Can we discuss the stolen fetus/mama murder from last week?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
because really, i find it terrifying. and after doing some research, i found out that homicide is the most common cause of death in pregnant women. AAAAAAAAACCCCCCCCCCKKKK! more than any natural cause! also, let us speculate on the killer's mental status and whether she acted alone.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)

"some research" = AP article??

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 15:55 (twenty-one years ago)

no, this was actually before that article. when the killing first occurred and they believed it to be random, some people actually thought that the act was the work of strangers with a motivation to sell the baby. anyway, i found out that these "experts" in maternal homicide thought it to be the first actual case of homicide/extraction of the fetus for such reasons. i went on to find out that murdered pregnant women are most often killed by the father of the baby or a woman of child bearing age who has had fertility issues and gone bonkers. which is what they now think happened in this case.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:02 (twenty-one years ago)

What I think is bizarre is that she told everyone she was pregnant, had gone into labour and then shows up a few hours later with a newborn. Did she stuff pillows under her shirt? Why did no one ask why she wasn't still at the hospital, rather than in a diner with an infant?

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, so this is a common thing then?

Do these stats apply worldwide or just in the States?

Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:14 (twenty-one years ago)

"because really, i find it terrifying. and after doing some research, i found out that homicide is the most common cause of death in pregnant women."

wouldn't homicide be common as cause of death for most young women?

stevie nixed (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:17 (twenty-one years ago)

i think accidents would be the most common. but for pregnant women, homicide tops even accidents!

i just found info in the u.s. so i don't know about elsewhere.

and about her claiming to be pregnant/have given birth---is her husband a total dolt? he has to be in on it, else he is the mental equivalent of an apple.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I made mention of the horrifying edit job CNN.com did for an article on one of these stories but it bears repeating:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/12/19/missouri.fetus/index.html

Who is the evil person who decided to put that picture with that headline???

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:29 (twenty-one years ago)

i thought the picture they put with the article was funny. i will burn for eternity.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:32 (twenty-one years ago)

"Look at my baby!"
"...That's a puppy."
"NO IT IS A BABY I BIRTHED HER FROM MY VERY OWN WOMB"
"Are you calling her Romula or Remie?"
"ARE YOU MAKING FUN OF MY BABY??????????"
"I'm leaving now."

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:37 (twenty-one years ago)

i can't find the u.s. numbers, but i found losts of stats for individual states. the rough numbers for young women (i looked at 24-35) broke down on average much like this example, which was west virginia: accidents-31.8%, intentional self-harm-6.8%, malignant neoplasms-9.1%, heart disease-13.6%, assault-6.8%. so i guess homicie would be 5th leading cause among young women in general. that is quite a difference.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Link to your research, please. I don't believe an effective nationwide study has actually been completed on this. In fact, I think any researcher would be hard pressed to come up with the necessary data, as pointed out in this article, though it does make the case that this problem is pretty fucking serious.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)

or maybe young women who are pregnant are far less likely to suffer accidents (being far more careful), intentional self-harm (being far more responsible), or heart disease or malignant neoplasms (being under medical supervision)?

if this is such a pervasive problem, why is this case singled out for such overwhelming media attention? other than the fact that it will be used by the right wing to try to overturn abortion rights?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)

a good way to tell, of course, would be to look at actual numbers rather than percentages

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)

gabbneb- read the Post story I linked

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:49 (twenty-one years ago)

actually, being pregnant makes you more likely to have accidents (slips and falls at least) because of the changes in your balance and weight distribution. i would wager that intentional self-harm is more likely as well, due to emotional distress caused by pregnancy.

it is a sensational story, that is why the media attention is so great. lots of wierd details. and i think your assertion that it will be used by the right wing to try and overturn abortion rights is a bit paranoid.

as far as the data i found goes, i am not about to relocate all of the individual state data! but if you are interested, just google search each state you want to look at. search through vital statistics by age and sex, then search for homicide stats and victim info.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:55 (twenty-one years ago)

The CNN headline/photo juxtaposition is pretty evil, but the "New York Post" used "WOMB RAIDER" as a headline on the Sunday front page and "Fetal Attraction" in a caption on the inside.

Nemo (JND), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:56 (twenty-one years ago)

The article Tom linked seems to make clear that pregnant women may be at increased risk of homicide by current or former partners, in particular when they are unmarried or where paternity is in doubt. Every single example discussed therein fits the profile. It's consistent with this NOW release that casts murders of pregnant women as aggravated domestic violence. Thus, the stolen fetus story does not seem to dramatize the issue, because it's a random murder. In light of the article and release, the statistics about cause of death don't seem to indicate that pregnant women are at increased risk of death by random homicide.

Nor do they necessarily indicate that pregnant women are at a greater risk of death by homicide than non-pregnant women. The release says that in one year, using national statistics, homicide was the second-leading cause of death among all young women, pregnant or not, and that accidents were the leading cause of death among both pregnant and non-pregnant women. Moreover, the The release does point to three state/local studies that showed homicide as the leading cause of death among pregnant women, (only) one of which also showed homicide as just the 5th-leading cause among non-pregnant women. All three studies focused upon urban communities – Cook County, Illinois, New York, and the State of Maryland (about 40% Baltimore, plus semi-urban sprawl through the DC suburbs). The Post article mentions additional studies showing the same in Massachusetts (population heavily dominated by Boston/Worcester) and Georgia (an exception, perhaps, but Atlanta metro is about 40% of the population and contains a big inner city). Urban communities are home to more single mothers. Would the statistics be the same if you studied cause of death in suburban and rural areas?

Note also that the big media stories here involve white people.

i think your assertion that it will be used by the right wing to try and overturn abortion rights is a bit paranoid.

"overturn abortion rights" was misleading. the anti-Roe forces are seeking incremental change in part through litigation involving just this kind of case.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 17:55 (twenty-one years ago)

or where paternity is in doubt

I should have added "or is sought to be denied"

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)

WOMB RAIDER

omg

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 18:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Here we go. Ms. Jolie's most groundbreaking role yet.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 18:29 (twenty-one years ago)

"overturn abortion rights" was misleading. the anti-Roe forces are seeking incremental change in part through litigation involving just this kind of case.

I thought the anti-Roe brigade just cared about cases where a pregnant woman's fetus is killed, seeking to change laws so that those responsible can be charged with murder. I doubt they will give a damn about a case where the baby survives but the mother dies. They are not concerned with the life of the mother.

Leon the Fratboy (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 18:41 (twenty-one years ago)

oh, I thought the baby died. I reflexively don't pay much attention to sensational stories.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 18:46 (twenty-one years ago)

baby is fine and home with the dad. i feel sorry for the grandma, who apparently said that when she found her daughter, it "looked like her stomach exploded". that vision will never go away.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Let's segue into Munchausen-by-proxy, eh? Something more pleasant?

andy, Tuesday, 21 December 2004 19:56 (twenty-one years ago)

baby is fine and home with the dad. i feel sorry for the grandma, who apparently said that when she found her daughter, it "looked like her stomach exploded". that vision will never go away.
-- Emilymv (emilyventer...), December 21st, 2004.

i would make an alien joke but....that'd be in rather poor taste.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 20:12 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/12/21/internet_logs_nail_foetus_snatcher/

Interesting

Michele Bianco, Tuesday, 21 December 2004 20:22 (twenty-one years ago)

which part?
It was trivial to trace Montgomery's IP address to her house, where police found the stolen infant, pretty much blowing any non-insanity defence Montgomery might have hoped to mount.
Huh?

The premature infant, named Victoria, is reported to be healthy and has since been re-united with her father. ® Is "father" a registered trademark now?

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 20:30 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.lansmeer.nl/images/LOL.jpg

LORD OF ALL THINGS HOMOELECTRONIC (trigonalmayhem), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 21:31 (twenty-one years ago)

It was trivial to trace Montgomery's IP address to her house, where police found the stolen infant, pretty much blowing any non-insanity defence Montgomery might have hoped to mount.
Huh?

i think they mean that by being caught with the baby in her house, she is legally screwed. she can't claim to be falsely accused, etc.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 21:35 (twenty-one years ago)

red-handed, they called it.

LSTD (answer) (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 21:45 (twenty-one years ago)

(I am still back on WOMB RAIDER)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 22:26 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.artsasia.com.my/offsite/faithnthecity/bigimages/blooddebt.jpg

papa november (papa november), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Yikes thats a scary pic.

An article about this in the Age had a comment from the alleged kidnappers husband that has me boggled:

Yesterday, Montgomery's husband, Kevin Montgomery, said he believed that the baby his wife presented to him was theirs.

According to federal authorities, Kevin Montgomery picked up his wife in Topeka on Thursday and drove her and the new baby, whom they called Abigail, about 65km south to Melvern, where the couple showed her off.

After Lisa Montgomery made her first appearance in federal court yesterday, Kevin Montgomery said, "I had no idea," when asked by reporters what he had known about his wife's alleged actions.

HOW CAN YOU HAVE NO IDEA YOUR WIFE WAS NOT ACTUALLY PREGNANT. What did she do, explain it away somehow? Stuff pillows down her top and refuse to be touched? Is the man retarded? Weird, this whole thing is so damn weird.

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 22 December 2004 04:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Apparently victim and suspect met on "Ratter Chatter", an internet chat group about rat terriers?!

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 22 December 2004 05:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I think that the woman had recently had a miscarraige, and it sounds to me like she and her husband may not have seen much of each other if he worked 70 miles away; she could still have been large from weight gain.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 22 December 2004 07:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I used to wonder if there was any story the New York Post would think was off-limits for a punning headline. But thanks to WOMB RAIDER, I wonder no more.

Nemo (JND), Wednesday, 22 December 2004 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Wow - the pun thing is just terrible!

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 22 December 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)

lamazest

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 22 December 2004 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)

hahahahaha
this thread made the funny that much funnier

"WOMB RAIDER: CAUGHT RED HANDED"

LORD OF ALL THINGS HOMOELECTRONIC (trigonalmayhem), Thursday, 23 December 2004 06:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Wow. Send your resume to the Post!

Nemo (JND), Thursday, 23 December 2004 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I might just do that.

LORD OF ALL THINGS HOMOELECTRONIC (trigonalmayhem), Friday, 24 December 2004 01:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I am still wondering about the fact that she was able to, basically, pull the infant out and wipe it off and get away with calling it a newborn. That child was robbed of an extra month, and still survived. That's a fucking miracle.
I hope that child gets a LOT of counseling. The husband not knowing is amusing - men fall for lies all the time, as do women.
Men fall for pregnancy lies, and women fall for faithfulness lies.
I think, of course, she is mentally ill. Her sickness is a sickness. She's mental! her ex-husband says her tubes were tied! She's mental!
I work with people who are on the edge - their previous actions are considered harmful to society, and because of those actions they need to participate in a positive way in society.
To actually cut a fetus from the birth mother and expect society to accept it - to think that you wouldn't get caught - means some profound mental illness is going on.
What is her worth - a baby or nothing?
Well, she has prison now.
What in God's name would provoke thiss?
Women having quintuplets after taking hormone enducing drugs, the absolute empire of fertility...and the sad state that women are STILL considered a bunch of ovaries that will, eventually, end up preggers.
I feel sorry for her, because she never got a chance to experience life within her womb. I pity her because i can.
The thought of mental illness being proscribed to women has a huge history. At times, the ability to conceive and give birth has been something that changes daily life.
So when she does it, it is a cry for completion - not motherhood?
I dunno.


aimurchie, Friday, 24 December 2004 02:17 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm sorry aimurchie but you kinda lost me after the first sentence...

kossori (not entirely unhappy), Friday, 24 December 2004 02:41 (twenty-one years ago)

What I was saying is...the woman who murdered to have a baby is like the people who want to choose a baby.
In a weird way.\
My point is that there is no choice. The choice to continue a pregnancy - or not - is a choice, today. And I want that to continue,
that.

aimurchie, Friday, 24 December 2004 03:10 (twenty-one years ago)

is that yen sign after 'in a werid way' only showing up on my j-computer, mysteriously, or is it integral to the meaning of your explanation, which is no clearer to me than your original post?

kossori (not entirely unhappy), Friday, 24 December 2004 04:43 (twenty-one years ago)

sorry - weird, not werid. \\\

kossori (not entirely unhappy), Friday, 24 December 2004 04:43 (twenty-one years ago)

No,it's me being weird (//), not you. The desire to have a healthy baby led to a woman committing murder. The woman who committed this crime is obviously mentally ill. Her husband, who seemed to go along with a fake pregnancy and a - a surprise! - baby showing up in a diner, with his wife, is obviously delusional.
It is a particularly horrific crime, and the details are equally horrifying.
But I think that society places such a high price on the ability to conceive that women are driven to desperate measures all of the time in order to fulfill the role of birth mother.
This particular crime is someone who is mentally ill. her particular illness is manifested in the desire to have a baby - any baby - and fuck the consequences.
This is a drastic example of a painful truth. many women will go to desperate measures in order to conceive - or be observed as having done so?
And yet, there are so many ways to parent in this world. Thousands of children, in America, cry out for fostering or adoption. But somehow, it is the reproduction specialists who are finding business.
There are babies all over the world crying for mothers. There are mothers all over the world crying for their babies.
Reproduction - in and of itself - is a lucrative science. There are several ways to have a kid, but not many ways to raise one.
To murder someone, and cut the fetus from the body, is sick and wrong. Sick.
The ability to do it is mental. Her ex-husband claims that she had her tubes tied. Her current husband didn't know this?
I shake my head and scratch my head and think that everyone is crazy.
But...reproduction IS a huge touch point.
How much can you pay to have a child? it's really strange - couples who can't conceive are barganing for a zygote.
A Specific Zygote. And what is left?
The more we consider these things the more we will be involved in the so- called cultural wars.
Murder for Parenthood. This is an extreme example but it is not exactly unprecedented.
Parents against murder.
People against crime.
Love against hate.
xxoo - Alison

aimurchie, Friday, 24 December 2004 09:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I think that just about covers it, yes.

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 24 December 2004 09:57 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.