Walmart hates fun.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Ever wanted to see supreme court heads superimposed on nude bodies? Well, you can't.
http://www.canada.com/entertainment/books/story.html?id=e824268c-152f-4499-a943-1b6869e7cbe9

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Friday, 22 October 2004 17:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Except you can buy it online from them. They still want the money.

Michael White (Hereward), Friday, 22 October 2004 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

They're still selling it online though! Because they realize the internet is full of dirty perverts!

Huk-L, Friday, 22 October 2004 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost

Huk-l, Friday, 22 October 2004 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

"we felt the majority of our customers would not be comfortable with it," said Wal-Mart Stores Inc. spokeswoman Karen Burk.

"We offer what we think our customers want to buy. That just makes good business sense."

And we don't have any interest in expanding our customer base... That makes excellent business sense.

dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 22 October 2004 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)

"The chain is offering the book on its website. Burk said the store's online customers are a 'different audience.'"

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Friday, 22 October 2004 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Basically, they're saying they think their instore customers are a bunch of unsophisticated jack-in-the-boxes and their online customers are the Astors and Vanderbilts. Science confirms this.

Huk-L, Friday, 22 October 2004 17:48 (twenty-one years ago)

It's harder to flip through the book and taunt other people's children online.

Michael White (Hereward), Friday, 22 October 2004 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Last time I was in Wal*Mart, this book was prominently displayed at the front of the store:

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0060760508.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

But hey. Four AA batteries only cost 88 cents.

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Friday, 22 October 2004 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I coming around to the idea of shopping at walmart occasionally. When they offer merch at a loss to hook you into buying other shit. Well, if they're selling something you want at a loss, I think it makes sense to buy it there as long as you don't buy anything that makes them a profit.

But that's just talk. FUck walmart, I aint shoppin there.

dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 22 October 2004 17:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I received this from Walmart yesterday... they sound a little testy:

Thank you for taking the time to bring your concerns to our attention. The "Bodega" store being built in San Juan Teotihuacán has been properly certified by officials at all levels, including an archaeologist with the Mexican Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH). We are not building "next to" the pyramids at Teotihuacán, but miles away. We have been awarded construction permits by federal, state and local agencies, and our project has the unanimous approval of the town council, the town mayor and neighborhood representatives chosen by the community. Construction is under the ongoing supervision of Veronica Ortega Cabrera, chief of the Technical and Legal Protection Department of Teotihuacán, located at the Teotihuacán archaeological site. Our construction is in an area designated for commercial buildings and residences, and hundreds are currently located there. The only opposition to our store has come from a small group of merchants who find competition unwelcome and are seeking to misrepresent our plans for their own interests.

andy, Friday, 22 October 2004 18:04 (twenty-one years ago)

The only opposition to our store has come from a small group of merchants who find competition unwelcome and are seeking to misrepresent our plans for their own interests.

The letter goes on to say, "Their interests include not being put out of business and having to work at fucking Wal-Mart. Seriously... can you believe these assholes?"

Lifted, or, the story is 'neath my ass (kenan), Friday, 22 October 2004 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Basically, they're saying they think their instore customers are a bunch of unsophisticated jack-in-the-boxes and their online customers are the Astors and Vanderbilts. Science confirms this.

Or else they're figuring that their online customers would send in more complaints than their meatspace customers if the book wasn't available.

Christine 'Green Leafy Dragon' Indigo (cindigo), Friday, 22 October 2004 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Other way around, I think: their online customers are less likely to come up complaining that their kiddies were looking at naked pictures of old people.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 22 October 2004 19:25 (twenty-one years ago)

also you have to have a credit card to buy online

cinniblount (James Blount), Friday, 22 October 2004 19:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I think kids should be made to look at naked pictures of old people as a form of promoting sexual abstention.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 22 October 2004 19:28 (twenty-one years ago)

In case you missed it on the Daily Show...

http://www.kaleo.org/vnews/display.v/ART/2004/10/20/417608ab20afe

They also dug up ancient graves for their Honolulu store.

the remains of the Native Hawaiians were found and now sit in cardboard boxes under the on-ramp.

Have you no decency, Wal-Mart?

Lifted, or, the story is 'neath my ass (kenan), Friday, 22 October 2004 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Other way around, I think: their online customers are less likely to come up complaining that their kiddies were looking at naked pictures of old people.

That's what I meant, actually. (Tortured syntax, ahoy!)

Christine 'Green Leafy Dragon' Indigo (cindigo), Friday, 22 October 2004 20:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Um, dudes, why the Wal-Mart hate? I myself go to Wal-Mart quite a lot for groceries, casual clothing, and other things, and am quite happy to utilize its deep discounts to stretch my budget. And anyway, the only issue this company had was with the nude photo, which I can understand completely considering that the books Wal-Mart stocks are in full display of everyone, including little children, and it can be and is quite possible that a young child would open up such a book and view this (age-wise) inappropriate photo.

I mean, yeah, Wal-Mart will be open about having books you guys might get sick over in stock, but damn, the last time I was at Wal-Mart I spotted the John Edwards autobiography and Michael Moore's Stupid White Men and Dude, Where's My Country? prominently displayed along with the other "current affairs" books it has toward the front of its store, next to the cash registers, so there's more political balance there than you guys are willing to acknowledge.

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 23 October 2004 04:02 (twenty-one years ago)

does tucker carlson own a significant chunk of walmart stock? or sit on its board of directors?

Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 23 October 2004 04:04 (twenty-one years ago)

(Okay, so maybe there's less Wal-Mart hate here than I thought there was. I read another thread about this very issue somewhere where people were being VERY pissy about Wal-Mart, much more so than here, and thus got a bit confused. Apologies! Still, however, I do HIGHLY believe that this book would have been stocked and heavily advertised at Wal-Marts throughout the country had it not had that doctored nude photo in it.)

(Sorry -- that was an xpost. Eisbär, I have no clue.)

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 23 October 2004 04:07 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.counterpunch.org/cox04202004.html

Pangolino (ricki spaghetti), Saturday, 23 October 2004 04:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Wal-Mart and their lame business practices sucked a year and whatever ago on that other thread and they still suck now.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Saturday, 23 October 2004 04:34 (twenty-one years ago)

so there's more political balance there than you guys are willing to acknowledge

If "unapologetic, Union-busting, ball-breaking, wage-slaving, highly discriminatory capitalism" equals political balance, then OK.

Lifted, or, the story is 'neath my ass (kenan), Saturday, 23 October 2004 04:51 (twenty-one years ago)

what's wrong with busting unions?

d.arraghmac, Saturday, 23 October 2004 04:58 (twenty-one years ago)

I was going to type up something to the effect of, "Well, all retail operations work like that, except for the ones that price their items so high that only the wealthy can afford the items for sale," but I decided that life's too short to engage in potentially combative dialogue, and that you were never going to waver from thinking that Wal-Mart was this Hugely Evil Corporation and that I was never going to waver from being a pretty loyal customer of Wal-Mart's, so I think for the sake of just moving on and conserving any possibly resultant anger for things that affect us personally (because again, life is just way too short to be continually angry), we'll have to agree to disagree.

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 23 October 2004 05:05 (twenty-one years ago)

(Besides, I'm really, really worn out, dog tired, and am not in the mood for making new enemies.)

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 23 October 2004 05:06 (twenty-one years ago)

You're not going to make an enemy of me, Dee, no matter what we argue about.

Lifted, or, the story is 'neath my ass (kenan), Saturday, 23 October 2004 05:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, all retail operations work like that, except for the ones that price their items so high that only the wealthy can afford the items for sale

That's just not true. And even if it were, Nike preys on slave labor abroad, while Wal-Mart creates its own slave labor by economically devastating the communities it moves into, so it's quite a bit more predatory than most.

Lifted, or, the story is 'neath my ass (kenan), Saturday, 23 October 2004 05:17 (twenty-one years ago)

And OMG have you read about their treatment of women? Holding company meetings at strip joints, offering women promotions only if they agree to move to Alaska, etc. Hence the numerous lawsuits.

Yeah, you're right. Low prices are not going to budge me off this point, and I'm not sure they should influence you as much as they seem to, either.

Lifted, or, the story is 'neath my ass (kenan), Saturday, 23 October 2004 05:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree with Wal-Mart's decision not to have naked old people on the shelves, FWIW. It is inapporpriate to the kind of store they have created. I don't have a problem with that small aspect of the company's management decisions.

Lifted, or, the story is 'neath my ass (kenan), Saturday, 23 October 2004 05:35 (twenty-one years ago)

"slave labor"

Why don't we save this term for actual slave labor.

supercub, Saturday, 23 October 2004 07:16 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.wal-town.com/index.php

It's co-produced by the prettiest girl who went to my high school, she was the nicest girl who went to my high school too. I think the first time I saw her I was eating Subway and she walked in and I just froze mid bite, Slick Rick "down south BBQ ribs fly out a nigga mouth" style. Pure grace - not surprised she doing the right thing these days.

LeCoq (LeCoq), Saturday, 23 October 2004 07:27 (twenty-one years ago)

oh Slick Rick, is there anything you CAN'T articulate so well?

Sir Kingfish Beavis D'Azzmonch (Kingfish), Saturday, 23 October 2004 07:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I worked for their website for two years. The side of the company that runs the web is really cool and very different from Bentonville corporate, which caused a lot of friction. True that the buyers for these things in Bentonville do not know shit, their music buyers had no background in music, etc; not true on the web. There was a constant attempt at the .com to not only stock things the stores wouldn't but even promote them; the web knew that they're competing against amazon here. Sometimes it worked.

Anyway, once corporate started hanging around and making us do the walmart cheer at meetings I quit. MOst of the engineering department was russian, they were not amused at the cheers. As my manager said, "I lived in Soviet Union. For me cheers mean something else."

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 23 October 2004 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I go to Wal Mart every weekend with my little boy. It's where I get all my ammo and firearms. If he ever sees a naked body while we're shopping there, you better believe we'll be taking our business somewhere else!

Andy K (Andy K), Saturday, 23 October 2004 16:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Here's what I think about Wal-Mart: when my wife or I go, I don't write "Wal-Mart" in the check register, I write "Satan." But sometimes poverty wins out over conviction and I go to carve a few dollars off the grocery bill. When things are really bad I even buy their store brands. I'm so ashamed.

the apex of nadirs (Rock Hardy), Saturday, 23 October 2004 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I myself go to Wal-Mart quite a lot for ... casual clothing

What, the Sam's Choice or whatever brand eveningwear isn't good enough for you? Elitist.

adam (adam), Saturday, 23 October 2004 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I hate Walmart but it was the only game in town until Target moved out to Boston. Now I'm back at my one true love; OH TARGET I KISS YOU WITH THE PASSION OF A THOUSAND SUNS XOXOXOXOXO

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 24 October 2004 04:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Does anyone else find the new string of "see, there really are good jobs to be had at Walmart?!?!" TV spots to be wildly defensive... as in they're not even selling what's available for purchase at the store any longer but, instead, are doing nothing more than attempting to debunk the, shall we say, urban myths about their employee relations?

Also, the CBS Evening News might as well flat out admit that it is the Walmart Evening News.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 5 November 2004 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)

eleven months pass...
ROFFEAUL...

Wal-Mart Memo Suggests Ways to Cut Employee Benefit Costs

when something smacks of something (dave225.3), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 11:09 (twenty years ago)

Oh. Link dint work..
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/26/business/26walmart.ready.html?th=&adxnnl=1&emc=th&adxnnlx=1130328429-vWv3vaoWTGVkm1GAOyZeXw

when something smacks of something (dave225.3), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 11:10 (twenty years ago)

Actually, if they didn't have such a deplorable record on health benefits, some of the ideas aren't that horrible.


"We are investing in our benefits that will take even better care of our associates," she said. "Our benefit plan is known today as being generous."

when something smacks of something (dave225.3), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 11:12 (twenty years ago)

does this mean no more retiree greeters?

tehresa (tehresa), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 17:08 (twenty years ago)

I liked the headline the other day that Walmart was asking the gov't to raise the minimum wage so that they could pay their workers more. Do they not understand the concept of MINIMUM? So silly.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 17:13 (twenty years ago)

the raise wasnt proposed for the sake of their employees, it was because the CEO noticed that the poor ppl who shop at wal-mart arent buying enough lately. paying your employees slightly more would be offset by the 10s of milions whod shop there with their new slightly higher paychecks

_, Wednesday, 26 October 2005 17:26 (twenty years ago)

fyi, wal-mart is america's largest employer.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 26 October 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)

It's also the world's largest company, if you measure by how much revenue they bring in.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 27 October 2005 00:15 (twenty years ago)

xpost I imagine their rationale was that if they raise wages without a national increase, they'll lose competitive advantage on other companies still paying minimum. It makes sense, at least in the twisted evil logic of capitalism. I'm impressed that they asked at all - it suggests the presence of human life among their executives.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 27 October 2005 00:21 (twenty years ago)

Replicants... sleestacks... lichens.

I do feel guilty for getting any perverse amusement out of it (Rock Hardy), Thursday, 27 October 2005 00:24 (twenty years ago)

i first noticed it a couple years ago

No HOOS need a steen whoppin (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, 1 December 2008 04:12 (seventeen years ago)

Never got any beer and ammo from Jesus...

Kerm, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:14 (seventeen years ago)

I'm offended at the agressive stereotyping of Target shoppers.

redmond, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:14 (seventeen years ago)

But what are you gonna do, make all your own clothes? And what else are you supposed to do when the DVD player stops working?

I try and buy vintage or from op-shops so at least the money's going to charity and the clothes are usually better made anyway. I cant sew so thats my only recourse rly.

I buy better-made electronics, and whatever happened to getting things fixed when they break???

Trayce, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:18 (seventeen years ago)

Anyway thats not rly germane to this thread, but yeah.

Trayce, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:18 (seventeen years ago)

who breaks a DVD player?

Kerm, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:19 (seventeen years ago)

I don't think I've ever seen PBR in a Target
although to be honest I still have not visited either the williamsburg or columbia heights locations

TOMBOT, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:20 (seventeen years ago)

Target here isnt fancypants at all, all the clothes are cheapo made in china shit. Is it diff in US? (I know its not the same company rly)

Trayce, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:24 (seventeen years ago)

the target in hollywood is a piece of shit, almost as bad as k-mart

velko, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:25 (seventeen years ago)

oh i'm not saying it's well (or fairly) manufactured stuff, i'm saying they seemed to have helped in the mainstreaming of the beardo look. simulacra vintage & skinny jeans etc.

No HOOS need a steen whoppin (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, 1 December 2008 04:26 (seventeen years ago)

xpost

I don't think the point is that people shouldn't buy things, ever, but rather that the price of products should reflect their true cost. If the price reflected the true cost of bringing that product to the consumer, then consumers would be more likely to honestly evaluate if they needed the product. And if they did purchase the product, they would be less likely to trash it.

Walmart's low prices are only possible through the exploitation of various groups of people along the resource extraction, manufacturing, and sales journey.

Or something like that.

Super Cub, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:29 (seventeen years ago)

The Targets here all have tshirts with fake punk stuff on them with sparkly bits for the tweenies. I actually saw an off the rack sparkly "punk" shirt with Siouxsies head on it. I should have taken a photo, Alex in NYC would have had apoplexy.

Trayce, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:30 (seventeen years ago)

Agreed, SC. If you think about it too, the people buying cheap shit are only entrenching their own lack of jobs, because to get things that cheap, you gotta offshore all the labor and manufacturing costs. So no jobs in the US, so the ppl remain poor, and so on the cycle goes, turtles all the way down.

Trayce, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:31 (seventeen years ago)

you guessed it...

http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.com/2008/03/31/stuff-white-people-like-bought-by-target/

Blog founders Christian Lander and Myles Valentin will be retained as consultants.

“I’m really happy to be working with Target,” says Lander. “I think this is a great partnership and a true step forward in the future of advertising.”

“White people love Target!” joked Valentin. “But in all seriousness, we could not have selected a better corporate partner. I think Target’s new organic line will really change the way that people eat and shop.”

Regular readers of the site will be offered free shipping on their next order at Target.com with the code “STUFFWHITEPEOPLELIKE.”

vermonter, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:32 (seventeen years ago)

also let's not kid ourselves that there's much more than cosmetic differences betw Wal-Mart and Target

vermonter, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:33 (seventeen years ago)

kind of like bud light and pabst blue ribbon

TOMBOT, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:35 (seventeen years ago)

target is for hip poor people while walmart is for regular poor people.

Super Cub, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:38 (seventeen years ago)

indeed.

vermonter, Monday, 1 December 2008 04:41 (seventeen years ago)

That hipster bingo card is partly inaccurate for real hipsters, but it nails Target clothes dead-on. Converse + shirts of guitars, skulls, boomboxes, or 60s-80s music icons + sweaters + military hats + tight jeans.

skygreenleopard, Monday, 1 December 2008 06:21 (seventeen years ago)

that pic of mick jagger's from like '63

Shacknasty (Frogman Henry), Monday, 1 December 2008 07:57 (seventeen years ago)

also let's not kid ourselves that there's much more than cosmetic differences betw Wal-Mart and Target

I want to dispute this! I think there's a lot of difference, tho I don't know much about Target's business models specifically. I think Target makes more $$ off having deals with housewares & clothing designers who make exclusive lines of stuff -- the prices are low-ish but not the lowest possible cost for that item; it seems reasonable that customers are willing to pay a bit more for melamine dishes styled by Cynthia Rowley or a cotton jacket by Isaac Mizrahi, rather than Target squeezing the life out of those designer's manufacturing procedures to undercut the other guy by $.25. That approach is v different from Wal-Mart's.

Also I think that while you can get "family-sized" versions of things at Target, it's still kind of a medium version of "family" -- whereas at Wal-Mart you can, rather famously, find containers of food that are bigger than a normal family could possibly consume before they spoiled.

One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Monday, 1 December 2008 15:17 (seventeen years ago)

there is no target in williamsburg

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Monday, 1 December 2008 18:03 (seventeen years ago)

also, laurel otm, vis-a-vis more than cosmetic differences within the contents of the stores. plus, wal-mart owners much more famous for having batshit fundie beliefs which spill over into what is sold in the stores, how employees are handled, etc. i don't shop at target very often but i won't shop in a wal-mart. no judgment against those who do, the price is a pretty compelling argument obviously.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Monday, 1 December 2008 18:06 (seventeen years ago)

at Wal-Mart you can, rather famously, find containers of food that are bigger than a normal family could possibly consume before they spoiled.

Am thinking specifically of a jar of pickles that I saw on a tv special abt Wal-Mart (I think?). WM went to the pickle manufacturer and said, "Make us a jar bigger than your biggest existing jar, make it enormous and we will sell it." And the pickle company was like wtf? No one is ever going to actually USE all these pickles! But they had to do it to keep WM as a customer.

OH HAI there's a whole thing about it online, apparently.

One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Monday, 1 December 2008 18:09 (seventeen years ago)

"Vlasic Pickles was roped into a contract with Wal-Mart, in which Wal-Mart sold a 3 gallon jar of whole pickles for $2.97. Wal-Mart sold 240,000 gallons of pickles per week. But the price of the 3 gallon jar was so low, that it vastly undercut Vlasic's sales of 8 ounce and 16 ounce jars of cut pickles; further, Vlasic only made a few pennies per 3 gallon jar. With its profits tumbling, Vlasic asked Wal-Mart for the right to raise the price per 3 gallon jar to $3.49, and according to a Vlasic executive, Wal-Mart threatened that if Vlasic tried to back out of this feature of the contract, Wal-Mart would cease carrying any Vlasic product. Eventually, a Wal-Mart executive said, "Well, we've done to pickles what we did to orange juice. We've killed it"—meaning it had wiped out competitor products. Finally, it allowed Vlasic to raise prices; but in January 2001, Vlasic filed for bankruptcy."

One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Monday, 1 December 2008 18:11 (seventeen years ago)

You guys should just be glad I bought anything. I'm still mostly rocking Minutemen T-shirts and shit I got freshman year of lollege

uәʇɹɐƃu!әʍ ˙ƃ ʎәu!Ⴁʍ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 1 December 2008 18:17 (seventeen years ago)

On the other hand, Wal-Mart deserves some of the credit for making bottles of laundry detergent smaller, reducing plastic and waste.

Also, they're making milk jugs that look like this:

http://www.sustainableisgood.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/06/30/square_milk.jpg

өөө (Pleasant Plains), Monday, 1 December 2008 18:18 (seventeen years ago)

Oh just wait until Walmart discovers vinyl.

Gino-Vanellyville (Mackro Mackro), Monday, 1 December 2008 18:20 (seventeen years ago)

pfft, wait until steve jobs discovers wal-mart

El Tomboto, Monday, 1 December 2008 18:22 (seventeen years ago)

Every Target sporting goods section I've ever seen is really just half an aisle between barbie dolls and yoga mats. You can buy boat anchors at Walmart.

Kerm, Monday, 1 December 2008 18:23 (seventeen years ago)

Anyone who thinks only hipsters shop at Target has never lived a day in a town with a Target

― velko, Sunday, November 30, 2008 9:59 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Yeah, the main demographic I associate with "Target shoppers" is middle-class Hispanic families.

jaymc, Monday, 1 December 2008 18:26 (seventeen years ago)

Oh just wait until Walmart discovers vinyl.

― Gino-Vanellyville (Mackro Mackro), Monday, December 1, 2008 10:20 AM (5 minutes ago)

pfft, wait until steve jobs discovers wal-mart

― El Tomboto, Monday, December 1, 2008 10:22 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

Transitively ---> iVINYL

Gino-Vanellyville (Mackro Mackro), Monday, 1 December 2008 18:27 (seventeen years ago)

Anyone who thinks only hipsters shop at Target has never lived a day in a town with a Target

― velko, Sunday, November 30, 2008 9:59 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Yeah, the main demographic I associate with "Target shoppers" is middle-class Hispanic families.

― jaymc, Monday, 1 December 2008 18:26 (3 hours ago)

Hahaha basically my family, which loves Target. I do admire their Method line of biodegradable shit, though. Besides the non-toxic soaps and stuff they actually use bamboo fibers in place of wood or synthetic fibers, which in my mind is a lot more helpful than just a little bit of soap.

skygreenleopard, Monday, 1 December 2008 22:47 (seventeen years ago)

THIS IS A GREAT IDEA WHAT COULD GO WRONG?

өөө (Pleasant Plains), Monday, 1 December 2008 22:54 (seventeen years ago)

I thought they already sold lotto tickets, honestly.

It is the only big-chain dept store that sells smokes.

Abbott of the Trapezoid Monks (Abbott), Monday, 1 December 2008 22:58 (seventeen years ago)

target doesn't own method

akm, Monday, 1 December 2008 23:18 (seventeen years ago)

the whole "target = hipster" thing is crazytalk

although I like the idea of ol' mall/retail standbys adapting to hipsters, like Foot Locker selling "ironic" sneakers or something.

Gino-Vanellyville (Mackro Mackro), Tuesday, 2 December 2008 00:03 (seventeen years ago)

But what are you gonna do, make all your own clothes? And what else are you supposed to do when the DVD player stops working?

I try and buy vintage or from op-shops so at least the money's going to charity and the clothes are usually better made anyway. I cant sew so thats my only recourse rly.

I buy better-made electronics, and whatever happened to getting things fixed when they break???

― Trayce, Sunday, November 30, 2008 11:18 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest

True, true. I havent bought first-hand clothes in nearly a decade, if you don't count socks and underwear you can get from dollar stores. I especially cringe when I see people paying top dollar for stuff made to look like it's 2nd hand when they could've gone the authentic route and just went to a thrift shop and saved a crapton of money. But I've never heard of a DVD player-repair shop, and I can't imagine getting one fixed would be cheaper than buying a new one these days...

I agree with you 100% on there being better ways to use your money than buying new stuff all the time at Walmart, but I think if people are going to gripe about Walmart they shouldn't stop there, they should think about the issues behind capitalism at large. This is what I mean about Walmart being the Jesus of capitalism. Every time some child labor/sweatshop/biohazard/consumer products issue comes up it seems like people crucify Walmart and then continue to shop at, say, Target, thinking "Oh they're OK, at least it isn't Walmart". Once Walmart dies for capitalism's sins these problems become less of a concern.

But that could just by my misreading..

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 2 December 2008 00:07 (seventeen years ago)

Why would StuffWhitePeopleLike (started by a dude in Toronto, right?) partner with an American firm we white Canadians can't even shop from? Balls.

skeletal lexing (Finefinemusic), Tuesday, 2 December 2008 00:09 (seventeen years ago)

Every time some child labor/sweatshop/biohazard/consumer products issue comes up it seems like people crucify Walmart and then continue to shop at, say, Target, thinking "Oh they're OK, at least it isn't Walmart".

i don't see this at all -- if anything, the stores themselves are rarely crucified and the person/supplier/brand associated the closest with the issue is vilified instead. people seem to be unwilling to acknowledge that there will just be another cheap-ass celeb or whatever endorsed line that is made the exact same way because of the behemoth stores and their cheap cheap cheap agenda. it's disingenuous either way its done but i think your way is less common...?

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Tuesday, 2 December 2008 00:14 (seventeen years ago)

people who're trying to say "wal-mart, target, what's the difference" should really read the story linked by Laurel - or the New Yorker story from a year or two ago - to think more about the nature of wal-mart's business practices and their effects on 1) american businesses, and by extension the economy and 2) the quality of merchandise generally available to the consumer. Target sells crap like anybody else. But to the best of my knowledge they haven't driven anybody out of business by demanding that they reduce their profits to points so low that they can no longer afford to do business in the US. Wal-Mart's whole business model contributes to a lesser standard of quality for American-made goods and to a lesser quantity of American-made goods, i.e., fewer American jobs. Unless the jobs created by new Wal-Marts can be said to offset the losses of American factories, which I don't think they do. One big reason that Levi's suck now, when they didn't used to, is that Wal-Mart got Levi's to think like Wal-Mart. That counts as a loss to me. Levi's were pretty cool once.

J0hn D., Tuesday, 2 December 2008 02:55 (seventeen years ago)

tl;dr "Wal-Mart is just a serious bummer"

J0hn D., Tuesday, 2 December 2008 02:56 (seventeen years ago)

to be fair wal mart is pretty bad-ass

:) Mrs Edward Cullen XD (max), Tuesday, 2 December 2008 03:01 (seventeen years ago)

well yeah but so is napalm

J0hn D., Tuesday, 2 December 2008 03:10 (seventeen years ago)

totally

:) Mrs Edward Cullen XD (max), Tuesday, 2 December 2008 03:19 (seventeen years ago)

although I like the idea of ol' mall/retail standbys adapting to hipsters, like Foot Locker selling "ironic" sneakers or something.

― Gino-Vanellyville (Mackro Mackro), Tuesday, December 2, 2008 12:03 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

yeah this is basically what i'm talking about: i think it's happening.

BIG WORLD HOOS. WEBSTEEN. (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 2 December 2008 03:22 (seventeen years ago)

The variety of products of all levels of quality generally available to the consumer has never been greater. Just because Walmart has made a ton of stuff cheaper than ever doesn't mean you have to shop there. For every product they carry, there's something better at another store in all but the smallest towns.

Kerm, Tuesday, 2 December 2008 03:29 (seventeen years ago)

one year passes...

http://i39.tinypic.com/21eqcud.jpg

turkeylurkeyknull, Saturday, 27 March 2010 09:38 (fifteen years ago)

five years pass...

http://i.imgur.com/PZLJbRJ.png

pplains, Wednesday, 3 June 2015 23:49 (ten years ago)

Life Is Crap

how's life, Thursday, 4 June 2015 12:56 (ten years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.