from this: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/17/politics/17cnd-dela.html
So ... apparantly no one is entitled to their own opinions in the Republican party?
So, apparantly this guy doesn't understand the system of 'checks and balances' programmed into the constitution?
I mean, he is from some political interest group masquerading as a religious organization so that if anyone attacks them, they're being anti-christian, etc. etc.
Buh.So much hate.
― trigonalmayhem (trigonalmayhem), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 19:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― trigonalmayhem (trigonalmayhem), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 19:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 19:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 19:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 19:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Oh Shit, Wednesday, 17 November 2004 19:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― briania (briania), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 19:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 19:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Krissy Duncan (kdruinscsayn), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― briania (briania), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Earl Warren (daveb), Thursday, 18 November 2004 02:10 (twenty-one years ago)
woulda gotten more votes from seniors
― kingfish (Kingfish), Thursday, 18 November 2004 02:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 18 November 2004 23:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 18 November 2004 23:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 19 November 2004 00:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 19 November 2004 00:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Friday, 19 November 2004 00:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Friday, 19 November 2004 00:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― beanz (beanz), Friday, 19 November 2004 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Friday, 19 November 2004 19:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 19 November 2004 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Friday, 19 November 2004 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 19 November 2004 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Friday, 19 November 2004 19:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 19 November 2004 19:34 (twenty-one years ago)
Rocky & Red
― donut christ (donut), Friday, 19 November 2004 19:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Friday, 19 November 2004 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 19 November 2004 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Friday, 19 November 2004 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 19 November 2004 19:40 (twenty-one years ago)
(in other words: this is ANOTHER reason why the jesus freak right hates arlen spector)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 20 November 2004 02:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Krissy Duncan (kdruinscsayn), Saturday, 20 November 2004 03:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 20 November 2004 03:42 (twenty-one years ago)
Well well well.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 28 April 2009 16:10 (seventeen years ago)
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/04/28/specter_to_switch_parties.html?wprss=44
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 28 April 2009 16:11 (seventeen years ago)
As it says:
Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter will switch his party affiliation from Republican to Democrat and announced today that he will run in 2010 as a Democrat, according to a statement he released this morning.Specter's decision would give Democrats a 60 seat filibuster proof majority in the Senate assuming Democrat Al Franken is eventually sworn in as the next Senator from Minnesota. (Former Sen. Norm Coleman is appealing Franken's victory in the state Supreme Court.)"I have decided to run for re-election in 2010 in the Democratic primary," said Specter in a statement. "I am ready, willing and anxious to take on all comers and have my candidacy for re-election determined in a general election."He added: "Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the Republican Party has moved far to the right. Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their registration to become Democrats. I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans."Specter as a Democrat would also fundamentally alter the 2010 calculus in Pennsylvania as he was expected to face a difficult primary challenge next year from former Rep. Pat Toomey. The only announced Democrat in the race is former National Constitution Center head Joe Torsella although several other candidates are looking at the race.
Specter's decision would give Democrats a 60 seat filibuster proof majority in the Senate assuming Democrat Al Franken is eventually sworn in as the next Senator from Minnesota. (Former Sen. Norm Coleman is appealing Franken's victory in the state Supreme Court.)
"I have decided to run for re-election in 2010 in the Democratic primary," said Specter in a statement. "I am ready, willing and anxious to take on all comers and have my candidacy for re-election determined in a general election."
He added: "Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the Republican Party has moved far to the right. Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their registration to become Democrats. I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans."
Specter as a Democrat would also fundamentally alter the 2010 calculus in Pennsylvania as he was expected to face a difficult primary challenge next year from former Rep. Pat Toomey. The only announced Democrat in the race is former National Constitution Center head Joe Torsella although several other candidates are looking at the race.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 28 April 2009 16:11 (seventeen years ago)
wow
― loaded forbear (gabbneb), Tuesday, 28 April 2009 16:14 (seventeen years ago)
i mean, it's pretty rational, but still
― loaded forbear (gabbneb), Tuesday, 28 April 2009 16:15 (seventeen years ago)
Is that for real? Ha ha!
― Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 28 April 2009 16:15 (seventeen years ago)
Talk about some political opportunism!
― Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 28 April 2009 16:16 (seventeen years ago)
Is this like Lieberman ?
― StanM, Tuesday, 28 April 2009 18:04 (seventeen years ago)
more like Jeffords, actually.
― All that you should require of music is that it gets you laid. (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 28 April 2009 18:05 (seventeen years ago)
Sadly, this will do nothing to make the GOP sit back and rethink their ridiculous positions.And even if it is mostly Specter not wanting to lose his senate seat, its still ballsy and he probably means what he said as well.
― Edward Aetheling (Viceroy), Tuesday, 28 April 2009 21:55 (seventeen years ago)
it's not remotely ballsy, but at least you all got to come for the first time since Jan 20th
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 30 April 2009 11:44 (seventeen years ago)