Discuss.
― Sterling Clover, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Samantha, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ally, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― JM, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― sundar subramanian, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I saw this movie over the weekend. Perhaps not coincidentally, in the company of a number of other philosophy graduate students. I can understand why people might find the dialogue (often monologue) tedious, but I don't think it was as bad as some people made it out to be (especially Fred, in the review on his web site). Some of the theorizing was more wild than other parts, but a good deal of it was at least based in more plausible ideas or ways of thinking that one might be willing to entertain if given reasons to - lots of those reasons were glossed over in the film, of course, which made the philosophies hinted at seem a lot more half-baked. I thought a lot of it was more interesting to entertain than, say, what made up 'Pi', which I happily ignored even though it had the potential to make me cringe as a mathematician and philosopher. Waking Life just had the unfortunate problem of making an entire movie out of that sort of thing.
― Josh, Wednesday, 21 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ally, Thursday, 22 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Josh, Thursday, 22 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Vic (Vic), Friday, 28 November 2003 20:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 28 November 2003 21:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 7 December 2003 01:29 (twenty-one years ago)