― g@bbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 1 September 2004 00:49 (twenty years ago)
The blog in question: http://www.blogactive.com/
― Layna Andersen (Layna Andersen), Wednesday, 1 September 2004 08:37 (twenty years ago)
More strongly, however, this person has a right not to discuss their private life. Is the fact that a gay person followed the party line and voted against gay marriage any more reprehensible than the fact that a straight person voted against it? They voted not to allow some people the rights enjoyed (taken for granted, perhaps) by others in their society. Why should their sexual orientation be an issue? I'm assuming this person is standing as a reactionary - why, then, be surprised when they turn out to be precisely that?
Ultimately, the policies his person supports are (or should be) far more important than what (or who) he likes to do in his spare time.
― hobart paving (hobart paving), Wednesday, 1 September 2004 10:03 (twenty years ago)
― hobart paving (hobart paving), Wednesday, 1 September 2004 10:10 (twenty years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 1 September 2004 11:15 (twenty years ago)