But what I've been led to believe are the following differences:
- Average age of a raver is younger in the US (about 16-17 compared to abou 19-20 in the UK) - Candy ravers (Wtf? British attire is usually camopants and dreadlocks - not dummies and beads) - Acts: Oakenfold and Shadow will play raves in the States but in the UK you're more likely to see DJ Scruttocks and his Bangalanga Getdown Van. - Commerciality: more commercialised in the States? I don't know about this one. - It seems a lot less scummier than British raves. - Legality - UK raving has been illegal for ages, but the US has only recently passed the Rave Act.
Can anyone confirm these or tell me more about the differences?
― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 07:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 07:30 (twenty-one years ago)
Meaning US raves have bigger name performers? Depends on which you go to. Perhaps those in the UK only hear about the big name DJ-ed, corporate sponsored American raves
- Commerciality: more commercialised in the States? I don't know about this one.
Again, depends on which raves you're talking about. I think on the whole raves in the States are still a lil bit more 'underground' than in the UK.
- It seems a lot less scummier than British raves. Then it must be REALLY scummy in the UK.
- Legality - UK raving has been illegal for ages, but the US has only recently passed the Rave Act.
They were illegal from day one here.
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 07:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 07:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 08:03 (twenty-one years ago)
Yeah, I thought raves were pretty much dead in the U.S. by 1998, 1999. Why are we still talking about raves? Dumpster Diving is the new rave in the U.S.
― cramedog, Wednesday, 4 August 2004 12:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Holy Crap! Typhoon is Coming!!! :O (ex machina), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 12:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 12:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Holy Crap! Typhoon is Coming!!! :O (ex machina), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 12:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 12:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 12:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 12:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 12:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jay79, Wednesday, 4 August 2004 13:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 13:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 13:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 13:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Adam from the L:')DN (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)
???
― Lukas (lukas), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 16:37 (twenty-one years ago)
i haven't heard anyone mention a rave or going raving in about 5 years.
― Anthony (Plato Guy), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― paulhw (paulhw), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 20:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― kephm, Wednesday, 4 August 2004 20:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)
??? There wasn't a specific NO RAVES, KIDDOS law, but trespassing and throwing a huge overnight party on that trespassed property has always been illegal in the US. Yes, from the mid-90s on there were promoters---who were sick of their parties getting busted---who tried to obtain permits, hire off-duty cops as security, etc and throw a legal rave, but this more or less put the nail in the rave coffin.
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 22:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 22:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 22:51 (twenty-one years ago)
xpost
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 22:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 22:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 5 August 2004 01:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 5 August 2004 03:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Thursday, 5 August 2004 03:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Thursday, 5 August 2004 03:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Thursday, 5 August 2004 10:21 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-rave-ecstasy-20100705,0,1073843.story?track=rss
― buzza, Monday, 5 July 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)
I know this is tactless to say, but Yuritzi Meza is HOT!
― PappaWheelie V, Monday, 5 July 2010 16:51 (fifteen years ago)
A connection between raves and ecstasy? Well I never.
― rhythm fixated member (chap), Monday, 5 July 2010 16:53 (fifteen years ago)
Has this book been mentioned on ILM?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_FcK7EMX3A
― mmmm, Monday, 5 July 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)
The drug's prevalence is no surprise to national and local officials, who report increases in both its supply and demand in Los Angeles County. In 2005, 4.5 of every 10,000 people entering treatment for substance abuse in Los Angeles County said Ecstasy was their primary drug of choice. By 2009, it was 33.6 — more than seven times as many.
The prevalence is no surprise, having increased from an alarming 0.045% of problem cases to a whopping 0.3%!!!!
― oh shit a ◕‿‿◕ (sic), Tuesday, 6 July 2010 00:31 (fifteen years ago)
That's some statistic relevancy, there.
― mh, Tuesday, 6 July 2010 02:11 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ6JwVmAMqI
― kkvgz, Thursday, 28 July 2011 16:30 (fourteen years ago)