The Power Of Nightmares/Adam Curtis

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
This is the new documentary by Adam Curtis - it started last night on BBC2. I think Adam Curtis is a bit of a legend - his last big series was The Century Of The Self, which was one of the best things I have ever seen on TV.

I thought the first episode last night was great - a brilliantly told story. And I love the bizarre sense of humour in the selection of archive footage. Also, (I should probably be ashamed of this), I had no idea Rumsfeld et al were around in the 70s! That's crazy!

What did everyone else think?

pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 21 October 2004 07:46 (twenty years ago)

you had no idea they were around in the 70s?

lukey (Lukey G), Thursday, 21 October 2004 07:51 (twenty years ago)

Yes, I watched this. I really enjoyed it - the analysis of the thinking of the neocons in relation to 'invisible' soviet threats was brilliant.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 21 October 2004 07:54 (twenty years ago)

I enjoyed it very much indeed, though I must admit when I see things like The Simple Life I'm rather in sympathy with old Sayyid Qutb re. materialist pseudo-individualism. Interesting how both Qutb and Strauss managed to twist the Marxist idea of collectivism to work as faux-benign moral dictatorship (do as you're told! it's for your own good!). The appearance of Rumsfeld and Cheney in the '70s was a bit of a shock (I was a kid at the time, didn't really take it all in) but, when you consider what's happened since, not really a shock at all. It will be interesting to see how AC manages to continue (and presumably combine/then forcibly divide) these dual threads through the other two programmes.

As for the likes of Irving Kristol and "Professor" Richard Pipes, the words "please kill me" sprang to mind...

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 21 October 2004 07:57 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, Pipes was funny - I could see him visibly strain to avoid evaluating his own thinking.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 21 October 2004 07:59 (twenty years ago)

that was another impressive thing - I was expecting the programme to be stuffed with nice, liberal academics (which it sort of was), but AC also managed to get interviews with all these people he will presumably end up attacking!

pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:03 (twenty years ago)

Top notch viewing, but I would have liked the power of rewind occasionally. What surprised me was that Kissinger came out of it looking so much like the good guy.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:21 (twenty years ago)

Yes that was a bit puzzling. Cambodian bombing? What Cambodiam bombing?

Come to think of it, where exactly does Pol Pot fit into all this?

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:24 (twenty years ago)

yes that was bizarre - him and the CIA as the moderate voices of reason. I suppose it was a clever way of emphasising just how extreme the neocons were/are.

pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:26 (twenty years ago)

The part about the submarine accoustic detection was priceless: 'we cannot detect their accoustic systems, therefore they must have NONACCOUSTIC systems which WE CAN'T DETECT!!!?!!'

RickyT (RickyT), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:29 (twenty years ago)

Yes, but Pipes and Ledeen seemed unrepentent on that kind of point (I found the CIA guy saying "well we knew most of the stuff about the Soviets in The Terror Network was hooey, because we'd made up ourselves as black propaganda" the most astonishing) and Ledeen is still writing books on terrorism. I wanted them to be asked to address the retrospective historical arguments more directly - that they couldn't have been as wrong as the programme was making out and still have the gall to sit there and pontificate.

But yes, a beautiful, confident piece of documentary making, that got me feeling all 'ahh, the BBC'.

I liked this assessment in the Times today:

If 'The Power of Nightmares' had been drafted as a play, it would be hailed as a dazzlingly thought-provoking drama. As a book, its thesis would become a debating point on talk shows round the world. Even in the form of a here-are-the-facts documentary, it is so artfully crafted, so engagingly argued, so playfully illustrated, that you happily reserve your questions and reservations until the final credits start rolling.

Here is a talented, intelligent film-maker enjoying himself and showing what you can do with an hour of television. It is deliciously spliced together, seasoned with deftly chosen archive footage from an improbale palette of sources: everything from clips from episodes of 'Perry Mason' and 'Gunsmoke', to American prom dances and Egyptian television commercials.

Apparently it was going to be trailed as long ago as the weekend before last, but they pulled back on it because of Ken Bigley.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:41 (twenty years ago)

anyone know if this will be repeated over the weekend at all? (bbc3, bbc4?)

cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:46 (twenty years ago)

I wonder how the argument that the Soviets control all terrorism is affected by the collapse of the USSR, and the Russian Federations problems in Chechnya? Perhaps the commies are trying to cause Putin's government to fall so they can reclaim power? I would imagine that the fact that terrorism continued after Reagan singlehandedly destroyed the USSR would invalidate their theories, but no-one seemed willing to admit that.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:49 (twenty years ago)

Ledeen's terrifically titled book

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:54 (twenty years ago)

...The War Against the Terror Masters: Why It Happened. Where We Are Now. How We'll Win. apparently addresses the question of "how the terror network survived the loss of its main sponsor, the Soviet Union".

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:55 (twenty years ago)

All of Ledeen's books are terrifically titled. Which do you mean?

X-post. Ahh, cool. I haven't read that.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 21 October 2004 09:00 (twenty years ago)

AC's the Mayfair Set is also fantastic. I don't think any of it has ever been repeated.

Pete W (peterw), Thursday, 21 October 2004 09:03 (twenty years ago)

One weakness of the programme, I thought, was the too-easy conflation of Strauss's ideas about necessary myths with the neo-cons views on foreign policy. Yes, to us it looks like scaremongering, but for Curtis to tell the story as if the Straussian neo-cons lobbied for hawkish policies on the basis of this, rather than on a real belief in the danger of the Soviet Union, seemed a little flimsy. Eventually he said something about them having come to believe in their own fantasies, but it came across as a speculative way of means of advancing his own narrative.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 21 October 2004 09:08 (twenty years ago)

Yes that part of his argument wasn't totally convincing, and I guess is a consequence of structuring the documentary around the ideas of two individuals. There were similar leaps of faith in The Century Of The Self, when Curtis asked us to accept that governments made decisions of national policy almost entirely inspired by the theories of Edward Bernays, or whoever. But focusing on individuals is a neat way of framing the programme, and makes for much more entertaining TV, I suppose.

pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 21 October 2004 09:19 (twenty years ago)

wasn't it a conflation that happened though? I thought he was saying that the neo-cons who did believe in Strauss's idea of the necessary myth (Bumsfeld, etc) became allied with ppl who believed in the imminent threat (Madman Pipes). these were different ppl with the same goal?

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Thursday, 21 October 2004 09:42 (twenty years ago)

is this being repeated?

stevie (stevie), Thursday, 21 October 2004 09:44 (twenty years ago)

Apparently.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 21 October 2004 09:44 (twenty years ago)

Richard Pipes did seem very "I'm a Russian Expert, so I know what they're all thinking! Even if they don't know it themselves!"

I did like his book "Russia Under The Old Regime", so was slightly disappointed to find out he was in with all the neo-cons in the '70s. Although he did have one very annoying habit of referring to all medieval people of Scandinavian origin as "Normans".

caitlin (caitlin), Thursday, 21 October 2004 10:11 (twenty years ago)

Maybe he meant 'Norman' like in those old 'a break from the norm' ads.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 21 October 2004 10:12 (twenty years ago)

Actually, thinking about it, one of the main points of the book was: the Russians are doomed to be ruled by an authoritarian bureaucracy, because of historical economics, and their geography and climate. So, no surprises that he says "The Russians will always be thinking like this".

caitlin (caitlin), Thursday, 21 October 2004 10:16 (twenty years ago)

Russian military planners be stockpilin'

pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 21 October 2004 10:17 (twenty years ago)

Oh - I've just remembered that anti-Soviet US Army film from the late 70s or early 80s they had clips from. It was amazing!

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 21 October 2004 10:18 (twenty years ago)

He did say, 'if anything, I'm an expert on Russian mindset,' or something.

I can't remember what the Mitrokhin Archive says about Soviet sponsorship of teroorism, but there was something. Possibly supplied by The Spy Who Came In From The Garden.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 21 October 2004 10:39 (twenty years ago)

http://www.torrentreactor.net/torrents/view_33863

A torrent for the episode, if anyone is interested.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Friday, 22 October 2004 16:42 (twenty years ago)

Watching the final part of this tonight is going to be so depressing.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:21 (twenty years ago)

Was the scheduling of the final episode deliberately timed, I wonder?

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:34 (twenty years ago)

Are you suggesting a conspiracy to rig the Bush vote involving *BBC schedulers* ? Coool.

Bumfluff, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:59 (twenty years ago)

If anyone outside the UK can get bittorrents of this, then I'd recommend you to do so.

In the end, it was strangely calming, rather than depressing. All this will pass.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 22:14 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I enjoyed this series a lot. There should be bittorrents about, and I would also recommend it.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 22:16 (twenty years ago)

I watched it tonight for the first time, and it was fanastic. I'd forgtten about The Century of the Self, that was fantastic too. I'm annoyed I missed the first two...I think it's time I understood how this bittorrent stuff works.

Tonight's episode was very poignant, and made me sad.

Cathy (Cathy), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 22:24 (twenty years ago)

If anyone outside the UK can get bittorrents of this, then I'd recommend you to do so.

I second that. I downloaded the last two episodes last Saturday and watched them, very powerful. It's sad that there's great documentaries such as this and The White House for Sale airing on UK television, and most people in the US won't get an opportunity to see them.

Leon in Exile (Ex Leon), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 22:36 (twenty years ago)

dwnldng

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 22:45 (twenty years ago)

I thought episode one was easily the best, mainly because episodes two and three spent a lot of time repeating things from episode one. I can see why they did this, but for me it took the shime off it a little bit. It would have been better as a single two hour-long programme, I think.

Also, things that weakened his argument, such as Madrid, were kind of skipped over a bit too lightly.

Kerry seemed shoved in just in case.

Quibbles aside, top-notch television. I may even go for a month without complaining about my licence fee.

It is strange that I had never heard those people swearing as the planes hit the towers.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 4 November 2004 07:18 (twenty years ago)

this was fascinating but it begged bigger questions.

cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 4 November 2004 09:23 (twenty years ago)

I agree with everything PJ Miller said.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 4 November 2004 09:37 (twenty years ago)

Grr, I missed it and forgot to set the recorder.

caitlin (caitlin), Thursday, 4 November 2004 09:42 (twenty years ago)

The first episode was by some considerable distance the best.

The cumulative effect was a kind of political version of James Burke's Connections series from the '70s. OK in shaggy dog conspiracy terms but didn't really pinpoint whether it was just the expected cocktail of bilateral incompetence, stubbornness and stupidity which led us to our current pretty pass rather than a Conspiracy as such.

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 4 November 2004 09:57 (twenty years ago)

I thought the last episode was quite weak, hammering away at the images of that fantasy creature that comes up out of the sea, and other images that have become somewhat familiar during the series.

I too totally agree with PJ Miller. I don't recall Madrid being mentioned at all. I couldn't get the idea out of my head that while it's fine to criticise the hysteria created by the neo-cons, (that Disney video!!), you can understand why the likes of Britain have to at least be on their guard against the kind of thing that happened in Madrid - even if we acknowledge the programme's main point that there is no such thing as monstrous Al-Qaeda.

Japanese Giraffe (Japanese Giraffe), Thursday, 4 November 2004 10:12 (twenty years ago)

there were a few omissions. correct me if i'm wrong, but when he was talking about the russian's being a busted flush in the 1970s he completely failed to mention the invasion of afghanistan. it only cropped up later, when the programme moved on to the muhajadeen. very good, totally necessary programme, but i didn't buy it.

Pete W (peterw), Thursday, 4 November 2004 10:40 (twenty years ago)

Did anyone tape it, for those of us who don't even know what bittorrents are? Or will it be repeated?

Two-Headed Zombie With No Face (kate), Thursday, 4 November 2004 12:00 (twenty years ago)

"there were a few omissions. correct me if i'm wrong, but when he was talking about the russian's being a busted flush in the 1970s he completely failed to mention the invasion of afghanistan."

This was the third part, part 1 was all about Afghanistan

Masked Gazza, Thursday, 4 November 2004 12:14 (twenty years ago)

yes, i was talking about the first and second parts. the film talked about the neocons bigging up the soviet threat and then skipped to the war of occupation in afghanistan without connecting the dots: ie, that russia invaded afghanistan at the very time the neocons were spreading supposedly unfounded reports of russian aggression. i agree with the thrust of the programme, but i think it left out anything that didn't support its argument.

great use of music, mind.

Pete W (peterw), Thursday, 4 November 2004 12:43 (twenty years ago)

Great programme but not really convincing

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 4 November 2004 13:25 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, but you could see the invasion of Afghanistan as the last, desperate agressive act of a moribund regime. There's no doubt the Soviet system was facing collapse - they would never stand a chance vs the US in full on warfare. That's not to say the nuclear threat wasn't real - my parents remember the Cuban missile crisis as a scary time.
Curtis didn't dismiss Madrid as inconsequential - but he dismissed the idea it was ordered and planned by Bin Laden. What you had was a terrorist group working independently inspired by the IDEA of Al Quaeda. And it's the idea that's dangerous and needs to be dealt with. Yes Bin Laden etc are dangerous, but they're not some deadly force in our midst as the neo-McCarthyist paranoia would have you believe.
Sure the UK needs to take precautions, but most of the arrests made under the terrorism act and the infringements on civil liberties are unjustified. The UK has been dealing with terrorist threats since the 60s - okay, the IRA et al usually called to say they'd planted a bomb, but not always.
The media have run with it cos it allows them to pursue existing agendas - the Sun/Daily Mail and their poisonous anti-immigration propaganda.
It wasn't perfect, but it made its point very well.

Stew S, Thursday, 4 November 2004 13:47 (twenty years ago)

yeah i only saw the last episode, but i thought it avoided answering some questions for example:

a) didnt really explore what Bin Laden's motivations were for trying a new policy of attacking america, going against what other islamic fundamentalist gorups were interested in (eg toppling central asian regimes*).

b) kept on repeating how the neo cons "grand mission" was some titanic battle of good vs evil, that seemed a bit suspect. are these people really solely driven by moral purpose, no matter how extreme or well, silly, that moral purpose is?

c) er i tcant think of another. but i sort of inherently dont believ things on tv when people make somewhat grandiose claims, whether they be blair, bush or some dude intoning opposing views over loads of tiny clips. it was kinda eisenstein-esque, and well, his aim was kinda totally "manipulate the viewer, worry bout factual issues later".

* interesting becasue in 2000 i was in debate with loads of russian politics students, and they savaged us about Chechnya, along the lines of "Russia is under the threat of Attack by a islamic super state, chehcnya will be the first to fall to them". We (ie a few brits) were all like, "WTF? Islamic fundamentalism? whats that? whats the issue here? quit being so paranoid!". a year later, it became a bit clearer what the idea of a threat from islamic fundamentalism might mean.

ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 4 November 2004 14:26 (twenty years ago)

... on keyboards and vocals.

Blake the Messenger (Tom D.), Monday, 16 June 2025 20:14 (one week ago)

more notes: he's still fascinated by dance and people just enjoying themselves - rightly imv - but i'm curious to know what this symbolises in his aesthetic. some sort of persistence in people beyond ideology while expressing v evidently what people feel, in a way nothing else can?

xpost Cardew! was it. amazing.

Fizzles, Monday, 16 June 2025 20:16 (one week ago)

I think Curtis wanted to show people having a good time/being positive while so much of the country was under the cosh of weird economic experiments.

All comes with an undercurrent that these kids are just the adults of tomorrow, who will make the same mistakes.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 16 June 2025 20:53 (one week ago)

yeah but dance has been persistent throughout his recent ouevre so it’s clearly a thing beyond this series.

Fizzles, Monday, 16 June 2025 21:09 (one week ago)

guy (cant remember his name but hes introduced as a 'polymath')

Jonathan Miller! Playwright, critic and director of a pretty great tv version of Alice In Wonderland w/ music by Ravi Shankar. Also part of Beyond The Fringe.

a ZX spectrum is haunting Europe (Daniel_Rf), Monday, 16 June 2025 21:11 (one week ago)

was listening to a recent Curtis interview, he quite annoyingly enthuses a lot about Banksy. I did not know that The Land of Make Believe by Bucks Fizz was an anti-Thatcher song!

vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Tuesday, 17 June 2025 08:06 (one week ago)

the guy interviewing him is a bit of dozy twit, but I did find it amusing that AC is aware of Garys Economics.

vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Tuesday, 17 June 2025 08:21 (one week ago)

I just found out that Curtis directed this music video for Weyes Blood in 2023:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bczKVMPmDlk

ArchCarrier, Tuesday, 17 June 2025 15:07 (one week ago)

Just finished the first episode, I'm here for the vibes and the found footage (will we all look as foolish in 40 years time? yes) but the stephen hawking stuff is absolute garbage and makes me question the veracity of the other captions.

the wrong witch roams the earth (ledge), Thursday, 19 June 2025 10:14 (one week ago)

Yeah, got very eyerolly there.

Blake the Messenger (Tom D.), Thursday, 19 June 2025 10:18 (one week ago)

It's a bit of a rug pull I think, further eps are...more skeptical

a ZX spectrum is haunting Europe (Daniel_Rf), Thursday, 19 June 2025 11:02 (one week ago)

Did he even need that wheelchair?

Alba, Thursday, 19 June 2025 11:12 (one week ago)

The squaddies trying to do Magic Eye absolutely killed me also.

LocalGarda, Sunday, 22 June 2025 20:26 (six days ago)

yeah that was real england gold

vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Sunday, 22 June 2025 20:28 (six days ago)

I think this one was probably the most consistently funny show he has done

vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Sunday, 22 June 2025 20:31 (six days ago)

Yeah it's so funny. It has some horrible bits also obviously, and sad stuff, but some absolutely hilarious shit throughout.

LocalGarda, Sunday, 22 June 2025 20:39 (six days ago)

Also, like, I know it is obvious that history and events are summarised incredibly thinly, though I do think a lot of people seem to act as if this isn't the case. This doc really does give a sense of depth and breadth and the myriad events occurring at all times. I know it's still just a tiny snapshot but it is quite powerful to get such a range of things.

LocalGarda, Sunday, 22 June 2025 20:41 (six days ago)

That said, the last episode really seems to skim about thirty years in three mins then just ends abruptly.

LocalGarda, Sunday, 22 June 2025 21:58 (six days ago)

I think this one was probably the most consistently funny show he has done

I think the Leeson/Barings one has this beat, but only because it's 50 minutes of Curtis beating up on Barings and not much else. The some great comic editing in that one.

(I was surprised that he mentions Katie Baring with Hatton and does not return to the well later on in Shifty)

carson dial, Sunday, 22 June 2025 22:17 (six days ago)

Yeah the Barings one was fucking phenomenal.

Loved the shot towards the end of the last ep of Shifty, of Blair and Brown looking around confusingly, juxtaposed with the tv pop performance

brimstead, Sunday, 22 June 2025 22:39 (six days ago)

Which is the Barings one?

piscesx, Sunday, 22 June 2025 22:43 (six days ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkhcpcuZvV4

brimstead, Sunday, 22 June 2025 22:45 (six days ago)

merci!

piscesx, Monday, 23 June 2025 01:01 (five days ago)

Watched the 3rd EP last night and its still on Thatcher, which is a bit boring.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 23 June 2025 10:22 (five days ago)

Pretty hard to escape Thatcher in the UK in the 80s.

Blake the Messenger (Tom D.), Monday, 23 June 2025 10:26 (five days ago)

... and for a long time after!

Blake the Messenger (Tom D.), Monday, 23 June 2025 10:26 (five days ago)

Not sure, I think a lot of her policies have (and are) unravelling. We could talk about the 2008 crash and spend an EP on that, Blair as continuation but with wars in middle east too, Greenfell, Brexit. Hope to see more of that, but there's way too much on the 80s when its worth mining the 90s and seeing what might have been there.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 23 June 2025 12:51 (five days ago)

Particularly as most of that ground was covered at length in Pandora’s Box (I think).

ShariVari, Monday, 23 June 2025 12:57 (five days ago)

Was checking to see what age Adam Curtis is and he's actually older than I thought, more of a child of the 60s/70s than the 80s.

Blake the Messenger (Tom D.), Monday, 23 June 2025 13:00 (five days ago)

I also felt a bit disappointed at "oh here's new labour oh now it's over", but tbf the intro makes it clear it's about the UK at the end of the 20th century. Now I think of New Labour as a very 90's thing, britpop and all that, but they only really got in in '97, so by the show's premise it was only ever going to take up a small portion of the thing.

a ZX spectrum is haunting Europe (Daniel_Rf), Monday, 23 June 2025 13:01 (five days ago)

Yes, the 2008 crash is the wrong century!

Blake the Messenger (Tom D.), Monday, 23 June 2025 13:04 (five days ago)

there is some very queasy footage of the emptiness of Millennium Dome committees with Mandelson talking on a large mobile phone to Blair. Some ghastly New Labour apparatchiks looking and sounding like the dead inside ghouls that they are. I enjoyed that bit.

I heard Curtis saying in an interview that Elon Musk was a fan of his work but he was more impressed to discover Kanye West is also a fan. Apparently Kanye's constructive criticism of his work was that it needed editing down to 20 mins.

vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Monday, 23 June 2025 13:07 (five days ago)

Or is this just another feedback loop of nostalgia? Repeating back sounds and images of the past. Which is the way the system controls you, and is the way this series was made.

Ok Adam, guess I'm the asshole for watching.

a ZX spectrum is haunting Europe (Daniel_Rf), Monday, 23 June 2025 13:13 (five days ago)

lol, that was a bit M Night Curtis

LocalGarda, Monday, 23 June 2025 13:30 (five days ago)

haven't seen the new one yet but thought this point was interesting localgarda!

z_tbd, Monday, 23 June 2025 15:37 (five days ago)

oops, hit submit before i was ready. i was just going to say i went wild and started this thread

some people on the left retreat to the arts as a space where they are unchallenged

z_tbd, Monday, 23 June 2025 15:37 (five days ago)

I think this one was probably the most consistently funny show he has done

The bit with the stroppy kid messing about on a dumper, arguing with someone offscreen about whether he can drive it or not, which ends on the single word, "Knobhead". Somehow even funnier because it's all happening in the dark and you can barely see anything.

Blake the Messenger (Tom D.), Tuesday, 24 June 2025 10:49 (four days ago)

yes, I think that footage was from Bradford and was very much in the character of the city.

vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Tuesday, 24 June 2025 11:02 (four days ago)

it reminded me of a period when I was working on the Windhill estate for a few years. Rough as fuck but never a dull moment.

vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Tuesday, 24 June 2025 11:06 (four days ago)

The Millennium Dome and Alexander McQueen stuff in the last EP was p good.

And yes, liked footage of kids mucking about with cars, guitars.

Hawking was really pushed and this was p weak overall. LRB did something similar with Roger Penrose in the current issue, coincidentally. Guy who has brains but has 'failed' in a fundamental way with other ppl.

https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v47/n11/steven-shapin/through-the-trapdoor

xyzzzz__, Friday, 27 June 2025 07:27 (yesterday)

Nothing on the tech right, but concluded that perhaps the BBC wouldn't have the footage for a program on that in particular given its roots are in the US, and that maybe cuts mean their archive of say 2000 to 2012 wouldn't be as strange and vast.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 27 June 2025 07:31 (yesterday)

Alexander McQueen was a very real, intense mofo. I don't know anything about fashion design, but it's hard not to be impressed with him.

vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Friday, 27 June 2025 07:47 (yesterday)

LRB did something similar with Roger Penrose in the current issue, coincidentally.

Somewhat amused to find out that Penrose, who is 93, has an older brother. He's 96!

Blake the Messenger (Tom D.), Friday, 27 June 2025 11:29 (yesterday)

Think it ended too early timeline wise to have the tech stuff in a big way

LocalGarda, Friday, 27 June 2025 11:31 (yesterday)

What no Alan Sugar and Clive Sinclair?

Blake the Messenger (Tom D.), Friday, 27 June 2025 11:33 (yesterday)

"His name, was Michael Dell"

LocalGarda, Friday, 27 June 2025 11:36 (yesterday)

ZX Spectrum modding scene is still huge

OK not really

i got bao-yu babe (Noodle Vague), Friday, 27 June 2025 11:38 (yesterday)

Confess I'd forgotten that Clive Sinclair was something of babe magnet.

Blake the Messenger (Tom D.), Friday, 27 June 2025 11:40 (yesterday)

Alexander McQueen was a very real, intense mofo. I don't know anything about fashion design, but it's hard not to be impressed with him.

Otm

brimstead, Friday, 27 June 2025 14:25 (yesterday)

going to start J G Farrell's Empire Trilogy this weekend just for the hell of it. There is a bit from that RTE doc that Fizzles linked that is still haunting my mind. The guy who says when he was a student he saw another student in the bar reading a copy of The Siege Of Krishnapur. And then it came back to him, oh yes, I watched the author of that book drown when i was a child.

vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Friday, 27 June 2025 18:03 (yesterday)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.