http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/4083169.stm
Potential cock up of a classic character and Morris' reputation or the best thing on TV in 2005?
― Secretly English (secretly english), Monday, 3 January 2005 09:06 (twenty years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 3 January 2005 09:30 (twenty years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 3 January 2005 11:20 (twenty years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 3 January 2005 11:21 (twenty years ago)
― Hari Ashurst (Toaster), Monday, 3 January 2005 11:59 (twenty years ago)
― James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Monday, 3 January 2005 12:52 (twenty years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 3 January 2005 13:21 (twenty years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 3 January 2005 23:49 (twenty years ago)
― fcussen (Burger), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 00:43 (twenty years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 07:50 (twenty years ago)
― Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 08:50 (twenty years ago)
― henry miller, Tuesday, 4 January 2005 09:28 (twenty years ago)
TVGH is funny because it relies on your imagination the TV series sucked, Cunt was funny because of the "the Kilroy team would like to hear from you" bits.
― Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 09:53 (twenty years ago)
Would he get the financial backing with his record of self-sabotage ("Grade is a...") and tabloid-baiting? Perhaps he would - My Wrongs wasn't cheap. I don't really know whether he's capable of developing a feature on his own. Perhaps he could team up with Richard Curtis - Hugh Grant and Mark Heap both fall in love with the same American movie star, but she has the body of a Hoover and they're wheelchair-bound mesogleal tripeds who can only communicate in supra-aural square waves. Features Rowan Atkinson as a funny vicar (who burns penguins).
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 10:16 (twenty years ago)
― henry miller, Monday, 10 January 2005 11:37 (twenty years ago)
Still, nothing.
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Monday, 10 January 2005 14:01 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 10 January 2005 14:15 (twenty years ago)
at first i thought that it was an invented Chris Morris character.
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Monday, 10 January 2005 14:32 (twenty years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 29 January 2005 15:54 (twenty years ago)
http://www.trashbat.co.ck/images/barley/gallery/large_covers/bkg_eph_4_large.jpg
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 29 January 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Saturday, 29 January 2005 23:03 (twenty years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 29 January 2005 23:19 (twenty years ago)
which bit?
Dean Lerner and the bloke from Boosh bodes well. looked all a bit like that soap set in a web design office. can't remember the name now...
the very first tv trailer was based on manic miner loading screen. = good.
― koogs (koogs), Monday, 31 January 2005 10:01 (twenty years ago)
― Miles Finch, Monday, 31 January 2005 10:06 (twenty years ago)
"They don't realise it's not good cos it's rude, yeah?""Yeah, it's good because it looks like it's good because it's rude." (the lazy-gobbed questioning-intonation is a bonus)
I had to install QT* to watch that again, which meant I had to install iTunes. I'm LIVING IN THE FUTURE.
(Funny cos I had to deliver a project in QT last week and I couldn't even watch the finished article at my desk.)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 31 January 2005 10:48 (twenty years ago)
"Once the idiots were just fools gawping in through the windows. Now they've entered the building..."
― Momus (Momus), Monday, 31 January 2005 13:28 (twenty years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Monday, 31 January 2005 13:36 (twenty years ago)
― debden, Monday, 31 January 2005 13:47 (twenty years ago)
I think a lot of the comedy in the print version came from the unhinged, psychopathic overstatement of the narrator's hatred of Barley for relatively trivial crimes against taste and morality. Who was this fellow, if not Barley's repressed, self-hating alter ego? I'll be interested if they show Ashcroft as a 'centre of goodness' – a reasonable and likeable man – or a jittering neurotic Goebbels, full of repressed, passionate, hissing, spitting, volatile-projected self-hatred.
― Momus (Momus), Monday, 31 January 2005 13:56 (twenty years ago)
― Miles Finch, Monday, 31 January 2005 14:00 (twenty years ago)
― debden, Monday, 31 January 2005 14:03 (twenty years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,1405547,00.html
key words relate to bleeding-edge 'creatives' being perfectly able to satirize themselves. i always thought the savagery of tvgohome was maxed so that you wdn't confuse it with halfway-house shite like shoreditdch twat -- it isn't comfortable satire, it's flamewar.
― Miles Finch, Friday, 4 February 2005 12:42 (twenty years ago)
― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Friday, 4 February 2005 12:54 (twenty years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 4 February 2005 13:03 (twenty years ago)
hmmmm.
― Pete W (peterw), Friday, 4 February 2005 13:05 (twenty years ago)
BUT the trailers look good and thinking on it, there's no really new paradigm that's emerged to displace the barleys in "new media" circles, so it can't be that dated.
sleaze nation is still going, right? i love the dnb soundtrack on the trailer, it's exactly right.
also i have a lot invested in barley. my first ever paid piece of writing was on tvgohome, three years back. i got to use 'cunt', 'fuck', and 'pissant' in my maiden piece! woo!
xpost -- watts, say nothing!
― Miles Finch, Friday, 4 February 2005 13:07 (twenty years ago)
― stelfox, Friday, 4 February 2005 13:10 (twenty years ago)
― stelfox, Friday, 4 February 2005 13:11 (twenty years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 4 February 2005 13:13 (twenty years ago)
― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Friday, 4 February 2005 13:14 (twenty years ago)
i can't remember how i came across tvgohome but i was 18 years old and not living in london -- but anyway, my line was nathan barley helps 'explain' things that normals do know about, in advertising, magazine design, fashion, ect. after all comabat trousers, scooters, trucker caps all ended up quite high street.
i've never been a part of the media-wanker circus but have had first-hand experience of barleys -- it isn't that small a world, perhaps.
― Miles Finch, Friday, 4 February 2005 13:16 (twenty years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Friday, 4 February 2005 13:17 (twenty years ago)
― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Friday, 4 February 2005 13:17 (twenty years ago)
― Miles Finch, Friday, 4 February 2005 13:18 (twenty years ago)
― Miles Finch, Friday, 4 February 2005 13:19 (twenty years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 4 February 2005 13:45 (twenty years ago)
I hate to be a hata, but HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
― Markelby (Mark C), Friday, 4 February 2005 14:02 (twenty years ago)
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=15150907&method=full&siteid=89488&headline=the-man-who-drinks-petrol-name_page.html
― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 4 February 2005 14:39 (twenty years ago)
Does he ever write Screen Burn anymore or is he now concentrating on bigging up his own projects and writing travel features in the midst of global recession?
― synths and drum machines (e.g. Simmonds) (Marcello Carlin), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 11:09 (sixteen years ago)
I don't really mind Brooker. He can be pretty funny and Screen Wipe was good. But that travel piece at the weekend was the most boring pointless thing I've read in a while. And I'm including posts like this on ILX.
― GamalielRatsey, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 11:13 (sixteen years ago)
despite slagging it off elsewhere, i'm taping dead set. i bet i never watch it, though. nobody here is making a convincing case for it being anything other than a mediocre diversion -- and trust me, i've got way too many of those going on right now.
― remorseful prober (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 11:19 (sixteen years ago)
Would have been even better with a slightly larger budget though.
I was surprised at how relatively expensive it looked as it is
― Cittaslow Mazza (blueski), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 12:00 (sixteen years ago)
i can't wait for ep5 of dead set (which i'm in, heh). haven't seen any of it yet though...
― CharlieNo4, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 12:05 (sixteen years ago)
also love that they didn't bother with credits, just gave a URL. if Brooker's over-rated it's more because there's just so many far worse people out there doing well too.
― Cittaslow Mazza (blueski), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 12:16 (sixteen years ago)
altho maybe it did undermine a bit the 'credits are useful as an interlude between programmes that allow you to pause for thought without some numpty chattering away about what's coming next as if it wasn't easy enough for you to find this out anyway' argument he made quite well on SW
― Cittaslow Mazza (blueski), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 12:18 (sixteen years ago)
brooker? a contrarian? well i never.
― remorseful prober (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 12:22 (sixteen years ago)
i always assumed credits existed as much to doff a cap to the people who worked to create a show as to inform the viewer who these people were. as such, i'd mourn their passing if they disappeared altogether: it's like not having the autor's name on a book sleeve.
― CharlieNo4, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 12:27 (sixteen years ago)
no it's closer to the book listing all the people who actually helped in the production process of the book at the end
― Cittaslow Mazza (blueski), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 12:29 (sixteen years ago)
I too was a bit perturbed by their lack of zombie knowledge, but I think that they probably wanted a contrast with most of the recent zombie projects, which almost all seem to have a good grasp of zombie history and use that for 'sly' meta-textual referencing. Which seems a bit of a strange thing to get away from when your whole schtick is OMG Zombies & Big Brother! Together at last!
I did enjoy it, tho.
― emil.y, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 12:42 (sixteen years ago)
An acknowledgements page, then?
I thought it was alright, nowt special, rather too much of it got taken up with Jaime Winstone making sobbing noises. Going to the credits site (features authentic scrolling-slightly-too-quickly-to-read effect, though I did see former Gladiators winner Eunice Huthart listed in the stunt performers), I came to realise that I had no idea what any of the characters were called.
― William Bloody Swygart, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 13:03 (sixteen years ago)
more like a list of every single person at the publishing company who ever had anything to do with it, right down to the dude who made the editor's PA his cup of tea in the morning.
― remorseful prober (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 13:08 (sixteen years ago)
ep5 of dead set (which i'm in, heh).
okay where?
― Ant Attack |=| (Ste), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 13:13 (sixteen years ago)
> also love that they didn't bother with credits, just gave a URL
jamcredits.com (now abandoned) got there first, you Clarkson faced Guff-Prating Berkskull.
copy here: http://www.channel4.com/entertainment/tv/microsites/J/jam/credits_ns6.html
...KEVIN ELDON...
― koogs, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 13:23 (sixteen years ago)
the sign with Eldon's face, arrow and GOLLUM tag
― Cittaslow Mazza (blueski), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 13:25 (sixteen years ago)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v134/tracerhand/TheyreEnglish-1.jpg
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 13:26 (sixteen years ago)
Kevin Eldon is playing the character I would actually be in the BB house
― Ant Attack |=| (Ste), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 13:31 (sixteen years ago)
the scene with the girl pounding bits out of the zombies skull with the fire extinguisher was amazing
― Ant Attack |=| (Ste), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 13:34 (sixteen years ago)
I thought they were going to play out the whole paranoia of the contestants disbelief that it wasn't just a stunt for a bit longer, perhaps they'll refer to it again.
― Ant Attack |=| (Ste), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 13:37 (sixteen years ago)
ep5 of dead set (which i'm in, heh).okay where?― Ant Attack |=| (Ste), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 13:13
― Ant Attack |=| (Ste), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 13:13
well...
haven't seen any of it yet though...
― CharlieNo4, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 12:05
so i don't know. but i'm what's known as a "background zombie"... so i might get a quarter of a second's bloodied screen time.
― CharlieNo4, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 14:31 (sixteen years ago)
i'm what's known as a "background zombie"
new user name for you there.
― remorseful prober (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 14:49 (sixteen years ago)
(or me, if you don't snap it up first.)
Or a useful phrase for an ILX Lurker?
― Ich Ber ein Binliner (Tom D.), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 14:50 (sixteen years ago)
splendid idea!
― Background Zombie (CharlieNo4), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 14:52 (sixteen years ago)
ach, it was only on for half hour tonight totally wasn't expecting that.
still enjoying it.
― Ant Attack |=| (Ste), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 22:33 (sixteen years ago)
watched last night's, and about 10 minutes of tonight. that'll be it for me. it's so fucking dull. beyond the basic premise -- big brother! zombies! -- there's absolutely nothing there, is there? the characters are ciphers, the action is predictable, the outcome interests me not a jot.
― remorseful prober (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 23:38 (sixteen years ago)
(and i appreciate what chewshabadoo says upthread about the characterisation improving, but i can't be arsed waiting around for that to happen!)
― remorseful prober (grimly fiendish), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 23:42 (sixteen years ago)
the installments are too short. would have been cool 90 minutes than two 60 minutes.
looks quite good for the budget. Obviously going off that whole current-horror movie thing with the fast cutting, the handheld, the shutter speeds etc..., but it's fine. Hardly groundbreaking or terribly inventive so far, but still a really enjoyable zombie horror by my standards. Glad the satire hasn't really got in the way of anything.
― Gukbe, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 02:46 (sixteen years ago)
lol at Pippa telling that producer guy he was using up the oxygen
"it's not a fucking submarine"
― Ant Attack |=| (Ste), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 09:23 (sixteen years ago)
Dead Set thread here:Dead Set - E4 Big Brother Zombie thing!
― koogs, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 13:50 (sixteen years ago)
is this out of print on DVD? anyone know where i can order it, preferably cheaply, and have it shipped to the US? (it's ridiculously expensive on amazon.co.uk.)
― i'd rather cut cane for castro (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Sunday, 1 March 2009 16:41 (sixteen years ago)
if you know how to use torrents then you can get it on http://thebox.bz/ - i think they have open sign up just now but if you need or want an invite then give me a shout.
― jed_, Sunday, 1 March 2009 16:45 (sixteen years ago)
It *is* out of print, aggravatingly (my copy was scratched when I lent it to someone). It went from being stacked in every HMV for 5 pounds to being tough to find in a matter of weeks, seemingly. The first 2 Charlie Brooker books are similarly tough to track down!
― Shannon Whirry & the Bad Brains, Sunday, 1 March 2009 21:30 (sixteen years ago)
Sold my copy of Brookers' TV Go Home book for £40 on eBay, to none other than... actor Michael Fenton Stevens
― Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Sunday, 1 March 2009 21:32 (sixteen years ago)
£40?! That makes it the most valuable book I own!
― nate woolls, Sunday, 1 March 2009 21:43 (sixteen years ago)
the DVD is awesome. comes with that booklet and so many extras on the DVD itself. torrents don't really compare to the whole package.
― cutty, Sunday, 1 March 2009 22:20 (sixteen years ago)
true true, my friend ran off te manchester wit mine. bitch.
― a raggamuffin is a type of cat (a-bomb), Sunday, 1 March 2009 22:21 (sixteen years ago)
keep it foolish yea
― a raggamuffin is a type of cat (a-bomb), Sunday, 1 March 2009 22:23 (sixteen years ago)
oh great, downloaded this as a torrent and none of the files work AWESOME thanks internet go die.
― i'd rather cut cane for castro (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Monday, 2 March 2009 17:34 (sixteen years ago)
Pssst-http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=Kfairy&view=videos
Not amazing quality, but perfectly watchable.
― chap, Monday, 2 March 2009 17:38 (sixteen years ago)
thanks, yeah, i know (that's where i saw them the first time). problem is my wife wants to watch it, and for reasons i can't go into here (or fathom) she hates watching video on the computer.
― i'd rather cut cane for castro (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Monday, 2 March 2009 18:08 (sixteen years ago)
saw this just before christmas in hmv and bought it thinking it was out of print. amazon has cheaper copies so i guess they've repressed it, or whatever you do with dvds. bum.
― koogs, Tuesday, 29 December 2009 20:48 (fifteen years ago)
still a great dvd to own.
― bum-sniff deviant (cutty), Tuesday, 29 December 2009 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
hell, I don't think I have a region-free player hooked up now, I might have to copy this over to my pc
― mh, Tuesday, 29 December 2009 21:49 (fifteen years ago)
i'm not a preacher man
― mh, Tuesday, 11 June 2019 03:41 (five years ago)
keep it chopped out, yeah?
― meaulnes, Tuesday, 11 June 2019 22:44 (five years ago)
Toby, you rim-licker. How's it fucking collapsing?
― findom haddie (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 11 June 2019 22:47 (five years ago)
well fucking weapon
― mh, Tuesday, 11 June 2019 23:06 (five years ago)
Someone has upscaled this and posted it all on youtube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtWTIY-isko
First time I've seen it since it was first broadcast nearly 20 years ago and tbh not really feeling it, first episode is ok, second is bad, not going to continue but might check out the bit with Kevin Eldon.
― This is Dance Anthems, have some respect (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Tuesday, 2 July 2024 18:45 (ten months ago)