How close is the US economy to collapse?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Fun week continues here in this forum. Of all the issues in the election that didn't get discussed, this ranks among the most threatening. With Bush in office things might just keep getting worse. Even Mortimer Zuckerman, conservative editor-in-chief of US News & World Report, worries

"Put simply, the U.S. economy is awash in red ink. It would be irresponsible in the extreme to rely on the inflow of capital from abroad, on the order of some $2 billion a day, to pay for the twin deficits of trade with the world and budget shortfalls at home; both the current-account trade deficit and the domestic fiscal deficit have widened dramatically during President Bush's first term.

"We must begin living within our means. We have avoided the consequences of overspending because other countries kept lending us money at reasonable rates to buy their goods. But now many of them, especially Asians, have huge stashes of dollars that are bound to depreciate before their eyes, leaving America in a fundamentally untenable place. The only question is whether we make the necessary adjustments or wait for the financial markets to force solutions upon us."

I would love it if someone could tell me this is nothing to worry about, that our society isn't like an 18 year old unemployed kid with a maxed out credit card and no way to pay it back, pretending la di da, there's no problem whatsoever, worrying is for fags, fuck you terrorist and your commie French bullshit, etc.

lysander spooner, Monday, 8 November 2004 01:19 (twenty-one years ago)

The question of whether the US can continue to run an enormous trade deficit and be a successful economy seems to have been running for years. Right wing economists tend to say yes, it doesn't matter.

The fiscal deficit issue seems to be a more recent one, though.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 8 November 2004 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Don't worry. When the collapse comes (probably next week when the Euro goes up even more), Bush, Cheney, Kerry, Edwards, Schwarznegger, and all their Haliburton/Enron buddies have plenty stashed away in order to buy new Hum Vees.

You, on the other hand, will be fighting rabid dogs in the street over a half-eaten buffalo wing. Also, watch out for replicants.

Dr. Benway, Monday, 8 November 2004 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Rumor has it China is looking for a new reserve currency.

Dale Panopticalis (cprek), Monday, 8 November 2004 02:17 (twenty-one years ago)

2004 - 1929 = 75 years, even. I'm not really that worried.

Remy (x Jeremy), Monday, 8 November 2004 02:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually it's more like "how close is the world economy to collapse?" And the answer is: when there is no more "third world" to foist all blue-collar work upon.

mouse (mouse), Monday, 8 November 2004 02:46 (twenty-one years ago)

massive unsubstantiated hearsay rumour alert: my friend knows some economist at UC Berkeley and he has taken all his money out of the bank and gotten rid of all of his stocks and claims that everything will continue to get worse for the next five years and then complete collapse ala Argentina in 2000/2001. Since I have no stocks or money in the bank, I should be free and clear!

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 8 November 2004 03:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Heh. I've got savings in a federal credit union, another set of savings in a UC program, and then I've got a life insurance policy tied into two money market accounts, which could easily fluctuate if things got goofy. The only actual money in a full on bank as such is what comes in (and then goes) from my basic salary and freelance work. No debt outstanding, no stocks otherwise. Not per se perfect and truly 'diversified' but I like to think I'm in a reasonable spot no matter what happens (but we'll see).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 8 November 2004 03:48 (twenty-one years ago)

what you fail to understand is that this administration doesn't view an economic collapse as a bad thing... it would trigger the apocalypse, we'd be judged and ascend to heaven. so a cut-taxes-and-spend economic policy, while suicidal according to any secular humanist economics, in their eyes is win-win.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 8 November 2004 04:26 (twenty-one years ago)

'Collapse' is far too dramatic a word. I would substitute the word 'interesting', as in the putative curse, "May you live in interesting times."

The dollar is going to suffer and I don't see any painless way out. That will bring much higher inflation than we've seen since 1983, but with no corresponding improvement in employment numbers. When it happened in the post-Vietnam era it was called stagflation. I look for a reprise.

Since most of the Social Security trust fund is in US Treasury bonds, Bush's wild deficit-growing policy will soon ensure that the trust fund will take an enoromous hit, as those securities lose a large part of their value in the open market.

Aimless (Aimless), Monday, 8 November 2004 05:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Dollar expected to fall amid China's rumoured selling
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/257979a6-30f4-11d9-a595-00000e2511c8.html

a banana (alanbanana), Monday, 8 November 2004 05:31 (twenty-one years ago)

sorry, that was posted above

a banana (alanbanana), Monday, 8 November 2004 05:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I know a guy who's so convinced that the dollar is right on the brink of taking a tremendous nose dive that with every paycheck he buys gold, both on paper and actual chunks of it that he puts in deposit boxes.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Monday, 8 November 2004 05:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Of course he's a libertarian, so you know what that means.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Monday, 8 November 2004 05:33 (twenty-one years ago)

He's melting down that gold to create a life sized monument to Ayn Rand?

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 8 November 2004 05:39 (twenty-one years ago)

When the economy collapses, those deposit boxes are gonna be jacked before he gets within ten miles of the bank.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Monday, 8 November 2004 05:57 (twenty-one years ago)

When he explained it it actually made a lot of sense, but it does sound kind of crazy now.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Monday, 8 November 2004 06:12 (twenty-one years ago)

You know I was kind of hoping the '70s would come back, but I thought it'd involve maverick Italian-American film directors and blaze orange muscle cars instead of this

MC Transmaniacon (natepatrin), Monday, 8 November 2004 06:54 (twenty-one years ago)

wait and see :D

:| (....), Monday, 8 November 2004 06:57 (twenty-one years ago)

aimless on the mark re. stagflation. there won't be a collapse, but a lot of people on the margins are going to suffer. and no one's going to be saving much.

amateur!!st, Monday, 8 November 2004 07:02 (twenty-one years ago)

we aren't under keynesian directives these days so a return to stagflation is unlikely. most countries are trying to grow their economies through exports because of anemic demand at home, this includes the eu and asia, it's a confluence that means record trade deficits for th eus. trade deficits always grow when the us economy grows quickly, gdp growth averages 3.5% when deficits grow because national savings rate here is too low to fund investment. it is in the interest of the rest of the world to keep investing in the US because along with China it is providing most of the economic growth globally, net payments are still around only 1.3% of total household wealth. the long term solution is for the creaking economies of europe to reform and expand again but that's probably not feasible until there are real structural reforms. australia's position is much worse but then the us ran trade deficits for a century and emerged as the dominant economic power at the end of it. china is running a trade deficit now because the opportunities for growth and return on investment are higher there than in most other places. by contrast russia is usually in surplus because it's not an attractive draw for foreign investment.

keith m (keithmcl), Monday, 8 November 2004 07:03 (twenty-one years ago)

If the US deficit was lower then the weka dollar would be a positive boon for US manufacturing, but the last 4 years and more the US has proped itself up with the worlds willingness to buy US paper to keep their exports to the US cheap (We're looking at you Japan). Now the USN economy is on the slide, tariffs are rising and demand is falling that imperayive is gone. Countries that have comodities are starting to prefer Euros to dollar so another demand for dollars is falling. The only way the US can keep running large deficits is increase the cost of borrowing which would strangle the US economy. China will surely abandon a peg to a currency that makes their exports too cheap and causes inflation at home.

Basically the Us economy is fucked unless it tightens it's belt, reigs in is demand for oil and other commodities, drops ridiculous trade tariffs. Us paper is no longer as gilt edged as it used to be wich will encourgae flows to Europe and Asia. At some point in the near future i can see a chinese or an indian government bond being more secure than a US one.

Ed (dali), Monday, 8 November 2004 09:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I really really must not get into spread betting on the currency markets, but I am so sure I can beat cantor's spread.

Ed (dali), Monday, 8 November 2004 11:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Euros! Luvverly Euros! Get yer Euros here! Buy them while they're less than $2 each! Get yer Euros here!

Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 8 November 2004 11:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Zlotys! Fresh steaming Zlotys! Polish government bonds! Safe as houses and twice as sweet! Zlotys!

Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 8 November 2004 11:25 (twenty-one years ago)

pegged to the euro I'm afraid

Ed (dali), Monday, 8 November 2004 11:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Pegged BY your girlfriend if you gamble on the interweb.

suzy (suzy), Monday, 8 November 2004 11:46 (twenty-one years ago)

It is quite funny that this topic should come up. My boss (or former boss, about six months ago) got me to read a book called the dollar crisis. It ran through the way that the budget deficit would be the US's downfall, when combined with a situation that led to it being doubted as the major reserve currency for all other countries (a fact which has made this position just about sustainable).

An interesting book, if a touch repetative and overbearing. The concern for the US has to be that with oil increasing, a recession again, now would be disasterous, as it would take the US into deflation.

3underscore (___), Monday, 8 November 2004 11:50 (twenty-one years ago)

spread betting on financials isn't really gabling, no really, think of it as excurciatingly risky investment, i should talk to T about it.

Ed (dali), Monday, 8 November 2004 12:52 (twenty-one years ago)

also Cantor's online trading doowhacky appears to have its ports blocked by our work firewall. i was interested for educational purposes only.

Ed (dali), Monday, 8 November 2004 13:00 (twenty-one years ago)

spread betting on financials isn't really gabling, no really, think of it as excurciatingly risky investment

Well, it is Options and Futures trading, pretty much. But that does mean that the uninitiated normally are those that get the worst end of things.

3underscore (___), Monday, 8 November 2004 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)

What makes you think it's not gambling? How is it different?

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Monday, 8 November 2004 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Currency trading is a very liquid market, and spread betting on it is (pretty much) gambling. The position I would argue that it isn't is when you are trading, and therefore are looking to obtain structural positions and spend ten hours a day analysing rates to identify any arbitrage opportunities or mispricing.

Depends on how you see it. You can't really use Black & Scholes on horse racing, or any such model. Currency markets are efficient, you just have to know how they work and why (which itself asks a lot).

3underscore (___), Monday, 8 November 2004 13:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah - I tend to think all stock trading is gambling. It's just that betting on horse racing for example benefits from a lot of research, so I'm not sure that the 'not about chance' argument works - after all chance is a big player in the market too, or at least forces that give the impression of chance (just in case you're a determinist). I think the distinction was originally made because the people that founded the markets believed gambling was immoral - as do the "moral" majority currently in power in the US. As far as I can see it's just haveing your cake and eating it - if you think gambling is immoral, it's hard to see how the stock market is exempt.

I believe (but might just have dreamt up) that currency trading is illegal in most places, and the US is an exception - is this correct?

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Monday, 8 November 2004 13:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Interestingly, about 10 years ago I suggested a piece for the US magazine I was working for on the British tradition of betting on the Christmas number one. They were a bit hesitant because of the gambling = immorality thing but commissioned it in the end.

suzy (suzy), Monday, 8 November 2004 13:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think so Kevin - it is one of the major desks in any Treasury (Currency, Derivatives and Funding/Liquidity are the main desks for them, then onto the more interesting stuff in bigger outfits and banks). It is a necessity to trade currency for nearly all business. The impression may be given that many trading companies are based in the bahamas and areas, but this is more for tax-haven purposes.

I would never view markets and trading per-se as gambling. Futures floors scare me, and trading of options is ridiculously technical, especially exotics. Most people are in the market for a reason though, and everyone takes their spread and has to check positions so regularly it is scary, and a lot more educated than horse-racing (these people have huge mathematical models, and currency's are pretty much stable, rather than "new horses" or whatever). There are rules for people moving markets as well, so there is little opportunity for abuse.

All the financial markets are is a very liquid version of anything else you can buy and sell, but with an opportunity to make/lose a lot of money if you know what to do (or don't). Dependent on knowledge and facilities available decides for me whether it is gambling or not.

(x-post)

3underscore (___), Monday, 8 November 2004 13:36 (twenty-one years ago)

So how far does the dollar have to slide, and how deep does the budgetary red ink have to get, before someone starts talking seriously about a Tobin tax?

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Monday, 8 November 2004 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I have no idea what it is I am thinking of. I'm sure I read something about currency speculation\betting against currency\using exchange rates for profit etc. which said something was legal in the US, but only a couple of other countries. I've looked around and can't find anything, so this one is being chalked up to a dream.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Monday, 8 November 2004 14:37 (twenty-one years ago)

If I were Mexico, Canada or Russia I'd be looking to get my hands on some cut-price real estate right now. That unnecessary bit of Michigan to Canada for $10b? A tearful reuniting of Old and New Mexico?

Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 8 November 2004 14:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it would be hard to get a Tobin tax implemented given the amount of participation we'd need from our trading partners--not really sure, given their investment alternatives, that we'd have a convincing argument to sell them. It's an defensive strategy that would be pretty obvious. Still, our trade policy will almost certainly have to be addressed in the near future.

I might add that a national sales tax would have some of the same implications and benefits as a Tobin tax, without looking so protectionist.

don weiner, Monday, 8 November 2004 14:44 (twenty-one years ago)

So how far does the dollar have to slide, and how deep does the budgetary red ink have to get, before someone starts talking seriously about a Tobin tax?

Till about then, apparently!

3underscore (___), Monday, 8 November 2004 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Don's right to point out that the amount of cross-border legal finessing required for a Tobin tax would likely undermine its implementation or effectiveness. We'd also have to count on dealers to scrupulously record their trades, and of that there is probably little chance. Plus, building an enforcement bureaucracy would increase our short-term budget deficits. But it might be beneficial to have a mechanism by which to throw some sand in the wheels of short-term currency round-tripping, etc. Just ask Thailand, Russia, and Mexico.

Has anyone in Bush-land been heard talking about a VAT, since they seem to like consumption taxes so much? Or is a value-added tax too "French"?

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Monday, 8 November 2004 14:59 (twenty-one years ago)

what's the difference b/w VAT and national sales tax?

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 8 November 2004 15:07 (twenty-one years ago)

The Tobin Tax is a really stupid idea, like the tax cuts and deficit spending it fails to address the fundamental weakness of the Us economy., i.e it consumes far more than it produces and the only sustaining factor has been a global demand for green pieces of paper. Stick a Tobin tax in the way and suddenly green pices of paper look a whole lot less attractive, a whole lot less liquid, whoops there goes the US economy.

Ed (dali), Monday, 8 November 2004 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)

VAT won't solve all the US's problems.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Monday, 8 November 2004 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

(x-post)

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Monday, 8 November 2004 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

A value-added tax is levvied on a good or service at each stage of production -- each time "value" is added. These levvies eventually all get built into the price that the consumer pays, and thus it is often seen as a sales tax of sorts. A sales tax simply taxes the final purchase of a good or service by the consumer. And Kevin is right, it surely won't solve all (or any?) of the U.S.'s current fiscal problems. Am curious, though, as to whether anyone is whispering about it. I know Clinton had floated the idea as a way to pay for his health-care plan.

And Ed, why aren't investors demanding a higher premium right now to hold their dollars? Since interest rates are so low, shouldn't the dollar have tanked already?

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Monday, 8 November 2004 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)

interest rates are low everywhere (admittedly not as ow as the US) once they get down to these levels other factors are more important, but nonethelss the flow of mney ahs been away from the US in the last year or so, it's hardly a stampede yet.

Ed (dali), Monday, 8 November 2004 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)

So educated guess, what do you think the tipping point is? What opens the floodgates? There seems to be all kinds of differing sentiment out there -- some people see a dollar wipeout in weeks, others say it might not happen for 20 years.

FWIW, Stephen Roach's note today said that Chinese planners have told him that the U.S. press may have gotten ahead of itself in saying the yuan peg is near its end. How does that change the dollar dynamic?

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Monday, 8 November 2004 15:56 (twenty-one years ago)

It might never happen, but there are weaknesses in the US economy that make it less attractive. Protectionism, very large deficits (large deficits are OK) and high commodity and energy prices are fairly big warts on the complexion of the US economy. The US has historical momentum on it's side. It definately not a good thing for the holders of US paper for Us paper to be worth significantly elss than it is now.

Ed (dali), Monday, 8 November 2004 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)

truth be told, i'd sooner buy bonds backed by subprime mortgages than any spoon record.

everyone happy now?!? even ben bernanke agrees with me!

Eisbaer, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:19 (eighteen years ago)

do Spoon still get Pixies heckles when they play live? I guess they don't sound as much like them anymore...

marmotwolof, Saturday, 11 August 2007 06:28 (eighteen years ago)

if you guys want to stop seeing banners just dload some fukkin pluginz yo

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/10

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1136

and the US economy has about 5-10 years to go before an immobilizing stroke, give or take some geniuses and a few million young immigrants

El Tomboto, Saturday, 11 August 2007 06:41 (eighteen years ago)

i'm a little confused about some of the comments upthread made by british ILXors. i've read, and heard, anecdotally that the U.K. has a real estate bubble of its own that is at least as bloated as the one here in the U.S. it's also the excuse of every flipper/donald trump-wannabe realtor over here in manhattan as to why manhattan real estate prices are so absurdly obscene -- i.e., that a $1.5M generic condo is a bargain to euros (there's also the weakness of the dollar compared to the pound and the euro to take into account with that, though). maybe the U.K. mortgage market doesn't have the ridiculous, fiscally-unsound mortgage products that we have over here -- or you do, they aren't as prevalent (?) -- but if there IS a U.K. bubble then something has to be inflating it no?!?

also nick -- isn't kind of risky to put your real estate purchase money in equities?!?

Eisbaer, Saturday, 11 August 2007 07:02 (eighteen years ago)

I think i'm going to start a thread about how much shit we all know how to repair, and how much we know how to grow.

Not that things will necessarily go full-on post-apoc, but my jedi/spice-addled/wine-powered senses get the vibe that handyman skills will become increasingly more useful.

kingfish, Saturday, 11 August 2007 07:23 (eighteen years ago)

there's a reason I carry an eyeglasses repair kit, a multi-head screwdriver, adjustable wrench and leatherman in my man-purse every day. Used to have a maglite and an umbrella too but one's batteries ran out and the other got left in Tallinn. Need to work on that.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 11 August 2007 07:49 (eighteen years ago)

that reason is the same reason I listen to the Doobie Brothers every day

El Tomboto, Saturday, 11 August 2007 07:57 (eighteen years ago)

Not that things will necessarily go full-on post-apoc

Quit trying to scare the young 'uns. This is not going anywhere near post-apoc anything. Reading this thread you'd think there had never been a recession before.

Ned Trifle II, Saturday, 11 August 2007 08:00 (eighteen years ago)

a jewish dude told me that i should carry a leatherman for SELF DEFENSE

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Saturday, 11 August 2007 08:02 (eighteen years ago)

those stupid jews. I bet they also like spoon.

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 08:05 (eighteen years ago)

leathermans are awesome! especially when you get them for free from your in-lawz

El Tomboto, Saturday, 11 August 2007 08:12 (eighteen years ago)

isn't kind of risky to put your real estate purchase money in equities?!?

It's only about 25% of it, and it's been in it for years.

Alba, Saturday, 11 August 2007 08:30 (eighteen years ago)

eisbar, the uk certainly has its own ridiculuous bubble, its not quite the same bubble, but its a huge bubble all right, cheap credit, amateur speculators. i believe its called a pyramid scheme

Filey Camp, Saturday, 11 August 2007 08:50 (eighteen years ago)

the crisis is being overdone. there are companies already picking up bargains at half the value of subprime portfolios. most of these people who are in trouble got loans with no down payment so there isn't a lot of risk of financial loss even if they lose their homes. the worst thing in the world would be a bailout that would justify the idiocy of lenders who made bad loans collected their fees and then packaged these loans and sold them off to someone else. that is the risk in that no one really knows who is exposed but it is also a positive in that the risk appears to be spread more widely and so will have less of an impact than say the s&l crisis. i am amazed at the 'sky is falling' people. perhaps it is only here but the economy is very strong, our business is growing by leaps and bounds and unemployent is 3.6%. hardly the stuff of calamity. but then i suppose this is the generation who believed that two quarters of contraction in 1991 was the worst economy of 50 years and economics education is sadly lacking. schumer's ready to shut off the credit spigot to low income households completely, not smart, but then he's not. scary talk of increasing gas taxes by 50 cents and not extending tax cuts, how exactly are these things a benefit to the economy, not to mention his idiotic 20% tariff on chinese imports.

keythkeyth, Saturday, 11 August 2007 17:58 (eighteen years ago)

These folks don't exactly sound very blithe.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 11 August 2007 18:06 (eighteen years ago)

"If you buy that $700 purse, it really cuts into your budget.""

well...sherlocks woken from slumbers on that one

Filey Camp, Saturday, 11 August 2007 18:08 (eighteen years ago)

Style is all. It's Southern California!

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 11 August 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)

keyth's analysis seems fairly accurate in the short term, I don't think the subprime/re crash is that big a deal either - the long-term, though, is less free money for the echo boomers as they have to compete in a global economy and pay their parents' medical bills, which is DOOM AND A HALF

El Tomboto, Saturday, 11 August 2007 18:35 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/466 is a good read on this.

stet, Saturday, 18 August 2007 04:57 (eighteen years ago)

three months pass...

riddle me this, economy-nerds: how come nobody's using the word 'inflation' even though gas, milk, and eggs are noticably more expensive than they were a year ago?

remy bean, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 04:43 (eighteen years ago)

Because that means you dare question the wonderful job the Bush Administration has done with the economy.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 04:44 (eighteen years ago)

i do not understand finance at all

remy bean, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 04:46 (eighteen years ago)

you might want to start here remy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_price_index

Dandy Don Weiner, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 04:48 (eighteen years ago)

So who's emigrating to Australia then? We could use some culture.

moley, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 04:57 (eighteen years ago)

That sounds kind of fun. Are there good jobs in the sciences?

Abbott, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 06:12 (eighteen years ago)

ie like zoology

OMG maybe I could achieve my lifetime dream of meeting a PLATYPUS!!!

Abbott, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 06:13 (eighteen years ago)

an econo-nerd blog if you really wanna shit yer pants over the american economy

Eisbaer, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 06:46 (eighteen years ago)

remy: http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2005/09/the_history_of_.html

ritholtz has been caning this issue - what he calls inflation ex inflation - for as long as I've been reading him.

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 06:48 (eighteen years ago)

greenspan still insist on fuel and expendable proceeds for corn-on-cow action?

daanyel, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 09:23 (eighteen years ago)

670 pounds of heroin for great justice

daanyel, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 09:24 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.avclub.com/content/feature/whither_clarabelle_cow_11_semi

daanyel, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 09:35 (eighteen years ago)

OMG maybe I could achieve my lifetime dream of meeting a PLATYPUS!!!

-- Abbott, Tuesday, November 27, 2007 6:13 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Link

watch out they are poisonous!

latebloomer, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 09:48 (eighteen years ago)

only bits of them.

GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 12:17 (eighteen years ago)

eleven months pass...

massive unsubstantiated hearsay rumour alert: my friend knows some economist at UC Berkeley and he has taken all his money out of the bank and gotten rid of all of his stocks and claims that everything will continue to get worse for the next five years and then complete collapse ala Argentina in 2000/2001. Since I have no stocks or money in the bank, I should be free and clear!
― kyle (akmonday), Sunday, November 7, 2004 7:31 PM (4 years ago)

so we got one year left, huh?

velko, Sunday, 9 November 2008 06:07 (seventeen years ago)

I don't even remember posting that. i wonder who I was talking about?

akm, Sunday, 9 November 2008 06:46 (seventeen years ago)

that friend of a friend, the same one who came home to find his dog choking and took it to the vet and the dog was choking on FINGERS and the police came and found a RAPING MURDERIST HIDING IN THE CLOSET MISSING TWO FINGERS!@

like burning a swan (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Sunday, 9 November 2008 09:40 (seventeen years ago)

oh yeah that guy. i don't trust him anymore

akm, Sunday, 9 November 2008 16:15 (seventeen years ago)

I don't even remember posting that. i wonder who I was talking about?

― akm, Sunday, November 9, 2008 1:46 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

ha!

✧✦✵✶✴i feel magical✴✶✵✦✧ (ice crӕm), Sunday, 9 November 2008 16:17 (seventeen years ago)

three months pass...

times were so much simpler in the '04

kamerad, Wednesday, 11 February 2009 06:12 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, bet those fuckers wish they'd voted for larouche right about now

get drunk and do legos (contenderizer), Wednesday, 11 February 2009 06:28 (seventeen years ago)

times were so much simpler in the '07 too!

iatee, Wednesday, 11 February 2009 06:35 (seventeen years ago)

ahh... August '07. Those were the good times.

Bad Banana On Broadway (kenan), Wednesday, 11 February 2009 07:04 (seventeen years ago)

Even when I was 25 and superdepressed things seemed to be better then. I had like unsubstantiated fears. WOO

Nathalie (stevienixed), Wednesday, 11 February 2009 10:48 (seventeen years ago)

Don't look now, but I think you're superdepressed in 2009.

Bad Banana On Broadway (kenan), Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:36 (seventeen years ago)

four months pass...

No economic system ever remains unchanged, of course, and certainly not after a deep financial collapse and a broad global recession. But over the past few months, even though we've had an imperfect stimulus package, nationalized no banks and undergone no grand reinvention of capitalism, the sense of panic seems to be easing.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/201935?from=rss
(zakaria's "capitalist manifesto")

kamerad, Sunday, 14 June 2009 21:27 (sixteen years ago)

don't trust it

Dr Morbius, Sunday, 14 June 2009 21:33 (sixteen years ago)

nine months pass...

we're so a third world country at this point
http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2010/04/08/jefferson-county-keiser-report-2/
or at least, second world

kamerad, Friday, 9 April 2010 00:19 (sixteen years ago)

Canada’s Only Bullion Bank Gold Vault Is Practically Empty

During the interview, Lenny Organ states that he was in the ScotiaMocatta vault in 2008. What’s the situation now??? Anyone dealing with precious metals, especially precious metals certificates, should listen to this.

Central Fund of Canada investors, who aren’t just using that thing as a blinking number that updates in realtime, also need to listen to this.

Via: ZeroHedge:

Continuing on the trail of exposing what is rapidly becoming one of the largest frauds in commodity markets history is the most recent interview by Eric King with GATA’s Adrian Douglas, Harvey Orgen (who recently testified before the CFTC hearing) and his son, Lenny, in which the two discuss their visit to the only bullion bank vault in Canada, that of ScotiaMocatta, located at 40 King Street West in Toronto, and find the vault is practically empty. This is a relevant segue to a class action lawsuit filed against Morgan Stanley, which was settled out of court, in which it was alleged that Morgan Stanley told clients it was selling them precious metals that they would own in full and that the company would store, yet even despite charging storage fees was not in actual possession of the bullion. It appears that this kind of lack of physical holdings by all who claim to have gold in storage, is pervasive as the actual gold globally is held primarily in paper or electronic form. Lenny Organ who was the person to enter the vault of ScotiaMocatta, says “What shocked me was how little gold and silver they actually had.” Lenny describes exactly how much (or little as the case may be) silver was available – roughly 60,000 ounces. As for gold – 210 400 oz bars, 4,000 maples, 500 eagles, 10 kilo bars, 10 one kilogram pieces of gold nugget form, which Adrian Douglas calculates as being $100 million worth, which is just one tenth of what the Royal Mint of Canada sold in 2008, or over $1 billion worth of gold. As Orgen concludes: “The game ends when the people who own all these paper obligations say enough and take physical delivery, and that’s when the mess will occur.”

Also note the interesting detour into what Stephan Spicer of the Central Fund Of Canada, said regarding his friend at a major bank, who wanted access to his 15,000 oz of silver, and had to wait 6-8 weeks for its to be flown in from Hong Kong.

It is funny that central bankers thought they could take the ponzi mentality of infinite dilution of all assets coupled with infinite debt issuance, as they have done to fiat money, and apply it to gold, in essence piling leverage upon leverage. They underestimated gold holders’ willingness to be diluted into perpetuity – when the realization that gold owned is just 1% of what is physically deliverable, you will see the biggest bank run in history.

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 9 April 2010 00:39 (sixteen years ago)

when the realization that gold owned is just 1% of what is physically deliverable, you will see the biggest bank run in history

This is a non-sequitor. Even if all the gold speculators in the world got burned for a return of one cent on the dollar, neither commercial banks nor central banks rely on gold assets for their stability. So, why run the bank?

Even with as much as gold has been bubbling since mid-2008, it still represents a minimal percentage of all investment assets. It would probably be a good thing for that bubble to deflate.

Aimless, Friday, 9 April 2010 00:45 (sixteen years ago)

two years pass...

guillotine time

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/112397/one-percent-gobbles-economic-recovery

reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 16 February 2013 23:22 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.