I'm arguing with somebody about evolution but his theory is nothing i've come across

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

He doesn't believe in God or Evolution but in alien seeding and 'ghosts' that live in white noise.

does anybody else know about this?

― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Sunday, 9 January 2005 12:11 (twenty-one years ago)

ok now he's saying that Darwin was paid off by a government to create the theory of evolution to stop people from discovering the truth.

― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Sunday, 9 January 2005 12:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Hari, didn't your mum tell you not to talk to nutcases?

― Markelby (Mark C), Sunday, 9 January 2005 12:17 (twenty-one years ago)

now he's saying that we haven't really progressed in the last hundred years.

― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Sunday, 9 January 2005 12:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Is this chap wearing a suspiciously shiny piece of headgear?

― RickyT (RickyT), Sunday, 9 January 2005 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)

This is ken again, isn't it?

― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Sunday, 9 January 2005 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

oddly this guy likes industrial music and is a goth.

he doesn't believe in death though.

― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Sunday, 9 January 2005 14:19 (twenty-one years ago)

this is 'viral marketing' for the new Michael Keaton movie

― oldlib, Sunday, 9 January 2005 14:22 (twenty-one years ago)

well its working on me.

oh wait

― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Sunday, 9 January 2005 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)

We've progressed in the last hundred years?

― Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Sunday, 9 January 2005 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

my main evidence for progress was the iPod

― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Sunday, 9 January 2005 14:39 (twenty-one years ago)

oldlib, that's hilarious.

― thee music mole, Sunday, 9 January 2005 20:07 (twenty-one years ago)

fruitcake obv, but where is he getting this stuff from?

― Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 10 January 2005 11:52 (twenty-one years ago)

what I mean is, where is his proof or justification?

― Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 10 January 2005 11:53 (twenty-one years ago)

now he's saying that we haven't really progressed in the last hundred years.

this is fair comment. but on the other hand, i don't think darwin posited evolution on that kind of a time scale. putting it mildly.

― henry miller, Monday, 10 January 2005 11:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Alien seeding = von Daniken theory? White noise ghosts sound like those E(lectronic)V(oice)P(henomena) nuts. Ferchrissakes there's a Hollywood film coming out on the subject this year. Odd combination of delusions, though.

― Liz :x (Liz :x), Monday, 10 January 2005 13:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes I'd seen the White Noise thread just after I posted, nevermind. So it's some movie fanboy just hyping the nonsence right?

I agree henry, one hundred years is hardly room for evolutionary improvement.

― Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 10 January 2005 13:21 (twenty-one years ago)

We've progressed in the last hundred years?

~~well we still haven't got a "later" link on ilx...~~

kiddin'!!

― ken c (ken c), Monday, 10 January 2005 13:41 (twenty-one years ago)

hey ken

― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Monday, 10 January 2005 13:56 (twenty-one years ago)

hi hari! apparently it's me again

― ken c (ken c), Monday, 10 January 2005 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I hear Afghanistan's exporting a lot more opiates these days.

― Aimless (Aimless), Monday, 10 January 2005 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it's fairly obvious that the most effective explanation for how homo sapiens came about is from 'Repo Man'. Time machines, man.

― Sasha (sgh), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 00:41 (twenty-one years ago)

five years pass...

Serious question - how do mutations that lead to a different number of chromosomes perpetuate? Surely they couldn't breed with any other living animal, even if it was an advantageous mutation?

― Gravel Puzzleworth, Saturday, 8 May 2010 18:01 (sixteen years ago)

I don't really know, but it kind of seems like if you can make gametes that aren't missing any big chunks of information it doesn't matter much if your mate has the same number of chromosomes. The offspring's chromosomes might not pair up nicely but everything would still be there in some form. Just wikipedia, but this seems sort of relevant.

― circles, Saturday, 8 May 2010 19:11 (sixteen years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.