Obviously, they were both pretty interesting guys, but if I had to choose (and I think I must) it would be Disraeli. Both were instrumental in parliamentary reform, especilly the extension of voting rights, but Gladstone couldn't get the reforms passed - it took Disraeli to pass the 1867 reform act (damaging his relationship with members of his own party) and for this he is classic. Also, for furthering the Trade Union movement, establishing the rights to peaceful picketing of employers and generally improving the rights of working people in Britain, Disraeli is a man to be admired. "rights of labour were as sacred as the rights of property" is a pretty good thing to say. On foreign matters he's a bit more muddy, quite imperialist - his main reason for being Queen Victoria's favourite. Gladstone gets props for trying to get home rule for Ireland, but he didn't manage, so never mind. And Disraeli being jewish must be a plus too (okay, a christian convert - but he still had to endure a fair amount of anti-semitism). So, Disraeli wins.
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 17:22 (twenty-one years ago)