Neocons making Democrats winning impossible in the future?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

I`ve heard rumours that US neocons are planning change US election laws and conditions in states and it would be very difficult for Democrats to win in 2008. Is it possible?

― Margus Kiis, estonian rock critic (Margus Kiis, estonian rock cri), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 22:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Anything is possible if you put your mind (and a lot of money) to it!

― trigonalmayhem (trigonalmayhem), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, it's probable. No use now. Might as well give it up. They got prescriptions now.

― Eric H. (Eric H.), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, your vague scenario is possible.

― Dan Quisenberry (deangulberry), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 22:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Great name, by the way!

― adam... (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 22:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Like the Congressional redistricting in Texas? I say count on it happening.

― Star Hustler, Wednesday, 3 November 2004 22:43 (twenty-one years ago)

"With a bigger majority, we can do even more exciting things,"--House Majority Leader Tom DeLay

― Nemo (JND), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 22:45 (twenty-one years ago)

OMG PATRIOT MK II!

OMG PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE ACT!

OMG EVEN LOWER TAXES FOR BILLIONAIRES!

OMG MORE FUX0R1NG WARS ABROAD!

SO EXCITING!

― trigonalmayhem (trigonalmayhem), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 23:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Basically they can plan whatever the hell they want. But I think you'll be surprised at how they probably won't be able to do it.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 23:14 (twenty-one years ago)

obstructionist!

― cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 23:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Yowsa!

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 23:16 (twenty-one years ago)

VOTE #1 RAGGETT 2008

― The Midnight ROFFLEr (haitch), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 23:17 (twenty-one years ago)

If nominated I will not run (that's Dan's job).

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 23:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I can get behind that. Has a campaign ever come unstuck due to the candidate's propensity for toilet humour?

― The Midnight ROFFLEr (haitch), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 23:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes - Iva Stonker's 1908 campaign went down the toilet.

― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 23:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Rigging election laws against your opponents has been a long-hallowed tradition in the USA. The 'Good Government' movement of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century fought some very tough battles over the worst of this stuff, but try getting a third party candidate on the ballot in about half of the states today and you'll see that the tradition lives on and is full of vigor and vitality.

In fact, many of the current battles in politics seem to be throwbacks to the late nineteenth century. Ack! We are regressing!

― Aimless (Aimless), Thursday, 4 November 2004 00:20 (twenty-one years ago)

ONE STEP FORWARD!
FIVE STEPS BACK!

http://www.trigonalmayhem.com/hannah04.jpg

― trigonalmayhem (trigonalmayhem), Thursday, 4 November 2004 00:23 (twenty-one years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.