, while the class weirdo that everyone hated ends up on TV. So I guess that means that Doomie will be on the cover of Time Magazine before all of us! Heh!

kate, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well, I was voted person most likely to write for Rolling Stone and all the rest, purely because that's the only part of it they 'got' and it took me approximately two weeks of being in Britain before I had achieved an ambition to write for music papers. I was surprised at how easy it was. I'm funny about 'ambition' as a term to describe what I want, as part of me thinks ambition is a polite way of saying you'll try and fail. I know what Kate means about the revenge of the nerds feeling; at least when they were making fun of me in Junior High I had the good sense to turn around and tell them they'd copy my funny haircut and dress sense, but they couldn't copy my talent.

Doomie might well write his novel and do just fine by it. By the time he settled down and stopped insulting the rest of us (which is when he became 'Doomie') I thought...maybe...

suzy, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I have no ambition. Sometimes I think about what it would be like to be different things, like what if I ruled the world, or if I was a living up a tree, or if I was a bank manager or a spy that could breathe underwater, but I don't actually want these things to be true.It's an interesting daydream. I kind of see people who feel they need fame as a bit pathetic; it's some kind of inability to cope with proper life. Why would anyone want to succeed in some kind of horrendous fake world when reality is so much more rewarding? I personally wouldn't want lots of people I didn't know revering me. That's just me though. Famous people are necessary, if only to provide distraction, and revenue for Heat magazine.

alix, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Thankyou Andrew, that's kind. Er.. how do I get a Borders gig?

Kate babe, your issues have swallowed your pop!

chris, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Chris, the whole point is, if I didn't have issues, I wouldn't have ever made pop in the first place.

kate, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

How well known is famous anyway? my definition is that if my Mum or sister have heard of you then you're famous. No-one on this board will become famous, unless Hanle y finally goes postal that is.

chris, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I just remembered, Katie G is famous as I put some Tompaulin songs on a tape for my sister, congratulations!

chris, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I wanted to be famous for much the same reasons as kate, a big fuck you to all of the arseholes at school. Now I couldn't give a toss. I am going down the road of a behind the scenes facilitator of other peoples fame, hopefully it will end in fun and mild fortune for me. I, as someone here has sugested man a time, have my fingers in a lot of pies an one of them might be about to come off in a cool and groovy way, It will not make me rich or famous but will hopefully lead to many more things. Keep your eyes peeled, I and a few others may just be about to make a splash, even if noone could give a toss that we're behind it.

Ed, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I want to be famous not because I want to say FUCK YOU to anyone in particular- I am quite capable of doing that verbally. But celebrity is accepted more places than american express...

Menelaus Darcy, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't really care to say fuck you to people via fame, it's just a bit petty at this point I suppose. The problem is that when you are doing it to say fuck you, you've got insecurity, and that opens you up to being more easily taken advantage of by people who aren't really your friends. It's better to try to overcome the fuck you thing, though it's good Kate already points out that it's fucked up and won't do anyone any good. It's still fun, it's like the best line in the history of movies, by Alan Cummings in Josie and the Pussycats: What's the point of being famous if you can't rub it in the face of all the people who were mean to you in high school?

Ally, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Wanting fame is a very obvious cry for acknowledgment and approval that most people find through more intimate means. The false gold implied here would be why E! True Hollywood Stories and VH1 Behind the Scenes have been such runaway succeses.

Personally I would like to be happy and then respected and admired. How many people know me or know of me b/c of those goals is an aftereffect, not the goal itself.

I think our society places far too much importance on "celebrity" partly b/c we've become lazy and withdrawn. And to anyone who's old enough to drink in the US (21) and is still thinking about High School and revenge on bullies, you really need to grow up and move on.

Samantha, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i said we should be *successful* cos we work for it. *fam* i have no interest in.

katie, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Not to compete with Sussed (different kinda pop anyway) but... I'm pretending to be famous tomorrow night at the Barfly (Monarch), supporting Animals That Swim. Onstage about 9.15pm and it's a noisy (full band) show. If you come, please come say hello so I can put more IL* faces to names.

chris, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh, there are too many points to counterpoint. I will try to hit a few.

1) I am well aware that my reasons (and many people's reasons) for wanting fame are fucked up. Fame is a fucked up concept in and of itself. (Ignoring the Warhol casualty alert that I also believe that Fame can be an artform in and of itself.) I know it is not going to bring one new friends, if anything, it seems to actually isolate people. But *I*, personally don't *get* to have love, approval, intimacy in the normal ways. It just never appears to be an option for me. Is it a fair trade-off to trade something that you need, and will never get (positive attention of unconditional love) for something which may be harmful, but seems to be easy to get (the negative attention of fame/infamy)? No, of course it isn't, and I'm aware that it's a fucked-up trade-off, but it seems to be the only one that I'm going to get. I really have come at this point to believe that it would be easier for me to be on Top of the Pops or on the cover of the NME than it would for me to find a committed, sustained, HEALTHY, and equal relationship. And please don't censor me for saying that, because it's not a dig at anyone except myself. Yes, it's fucked up, but it's me admitting my own shortcomings as well as the shortcomings of my relationships.

2) Fame as FUCK YOU is not *just* about people from the distant past who have done me wrong. It is about people in the here and now, still walking around doing damage. And this isn't, as some would believe, just about writing nasty songs about ex boyfriends or girlfriends. Last week I walked into my former office with a copy of our latest single and an NME with a review of it in my hand. That was a lovely FUCK YOU. Individual FUCK YOU songs do tend to take on a life of their own, long after the grudge has worn itself out. (Which is funny, considering that the love songs I've written have never won me the boy, but FUCK YOU songs always hit the mark in question.) In many ways, Fame DOES equal Power, and reclaiming power is the ultimate purpose of revenge.

4) Fame and Art (despite Warholian commentary above) are not the same thing. This is going to sound SOOO pretentious, but the creation of music for me is not a desire, it is a need. I'm not arrogant enough to think that I'm "enlightening" anyone. (No offense, Chris) I make music on my own, sitting in my room with a guitar and a 4-track because I would go (more) insane if I didn't. The craving for fame, on the other hand, is a desire, not a need. I would NOT sacrifice everything for fame, the way that I have sacrificed everything for my need to make music. I think that's an important distinction I may have failed to make. No, I would not like to be an Anna Nicole Smith or a Tara P-T, famous for nothing but being famous, as intriguing as the idea is.

There's obviously a lot going on in my life right now which is making me feel this way. Maybe Chris and the rest of you are right, maybe if I'd ever BEEN in a good or healthy relationship, I wouldn't have this need for fame as a replacement. I'm thinking about this far too much, but it's obviously very close to the bone right now.

P.S. with regard to "working hard" vs. drive vs. talent. Lots of people, artists and not artists work hard. But there really is something to be said for drive. I know lots of people who have loads of talent, but no drive, who are still making 4-tracks recordings for themselves in their parents basements. I also can name lots of people with very little talent, but massive drive, who are currently inhabiting the upper eschelons of the charts. Draw your own conclusions. But even drive and "working hard" are not the same thing.

kate, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh, c'mon. Let's get real. I'm glad it died down, but we should all recognize that in fact Samantha did in so many words, accuse Kate of being Pam Anderson. Which is a low blow, even by my standards.

Sterling Clover, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This is so fucking stupid. Everything is bloody "nasty" or "snarky" or whatever else. Talk about paranoia. I'm not trying to stifle the debate here but if something is said and it's meant to have offended someone else, you don't really have to stick up for the person. Just let them fucking deal with it. And before someone brings up the notorious "vegetablegate" that was different since it was a general point I wanted to make about ILE rather than leaping to someones defence and saying such and such is nasty or whatever.

Ronan, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Drive vs Talent thing, I'm totally with you on that.

Without the drive I'd be sweeping streets.

Badly.

Ronan, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

And sorry to harp on, but I just saw this:

And to anyone who's old enough to drink in the US (21) and is still thinking about High School and revenge on bullies, you really need to grow up and move on.

Yes, DRINKING is a far more constructive way of dealing with childhood trauma, and long-running grudges, and being continually fucked over by loved ones than oh, say, using it as fuel for your creativity and turning it into something constructive.

Not that I'd know anything about drinking... ;-)

kate, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

anyway, about my gig...

chris, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Katie: I certainly didn't mean that you or anyone else doing what they loved (with or without desire for 'fame') didn't count as work - not at all. I meant only to suggest that lots of people work equally hard in jobs/professions/lives that have no fame quotient, and that work was worth equally as much, sometimes maybe more in a wider social context, and sometimes valued less.

I also meant that I didn't think that fame was usually a *direct result* of hard work - too many other factors!

You're right that in my second post that was a bit ambiguous - sorry.

Ellie, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes, DRINKING is a far more constructive way of dealing with childhood trauma, and long-running grudges,

I didn't say it was. I was only using the legal age to do so as a common hallmark of maturity. I figure 4 or 5 years out of high school should be enough time to build a life and move on. And no Sterling, I was talking in general about all the posts on this board. This is a topic that gets to me b/c I think Americans are so obsessed with celebrity. What's odd is that I almost put Pamela Anderson Lee but then figured someone out there might think Barbwire was the height of brillance and I didn't want to be offensive.

Samantha, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No doubt fame brings many pleasures, but the pleasures of snubbing celebrity are far greater.

Kerry, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

a la jonathan franzen.

maura, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Indeed Kerry. When the Academy tried to present me with a lifetime acheivement award I said, "Please, it's so passe."

Samantha, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Nelly explains fame best in the new single: You ain't gotta gimme my props just gimme the yachts gimme my rocks and keep my fans comin in flocks. 'Till you top the superbowl keep your mouth on lock.

Word.

Sterling Clover, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This is how I feel about fame:

"Don't you know it takes an honest man, who knows he sucks but does the best he can"

So, if someone becomes famous for working really hard, but also maintains the capacity to like themself and others, that's the greatest.

james, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Ellie i am actually totally with you on the "people who do unrecognised jobs which have a wider social value" point - my mum's a teacher so i can relate to that (and i know that if i took up teaching it would drive me batty, and have nothing but respect and gratitude for those brave teaching and nursing souls out there). did anyone see those teaching awards the other night? such a horrible, cynical attempt by the govt. to persuade people that they *can* get recognised for teaching when what they really want to do is snare you into their pit of debt and unfair legislation. it's good that some good teachers got recognised and were obviously very touched by this, but it gave me the creeps all the same.

at heart, i admit it, i am a bit guilty that i don't do a more altruistic job.

katie, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Kate (oi, this Katie Kate thing is confusing! ;), you're very self- aware which is good.

My problem right now with continuing to discuss this is that we're standing on the tremulous ground of art = pain, IMO. It's not a concept I buy into but we're getting awfully close to the idea that the "fucked up" musician is telling everyone that the drive is due to being fucked up, while the other side is telling the artist that if they were "normal" they wouldn't feel the way they do. Ay carrumba. I'm not stating, for the record, that I actually think either side thinks this; rather that it's a little too close to a subject that causes hemmorages of the brain at times.

Ally, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Awards for teachers ARE creepy, as is the attempt to introduce performance-related pay: it bums out the people motivated by public service values (making them submit to some kind of prima donna individualism), and supports the idiots (a la 'bad teachers' thread') in continuing to be idiots ('cos they'll never get an award or a bonus, so why bother?). And even the ones who win will never be famous or get to wear leg warmers.

Ellie, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I propose we all take up wearing leg warmers.

Samantha, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

leg warmers yay! *political* legwarmers, no less. i love it!

katie, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'll give leg warmers a go, but I don't think they'll suit me.

james, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

james: it is my lifelong conviction that they don't suit anyone. Especially Geri Halliwell.

Ellie, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Today I'm wearing capri pants so I don't think they would go with leg warmers. Granted it's about 80 degrees so. . .

Samantha, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think legwarmers are nice and I don't understand the stigma. I've never had a pair. Weep, weep.

And Kate- my respect for you has increased a great deal, a little because of what you said but mostly because you said it well.

Maria, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I second what Maria says about everything, even if I disagree with the whole fame for spite thing in theory. And I also wish I had legwarmers right now, cos it's hella cold out.

Ally, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i don't want to be famous. i am scared that if i were famous i would become everything that i hate. its hard enough practising what you preach without adding money and adoration into the equation.

in any case, money and adoration don't interest me that much. i can survive okay on fuck all dollars. i have no desire for adoration either, who wants to be put on a pedastal? i require only love and respect from the people i love and respect.

maybe i would like to be recognised one day as being a talented musician on the underground level, but i think i can do that without fame.

di, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

but you already are famous Di.

hamish, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

oh yeah. famous to the 20 people who come to see LD50 play.

but thinking about it, what more could i ask for? if 10 people like my band, that gives me a warm feeling in my tummy.

di, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Am I the only person who wants to become everything they hate? I think it'd be interesting.

Ally, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Eurgh, no, not me. The idea of becoming a raving ignorant fundamentalist even as a joke frightens me to the depths of my soul.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Fame's great, but infamy's nearly as good for much less effort.

Otis Wheeler, Tuesday, 6 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I want to be famous so I never have to be nice to anyone ever again.

dave q, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

the word "again" functions how in that sentence dave?

mark s, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I want to reply to the "post-high school = maturity" comments that Samantha made, but this subject probably needs a new thread in and of itself. (if it hasn't already had one.)

The high school geek example was an analogy, I never said that I was still walking around with a head full of anger about my high school years. In truth, patterns of alienation were already well established and set by that time. Yes, adolescent angst is something that most people grow out of. But alienation on a fundamental level is not something people are just going to grow up and snap out of because they've reached an arbitrary "age of maturity".

The idea that there is a magic age where you suddenly hit maturity, and you have "dealt with" all the shit from your past is absurd. Your tone comes off to me as patronising, and I think that a lot of people, including me, are responding to that as much as they are responding to what you are saying. It's reductionist and simplistic to the point of being vaguely insulting to insinuate that everyone has the same maturing process, because no one has had the same formative experiences (positive or negative, supportive or destructive). Everyone carries their past around on their shoulders, to a greater or lesser degree; you are the sum of your past experiences and more.

Also, the comment that only Americans are obsessed with celebrity is just patently untrue. The obsession with celebrity has been with human culture since the Classical Greeks (good god, was THIS the argument I got into with Brent on Saturday night? I think it might have been.) - it's not something new or even necessarily American. Maybe you *read* it as being a purely American thing because the advent of an instantaneous mass media has coincided with American domination of world culture. Classical civilisation was just as obssessed with celebrity- remember they actually made gods of their emperors and their poets.

Being a celebrity (or an artist, because we are, ultimately, talking about celebrity coming from being an artist of some form. No one has mentioned celebrity that comes about through political means, have they?) is possibly one of the most useless and selfish things that one can be. Hence my bristle with the idea that art is "enlightening" anyone. Of course we should all be doing something more altruistic and positive for society. The obsession with fame and celebrity, and maybe even art itself *is* a self obsession, ultimately. I can't offer an argument against that. I know that it is wrong, but I want it anyway.

Leg Warmers? Please stop. I am old enough to remember when leg warmers were fashionable the first time round, the craze inspired by movies such as Flashdance and Fame. Make the thinnest and most elegant part of your leg as bulky and unattractive as possible, now THERE is a good look. They didn't even actually make you any warmer, as more heat is lost through the sole of the foot than the ankle, and leg warmers don't cover the sole of the foot.

kate, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Roman emperors were certainly famous but to apply the concept of celebrity to them feels anachronistic to me. That said the ancient Greeks were acutely aware of the dangers of excessive individual fame to the wider community.

I'd be interested to know if the same people who approve of drive/work -> artistic success -> psychological revenge would also approve of drive/work -> financial success -> psychological revenge.

Tom, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

What Kate just said. Psychological revenge is probably too simplistic a term to describe what goes on when someone who has been bullied in some way finds success and, yeah, perhaps some validation. The reason they're looking is because some bastard pinched it from them and they want what everyone else has in terms of feeling like a valid individual with a place in society. Fair enough. Also, most of us here are sophisticated and intelligent enough to realise that it's dead easy to perpetuate a cycle of bullying or just being mean for the sake of it when it's happened to you. And we have enough idealism to think we won't be the next bully or victimiser. I think art and being creative are great ways to communicate that you're not willing to perpetuate that cycle, that you're going to be better than that.

suzy, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Then why is the art world so bitchy? ;)

I think what I'm getting at is that the idea of 'drive' separating the successful from the unsuccessful seems kind of...well, Thatcherite, almost, when combined with the idea that it's in some way a 'fuck you' to those who don't make it. Of course self- validation plays a part - I think we're all looking for that.

Tom, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I still would like some legwarmers. My fashion style is to try and look as twattish as possible, I do hope it works. Today I am dressed all in BLACK and look like a GOFF. I think having huge, saggy, BEIGE legwarmers would be a fantastic addition to the outfit. Also see Samantha MUMBAS big hairy knee boots ho ho. They're ACE and Smash Hits made a joke about getting a new LADYSHAVE arf.

I am incapable of being serious this morning due to my rubbidge day job being bad enough without thinking of any hypothetical "fame" issues that ARE NOT GOING TO HAPPEN chiz.

Sarah, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The art world is so bitchy because it's competitive and incestuous and people get nervous about the pecking order and looking good in front of rich people they're trying to court or culture arbiters they wish to notice them. And simultaneously they're pretending to be above it all. I basically just go around being nice to everyone, ergo if someone's an asshole it isn't me, it's them. Last night's Turner Prize reception was a case in point: a friend of mine was nervous because a) her ex is one of the nominated artists, and it was an unhappy breakup even though they're pals and b) she's got the first opening in her gallery on Thursday and was schmoozing it up. She got jealous and bossy when I was talking to her ex and said something snide about my job, you know, the job I have that enables her to come to nice gigs and clubs with me that she wouldn't get to go to otherwise. Grrr. I know she'll de-stress, I'll have a go about her being a cow because we're friends and are supposed to help one another, but that's not something I have to be told.

suzy, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This just sorta leapt out at me, let's see if I can do it in italics...

Everyone carries their past around on their shoulders, to a greater or lesser degree; you are the sum of your past experiences and more.

Wow. I have to say that if I lived my life like that I'd probably be round the bend by now. And if everyone judged me by my past behaviour and actions I'd be in deep trouble. Life's about the future isn't it? The only thing that keeps me going half the time is the hope things are getting better. Maybe I'm just a naive optimist.

Suzy, your posts always fill me with joy, you live such an impossibly glamorous life. I don't understand what you're on about half the time, but it's fun.

Andrew Williams, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think what I'm getting at is that the idea of 'drive' separating the successful from the unsuccessful seems kind of...well, Thatcherite

This is a topic that probably deserves its own thread, which I will start in a minute. Please bear with me, because I have to log off the internet to make long posts, in order to save my godparents' phone bill.

kate, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Fame's great, but infamy's nearly as good for much less effort

I dunno, Wheeler. We seem to be putting a lot of effort into our attempts to be infamous, and hell, no one at Hampshire even seems to notice.

Ally, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yesterday after work I heard a piece on the radio about Brad Pitt's apparent breakdown. He was blaming it all on fame saying it made people ugly self-centered people who think they're better than others. Then he went on to describe his marriage with Jennifer Aniston as a "merger". I couldn't decide if he was a prick or just a joke. Anyway it seemed appropo to this thread.

I'm not going to address all the other points that address mine b/c I have to work. But I'll say dwelling in the past is unhealthy and will stifle you if you don't try to move on. I only referenced America's obsession with celebrity b/c that's what I'm familiar with. And if my tone sounded patronizing, well then maybe it's because I think admitting you started a venture based on revenge is really sad.

I'm old enough to remember leg warmers as well which is why I think bringing them back is a great idea. Somehow this dovetail's nicely into the Ally=Valley thread but I really do have work to do.

Samantha, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i taught myself to cook based on revenge: thru own absurd stubbornness not to warm to me as life companion, [xXx] wil NEVAH sample my genius cuisine hahaHAA the fool the fool!!!

Clearly this = v.mentalist, but fact of learnionbg to cook = quite helathy in itself and many others now can sample MGC (inc.ILE before now) so hurrah and if [xXx] shd happen by when the oven was opening, bygones are bygeones and yesw i'm ovah it, and anyway as it stands ignorance = bliss which foils my plan entirely chiz chizoR

mark s, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I can vouch for marks tremedous cooking, lamb felafels, and mango pickle,mmmm

Ed, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

My answer would be no X3. Gale

Gale Deslongchamps, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

In so close a contest, many factors undoubtedly make the difference between victory and defeat. Among those that determined the 1960 winner, four television debates between Nixon and Kennedy surely ranked among the most decisive. Though Nixon apparently was the more impressive to the radio audience, the larger television audience preferred Kennedy.

After 14 years in Washington, Nixon returned to his native California, became counsel of a large Los Angeles law firm, and wrote his political memoir, Six Crises (1962). His yearly income exceeded his total earnings for the previous 14 years, but wealth could not substitute for political power.

maryann, Wednesday, 7 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

six years pass...

you're all the st.lunatics to my nelly.

-- ethan, Sunday, November 4, 2001 8:00 PM (6 years ago) Bookmark Link

and what, Friday, 1 August 2008 17:09 (seventeen years ago)

as a teenager i was convinced i was going to be a successful techno dj like dave clarke or something. it was inevitable, it HAD to happen. this was before i'd ever laid hands on or learned anything about decks/mixing/selection or even knew much about techno at all, everything would just fall into place. the idea faded by the time i was 17 or 18 and realised there were millions of tools just like me out there dreaming of something similar. by the time i got decks i realised it was just going to be a fun hobby and the odd unpaid gig.

i think this is part of the reason teenagers can be so arrogant, because they're destined to be a genius, just you wait and see, world!

although if you are to succeed in any competitive field you need an almost delusional sense of self-belief (talent and hard work help too, i suppose)

jeremy waters, Friday, 1 August 2008 17:22 (seventeen years ago)

come on, i bet you all wanted to be ballerinas or astronauts or some shit.

jeremy waters, Friday, 1 August 2008 19:40 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.