An all-new version of the ILX code is being developed. You can test and comment at
sandbox.ilxor.com.
What is a tesseract?
Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
It's also a rather forgettable book by Alex Garland.
― Nick, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Opps I made my e-mail addy into a link!
hypercube
― james, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Didn't Madeline L'Engle use them in her books somewhere as a metaphor
for creation or something...?
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
It involves ants, and string.
― Benjamin, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I read a book called "A Wrinkle in Time" when I was a kid about 11 or
12 that had that word. I forget what it was all about.
― Sean, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
That would be L'Engle. ;-) And yeah, it threw me when I first
encountered it.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I also thought first of Wrinkle in Time. Wasn't the Tesseract some
sort of creature?
― Samantha, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
the tesseract in Wrinkle in Time is how they teleport across the
universe by bending space/time. But I'm wondering if it has some more
scientific basis.I always thought the fourth dimension was time. I
knwo the fifth dimension did "Up , UP and AWAY"
― Mike Hanle y, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
They also did "Stoned Soul Picnic". But Laura Nyro wrote it.
― Sean, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
It's a fourth dimensional cube. I was going insane one morning,
brushing my teeth trying to remember what the name of a fourth
dimensional cube was, and I ran downstairs and asked everyone in the
house, and they all laughed at me for this saying "Kate is the only
person we know who would think about trans-dimensional geometry while
brushing her teeth..." but none of THEM knew, the bastards. So I
phoned my brother and he immediately knew. So there.
― Ugly Wife, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
but a cube is 3 dimension al by definition. Isnt it? I dont
understand the fourth dimension. Are math tricks involved?
― Mike Hanle y, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Tesseract = fourth dimensional cube : cube = third dimensional square.
Geddit?
― Ugly Wife, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Well, if it was four dimensional it wouldn't be a cube, it would be a
tesseract, I guess?
I remember it from A Wrinkle In Time but I
always thought L'Engle made it up.
― Maria, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
but I thought the fourth dimension was Time? WOuldnt a fourth
dimesnional cube just be a cube that is there for a while?
― Mike Hanle y, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Time is funny coz it is nonreversible in practice (due to entropy) & coz human perception an only see it for a moment. Watching an object pass through our 3-d plane on the 4d axis would make it appear as though the object were transforming over the course of time, "morphing" as it were. Imagine passing a sphere thru a 2d plane and how to a 2d person it would look like a circle getting bigger & bigger then smaller and smaller.
― Sterling Clover, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
actually I have been thinking. Perhaps the reason we only see
fragments of time , like frames in a movie film strip, is because we
are constantly in motion in life due to Universe expansion, and
perhaps if we coul din some way be totally still we would actually
see all of time at once
― Mike Hanle y, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
shurely as our creator and omnipresent ruler you could do this dead
easily.
i was thinking it was like a fjord, don't know why
― carsmilesteve, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
http://adbusters.org/spoofads/fashion/nike/ad.jpg
― Mike Hanle y, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Square = 2d version of shape with square face
Cube = 3d version of shape with square faces
Tesseract = 4d version of shape with square faces (perhaps cube faces
would be more apt, but anyway, hypercube is to cube as cube is to
square)
You can make a 2d "net" of a cube out of squares:
_
_ _|_|_
|_|_|_|_| <-- cut out, fold and stick together to form cube
|_| (imagine sides are square, obviously)
and in theory you can make a net for a tesseract out of cubes, though
my head begins to hurt at this point, so I don't know what it looks
like or how it fits together, and you can't actually fold it, you can
just stare at it and ponder how it would have to fold.
Time is sometimes thought of as *a* fourth dimension. It's not the
only possible interpretation of "fourth dimension". However, because
our brains are better at coping with visualising things changing over
time than they are at picturing other ways of thinking of extra
dimensions, the easiest way to model 4D objects is to think of it as
time and show 3D cross-sections changing over time, or rather due to
primitive early-C21st rendering technology (no holo-vids yet! *sigh*)
as 2D perspective representations of 3D cross-sections of a 4D object
with changes over time representing movement along the fourth axis (k-
blimey, etc).
Akshly I don't know what I'm talking about. At all. Sorry. I expect
some of the maths degree posse will come and rip this to pieces soon.
My maths tutor at uni had done loads of work on 27.4-dimensional
manifolds or something, oo my head, and he tried to explain it to us
in a first-year tutorial once, oooo our heads, just before first-year
exams when we'd finished the actual syllabus, oooooo growing sense of
panic at the thought that maybe we were meant to know this for exams
vudge welcome, eek. But his webpage explaining this stuff
in "layman's terms" (= still more complicated than my 60% of the
easiest year of degree-level maths allows me to comprehend) does have
the ace pun "Euclidean geometry went out with the arc", so I will
forgive. Arf!
Best short trashy sci-fi story about tesseracts = Robert A
Heinlein, "And He Built A Crooked House". I imagine you can guess the
plot, really.
― Rebecca pretends to know stuff she doesn't, again, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
He builds a straight house but knocks it sideways well having sex with
the red headed earthling and uses its crookedness to defended from the
Mars humans who are annexing his corner of the moon of Jupiter?
― Mr Noodles, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I think of time as a fourth axis that all 3d objects stretch out on.
I often try to imagine putting all the frames of a film strip
together and shining a strong bulb thru it all so you could see all
of a time at once
― Mike Hanle y, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
it's this thing
― chris, Friday, 16 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Arrgh I don't get it, Rebecca, will you come to the pub with me one
day and explain it to me with beermats? That's how RickyT tort me
about STACKS and I THINK I understand them although quite possibly I
don't because MY BRANE HURTS. Is there an Uncle Albert book to
explain this? Hmmm, trippetty trap off to Amazong I go!
― Sarah, Friday, 16 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Carl Sagan did the tesseract thing in Cosmos (and you know how I love
Cosmos) - basically, you know how that drawing of two squares
connected by diagonal lines represents a 3D cube in 2D, that in the
3rd D, all angles would be right angles. Well, he had this model of
two cubes inside one another, connected by diagonal lines, which was
a 3D shadow of a tesseract, and a tesseract would have all right
angles again. Oooooohhhh... my dad used to tell me bedtime stories
about this sort of stuff, Mr. Line and Mr. Point and Mr. Square all
living on The Plane and how one day Mr. Cube came along and played
magic tricks on them.
― Ugly Wife, Friday, 16 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Robert A Heinlein = published by the NEW ENGLISH LIBRARY!!!! This is
more than enough recommendation for me. Amazong is not haffing his
books but I AM SO ordering one of the other ones heh heh heh.
― Sarah, Friday, 16 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Carl Sagan rules. Recently made a song about him.
― Mike Hanle y, Friday, 16 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Sarah, why is being published by NEL a particular reccomendation for
you? 'Cos they also published the Richard Allen 'Skinhead' novs?
― Andrew L, Friday, 16 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Going to pub = excellent idea, except I'm currently too poor to go
anywhere with pubs not full of very scary people who'd like to kill
me, hence another exciting Friday night spent at home staring at the
computer. However, I don't think I could explain it with beermats.
I'm not sure I could explain it at all in person. The internet makes
trying to sound like you understand things you don't understand far
easier, though I suppose alcohol might also help. And most of the
London ILE people know far more about these bizarre mathsy physicsy
concepts than I do anyway. Perhaps they will explain it with beermats.
Stories about lines and points and squares living on the plane and
meeting Mr Cube or passing spheres through 2d planes are quite
possibly taken from or based on Flatland: a Romance
of Many Dimensions by Edwin Abbott, which you can read online now
because it was written in 1884 and is now copyright-expired. You can
also read Heinlein's And He Built A
Crooked House online. Whee. Those should waste a few hours at
work. And afterwards you will know as much about tesseracts as I know.
Blimey, I'd forgotten about the Uncle Albert books, I have one of
those. What are stacks, are we talking about push-y pop-y computer
data structure stacks? Can I be taught how to understand compiler
design and distributed systems using beermats? Please?
― Rebecca, Friday, 16 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Tess A. Racked― Kodanshi, Saturday, 17 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Duh!! Ignore that above link.
Instead, go here.― Kodanshi, Saturday, 17 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
bluffin
― Mike Hanle y, Saturday, 17 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
RickyT says yes, those are the stacks. The fact that I was not quite
sure indicates I haf a little way to go in my quest for KNOLEDGE.
COme to the pub Rebecca!
― Sarah, Saturday, 17 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Oh sorry, I didn't see that above. I used to have a friend who
obsessed over New English Library tat and whilst living in Kingston
found a charity shop with a HUGE NEL stock languishing on the
bookshelves. They all tended to be hilarious slices of trash and only
10p each! I really should look up more about them but the fact
remains if I see the NEL logo I know it should be... "interesting"...
― Sarah, Saturday, 17 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
"COme to the pub Rebecca!"
That sounds like an order to me. So, are you going to December Sussed
and the hour or two beforehand? I might actually be there for once.
Unless anyone else doesn't want me there, obviously.
I will probably not explain n-dimensional geometry with beermats, but
I have found my NES and can bring it along for you and Alan to fight
over, heh heh heh. Although I can't find the cable thing to connect
it to the TV. I'm not sure if you need a special cable, either you do
or I'm being really dense. Hrm. And there aren't any game cartridges,
either - I have a vague memory that there's a built-in game which
will run without one but I don't know since I don't have the cable.
What was the other console both of you wanted, was it a Megadrive?
I'll have a look to see if I can find my Megadrive too so you can
both take a console home; I don't like the idea of having to choose
who gets the NES. But I've now found my big bag of retro console
gubbins and it wasn't in there so I have absolutely no idea what I've
done with it, so I might not find it.
― Rebecca, Thursday, 22 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Problem with December Sussed is that it clashes with the Strange
Fruit with CHRYS LYNYRD, TP and those Camera Obscura chancers. Let's
face it, I could give no shits at ALL re: Camera Obscura although
this is probably a personal matter related to my bearing grudges
about bands I've barely heard (they were shit at last SF though) but
Mistopher Chris at least is U&K as he do not come to that London very
often. TP I could catch another time I supose but hrmph stomp change
the date of Sussed! It is the 5th, right?
― Sarah, Thursday, 22 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)