― Peter Boyle, Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― toby (tsg20), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jon Williams!!!!! (ROFFLE!@!@!@) (ex machina), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jon Williams!!!!! (ROFFLE!@!@!@) (ex machina), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Timothy Leary, Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)
But more opinions would be great, if anyone has them.
― Peter Boyle, Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:56 (twenty-one years ago)
I remember Catch 22 as being, as John said, rich and dark, but I read it when I was 18 or 19, so I was more susceptible to that kind of stuff. I don't know if the satire would work on me as well today.
― Scott CE (Scott CE), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― mcd (mcd), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:32 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm probably sounding like a crotchety old man here, but are they letting you read John Irving in a Literature class?! I call shenanigans on that.
― Ernest P. (ernestp), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:48 (twenty-one years ago)
Yeah, 11th grade literature.
And no, they aren't comparable, but they're on a list of books I have to read this summer and I didn't know which one to get (I have to pick one of the two.)
― Peter Boyle, Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 06:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 06:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 10:20 (twenty-one years ago)
(someone told me that last scene is cribbed from a russian novel - true/false?)
― Johnney B (Johnney B), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 10:58 (twenty-one years ago)
That said, they're pretty different works. OM is Victorian in style and structure (if not content), while C-22 is more original and modern formally. Their concerns are quite varied, too.
― JC-L (JC-L), Thursday, 24 June 2004 14:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― leigh (leigh), Thursday, 24 June 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― People love Gravity and Ebullition! (ex machina), Thursday, 24 June 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Morley Timmons (Donna Brown), Thursday, 24 June 2004 20:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― pepektheassassin (pepektheassassin), Friday, 25 June 2004 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Skottie, Sunday, 27 June 2004 02:56 (twenty-one years ago)
morley, just got over with 158 pound marriage.. didnt do much for me either
― cheeesoo (cheeesoo), Sunday, 27 June 2004 19:12 (twenty-one years ago)