Woman Loses Job Because of Kerry Sticker

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/news/040912/sticker.shtml.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 04:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, there's a no-brainer lawsuit waiting to happen.
Her union will slap the boss so hard with the pages of their collective agreement, they'll be able to read its text off of his face.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 04:10 (twenty-one years ago)

urge to kill...rising.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 04:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I think employers should get to block vote for their emloyees, kind of like the old rotten boroughs.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 04:17 (twenty-one years ago)

What an economic girly...uh, girl.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 04:18 (twenty-one years ago)

That letter in the paycheck envelope is ridiculous.

dean? (deangulberry), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)

i hate people, moreso every day

Lt. Kingfish Del Pickles (Kingfish), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 04:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Is there no-one in Alabama intelligent enough to point out that a guy who is a bankruptcy lawyer might well be having a very good run under Bush? Pfff.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 05:45 (twenty-one years ago)

She should go back to that factory, sportin' a newly-legalized 30-mag rifle with flash suppressor!

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 11:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Wow, just imagine if it had been a Nader sticker.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 12:10 (twenty-one years ago)

"her union" - are we sure she's got one?

chris herrington (chris herrington), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 12:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I think Alabama might be a "right to work" state.

Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 12:18 (twenty-one years ago)

union or no union, surely this must be illegal? i mean it'd be illegal here and we don't even have a constitution...

please americans, tell me this cockfarmer of a boss did something that is really actually illegal?

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 12:19 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not sure that it's technically illegal, as in criminal. But I do think she can bring civil charges for wrongful termination.

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 12:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Alabama has unions. I know because one time my neighbor came home late from work with his windshield smashed in by picketers.

I don't have much to say about this except that there are parts of my home state that aren't so bad, even though stories like this remind me of why I used to always say the only thing to do in Alabama was try to escape.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)

This is amazing. If I were her I would own the plant.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean, opportunity only knocks once.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, I heard Mister Young sing about her.
Well, I heard ole Neil put her down.
Well, I hope Neil Young will remember
a southern man don't need him around anyhow.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:26 (twenty-one years ago)

honestly that this happened in Alabama seems incidental to me. There just seems to be a pervading mood in the country that says "dissent is unpatriotic" and if I can feel that in NYC of all places, it couldn't happen anywhere.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:28 (twenty-one years ago)

it could, sheesh, I can't even write today.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)

(This does not change the fact that she should soon own all of this man's assets, stence.)

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:37 (twenty-one years ago)

i hate people, moreso every day

you took the words out of my mouth.

There just seems to be a pervading mood in the country that says "dissent is unpatriotic"

yeah, this really bothers me. my mom teaches in a small town in michigan, and people have really been giving her crap about not voting for bush. and that's without any stickers or badges or anything. she got so pissed off about it that she joined the local dems and started going door to door and making calls. i just wish that more people would get pissed and actually do something about it, rather than just go along with the mob mentality.

colette (a2lette), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I have to say, I have been reluctant to put a Kerry sticker on my car because there is a certain right wing nutball at work and I'm a little afraid of how he might react. He's not my boss or anything, but I just don't want to get into any arguments or confrontations with him.

Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Funnily enough I DON'T feel that pervading mood here in DC. I CERTAINLY didn't feel that way when I was in the military, I mean Clinton jokes etc. fly freely but then again so do the Dubya ones, I guess politics are handled rather more professionally when you're effectively talking about your boss(es). I don't know, I'm not sure if I can really say anything because frankly every time I hear stories like this all I can think is that the rest of the world must be really incredibly rude and unprofessional and I work in some strange bubble of workplace propriety where everybody has boring hair.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:38 (twenty-one years ago)

(xpost) OMG you should put the sticker on his car! (use Post-Its so that it can be easily removed and you can't be accused of vandalism)

Dan Perry '08 the Extremely Helpful (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Did everyone in the army have really wacky hair?

xpost

Wooden (Wooden), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)

(This does not change the fact that she should soon own all of this man's assets, stence.)

Oh I agree, she should sue the bastard, and more than likely will win. I just would prefer that this thread not devolve into Alabama-bashing because I do think this could happen anywhere.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I like TOMBOT's point about military attitudes and how things internally are very different from the way thy're perceived; I had many preconceptions about military life challenged, first when my brother joined the Air Force but especially when I graduated from college and worked with a lot of ex-military and current military people to the point where if it wasn't for the whole war issue I was seriously considering joining (there's a lot of discipline there that I admire and could use in my life).

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)

We often wonder if our neighbors across the street hate us. We have two neighbors directly across the street from us and the one neighbor has a PROUD AMERICAN bumper sticker on her car and the other neighbor has a TERRORIST HUNTING LICENSE sticker on his truck along with some other patriotic sticker. On our truck: IMPEACH BUSH! We are outnumbered and outgunned, but I'm scarier looking than all of them so I don't worry about it too much.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Strange how everyones seems to forget that if Kerry were to get in, he'd still be president of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and not, I dunno, Yemen or something.

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:48 (twenty-one years ago)

That shows how much you know, Mark.

Yemenites for Kerry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Yemenites for Kerry

hot chocolate nearly out my nose, there.

colette (a2lette), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh I agree, she should sue the bastard, and more than likely will win. I just would prefer that this thread not devolve into Alabama-bashing because I do think this could happen anywhere

I wouldn't assume that she can win under wrongful termination as many states in the Confederacy strongly favor the employer with regards to employment "rights". If she were in California she would already have a bevy of attorneys lined up by now, but down here my guess is that she probably is fucked. Even if she sued and won wrongful termination, my prediction is that her best case scenario is that a) she'd get her job back + any back wages owed and b) perhaps some extra compensation though nothing significant. Certainly nothing in the Fuck You Money range.

Right to work states have unions, and Alabama is one of them.

don carville weiner, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I dunno, a family member of mine in Alabama didn't have that much of a problem with a similar situation. Granted, I don't think discrimination on political grounds is very common, but I don't think it's unwinnable.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Can she sue for violation of civil liberties/ freedom of expression?

Seems like she ought to be able to have one of the guy's legs cut off or something.

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Can she sue for violation of civil liberties/ freedom of expression?

not exactly, I think the only thing she could be able to sue for would be wrongful termination, since, y'know, the dude didn't like take the sticker off, or something. But I'm not a lawyer. Anyway, even if she wouldn't necessarily win (though I think she might), she might be able to wring a settlement outta the jerk (though as Don stated that might not be in the Fuck You Money range).

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:10 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not that it's unwinnable. It's that, generally speaking, political discrimination is not protected by the law. She would probably argue her right to free speech, but that's not generally explictly protected depending on the locale--sometimes, as you may know, even municipalities have different laws than the rest of the state. But I can say if she was somewhere in Georgia she'd almost certainly have no case.

And the greater point is whether or not it would be worth it. No jury down here is going to award her millions of dollars for this--worse, she might be under the auspice of mediation or arbitration arranged by her employer. She could sue for wrongful termination but it's not like it's going to be gender or racial-based (two things that are explicitly protected assuming the company is large enough) so she'll likely win her job back and little else. People don't generally like to go back to a place where they've been fired, especially if they are forcing the employer to re-hire them.

don carville weiner, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)

But he tried to limit her free speech through coercion. Seems like it's more than just being fired for an unjust reason. He threatened her livelihood in an attempt to silence her. It goes beyond an employer/employee relationship - he was abusing his power over her.

And it wouldn't have to be a jury trial. And wouldn't it be a federal court, not a state court? (For the free speech case, not the wrongful termination case.)

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)

if kerry wins she has to stage a dance party on this guy's parking lot

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Note to self : never live in the southern USA.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

She should put the factory's address on every ultraliberal mailing list out there.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:17 (twenty-one years ago)

(xpost like that's unique to the South! Let's not kid ourselves here.)

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah clearly it's not unique to the South if you read scott's post about his neighbors - y'know, since he lives on Martha's Vineyard aka Kennedy Central.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:19 (twenty-one years ago)

She was fired without justifiable reason - political discrimination is irrelevant to the argument, and only comes into the equation if there's some fucked up law that says you're allowed to fire an employee for showing a political affiliation. This is purely about employment law.

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:23 (twenty-one years ago)

This enrages me. I hope she sues the fuck out of him.

Je4nne Ć’ury (Jeanne Fury), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry Dan.

Note to self : Never move to the USA.

My real beef, of course, isn't with people like Scott's neighbours. But living in a state where employers have the right to fire you because of the way you think? No thanks.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not clear that employers in Alabama have that right, though.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:31 (twenty-one years ago)

It's at moments like these I'm so glad I work for the state.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:31 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not clear, but even the fact that we're discussing this as anything other than a no-brainer violation of a factory worker's collective agreement really bugs the shit out of me.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Example of a prior case where an employee was awarded damages for wrongful/free speech termination:
http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=9319

.. not exactly the same, but there is precedent for awarding extra damages.

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:36 (twenty-one years ago)

there are a number of protected classes that vary by locale. you generally cannot be fired on the basis on your gender, race, national origin or disability in most states. some places extend those protections further... sexual orientation, for example. but "right to work" states (like the one i'm in, texas) heavily favor the employer when it comes to stuff like this.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 15:42 (twenty-one years ago)

What does "right to work" mean? Can someone give a concise definition that makes sense to us Englanders?

(I am NEVER living in a country where I can legally be fired at any time for any reason, and where I can legally quit a job without notice)

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 15:46 (twenty-one years ago)

oh yeah, religion is also a protected class.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 15:46 (twenty-one years ago)

But if it's a free speech issue, it goes to a federal appellate court I think, and not a local/county decision.

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)

"right to work" basically means you cannot be forced to join or pay dues to a union in order to work somewhere.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 15:49 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.boli.state.or.us/technical/taprocls.html

the left column applies nationwide and lists protected classes. these apply to the factory as long as there's more than 15 people working there. political opinion isn't a protected class (neither is sexual orientation, nationwide).

i'm sure there's better lists, but i'm doing work as well, and it's the first one i found that was ok.

colette (a2lette), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Markelby, don't you value the right to just walk out of work one day and never come back? I'm about to exercise this right VERY SOOON NOW!

Towelette Pettatucci (Homosexual II), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 15:54 (twenty-one years ago)

How did we get into protected classes? This doesn't have anything to do with protected classes. Her political beliefs are irrelevant. Her employer fired her over a message that was on her car. It doesn't matter what the content of the message was.

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 15:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, we're losing sight of his basic hypocrisy: he felt free to put his opinions where his employees had no choice but to look at them, but refused to extend something he'd probably call a right to his employees, even fractionally, if they did not share his views. It would be more relevant legally if other employees had bumper stickers, and especially if they had political ones. If he wants to whack a samizdat into his employees' paycheques he has to respect their rights to express politics too. It doesn't matter if he's the owner.

WHERE IS A SPIN DOCTOR TO POINT OUT THAT BANKRUPTCY LAWYERS DO GREAT UNDER BUSH?

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

I dunno, Mandee. If a job's not working out you give notice, assuming you're on a contract, right? I guess it's fine for casual or temp workers. Maybe I wasn't thinking straight. The employee has a responsibility to his/her boss too.

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)

(xpost) Also, and this is something my magazine covers in the small print: opinions expressed are in all cases those of the individual and in no way reflect the organisation as a whole.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 16:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Well... maybe this is just me, but I have never signed a contract before. In theory, I could just up and leave and never come back. The way I figure it, if they were to can me tomorrow, they wouldn't give me 2 weeks notice, so why should I?

Towelette Pettatucci (Homosexual II), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 16:13 (twenty-one years ago)

2 weeks notice is just a courtesy. You're under no obligation.

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 16:13 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah I've never signed a contract either. Generally I'd like to give two weeks notice, but at my current job I wish something as petty as a bumpersticker would be enough.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 16:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Aren't contracts are British thing? Or, at least, not an American thing? You sign papers saying you'll follow office policy and whatnot, but not an actual work contract.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 16:16 (twenty-one years ago)

some jobs here are contract jobs, though at least in the industries I've worked in they tend to be for higher-ups instead of lowly grunts like myself.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 16:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Her political beliefs are irrelevant. Her employer fired her over a message that was on her car. It doesn't matter what the content of the message was.

again, this is not a free speech issue. nobody can stop her from putting a kerry bumper sticker on her car. but her boss can fire her for doing it if he wants to.

If he wants to whack a samizdat into his employees' paycheques he has to respect their rights to express politics too. It doesn't matter if he's the owner.

i agree that he should, but he doesn't have to, at least not according the employment laws of the united states and alabama.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)

It IS a free speech issue because he's using his power as her employer to keep her from speaking freely. There are tons of court cases where employers were sued (successfully) for firing an employee for something they said.

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)

British company: unless you are employed on a 'casual' basis (where you can be shitcanned at any time and although you qualify for a statutory paid holiday period from your boss, in reality many bosses stick red tape around their ears to avoid hearing such requests) you generally have to give notice. Often the people will say you can go home now, and they will pay you for holiday time untaken and the month's wages you'd have to give.

Generally one pay period's notice (usually a month in the UK) is the done thing.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)

re-reading the article I'm not sure that she doesn't have grounds on retaliation or something like that (but then again obv. I'm not a lawyer). Also the way she tells it, unfortunately it sounds like the douchebag employer will try to make it seem like she quit.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 16:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Employers have a lot of leeway when it comes to firing, but it does have to relate somehow to the employee's performance on the job.

No it doesn't. In many locales you can fire someone strictly because they are gay, no matter what their job performance is.

He can fire her for no reason, but if he gives a reason, it can't violate her rights.

Her rights are only determined by relevant local laws or, if the company qualifies, by various aspects of the Civil Rights Act, which only covers protected classes.

Free Speech is not a protected right in a private workplace.

Your employer (in the private sector) can prevent you from speaking freely.

Your employer can fire your ass for working on the Kerry campaign during off hours and in some states, your recourse will be nil.

While there are many cases where employers were successfully sued for firing an employee for something they said, there are tons where employers won. It's no slam dunk.

don carville weiner, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)

But it seems like once this sort of case makes it into court, there's a weird non-technical shift that puts the burden of proof on the employer, to demonstrate some sort of just cause for the termination -- presumably because no list of protected classes could possibly encompass all the various unjust or ridiculous reasons a person could be fired. (Like note that under the present classes, she's not protected for supporting Kerry, but would theoretically be protected for worshipping him.) In most states my guess would be that if she followed up on this and brought suit, she'd find some success; the only thing is that that optimism is sort of tempered by a little bit of pessimism about the Alabama juidiciary and her chances of successfully filing suit in the first place.

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I dunno, I'd think filing suit might not be too difficult if, say, the ACLU or some other legal aid group gets involved. Which might happen, if there's enough publicity about it.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Like note that under the present classes, she's not protected for supporting Kerry, but would theoretically be protected for worshipping him.)

Only if she could validate him as a religion, which, while I get your point, is a large stretch.

there's a weird non-technical shift that puts the burden of proof on the employer, to demonstrate some sort of just cause for the termination

Not necessarily. As I have mentioned, you can fire someone for being gay in most places. Does that fit your description of "just cause"?

You can fire somebody for a lot of really (what I would call) bizarre reasons and never fear a lawsuit. It happens all the time.

(Although, there is a burden of proof that falls on the employer in discrimination cases of adverse impact.)

if she followed up on this and brought suit, she'd find some success; the only thing is that that optimism is sort of tempered by a little bit of pessimism about the Alabama juidiciary and her chances of successfully filing suit in the first place.

Which is why I think this whole thing is a long shot--not Alabama's judiciary, but its relevant code, and the fact that the actual damages would be so comparatively little that it wouldn't be worth getting her job back over.

don carville weiner, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)

It could also be a point in her favour if it could be successfully argued that creed is shown to also mean beliefs in the wider sense rather than just religious beliefs - is creed not what the term would be in the statute itself? Even the biggest private sector asshole cannot discriminate or threaten jobs over a creed issue.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)

too easy. please do not make Creed jokes.

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)

She wouldn't have a prayer using creed as an argument Suzy. Or Creed.

don carville weiner, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)

"She should go back to that factory, sportin' a newly-legalized 30-mag rifle with flash suppressor!
-- dave225 (adspac...), September 14th, 2004 5:08 AM."

This is the funniest thing I read all day

Taxi Dancing in the Soft Prison (Ben Boyer), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Support Bush!

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

That should have read:
Support Bush, Motherfucker!

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Like note that under the present classes, she's not protected for supporting Kerry, but would theoretically be protected for worshipping him.
So, if we Crucify Kerry, and he comes back from the dead, can she get her job back?
How about we just Crucify Kerry just for shits and giggles?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:54 (twenty-one years ago)

the Democratic Party and its representatives in the news media are already doing their best to crucify Kerry.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)

hey yall - http://slate.msn.com/?id=2067578


i'm pretty sure i've told the story of how my 'veteran for kerry' bumpersticker gets me heat from both sides round here

cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:00 (twenty-one years ago)

i have to say i don't completely disagree with the law here

cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I didn't hear that story, but would like to.

Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, same here.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)

She should have gone with one of those stealth bumper stickers, like the one that looks exactly like a Bush-Cheaney sticker until you get up close & see that it says "Bush Cheated."

briania (briania), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I need to get one of those!

Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:09 (twenty-one years ago)

basically in rightwing oconee county (where i live) i get harrassed for the 'for kerry' part and in leftwing athens (where i love) i get harrassed for the 'veteran' part. boohoo o well, least i ain't lost my job yet! yet.

cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Or "Enron/Halliburton 2004," Bush/Cheney-logo style. (Can she be fired for "irony"?)

I like the small, classy crossed-out-"W" stickers.

morris pavilion (samjeff), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:09 (twenty-one years ago)

haha although nothing compares to what happened to this one poor gop schmo's car - he parked downtown, suv with a 'nuke 'em all and let allah sort 'em out' sign in his window. within an hour his car was just brutalised - 'RACIST ASSHOLE', 'BOMB TEXAS', etc., i noticed the florida state tag he had on the front of his car and wrote "WIDE RIGHT" all over it with shoe polish. i'm pretty sure my graffiti pissed him off most.

cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:14 (twenty-one years ago)

from a strictly design standpoint i think the "W" ovals are probably the best loooking campaign stickers outthere, although 'best in show' overall goes to the kerry ringer t's i think.

cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Or "Enron/Halliburton 2004 [bumperstickers]"
I'm stunned that Billionaires for Bush aren't already making these.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Someone is - a Jeep in my workplace's parking lot has one.

morris pavilion (samjeff), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:21 (twenty-one years ago)

She's been hired by the Kerry campaign

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 22:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Ha! Amazing.

chrisco (chrisco), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 22:19 (twenty-one years ago)

See!! The Kerry campaign rules!! I find that ingenious.

There should now be a thread titled 'he's gonna be a one-term president, isn't he?'

Richard K (Richard K), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 22:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Enviromate
P.O. Box 847
Moulton AL 35650
256) 974-9972
johngraham@bellsouth.net

*ahem*, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 23:01 (twenty-one years ago)

you're a little late there

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 23:07 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
Here's a story kinda like that one...
The Boldface Emphasis is mine.

WWW.PHILLYBURBS.COM

LOWER MAKEFIELD
Resident says confusion cost her tickets to Republican rally
By MATT COUGHLIN

COURIER TIMES

A Lower Makefleld woman said she received a rude awakening Wednesday
when she tried to get tickets to see President Bush today in Lower Makefleld.
Simi Nischal got a ride with a co-worker to pick up tickets for herself, her husband, Narinder, and their two children. But just as the tickets were about to be placed in her hands, she was escorted from the Yardley gristmill and told to leave, she said.
" 'I deny you the right to attend this rally,' " Nischal
said a Bush-Cheney campaign worker told her.
Apparently, Nischal's ride was a Kerry-Edwards supporter. Her car sported a bumper sticker for the Democratic candidates.
Nischal, a computer programmer who is originally from India, said her children wanted to see the president.
The family had talked over dinner Tuesday night about attending today's campaign rally at the Broadmeadows Farm in Lower Makefleld.
About lunchtime Wednesday. Nischal's coworker dropped her off at the gristmill to pick up free tickets. When the co-worker returned, rally organizers for Bush and Vice President Cheney apparently noticed the Kerry-Edwards sticker stuck on the car. Nischal said. The organizers asked the co-worker why she was there and she responded, "to pick up Simi." While this was going on, Nischal was in the ticket office fmishing paperwork and showing her identification for her tickets.
"The lady came in and said, 'Who's Simi?' " Nischal tearfully recalled Wednesday night, adding that she identified herself and was then
refused tickets to the rally and escorted from the building.
Shortly after that, a man wearing a Bush-Cheney T-shirt confronted Nischal in the parking lot and told her to leave.
"He was so rude, he made me feel like a criminal," Nischal said. "I said, That's not fair, you are losing a supporter.' [And he said], 'We don't care about your support.' "
Nischal said onlookers cheered and laughed at her as she left the property; But that wasn't the end of the insult, she said.
She said another co-worker took her back to the gristmill to try to clear up the confusion, but she was again refused tickets.
Multiple calls to Bucks County Republican Party headquarters, several party members and the Broadmeadows Farm were not answered. However, rally organizer Hank Miller said he could not comment on the incident because he was not there and had not heard of it.
Nischal said her daughter has been learning about the political process at school and has been a Bush supporter. She even picked up
papers for her daughter to volunteer for the Bush campaign right before she was kicked out of the gristmill, she said.
Nischal said she and her husband had not voted in previous elections, but the couple wanted to set a good example for their daughter by voting this year.
"I was undecided, but we have changed our opinion," .
Nischal said. "You don't treat people that way"
The first thing her son asked when he got home from school Wednesday
afternoon was if they would get to see the president.
Nischal said her son did not understand what happened.
But she said her daughter said she wasn't going to support Bush anymore.

Matt Coughlan can be reached at 215-949-4172

Wow.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 28 October 2004 20:25 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.