― Maxwell von Bismarck (maxwell von bismarck), Saturday, 24 July 2004 18:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 24 July 2004 19:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 24 July 2004 19:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 24 July 2004 19:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― AaronHz (AaronHz), Saturday, 24 July 2004 19:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian c=====8 (orion), Saturday, 24 July 2004 19:24 (twenty-one years ago)
Fitzgerald's translation doesn't retain the hexameter of the original greek, but it is also a good translation, and you may find it more engrossing than Lattimore. Compare passages and read the introductions/notes in both before you decide which you prefer.
Fagles relies heavily on contemporary colloquial speech, and too often sacrifices the beauty and simplicity of language in the Greek in an effort to have the dialogue and narrative "make sense" to modern readers.
Pope's translation is beautiful, but has been criticized for excessively dressing up Homeric language, though many people consider this the best translation.
If you are reading a prose translation, you are not reading the Illiad but about the Illiad, as prose is a vehicle as far removed from ancient Greek oratory as film.
― Ryan McKay (Ryan McKay), Saturday, 24 July 2004 22:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Maxwell von Bismarck (maxwell von bismarck), Sunday, 25 July 2004 00:15 (twenty-one years ago)
What?
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 25 July 2004 00:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian c=====8 (orion), Sunday, 25 July 2004 00:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 25 July 2004 00:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian c=====8 (orion), Sunday, 25 July 2004 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)
"Describe in detail the activities of Zeus and Hera in Book IV."
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 25 July 2004 00:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Miss Lonelyhearts (Jaromil), Sunday, 25 July 2004 00:56 (twenty-one years ago)
I looked at some chapters from them side by side, and I ended up choosing Fagles for my first go-around with Homer. (I'm actually just about to start Iliad next week.)
Lattimore seems too stilted to me, and Fitzgerald is decent but eh. I thought Fitzgerald's Aeneid was a bit mediocre too, so not surprising. But I guess maybe this is one of those works that really needs to be re-read in several translations to really get a feel for the original lying somewhere in between all the translations.
― Girolamo Savonarola, Sunday, 25 July 2004 01:47 (twenty-one years ago)
Chapman? Which I have a copy of.
An example is when I moved to New York after getting my MFA in Iowa City. I’d lived here not that long—maybe a month. And one day I walked into this coffee shop wearing these bright green pants. The guy behind the counter said, “Nice pants! Where did you get those?”I told him I got them in Iowa City. He was like, “Where’s that?”And I said, “Um, it’s in eastern Iowa.”“Oh,” he said, “I thought it was a store.”That was the oar moment.
I told him I got them in Iowa City. He was like, “Where’s that?”
And I said, “Um, it’s in eastern Iowa.”
“Oh,” he said, “I thought it was a store.”
That was the oar moment.
http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2015/05/by-heart-writing-means-wandering-into-the-unknown/393602/
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 5 June 2015 20:43 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsG_yPKAor4
― he quipped with heat (amateurist), Friday, 5 June 2015 21:12 (ten years ago)
i went crazy for lattimore's iliad last year. the stiltedness people talk about was just alien enough; the repetition was incantatory. not much to compare it to tho as i'd previously only read a prose translation (dunno which one; it was an old penguin).
― difficult listening hour, Friday, 5 June 2015 21:20 (ten years ago)