― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 02:44 (twenty-one years ago)
As an example I'm currently re-watching all of Babylon 5 in reasonably short order (I'm almost thru season 4 already and its only taken about 3 weeks). With a show like that with such an overarcing storyline you can pick a lot of clues and things up you could miss otherwise. I think it'd kill me having to wait each week for a single episode! I'm so impatient.
― Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 02:48 (twenty-one years ago)
I've done the same thing with other series, also. I watched Curb Your Enthusiasm (all four seasons) over a two-week period, and the whole of Seinfeld (9 seasons of around 20 episodes each) over a month.
I'm not sure whether it's better or worse to do this. It certainly satisfies your craving for more after each episode. I think it can become compulsive if you do it too much, too often.
― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 02:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 02:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― isadora (isadora), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 02:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 03:03 (twenty-one years ago)
And as for saturation - if you want it, go for it. If you're burnt out, that's the great thing - you can put it down and come back whenever you're ready.
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 21 December 2004 03:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 03:15 (twenty-one years ago)
Hahaha I long ago downloaded the whole series and watched it in like 3 sittings - how fucking annoying is it?!
― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 03:40 (twenty-one years ago)
the second season isn't living up to the first though.
― cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 03:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 03:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Slim Pickens (Slim Pickens), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 03:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 03:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 04:06 (twenty-one years ago)
not recommended for Strangers with Candy - too much.
looking fwd to seeing the Sopranos & 6 Feet Under some day. what a day.
― autovac (autovac), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― derrick (derrick), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 06:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 07:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 07:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael Stuchbery (Mikey Bidness), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 09:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Abby (abby mcdonald), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 10:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Madchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 11:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― Archel having login trouble, Tuesday, 21 December 2004 11:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 12:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― cis (cis), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 13:59 (twenty-one years ago)
However, I find dramatic cliffhangery stuff more rewarding if I can bring myself to watch it once a week; especially with shows (such as LOST) where I don't have DVDs to turn to, yet.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 14:12 (twenty-one years ago)
law and order marathons, on the other hand, are excellent for decompressing. each story is different, so each episode hooks you anew. oh, and on cable, they tend to begin the next episode over the credits of the former, which is genius. once you see that first scene, you have to know how it all sorts out.
― carly, Tuesday, 21 December 2004 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 15:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 15:15 (twenty-one years ago)