arabs respond to michael moore's film

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
From the New York Times:

Arabs Riveted and Angered by 'Fahrenheit'
By NEIL MacFARQUHAR

Published: August 4, 2004


CAIRO, Aug. 1 - When it opened last weekend in Beirut, "Fahrenheit 9/11" achieved the almost impossible: It silenced a movie audience. Although Beirut is the one capital in the region where almost all American films are shown with no censorship, screenings are somewhat more social affairs than elsewhere in the world, with people chattering on their cellphones or with their friends in the audience.

But the unheard of happened during the initial showings of the film, Michael Moore's angry documentary about President Bush. A cellphone began ringing, and the rest of the audience hissed loudly that the owner should shut it off, prompting virtually all the people in the rapt theater to whip out their phones and silence them, too.

Also unusual for an American documentary, the film is expected to receive wide play in the Arab world. It has already been in theaters for several weeks in the Persian Gulf, and censors in Syria and Egypt have approved the film, although no screenings have been scheduled in those countries.

A few critics have weighed in, arguing that Arabs should not be so gleeful about the movie's Bush bashing, given that the image of the region and its people that "Fahrenheit: 9/11" presents is not so positive.

Mamoun Fandy, an expert on Saudi Arabia based in Washington, wrote an op-ed article in Asharq Al Awsat, the Arabic newspaper in London, blasting the movie as racist and making faulty generalizations about Arabs, who, he argued, should not hail it as supporting their cause.

Kuwait barred the movie as offensive to its Saudi neighbors, and the Saudi ambassador to London, Prince Turki al-Faisal, was quoted in the London-based Arabic daily daily Al Hayat as saying the movie twisted the truth and was inadequately researched. (There are no movie theaters in Saudi Arabia, out of concern they would allow the forbidden mingling of the sexes, but the film is said to be widely circulated there via DVD.)

At the packed Beirut screenings many in the audience glued to the film said it showed them a way that America works with which they were unfamiliar. "What really struck me is how the American administration was able to manipulate the American people," said Leila Kanso, a 59-year-old social worker. "How can a government do that?"

Many said they wanted to know more about the reaction to the movie among Americans, who have bought more than $103 million in tickets.


Leena Saidi in Beirut contributed reporting for this article.


mtrst, Thursday, 5 August 2004 18:16 (twenty-one years ago)

and women respond to bass

renegade (Affectian), Thursday, 5 August 2004 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I read another story that said the most prevalent Arab reaction was, "What about Israel?" They were upset that Moore left out the vast Jewish conspiracy.

spittle (spittle), Friday, 6 August 2004 00:35 (twenty-one years ago)

"vast Jewish conspiracy"

Obviously, there is no such thing. But I have to admit, when I was building my own hell and had to choose whether George Bush was more evil than Ariel Sharon, I paused and though for a long moment.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 6 August 2004 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)

though=thought

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 6 August 2004 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)

There's no jewish conspiracy now?

Andrew (enneff), Friday, 6 August 2004 03:48 (twenty-one years ago)

blasting the movie as racist and making faulty generalizations about Arabs, who, he argued, should not hail it as supporting their cause.

The movie had a few too many unexplained shots of Bush Sr. standing with sinister anonymous arabs for my taste. It was like "If he's meeting with an Arab, they must be doing something EVIL"

Symplistic (shmuel), Friday, 6 August 2004 06:29 (twenty-one years ago)

"far from hating Arabs as they claim, the Bush family actually LIKES them!!"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 6 August 2004 07:05 (twenty-one years ago)

the peculiarities of the Bush family, their rarified circle of associates, clashes with the propaganda needs of the people who surround GWB; i think this is the main thing Moore's pointing out

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 6 August 2004 07:07 (twenty-one years ago)

The movie had a few too many unexplained shots of Bush Sr. standing with sinister anonymous arabs for my taste. It was like "If he's meeting with an Arab, they must be doing something EVIL"

OTM

ENRQ, Friday, 6 August 2004 07:22 (twenty-one years ago)

"What really struck me is how the American administration was able to manipulate the American people," said Leila Kanso, a 59-year-old social worker. "How can a government do that?"

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Friday, 6 August 2004 20:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Seriously that has got to be one of the most naïve quotes ever

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Friday, 6 August 2004 20:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, it's only in a functional democracy that there's any need for a particular government to actually, successfully mislead people. A lot of other places, it's sort of understood when governments are fucking with people, and it's sort of understood when people are safer just smiling and playing along.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 6 August 2004 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I've talked to people who have said "And then Bush was meeting with some Saudis, and it was really crazy!" or something along those lines.

"Liberals" are weird sometimes.

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 6 August 2004 20:51 (twenty-one years ago)

A lot of other places, it's sort of understood when governments are fucking with people
Sure, in a totalitarian society you don't have to worry as much about having to mislead, because you have the option of, say, jailing and torturing people who protest or write an editorial criticising the goverment. Then, your people don't have the easy means to discover how they are being misled, whereas in a functional democracy there's loads of information at people's disposal so you have to do a better job of presenting your viewpoint (and convince people that they are not being misled, because nobody likes being misled).

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 6 August 2004 23:06 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.