Chicago's crazy new $400 million park. What do you think of it?
― St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Monday, 19 July 2004 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Monday, 19 July 2004 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Monday, 19 July 2004 14:31 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm not sure what I think about it. It seems like it was set up on a faulty premise. That is, it was designed above all to impress, to be an Event, when really what it has to be (for posterity, or maybe just after this September) is a park. But I didn't notice many places to sit, whether benches or sloping sections of grass.
I can't imagine the "water sculptures" being much more--after the initial, admittedly real, "wow factor" wears off--than a sort of iconic presence without any real relationship to the city and its people.
But the Gehry theater seemed extremely cool, and the Harris theater on Lake St. will likely be pretty useful (and the roof was a nice space for a multimedia event).
On the other hand, that neoclassical colonnade at the northwest corner seems pretty pointless, although a friend suggested to me that it was some kind of homage to a monument that had stood there before (? if so I don't remember it).
*May not be true.
― amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 19 July 2004 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 19 July 2004 15:35 (twenty-one years ago)
I think it's trying very hard to be "cultural." (My boyfriend was commenting that the grand opening event was probably the closest thing to the Columbia Exposition we'll ever see, which I think is apt and related to a certain self-conscious modernism I've noted in the vibe and surrounding hype.) I was impressed with the Gehry Pavilion (from a distance I didn't know how I felt about it, but the perspective from underneath it is pretty amazing) and I like the way the buildings reflect in the Kapoor Bean/Cloud Gate sculpture. I'm ambivalent at best about the water sculptures--they don't seem to work with the pavilion or the bean. Some friends of mine were commenting that it seems like it would be interesting to make them more dynamic and use them as a showcase for other video art besides the slightly creepy big faces.
I think the pavilion will prove useful, but I'm not sure about the rest of it in terms of functionality. It will be interesting to see how people feel about it in ten years.
― mck (mck), Monday, 19 July 2004 16:50 (twenty-one years ago)
all seemed cool to me. better than what was there (i think, it's been so long all i can remember being there are walsh construction vehicles).
― otto midnight (otto midnight), Monday, 19 July 2004 16:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 19 July 2004 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 19 July 2004 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)
This will happen within five years, I guarantee.
― St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Monday, 19 July 2004 17:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 19 July 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Monday, 19 July 2004 17:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 19 July 2004 17:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Monday, 19 July 2004 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)
just let me know and i'll be there. it turns out i had saturday night free anyway, i thought the new year was playing friday and saturday so we bought tickets for the second show. turned out it was thursday and friday so we missed out.
― otto midnight (otto midnight), Monday, 19 July 2004 17:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 19 July 2004 18:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― otto midnight (otto midnight), Monday, 19 July 2004 18:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Monday, 19 July 2004 18:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 15:33 (twenty-one years ago)
10 years old.
― jaymc, Saturday, 12 July 2014 16:17 (eleven years ago)