Anyone now wishing they'd backed Nader instead?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Some people still see him as being the only one talking honestly (not that anyone ever won an election that way).

everything, Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:29 (twenty years ago)

I think he went a little kooky between 2000 and this year.

Huk-L, Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:32 (twenty years ago)

finally a thread on ilx that addresses nader!

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:32 (twenty years ago)

you can't spell Nader without "nad"

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:33 (twenty years ago)

yeah, I was already planning on voting for nader in 2008, but I kind of wish I had this year.

trigonalmayhem (trigonalmayhem), Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:34 (twenty years ago)

Nader lost any credibility he once had by getting in bed with anti-gay groups and Fox media.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:35 (twenty years ago)

why nader over the green party? just curious

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:35 (twenty years ago)

I joined the Green Party because of their vision for a just society, and voted for Nader in 2000. Nader IS the Green Party's candidate. I'm in CA (which goes Demo) so it wasn't much of a risk to the close election, and I did it to send a message to the Democratic party, where I had been registered since turning 18.
Some counties in CA had impressive percentages of Nader voters (Humboldt).

I voted for Kerry in 04. I was looking at Nader's 1% of the vote, higher in NY where the Nader campaign told voters it was safe to cast the vote and not cost the Democrats the state. It would have higher if people like me voted for him again.

It seems impossible for us to oust the Republicans because of the South and Midwest so next time I hope Democrats who are thinking seriously about the party platforms vote for Nader because the Republicrats can't produce a candidate for real change. Seeing those numbers rise might frighten the Democrats into folding some of the Green platform issues into their platform.

I want Michael Moore to run for President. That's what I want. I wonder how much of the vote he would get.

Orbit (Orbit), Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:39 (twenty years ago)


Nader lost any credibility he once had by getting in bed with anti-gay groups and Fox media.

But aren't orgies "near-queer" at the very least? What an ass!

Huk-L, Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:39 (twenty years ago)

um nader wasn't the green party's candidate this year and stole votes and potential contributions away from them

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:41 (twenty years ago)

Whose candidate was he then?

Orbit (Orbit), Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:41 (twenty years ago)

He ran as an Independent.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:42 (twenty years ago)

Nader = indie

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:43 (twenty years ago)

Anyone who would do something so totally illogical as Nader did in chooseing to run in this past election is not someone I imagine anyone could trust in power.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:43 (twenty years ago)

well almost all his money came from the gop but he was 'independent'; david cobb was the green party candidate

yeah the dems should nominate nader so that people who care at all about abortion rights or gay rights will have nowhere to turn to, great idea

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:44 (twenty years ago)

The Green Party: http://www.gp.org/tenkey.html

I would vote for anyone who is pledged to try to come as close to these ideals as possible.

Orbit (Orbit), Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:48 (twenty years ago)

The Green Party in Canada has gone screwy and libertarian. Mind you, Canada has awesome fringe parties:
http://www.politicalresources.net/canada/canada.htm

Huk-L, Thursday, 4 November 2004 20:50 (twenty years ago)

I wish they'd backed Nader instead.

Pangolino Again, Thursday, 4 November 2004 21:00 (twenty years ago)

Green Party isn't the answer; they're further out-of-touch with conservative voters than the Democrats.

The Democrats need to completely demolish their current structure & find a way to become more accessible to voters on the far left, while at the same time developing a simpleton rhetorical approach that appeals to the conservative "moral majority". It's not going to be easy.

The biggest obstacle to the Democratic Party is their image--as a bunch of commie tax-raisers who want to kill babies & take guns out of peoples' hands. They need to do a better job of combatting that image, especially among the working class. It's shameful that the Democrats represent blue-collar America much more fairly than the right wingers, but they can't get them to identify with them at all.

John Kerry, in retrospect, was a horrible choice. A Catholic Bostonite who uses big words is not going to appeal to Southern and Midwestern voters. What we needed was another Clinton.

Face it, folks--a Yankee isn't going to be the next president. Neither is a woman, a black or a Jew. It's going to have to be a white-bread Southern boy, heavy-drinkin', gun-totin' bubba.

Hey--Hunter S. Thompson in 2008!

Just kidding; but I fear that at least for the next couple of decades, we're not going to able able to elect a Democrat unless his carrying around a bible & a handful of poisonous snakes. The South and midwest doesn't care about ecomomy--they care about maintaining their ideology. And anyone who deviates from it is an infidel & a heathen and won't be fit to shine the shoes of the next president.

Nothing like being held a political slave by 100 million Jesus freaks...time to take up arms, people.

jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Thursday, 4 November 2004 21:01 (twenty years ago)

Green Party isn't the answer; they're further out-of-touch with conservative voters than the Democrats.
Which is kind of the point. The Green Party trying to appeal to right-wingers = Nader '04 = bullshit and a disaster (of a campaign)

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 4 November 2004 21:24 (twenty years ago)

See, I thought what Nader was doing in that interview with Pat Buchanan (maybe this isn't what you're referring to) was being subversive and attempting to draw people who are both reasonable and conservative away from the Republican party as it stands. I thought it was an admirable attempt to get an alternative discourse going.

Pangolino Again, Thursday, 4 November 2004 21:34 (twenty years ago)

I, like the majority, voted for Nadir.

Dan Quisenberry (deangulberry), Thursday, 4 November 2004 21:40 (twenty years ago)

The South and midwest doesn't care about ecomomy--they care about maintaining their ideology.

Exactly. How can they when most of the nation's wealth doesn't come from them, but rather flows TO them from the (largely democratic) civilized regions of the country?

trigonalmayhem (trigonalmayhem), Thursday, 4 November 2004 21:48 (twenty years ago)

I voted for Nader in 2000, but it was largely a vote for a viable third party -- it seemed like he had a good chance of getting that 5% that would make the party eligible for federal matching funds. Unfortunately, it didn't happen, and it's even less likely to happen any time soon. So I don't care so much about Nader, esp. since he didn't even run with the Green Party this year. I think I've also become a lot more pragmatic in the last four years.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 4 November 2004 21:55 (twenty years ago)

I want Michael Moore to run for President. That's what I want. I wonder how much of the vote he would get.

Not very much.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 4 November 2004 21:57 (twenty years ago)

Nader's also just as blinkered as the major party candidates -- he acts like he's the only one speaking THE TRUTH, and when it comes to critiques of corporate interests, yeah, he does have some good points. But in other areas seems so out of touch with what issues affect people on a day-to-day basis, and what's actually possible in our current political system.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 4 November 2004 21:58 (twenty years ago)

I am a registered Green. I voted for Nader in '00. I did not vote for Nader this time and I do not wish it otherwise now that Kerry lost. Nader took his message as far as it could go in '00. That message now requires a new bearer. This was not an election for splitting the opposition, but for making common cause against Bush and the war party.

I shall continue to be a registered Green. I will continue to vote as strategically as I know how. My values don't change, but my emphasis can and does, as the situation warrants.

Aimless (Aimless), Thursday, 4 November 2004 22:06 (twenty years ago)

last 4 posts otm, I voted Nader in 2000 mainly for the prospect federal matching funds, to send a message and basically to sow some Green party momentum(still registered Green). This year his message was basically warmed over 2000(great analysis, just poorly packaged and delivered with more tangents and thematic quagmires than even Kerry could ever conjure) complete with by-now-plainly-asinine refusal to acknowledge the stakes or directly engage progressive criticism. His obstinance was creepy and depressing. I saw/see absolutely no reason to vote for him this year, especially on principle.

tremendoid, Friday, 5 November 2004 00:16 (twenty years ago)

Until I see third-party state legislators, constitutional officers, mayors, representatives, or senators, there's no way that I can support a third-party candidate for president. I believe that third parties would be wiser to spend their money on the little races that they can win than throwing money at some Don Quixote trying to run a national crusade.

And at this point, I'm about ready to apply the above belief to fucking Democrats. Good grief.

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Friday, 5 November 2004 00:23 (twenty years ago)

at least you've got a democratic senator pp!

cinniblount (James Blount), Friday, 5 November 2004 00:26 (twenty years ago)

I've got two of those! Last state in the South doing that. We're freaks!

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Friday, 5 November 2004 00:33 (twenty years ago)

eighteen years pass...

who else (besides me) voted Nader in 2000?

hootenanny-soundtracking clusterfucks about milking cows (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 21 March 2023 20:23 (two years ago)

see above

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Tuesday, 21 March 2023 20:29 (two years ago)

Did, would do it again because my vote was completely irrelevant.

papal hotwife (milo z), Tuesday, 21 March 2023 20:41 (two years ago)

mine wasn't, but i didn't know that at the time!

hootenanny-soundtracking clusterfucks about milking cows (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 21 March 2023 20:44 (two years ago)

I think I voted for him in the primary? Same thing, didn't matter here.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 21 March 2023 20:57 (two years ago)

I did.

jaymc, Tuesday, 21 March 2023 21:02 (two years ago)

One of my managers spent the post-election day shift yelling at me for not voting for Gore, she could not wrap her head around the reality that he lost Texas by 20 points.

papal hotwife (milo z), Tuesday, 21 March 2023 21:04 (two years ago)

the idealism of youth

I didn't vote for him - he'd be a good labor secretary or something, I just didn't see him in the WH

Andy the Grasshopper, Tuesday, 21 March 2023 21:04 (two years ago)

if you were in a state where blue wasn't winning yeah, vote for whoever the fuck, really.

never figured my first election vote would be the most fucked up one in the 21st century.

hootenanny-soundtracking clusterfucks about milking cows (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 21 March 2023 21:05 (two years ago)

or where blue was winning by default (NYC/Cali)

hootenanny-soundtracking clusterfucks about milking cows (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 21 March 2023 21:05 (two years ago)

I voted Nader in 2000, I was v v deep in my "fuck the two party system" feelings.

Of course my state was in absolutely in no danger going anywhere but blue, so...

Maxmillion D. Boosted (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 21 March 2023 21:14 (two years ago)

how many 'Hanging Chads' bands were started that year

Andy the Grasshopper, Tuesday, 21 March 2023 21:26 (two years ago)

I was registered to vote in Georgia, so I wrote in Nader

rob, Tuesday, 21 March 2023 21:28 (two years ago)

I was in a solid blue state, so I specifically voted Green in the (retrospectively very stupid) hope that they would get the 3% popular vote that would help the party going forward (see Ross Perot/Reform Party in 1992)

Now I hate the Green party almost as much as Republicans

obsidian crocogolem (sleeve), Tuesday, 21 March 2023 21:32 (two years ago)

is it 3%? I forget now

obsidian crocogolem (sleeve), Tuesday, 21 March 2023 21:32 (two years ago)

5% for matching funds IIRC

papal hotwife (milo z), Tuesday, 21 March 2023 21:36 (two years ago)

yeah that was the reason I voted for him too. well and also to appear superior to all of my friend.

hootenanny-soundtracking clusterfucks about milking cows (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 21 March 2023 21:38 (two years ago)

though tbh his platform in 2000 is something I still support

hootenanny-soundtracking clusterfucks about milking cows (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 21 March 2023 21:38 (two years ago)

In the wake of the WTC protests, start of the NAFTA fallout, etc. picking Joe Liebermann was a fuck you to young people and what passed for the left of the party at the time that deserved to be punished, it was impossible to predict 9/11 and what the GOP could pull off in the wake of it.

papal hotwife (milo z), Tuesday, 21 March 2023 21:41 (two years ago)

I actually argued it was nbd when Bush got elected, at the time

hootenanny-soundtracking clusterfucks about milking cows (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 21 March 2023 21:43 (two years ago)

Considering the shenanigans in Florida and subsequent court decision, anyone who blames Nader for Gore’s loss is just a closet Republican/expert at punching down.

The Florida high jinks weren’t just limited to hanging chads either. I have yet to see any real refutation of Greg Palast’s investigation for the BBC showing Jeb Bush illegally disenfranchised thousands of black voters. (Of course the Beeb took down that coverage long ago, but it was there originally.)

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Wednesday, 22 March 2023 05:52 (two years ago)

there was a ton of fuckery in FL that got swept under the rug. like how Pat Buchanan won all those votes in that one county due to the butterfly ballot confusion

hootenanny-soundtracking clusterfucks about milking cows (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 22 March 2023 14:19 (two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.