The Scottish Parliament

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I've done a search, and we don't appear to have done this yet.

Today is the official opening of the Scottish Parliament building after much controversy, much money, and a huge public enquiry into exactly why it all went so wrong.

So, is it worth it? Has anyone been in it yet? Did we even need a new building? Especially one with "think pods"?

Opinions, rants, whatever. Fire away.

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 9 October 2004 10:14 (twenty-one years ago)

So, is it worth it?
No. What's the latest estimate? Around £450M? Almost as much as a Millenium Dome or a New Wembley. I remember an article that said the main reception desk cost over £100K - that could build three council houses.

Has anyone been in it yet?
I'm going with work to see it just before Christmas. I've been told I can't say "AND HOW FUCKING MUCH DID THIS COST?" every time I see something shiny.

Did we even need a new building?
We didn't strictly need one, but I was in favour of building one - when I thought it would cost £50-80M.

Especially one with "think pods"?
For that kind of money it had fucking better have think pods and all manner of pointless nonsense - at least that way we know the contractors didn't pocket ALL of the money. I want Star Trek swishy doors, retinal scanners, black marble urinals that play music and a pop-up GameCube at every seat.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Saturday, 9 October 2004 11:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Come on Gerry, we both know how shite Star Trek swishy doors are. You've already got them at work and they're broken most of the time.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Saturday, 9 October 2004 11:56 (twenty-one years ago)

pop-up GameCube at every seat

So they can do even less work than they already manage?

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 9 October 2004 11:59 (twenty-one years ago)

So why exactly did it end up costing 10 times the original estimate?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 9 October 2004 11:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Headline in the Daily Record following publication of the Fraser Report = A Big Civil Servant Did It And Ran Away.

In other words, no-one actually knows. So add cost of pointless enquiry to the overall cost.

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 9 October 2004 12:04 (twenty-one years ago)

The inquiry famously found "no single villain".

Everbody else pointed the finger at power-crazed ex-left wingers wanting to have luxurious offices, plus Donald Dewar lying about the original estimates to get it through (being cheap making it less difficult for the other parties to oppose).

Add in chunks of the usual mismanagement that happens when the public purse is involved - contractors cynically exploiting the inability of civil servants to punish them, cost inflations being agreed because "it's too late to stop", the press automatically attacking the public servants irrespective of the facts leading to extreme apathy on their part.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Saturday, 9 October 2004 12:07 (twenty-one years ago)

The only thing I picked up from the Fraser Report coverage was that they specifically didn't want to blame either Dewar or Miralles. But, then, they didn't seem to blame anyone at all.

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 9 October 2004 12:07 (twenty-one years ago)

the original estimate was as silly, I think, as the final cost.

I thought the "think pods" were "contemplation spaces".

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 9 October 2004 12:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I believe there were a few cost implications when they kept changing the design of the building *while they were building it*.

No-one wants to blame Dewar because he was the Parliament's First First Minister and because he's dead. If he was still alive they'd be crucifying him.

The GameCube idea was for visitors. MSPs can make do with the multichannel digital TV in every office. They need to keep up to date with world events apparently, which is why they all have the sports channels.

On another Scottish sour note I've just heard the team news and I'm going to go out now and get drunk and watch our excellent home World Cup record being broken by a team that Vidar Riseth can get in.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Saturday, 9 October 2004 12:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Likewise. Except for the watching the home record bit get shattered, as I am a pathetic optimist when it comes to Scotland.

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 9 October 2004 12:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Pish.

Pish.

Pish pish pish pish pish.

Should a manager who takes off your most likely goal threat when you're losing stay? Good job he's "upbeat". The fucking prick.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Saturday, 9 October 2004 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't get it.

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 9 October 2004 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry, I hijacked it slightly with my disappointment about the fitba.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Sunday, 10 October 2004 12:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I would like to comment one thing on the price - I believe it to be very misleading. In the time that the Parliament has been built, they have had to increase the security provision on the building hugely - steel levels to the walls etc - to deal with the current "terrorist" environment.

There has been a similar project taking place in Westminster, along with much larger things, which have probably been equally expensive but are under a cover of protective intelligence. We are allowed to see how the cost of the Scottish Parliament has increased, whereas expense of "building work" at Westminster is not public.

I think the building is great. Any great building should have a clear purpose, and this will stand in time to be known as a worthy building (Westminster cost a ridiculous amount over budget when first built - not something anyone questions nowadays). There are the amusing factors - the belief that the design may actually be influenced from the architect being in Northumberland, not Scotland - and many other things. The fact is that the building is stunning, and in many years to come will be looked at and admired.

___ (___), Sunday, 10 October 2004 13:01 (twenty-one years ago)

most likely goal threat
Who would that be?

The fact is that the building is stunning

ihttp://www.edinburgharchitecture.co.uk/scotparl_msp_southwest_kh_rmjm.jpg

Onimo (GerryNemo), Sunday, 10 October 2004 14:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm with triple underscore.

I'm just glad all the little sandwich shops and cafes that strung out like pearls along Holyrood in anticipation of great throngs of MPs and advisors are finally going to get some regular lunch-time business.

One of the things I don't understand why none of the shots I've seen of the new building manages to capture the bleak angular bluffs behind it, whose ruggedness makes me feel that the new building has crash-landed in Scotland from some parliamentarily-advanced future.

The people who laugh at the think-pods surely are missing easier targets, like the "zen rock garden" (although this came in under budget), and a loving recreation of the old black-and-white-tiled corridor of the Church-of-Scotland temporary debating chambers.

You've Got to Pick Up Every Stitch (tracerhand), Sunday, 10 October 2004 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/nmCentre/images/latest/Images/Previews/Preview1.jpg

You've Got to Pick Up Every Stitch (tracerhand), Sunday, 10 October 2004 14:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Okay, THAT'S cool.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 10 October 2004 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

There are the amusing factors - the belief that the design may actually be influenced from the architect being in Northumberland, not Scotland Maybe he was just being prescient. ihttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/tyne/wear/3725958.stm

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Sunday, 10 October 2004 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm hoping to get a guided tour of the building as my sis is the PA to Paul Grice, one of the underfire civil servants and current Chief exec of the parliament.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Sunday, 10 October 2004 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)

if you see malcolm chisholm, tell him to fix his fucking tie.

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 10 October 2004 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Billy Dods - you are right. For those that don't know, the story is that the architect had the image of upturned ships that reminded him of his visit to Scotland in the past. In all the picking on the building, someone identified he wasn't actually in Scotland when he saw the boats.

All the same, I really like the building. I do question its arrangement (there was a lot of darkness regarding who was a Scottish & Newcastle shareholder who made the decision, as that is who they bought the land off rather than using New Parliament house) but I think it sits very comortably where it is, and the surrounding landscape works with it stunningly.

I would love to find out how much has been spent on Westminster of late to compare. The debating chamber in the Scottish Parliament is stunning, and even big enough to accomodate all the MSPs (something that Westminster cannot do).

___ (___), Sunday, 10 October 2004 15:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Having started this thread, I suppose I should contribute to it. I like it. I think we need a new building of some visual, cultural and architectural significance as the seat of our new Parliament, and not just have our MSPs squatting in whatever building is big enough for them. I'm not even remotely qualified to be in any position to comment on the escalating costs and I have no real idea why it has happened, what I do know is that we (eventually) have a beautiful and unique building worthy of the task of housing the Parliament of this country. Now we just need some worthwhile stuff to emanate from within it.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 10 October 2004 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)

The costs escalated for various reasons, ailsa. The design never being finalised (he worked with vision), increased security requiring a steel body (which can't have been cheap), delays, and things I completely agree with such as using expensive granite from Aberdeen and not cheap granite shipped from Asia. It is a properly Scottish building in that way, and something I don't mind them having spent more on.

Obviously, it could have been somewhat cheaper...

___ (___), Sunday, 10 October 2004 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks. I realise the death of Miralles and the increased anti-terrorism measures had some sort of effect on the cost, but it's the sheer

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 10 October 2004 16:09 (twenty-one years ago)

One of the other reasons was the estimate at the start was far too modest. Seemingly everyone with any expertise in the construction industry realised that the estimate should have been at least doubled when the scale of the building became known.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Sunday, 10 October 2004 16:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Fuck, where did the rest of my post go? What I had gone on to say was that it was the sheer size of the discrepancy that was the problem, and that RJG had hit the nail on the head when he said "the original estimate was as silly, I think, as the final cost.". RJG knows a bit about architecture, so I think I believe him.

Which is what Billy has now said anyway.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 10 October 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I like to hope that RJG knows something about architecture.

Has the investigation turned out to be a bigger waste of money than the building itself?

Ally C (Ally C), Sunday, 10 October 2004 22:07 (twenty-one years ago)

At least there has been some purpose to the building, so probably, yes.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 10 October 2004 22:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean, there was a purpose to the enquiry too, but there was a positive result to the building, oh, you know what I mean. Hopefully.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 10 October 2004 22:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Catalan archietects though...I was in Barcelona and had a peek at Gaudi's cathedral. I asked a local when it would be finished, he said it would this century sometime. So really, we did alright :)

scotstvo (scotstvo), Sunday, 10 October 2004 22:14 (twenty-one years ago)

three years pass...

So then. Wendy Alexander.

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:05 (seventeen years ago)

an irrelevance. not even a footnote on a footnote in history. next!

grimly fiendish, Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:14 (seventeen years ago)

(i've never seen this thread, incidentally. and i certainly have no plans to read it.

yet.)

grimly fiendish, Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:14 (seventeen years ago)

Apart from the fact that she may have accidentally triggered the seperation of the union?

xp

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:15 (seventeen years ago)

Doubt that. Cameron winning the election will do that.

Tom D., Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:17 (seventeen years ago)

xpost what? like nobody had even thought about it until she piped up? up here we've been worrying about that one quite a bit, me laddo :)

all she's done is say: "can't we move things on a little faster?" and fair play to her -- bring it on, say i. (that said: i would like to wait till 2010 because there's a good chance that you lot will have voted in tories all over the place, making persuading our lot to cut the ties an absolute slap :)

wendy has an unenviable habit of opening her oddly-shaped mouth at the worst possible time, but believe me -- when she says: "i'm not the problem," she's pretty much on the bloody money, because she matters not an iota of a jot.

grimly fiendish, Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:19 (seventeen years ago)

She's saying bring it on 'cos she knows people won't vote for independence yet

Tom D., Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:22 (seventeen years ago)

Challop.

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:23 (seventeen years ago)

she hopes.

but i have to say: i probably agree. hellfire, it's easy for me to sit here and rhapsodise about it, but that's because i've got the security of knowing it's not actually on the cards right now. and even if -- and it's a big if -- eck doesn't fuck shit up/cameron wins over england/etc, i'm still not sure a majority would turn out in favour, for all manner of reasons.

also, there's the SNP paradox: the better they do running the devolved administration, the more people will say: "hey, this works pretty well -- let's not rock the boat." which, in fairness, salmond understands -- better, i think, than many of his party.

grimly fiendish, Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:26 (seventeen years ago)

I reckon once there's a Tory landslide in England and the 1000 Year Reich begins in earnest then a lot of Scottish Labour apparatchiks will start throwing their lot in behind indepedence. I mean, what's in it for Scotland anymore? Being saddled to a country full of right wing mentalists and peabrains for all time.

Tom D., Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:30 (seventeen years ago)

Doesn't a lot of Scottish independance rest on whether or not they get control of the North Sea oil rigs?

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:32 (seventeen years ago)

Why wouldn't they get control?

Tom D., Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:33 (seventeen years ago)

Territorial waters, innit?

Tom D., Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:33 (seventeen years ago)

Why wouldn't they get control?

'cos life has a habit of being really, really fucking unfair. especially where capitalism, vested interests and oil are concerned.

grimly fiendish, Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:41 (seventeen years ago)

I don't think the oil is all that important anyway

Tom D., Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:49 (seventeen years ago)

it's a factor.

grimly fiendish, Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:50 (seventeen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v417/albaalba/ilx/Picture2-1.png

They look like old people dancing at a wedding.

Alba, Thursday, 8 May 2008 23:09 (seventeen years ago)

six months pass...

Pfunkboy Formerly Known As... (Herman G. Neuname), Saturday, 15 November 2008 22:01 (seventeen years ago)

Probably be a referendum,doubt they'll be independence.

tending tropics (jim in glasgow), Friday, 6 May 2011 08:22 (fourteen years ago)

SNP in a strange position because they know, no matter how well they do in this election, there's no way they'd win a referendum on independence, the ConDem government might swing it for them but other than that, can't see it.

Tom D has taken many months to run this thread to ground (Tom D.), Friday, 6 May 2011 08:45 (fourteen years ago)

it might affect their support if they go "y'know what? fuck this independence bollocks" tho

bell hops (Noodle Vague), Friday, 6 May 2011 08:54 (fourteen years ago)

That's pretty much what they have been doing and it has affected their support: it's gone up

Tom D has taken many months to run this thread to ground (Tom D.), Friday, 6 May 2011 08:58 (fourteen years ago)

Admittedly pretty much entirely Lib Dem voters

Tom D has taken many months to run this thread to ground (Tom D.), Friday, 6 May 2011 08:59 (fourteen years ago)

Too many pretty muchs there

Tom D has taken many months to run this thread to ground (Tom D.), Friday, 6 May 2011 08:59 (fourteen years ago)

maybe the Labour party shd try renouncing socialism oh wait

bell hops (Noodle Vague), Friday, 6 May 2011 08:59 (fourteen years ago)

Well it worked in England that's for sure

Tom D has taken many months to run this thread to ground (Tom D.), Friday, 6 May 2011 09:01 (fourteen years ago)

SNP has moved to the left and concentrated on social issues,independence on the backburner,abt 1/4 of people who vote for them are unionists according to some poll I read.lib dems punished for faustian pact and voters gone to SNP because labour campaign/iain gray were fucking shite.scotland gone SNP but not nat.labour probably still dominate next Westminster election.

tending tropics (jim in glasgow), Friday, 6 May 2011 09:29 (fourteen years ago)

1/4 of people who vote for them are unionists

Less than I thought!

Tom D has taken many months to run this thread to ground (Tom D.), Friday, 6 May 2011 09:45 (fourteen years ago)

labour probably still dominate next Westminster election

If Scotland's involved! Wahey!

scotstvo, Friday, 6 May 2011 10:05 (fourteen years ago)

Haha. I think you're getting ahead of yourself.

Iain Gray's tea must be out?

tending tropics (jim in glasgow), Friday, 6 May 2011 10:38 (fourteen years ago)

He'll be getting his jotters soon I reckon

Tom D has taken many months to run this thread to ground (Tom D.), Friday, 6 May 2011 10:41 (fourteen years ago)

Who can replace Gray though? There's next to none of the Labour front bench left!

treefell, Friday, 6 May 2011 10:41 (fourteen years ago)

iain gray is shit

conrad, Friday, 6 May 2011 10:42 (fourteen years ago)

The most horrifying thing about this whole electioncampaign has been the discovery that Subway is open at 8:30am - what a horrible thought, a meatball marinara for breakfast.

ha ha ha ha jack my swag (boxedjoy), Friday, 6 May 2011 10:44 (fourteen years ago)

what a horrible thought, alex salmond eating a meatball marinara or nine for breakfast.

conrad, Friday, 6 May 2011 10:45 (fourteen years ago)

He stole a chip from me once. Couldn't tell if he was trying to be personable or if he was just being, well, you know...

textbook blows on the head (dowd), Friday, 6 May 2011 10:50 (fourteen years ago)

Listen, count your blessings, if Alex Salmond hadn't given up his Westminster seat, Nicola Sturgeon might be Scotland's First Minister now

Tom D has taken many months to run this thread to ground (Tom D.), Friday, 6 May 2011 10:51 (fourteen years ago)

nahh she doesn't have his charisma - they kept going on this week about how charismatic osama bin laden was but fat eck's the real deal

conrad, Friday, 6 May 2011 10:53 (fourteen years ago)

I know she's got no charisma but she's like the only other politician in Scotland, isn't she?

Tom D has taken many months to run this thread to ground (Tom D.), Friday, 6 May 2011 10:55 (fourteen years ago)

According to the producers of Question Time anyway

Tom D has taken many months to run this thread to ground (Tom D.), Friday, 6 May 2011 10:56 (fourteen years ago)

i once heard a fruity bit of gossip about nicola sturgeon but i've forgotten what it was now.

i've always been very, very impressed with her but yeah she's not exactly the warmest.

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Friday, 6 May 2011 11:04 (fourteen years ago)

I enjoy telling people she's the reason I left Scotland. The concept of being impressed with Nicola Sturgeon ... uh... sorry, just can't get my head around that

Tom D has taken many months to run this thread to ground (Tom D.), Friday, 6 May 2011 11:07 (fourteen years ago)

i just think she's the total pro package. she never, ever gets flustered and she's on the right side of the issue most of the time.

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Friday, 6 May 2011 11:09 (fourteen years ago)

she's the total pro package.

Exactly

Tom D has taken many months to run this thread to ground (Tom D.), Friday, 6 May 2011 11:10 (fourteen years ago)

Pretty easy to be the consummate pro in the Numpty Parliament of course

Tom D has taken many months to run this thread to ground (Tom D.), Friday, 6 May 2011 11:12 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.laetitiaguilbaud.org/communities/4/004/007/924/204/images/4533221388_pre.jpg

Ward Fowler, Friday, 6 May 2011 11:13 (fourteen years ago)

well yeah. i'm sure it can grate if you see her every day but her performance abilities - at the level of pure skill, staying on track, etc - are just awesome. she'd be good in a foxhole.

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Friday, 6 May 2011 11:14 (fourteen years ago)

she does have a look of Basil Brush about her

bell hops (Noodle Vague), Friday, 6 May 2011 11:22 (fourteen years ago)

she's awful

conrad, Friday, 6 May 2011 13:08 (fourteen years ago)

SNP have their majority.

treefell, Friday, 6 May 2011 13:40 (fourteen years ago)

This is wild. I will actually get to vote for independence.

tending tropics (jim in glasgow), Friday, 6 May 2011 14:16 (fourteen years ago)

Strongly suggest you check the current Iain Grey image here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_Parliament_general_election,_2011

Literally changed in the past minute.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 6 May 2011 14:16 (fourteen years ago)

Gray, rather. Anyway.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 6 May 2011 14:16 (fourteen years ago)

Alas, switched back. But for one brief minute, Glenn Quagmire was your Labour Party leader for Scotland.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 6 May 2011 14:19 (fourteen years ago)

Here it is in revision history: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scottish_Parliament_general_election,_2011&oldid=427750122

scotstvo, Friday, 6 May 2011 14:21 (fourteen years ago)

people who revert awesome wiki edits like that are the most disgusting Picts

bell hops (Noodle Vague), Friday, 6 May 2011 14:22 (fourteen years ago)

Iain Gray resigned now (well, in autumn)

textbook blows on the head (dowd), Friday, 6 May 2011 14:45 (fourteen years ago)

He's like some Arab leader, go now you twat

Tom D has taken many months to run this thread to ground (Tom D.), Friday, 6 May 2011 14:47 (fourteen years ago)

Tho dunno why he's going and the Tory + Lib Dem leaders are stayiong, presuming they are

Tom D has taken many months to run this thread to ground (Tom D.), Friday, 6 May 2011 14:48 (fourteen years ago)

Maybe he was hurt by the wikipedia hijinks.

textbook blows on the head (dowd), Friday, 6 May 2011 14:50 (fourteen years ago)

Neither have any replacements ready. Goldie still Tories best bet, and Scott one of few LDs have left.

stet, Friday, 6 May 2011 14:56 (fourteen years ago)

man who wouldn't wanna be compared to Quagmire?

bell hops (Noodle Vague), Friday, 6 May 2011 15:05 (fourteen years ago)

need these bloody regions to return; gonna fall asleep

stet, Friday, 6 May 2011 15:41 (fourteen years ago)

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22713/electionresults.png

scotstvo, Friday, 6 May 2011 17:06 (fourteen years ago)

So that'll be that.

scotstvo, Friday, 6 May 2011 17:06 (fourteen years ago)

wow. more than everyone else combined?

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Friday, 6 May 2011 17:12 (fourteen years ago)

Yup, one-party majority government for the first time in the reconstituted Scottish Parliament.

If nothing else, the next few years should be interesting.

scotstvo, Friday, 6 May 2011 17:18 (fourteen years ago)

With a system that is designed to make majorities really hard to achieve.

tending tropics (jim in glasgow), Friday, 6 May 2011 18:34 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.