People who believe God talks to them--What's going on?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I actually once knew a Christian who claimed that God "speaks" to him in various ways. Telling him what to do, SPECIFIC stuff, not just the logos of the universe or whatever. I gather this is pretty common in religious circles.

If we can assume God is not really talking to them (yes I know this is possibly condescending and intolerant or whatever, but there are limits), what is going on here?

Massive over-rationalization for their own actions?
Low-level, possibly harmless insanity?

And maybe, just maybe, they are lying in the service of justifying their own faith? A kind of competition with other Christians?

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/39350000/jpg/_39350125_bush_ap.jpg

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Read Jon Krakauer's book on mormonism. There is some great stuff about people who feel compelled by god to commit illegal acts and the difficulty of classifying this (and in turn, a large part of the world's religious belief systems) as "insanity".

adam. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:07 (twenty-one years ago)

A bit of all three, I think. I can let it go as long as He doesn't start telling them to burn stuff.

Wooden (Wooden), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Or to invade Iraq.

Wooden (Wooden), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:09 (twenty-one years ago)

GW looks like he is tipping an imaginary pair of shades in that picture. Is there a cool blonde walking out of shot in front of that podium?

adam. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:10 (twenty-one years ago)

It looks more like he's trying desperately to use his powers of telepathy, in vain.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:13 (twenty-one years ago)

DAMN YOU KIM JONG, OPEN YOUR MIND PORTAL AND LET ME IN SO I CAN FEAST ON THE SECRETS HELD THEREIN!!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:14 (twenty-one years ago)

My father in-law has heard from god twice. The first time was apparently when he was told that he had to become a minister. God told him "feed my sheep". So he did.

This all seems quite rational when he recounts it in person.

adam. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Or more likey 'Bend over, Condi. That's it, a little lower...'

xpost

Wooden (Wooden), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:15 (twenty-one years ago)

There is no way to answer this question seriously without an unsatisfying appeal to the mysteries of the universe/religion/etc. or being incredibly condescending to anyone with religious beliefs. It seems like from the way you've phrased the question, you're basically looking for someone to say "OHMYGOD THEY ARE CRAZY RELIGIOUS WACKOS," which I'm not going to be the person to do.

n/a (Nick A.), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I think that ryan is too intelligent for that.

adam. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:19 (twenty-one years ago)

n/a - I'll say it then!

People who believe God talks to them are obviously completely fucking insane (no offence to yr dad, Adam), why are we even bothering discussing this rationally? It's like people who believe the trees or Jimminy Cricket or Shaq or Bilbo Baggins talks to them; just cos one person's completely batshit aural delusion is grander than another person's doesn't mean they're any less fucking crazy in the head.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)

father IN LAW

adam. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd like to think so, but how the hell else is this supposed to be interpreted:
If we can assume God is not really talking to them (yes I know this is possibly condescending and intolerant or whatever, but there are limits), what is going on here?

Massive over-rationalization for their own actions?
Low-level, possibly harmless insanity?

And maybe, just maybe, they are lying in the service of justifying their own faith? A kind of competition with other Christians?

Just because he admits his own condescension doesn't make it any less condescending.

n/a (Nick A.), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:21 (twenty-one years ago)

If you believe in God, what is insane about believing God is talking to you?

n/a (Nick A.), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:22 (twenty-one years ago)

So we are just supposed to avoid this subject entirely?

adam. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:22 (twenty-one years ago)

i think this is an interesting question, and a very very tough one to answer in a useful way.

one interesting spin on it might be: why do some people claiming to act on god's behalf (and perhaps on His specific instructions), gain credibility... and why do so many not gain any credibility at all?

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)

well i admit i do think it is crazy. i also have religious friends and religious people in my family and i love them very much. it's hard to meet them halfway wih respect but i try.

just how should i feel about this sort of thing if i am a non-believer?

lots of x-posts

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Has anyone read The Origin Of Consciousness In The Bicameral Mind?

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Believing God talks to you is INSANE; God actually talking to you is not insane.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I have religius friends and relatives too and I love them to bits, but I am always aware on an almost subconscious level that they are batshit.

NB. I am being comically wankerish on this thread on purpose.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)

OF course some people who believe this could be suffering from a form of schizophrenia, but that's not really that helpful as most of them probably aren't. I guess you have to accept that this is what they believe (is it really that big a jump from the 'inner light' of the Quakers to a voice?), unless it reaches a point when they are a danger to themselves or others - which I think is the only definition of insanity I am close to happy with. "harmless insanity" is just difference, I guess, though that can be hard for some people to accept.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)

It's kind of hard to swallow, but the dude claims that there's a part of the brain that was used to do self-consciousness, before self-consciousness. And that if you stimulate it, even now, people totally get a "voice of god" effect. He has, like, experiments and stuff.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Every time I see a new psychiatrist about my depression, they have a list of questions they ask, and they include "Do you hear voices inside your head?" and "Do you think someone else is controlling or influencing your actions?" I've never suffered from such psychotic delusions, but they're obviously not incredibly rare. If you hear voices in your head and/or think someone else is controlling your actions, and you believe in a god, surely that's the explanation you'd leap at? (I'm a committed atheist, so I don't believe any religious explanations of this.)

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:26 (twenty-one years ago)

i guess another common phenomenon that is similar is near-death experiences.

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:27 (twenty-one years ago)

interestingly claiming that god spoke direcly to you would have been a very bad faux-pas indeed in the days before the reformation (at least, in christendom). you need church authority for that!

seriously, why did numerous people believe john smith (of the mormons)but so many other people who claim god speaks to them, are decried as schizoids and freaks? the vicissitudes of religious belief are pretty fascinating, seeing as they are often largely determined (so i think) by pretty worldly factors.

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post about God spot

Yeah, but the 'God-spot' is king of distracting. If I found a point on your brain I could prod and make you see a chair, it doesn't mean there are no chairs, or that if I sat you in front of a chair and prodded this part of your brain (Ok, I'd be something of a dick, but assume I have your consent), it wouldn't stand to reason to claim there wasn't a chair in front of you. It's kind of a question about whether this part of the brain causes thoughts about God, or is stimulated by thoughts about God, or, indeed, God Himself.

x-post to Martin: Yeah, I got asked all thise questions when I got locked up too. I do believe in God, and that he 'guides' my actions in some way, but I just kept my crazy mouth shut about that.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I imagine a lot of people feel compelled to do something incredibly strongly, and, because of their faith perhaps, put that down to God telling them to do it. But as soon as you begin to hear actual voices of deities, well, you're fucked. Your ego has broken. Western religions are total ego-trips. I'm special, I'm going to heaven. Bollocks off, you're a tosser and porbably insane.

PS. God just told me to go and get ice cream but when I got to the freezer in the garage it was all frozen and frosty and horrid and inedible = I have said bad things here this evening.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:32 (twenty-one years ago)

many religious organizations are vehemently opposed to psychiatry and i think the sort of conflict kevin and martin have pinpointed has a lot to do with that. i think the unspoken (perhaps even unconscious to some extent?) idea is that the faithful ought to decide the validity of religious claims, not the psychiatric establishment.

xpost

see, nick, part of me agrees with you, but also i wonder where this kind of talk gets us. i find it more interesting to think about how and why certain claims are believed by some people (and, often, why those same people stop believing after a certain point).

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:35 (twenty-one years ago)

(it's weird to suddenly turn up as the voice of postructuralism)

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:37 (twenty-one years ago)

(ahem poststructuralism)

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Validity of religious claims surely has to be down almost entirely to the charm and charisma of the claimant the gullibility (for whatever reason) of the followers thereof?

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)

those are factors but i think it's more complicated

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I think I'm gonna go listen to that Genesis song of 'We Can't Dance'. Can't remember the name of it though. Nick, surely most people who believe God has spoken to them, and there are probably more than we realise, don't have followers. Part of what is interesting about it, if we assume it's not insanity (which I believe is is at least some of the time) but lying, is trying to figure out what they gain from the lie. Most of them are going to be ordinary people, not messianic prophets, and probably only tell their spouses or whatever.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)

i think it's more or less the same as that subconcious 'inner voice' everyone has. it's just that religious people tend to interpret it as the voice of god and thus give it more importance.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, I would say so. Or be suffering from a chamical imbalance where internal thoughts become confused with other kinds of experience, ie schizophrenia.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

"honey, did you hear something last night?"

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

seriously, why did numerous people believe john smith (of the mormons)but so many other people who claim god speaks to them, are decried as schizoids and freaks?

i think in the end it comes down to questions of community, god as social bond, and hearing a voice in a certain kind of evangelical community must be a sort of validation, like faith healing.

if there was a religious community that, as you point out about pre-reformation, was prone to think badly of this sort of thing i think it would cease to be expressed, at least publicly.

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

i think it's odd to suggest there's some sort of competition going on...
sure people do want to seem, literally, holier-than-thou, but i don't
think it's fair or intelligent to presuppose their motives that way.

i find joan of arc to be one of the most fascinating stories ever... i am not sure whether
i believe that god really was speaking to her, but i am certain she wasn't just trying to
impress anyone.

the kind of person you're referring to would be an empty, searching person willing to
do anything to get attention... they exist, sure, but you can't lump them in with other
people experiencing other sorts of phenomena (whether that be true divine revelation,
mental illness, or some other inexplicable event).

that said, i certainly hope that at least some of the people who claim to be spoken to by
god are actually being spoken to by god... i would find this to be a much more interesting
world.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:47 (twenty-one years ago)

LYING that God talks to you makes you insane too, just in a different way.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:50 (twenty-one years ago)

why is a practical lie so much different from an esoteric lie?

firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)

when dreyer made his joan film, he wasn't a religious man and presumably didn't care too much about whether god had actually spoken to joan. he was more impressed by the nearly unwavering conviction of this girl in the face of her judges, whose conviction that they were the arbiters of god's law seemed smug and grotesque by comparison.

why did so many choose to believe joan at the time? why was her peculiar conviction so inspiring for some and dangerous for others?

anyway i think we've had a joan of arc thread right?

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:53 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost

there's a lot of really weird middle ground between telling the truth and telling a lie

amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:53 (twenty-one years ago)

interestingly claiming that god spoke direcly to you would have been a very bad faux-pas indeed in the days before the reformation (at least, in christendom). you need church authority for that!

This is still pretty much the case in Catholicism. I grew up in a strongly Catholic environment (rural Southern Ireland), and I never heard anybody claiming God spoke to them, and if they had, the first people to laugh at them would be other believing Catholics. Instruction comes from the priest, not directly from God.

Joe Kay (feethurt), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)

"competition" is probably a poor word, but i still think it is connected to status in the community, even if in a very small sense.

i onced ask my sister about the people in her church who seemed suspiciously moved to a great extent by the word of god and she rolled her eyes. i dont know, however, whether most christians look down upon such ostentatious displays of faith as she does.

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:08 (twenty-one years ago)

She should go to a Church of Scotland (and perhaps England) service. There are no ostentatious shows of faith among 6 old people.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Would someone please answer this question:
If you believe in a god, why is it crazy to believe that it is talking to you?

n/a (Nick A.), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:21 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe if you live in mayberry... but the majority of american communities are so fractured and decentralized that any/all-encompassing spirit indexed community status would be very difficult to gauge on any meaningful level beyond the way the local gossip fiends talk about ms. x and her supposed revelations and whether or not she had the baker in the kitchen. the majority of people, christians, groups, whatever, are fairly insular... having
lived in a few different areas throughout the U.S. and in small and large towns and rich
and poor cities i think that the modern america is not a neighborly community-oriented
place... while city hall may lie under the shadow of a cross, it's much more unspoken unless some detectably radical or fringe-ish element threatens to disturb a place's/peoples' peace.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:22 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't believe it is crazy to believe, i just think most of the people who make the claim seem crazy.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I wish I were closer to insane than I am, frankly.

oops (Oops), Friday, 17 September 2004 00:34 (twenty-one years ago)

oops, I have met some crazy-ass accountants. Their delusions and hallucinations are quite unimaginative, granted.

You do strike me as sane. I myself am extremely sane. Yet I have enough visions and voices to keep me entertained all day long with the TV off! I assure you it's possible.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Friday, 17 September 2004 00:36 (twenty-one years ago)

"Like I said, there's a whole spectrum between sane and insane"

Speaking of SPECTRUMS, I would like to point out that the book I previously suggested, "Grand Illusions: The Spectral Reality Underlying..." by Gregory Little picks up precisedly where Jung left off with his book about UFO phenomenon.

redfez, Friday, 17 September 2004 00:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I love making stuff up in my head! I have internal conversations all the time. I talk to myself. I run scenarios through my mind - often this is very helpful when it is something stressing me and I've no one I can talk to (if I'm having a bad time with depression etc). Religious types might call that praying perhaps. I just do it, I don't label it.

I have had poems come out of my head almost word-perfect in one draft, and had NO idea how I came up with them (rare, but it does happen). Where's that shit come from? It's always in there. The mind is a strange and powerful thing.

Trayce (trayce), Friday, 17 September 2004 00:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I think everyone who doesn't think exactly the same way as I do (ie everybody else in the world) is at least slightly insane.

Surely this is a common way to feel? If not, you're all madder than I thought.

Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 17 September 2004 00:41 (twenty-one years ago)

i agree with wooden, you all seem a little insane to me.

"we all go a little mad sometimes.."

Darraghmac, Friday, 17 September 2004 00:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Yet I have enough visions and voices to keep me entertained all day long with the TV off!

Me too. You can have a very active inner world---crack jokes to yourself, make up songs, ponder anything and everything---yet still be pretty grounded in reality.

oops (Oops), Friday, 17 September 2004 00:43 (twenty-one years ago)

"All the world is mad, save me and thee - and I've doubts about thee"

Trayce (trayce), Friday, 17 September 2004 00:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Madness is repression and denial, in my view. Dishonesty is madness.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Friday, 17 September 2004 00:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Sometimes I think that if others had access to my inner monologue, I'd be locked up in Bellevue. But actually they'd probably just think I was a weirdo. Rightly so.

oops (Oops), Friday, 17 September 2004 00:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey, I found a small excerpt here where he is comparing demonic possession, fairies, incubus/succubus and alien abduction phenomenon. If this seems interesting, you've got to check out the rest of the book! It gets much more interesting. It is not just endless comparison as this excerpt might give indication: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/abduct050.html

redfez, Friday, 17 September 2004 00:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I've had a copy of Man and His Symbols sitting on my shelf for six years now. Guess I should finally check it out.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Friday, 17 September 2004 00:53 (twenty-one years ago)

If 90% of ILX holds the same opinion that you have expressed on this thread (which they don't)

I missed this part! He takes mighty quick surveys.

oops (Oops), Friday, 17 September 2004 00:53 (twenty-one years ago)

wishful thinking, insanity, cold cynical manipulation, or all 3. yup.

Queen Electric Cop Smacker SLAPPITY SLAP! (Queen Electric Butt Prober BZZ), Friday, 17 September 2004 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Only one person I've ever discussed religion with (who believes) has been able to answer the question why do you believe?, and he (an ex-lecturer at the university with a PhD in English lit. and a Powerbook full of downloaded techno and hip hop) said that he believed because he had chosen to, and specifically had chosen Catholicism. He couldn't justify it beyond that; he just said that he felt that most people, and he particularly, felt a need to believe, and that if this was the case they should choose something they felt they could believe in consistently, and he chose Catholicism. He was a good man and I liked him a lot, but this seemed completey irrational to me, even if it seems quite logical at the same time.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Friday, 17 September 2004 06:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Is hearing voices just having a fucked internal dialogue that you cannot control and do not perceive as your own mental voice?

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Friday, 17 September 2004 07:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey, I found a small excerpt here where he is comparing demonic possession, fairies, incubus/succubus and alien abduction phenomenon. If this seems interesting, you've got to check out the rest of the book! It gets much more interesting. It is not just endless comparison as this excerpt might give indication: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/abduct050.html
-- redfez (redfe...), September 17th, 2004.

you ever read Jaques Vallee?

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 17 September 2004 07:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Is hearing voices just having a fucked internal dialogue that you cannot control and do not perceive as your own mental voice?
-- Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (sickmouth...), September 17th, 2004.

i suggested something similar earlier upthread:

i think it's more or less the same as that subconcious 'inner voice' everyone has. it's just that religious people tend to interpret it as the voice of god and thus give it more importance.
-- latebloomer (posercore24...), September 16th, 2004.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 17 September 2004 07:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Indeed you did, but I think my point went a step further - do sane religious people interpret their internal dialogue as the voice of God, or do you need a fucked-up mechanism, an inability to deal with your own internal dialogue, before you start interpreting it as such, and does that make you schizophrenic? One of my best mates (who I was discussing this with this morning) teaches one-on-one Spanish classes, and one of his students is schizophrenic, and it's a bizarre phenomena, a lot to do with weird ego responses and perceived responsibility for things beyond one's control and such, as well as "hearing voices". But if the voices you hear are your internal dialogue whcih has got fucked somehow, then maybe the old "split personality" trope isn't actually that far off.

What this leads to is the question of whether or not all people who believe in religious doctrine of whatever creed are irrational / delusional / insane or not, on an incredibly mild level (which may just be a level of acceptance of received wisdom as opposed to a level of actual engagement with rational argument, which obviously doens't make you insane necessarily, just not interested in / capable of the kind of rationality necessary to conclkude that God doesn't exist - otherwise my [vaguelly] Christian mother would be 'insane'; she doesn't believe in God because he speaks to her but because she thinks or feels or whatever that it's a nice thing to believe and she hasn't ever really engaged seriously with the arguments against), and whether the ones who hear voices are, in addition, schizophrenic or something similar.

Obviously there is SHITLOADS of WILD conjecture here, and I'm sure someone will take offense, but certainly none is meant. I mean I love my mother, obviously, I just think she's completely irrational about some things (like reading The Daily Express, but that's another matter).

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Friday, 17 September 2004 07:42 (twenty-one years ago)

'do sane religious people interpret their internal dialogue as the voice of God, or do you need a fucked-up mechanism, an inability to deal with your own internal dialogue, before you start interpreting it as such, and does that make you schizophrenic?'

I guess it depend on what degree they feel God is talking to them or making them do things. Otherwise non-mentally ill religious people might interpret their interior dialogue as God talking to them. I doubt that requires a truly fucked up or abnormal mechanism. Maybe the voice of 'God' is a part of their subconcious they don't normally access with everyday conciousness so that when they have these 'voices' or thoughts (maybe unleashed as the result of an emotional crisis or some other catalyst) it's interpreted as an "other".

But these people usually can control their own actions, even if 'God' is speaking to them, no? Schizophrenic differ in that they are literally at the mercy of the voices in their heads.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 17 September 2004 08:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Hmmm... Interesting. I'd automatically assumed that hearing the voice of God would necessitate obeying the voice of God, because if you believe in God then surely you bow to His Infinite Wisdom? Disobeying the voice of God either makes you a sinner / infidel or an athiest with a fucked-up mechanism, surely?

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Friday, 17 September 2004 08:10 (twenty-one years ago)

"I'd automatically assumed that hearing the voice of God would necessitate obeying the voice of God, because if you believe in God then surely you bow to His Infinite Wisdom?"

You have a point. Maybe the difference is that they FEEL like they can make the choice between obeying the voices in their head and not obeying (even though in all probability they will)?

Possibly another difference is that their 'voices' are perceived as a break form ordinary conciousness, experienced as an 'other'.

Schizophrenics are largely not able to differentiate between their voices and themselves (which is why they often have 'Jesus' complexes or messiaanic delusions).

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 17 September 2004 08:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Billy's student had a Levellers t-shirt.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Friday, 17 September 2004 08:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Which is kind of the same thing. He's paranoid schizophrenic though; like, if you're having a conversation with him and mention that you've had a bad day, he automatically assumes that it's his fault that you've had a bad day, that he caused it somehow. Does that suggest a massively out of control ego?

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Friday, 17 September 2004 08:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Why does something automatically become more valid when a lot of people believe in it?
-- oops (don'temailmenicelad...), September 16th, 2004 5:10 PM. (later)

Dude, aren't you the one who invoked 90% of ILX agreeing with you as a reason why you're right?

n/a (Nick A.), Friday, 17 September 2004 13:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Disobeying the voice of God either makes you a sinner

Ha! Can we go back to the basic premises of Christianity here?

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 September 2004 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes!

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Friday, 17 September 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Being a sinner != being evil. Being a sinner = being human. That's kind of the entire point of the New Testemant; even though you can't achieve perfection, you can strive for it and oh by the way here are some guidelines on how to do it and don't get too crushed or too upset if you don't always do the right thing because I understand and I love you and next time you'll do better.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 September 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)

A big problem with modern-day Christianity lies directly in the fact that the people who practice it are fallable but often forget this, leading into all kinds of hubris/self-importance that Jesus specifically shuns and castigates all throughout the New Testemant (these are the people who forget that Jesus decided he'd rather hang out with whores than priests because they were better people).

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 September 2004 14:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Also 'cause the whores weren't constantly trying to sodomize him.

Michael White (Hereward), Friday, 17 September 2004 14:32 (twenty-one years ago)

It's all the Jews' fault for being the religion for which Christianity was based! Without the old Testament, sin wouldn't even exist.

Oh, Happy Rosh Hashanah.

dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 17 September 2004 14:37 (twenty-one years ago)

No, that's not why I invoked that. It was a reason why I shouldn't be viewed as some extremist.

You never told me if whether or not you believe these people are actually hearing GOd.

oops (Oops), Friday, 17 September 2004 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)

what do you think i think i'm right about? that god doesn't exist??

oops (Oops), Friday, 17 September 2004 15:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't mean to trample over anyone's beliefs, but Christianity is such a mystery religion grafted onto the Old Testament to give a sense of legitimacy. That doesn't necessarily mean it's "wrong." If everything else evolves, why not religion, right?

redfez, Friday, 17 September 2004 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

The very last time I did E I lay awake terrified all morning believing God was speaking to me. I don't even believe in God, but this was so realistic, the voice was in my head answering all my questions so quickly - so specifically that I knew (or thought I knew) it wasn't just me.

I'd also had a good few bongs but at this point felt totally alert. 'God' told me that the next time I took ecstasy I was going to die, he didn't tell me in which manner, whether it be completely drug induced or by falling under a bus, but this was just so real feeling that however implausible it seemed in the cold light of day I have never touched ecstasy again.

Can't be a bad thing, eh?

Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Friday, 17 September 2004 15:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Not a bad thing, no.. But maybe it wasn't God. Maybe it was just your better judgement. Or Jerry Lewis.

dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 17 September 2004 15:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Could have been my better judgement, yeah. Disguising itself as God because it knew I'd scoff at it otherwise.

Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Friday, 17 September 2004 16:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Rumpy, a couple good books on consciousness and drugs and consciousness are Dean Radin's "The Conscious Universe," which meta-analysis the last century's multi-million dollar research of "Psi" and shows that science actually does statistically indicate evidence for Psi. Once you're done with that, the drug books that go into supernatural/God phenomena are "DMT: The Spirit Molecule" and "Tripping". Forgot the authors of the last two, but they're the only books you'll find under those titles. Then for kicks seek out the official CRV manual used by the military. Fun stuff!

redfez, Friday, 17 September 2004 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks red, I'll have a look. I'm sure I'm not the only one who has heard from the almighty through the medium of drugs!

Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Friday, 17 September 2004 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)

hi all. should i bother reading the last 100 posts to this thread?

thanks,

amateur!!st

amateur!!st, Friday, 17 September 2004 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)

No.

n/a (Nick A.), Friday, 17 September 2004 16:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, read mine. They're cute.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 September 2004 16:26 (twenty-one years ago)

(xpost to latebloomer)
you ever read Jaques Vallee?

Heard of, but never read. I definitely will if you have a suggestion in particular. Thanks to overstock.com, I spend about $100/month on books.

redfez, Friday, 17 September 2004 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)

You do????

Do you want to spend $200/month on a opera singer's career?

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 September 2004 17:00 (twenty-one years ago)

(Sorry, I Read that as $1000, carry on.)

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 September 2004 17:00 (twenty-one years ago)

A small nugget of wisdom...
"When you talk to God, it's called Prayer.
When God talks to You, it's called Paranoid Schitzophrenia."

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Friday, 17 September 2004 17:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Dan--Yeah, I buy everything that looks remotely interesting. Then, I sell the lame stuff on Amazon.com (better than ebay as far as profit goes for sure!) What's kind of annoying is I expect to sell a lot of it, but it ends up being good enough to keep.

redfez, Friday, 17 September 2004 17:06 (twenty-one years ago)

http://simpsons.metropoliglobal.com/famosos/4F05RodneyDangerfield.jpg

amateur!!st, Friday, 17 September 2004 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Joseph. It is Joseph Smith, not John Smith. Anyway, to be a believer you must be a literalist with a mind open to infinite possibilities.

pepektheassassin (pepektheassassin), Saturday, 18 September 2004 15:39 (twenty-one years ago)

(xpost to latebloomer)
you ever read Jaques Vallee?
Heard of, but never read. I definitely will if you have a suggestion in particular. Thanks to overstock.com, I spend about $100/month on books.

-- redfez (redfe...), September 17th, 2004.

get 'dimensions' or 'passport to magonia' first if you can.

also recommended: 'confrontations', 'forbidden science', 'challenge to science' and 'messengers of deception'.

also recommended in that vein (not by vallee though):

'the trickster and the paranormal' by george p. hansen and 'borderlands' by mike dash.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 18 September 2004 16:09 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.