SO since the american people seem to think that changing leaders during a "war" is bad

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

does this pave the way for a third, fourth, and possibly lifetime term for bush? I mean, you know, times of emergency call for drastic measures! Changing leadership is bad! He's proven he can fight the terrorists!

Doesn't anyone else smell something in that rhetoric and reasoning, especially if the poor saps voting bought into it?

― obviously, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 09:39 (twenty-one years ago)

People tire of bloodshed eventually. Not yet, sadly.

― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 09:42 (twenty-one years ago)

well, there are laws against it at the moment. so i think they'll draw a mustache on him with a sharpie and run him as "jorge w. topiario" in 2008.

― el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 09:42 (twenty-one years ago)

you never know what bush's new supreme court will overturn or change.....

― todd swiss (eliti), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 09:43 (twenty-one years ago)

there's also talk of 'one person one vote' - i don't know who comes up with these avant garde hip-hop suggestions

― Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 09:45 (twenty-one years ago)

the war (take yr pick) had nothing to do with why bush won

― cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 09:46 (twenty-one years ago)

But fearmongering does.

― obviously, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.