I didn't really get the ending - v. dramatic and all but why was the whiny emo dude shouting so much? Is he going to die because he got locked in the room and the key for the chains has gone? Or is it implicit that Bad Man is going to catch the doctor guy because he hobbled off on one leg fairly recently? I'd watch it again but I think I've reached my quota of abject bleakness for the month.
― Michael Philip Philip Philip Philip Philip Annoyman (Ferg), Thursday, 14 October 2004 02:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― lukey (Lukey G), Thursday, 14 October 2004 07:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael Philip Philip Philip Philip Philip Annoyman (Ferg), Saturday, 16 October 2004 02:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Monday, 18 October 2004 18:22 (twenty-one years ago)
I thought this movie was FAN-FUCKING-TASTIC. Whoever the guy is who played Adam, good job.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 18:55 (twenty years ago)
A) genuinely surprisingB) so, so retarded
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 19:01 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 19:02 (twenty years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 19:07 (twenty years ago)
― TOMBOT, Tuesday, 1 March 2005 19:15 (twenty years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)
I hated it, too, Tom. Fuck Netflix GO RENT IT RIGHT NOW!!
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 19:18 (twenty years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 19:41 (twenty years ago)
― TOMBOT, Tuesday, 1 March 2005 20:55 (twenty years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)
― LeCoq (LeCoq), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 21:15 (twenty years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 21:19 (twenty years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 21:38 (twenty years ago)
I loved the acting, the real sense of people undecoriously losing their shit.
I loved the way everything was framed by this ululating murk.
I loved how any scene shot outside the killing room was made to look disconnected from the reality of terror (the LOST HIGHWAY-like car chase to and from nowhere.)
The sequence with Shawnee Smith being thankful to the killer had more psych truth per square inch than the aggregate of US cinema combined.
Great film.
― iang, Tuesday, 1 March 2005 23:28 (twenty years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 23:49 (twenty years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 23:50 (twenty years ago)
so being Halloween season I've been revisiting a lot of flicks, including not so great ones, but I've been thinking on the Saw franchise. Obviously, any franchise that goes 8 or more films deep is going to be mostly crap, but I don't even have much affection for the original. It's *alright*, I suppose, and because Jigsaw is more of a mystery at that point, it manages to stay fresher a little while longer than the rest. I kinda liked the second one at the time cos it had some fun visuals.
but besides the fact that I hated torture porn, I think my real issue with this series is that it only would really work, to me, if the screenwriters are more detached from Jigsaw and his deeds, rather than actually presenting him as the rational actor in the series. Instead of the hypocritical, binary-thinking loony tune who says "he hates murderers" prior to creating a scenario that kills a young girl whose only crime was being related to the guy he was actually trying to punish in Saw 3.
has anybody revisited the first one recently? kinda wondering if it will look dated, since that torture porn genre screams "aughts" to me.
― Neanderthal, Monday, 31 October 2016 01:09 (nine years ago)
however Cary Elwes hilarious performance will never not be classic. Scenery chewing at its finest.