does anybody else know about this?
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Sunday, 9 January 2005 12:11 (twenty years ago)
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Sunday, 9 January 2005 12:16 (twenty years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Sunday, 9 January 2005 12:17 (twenty years ago)
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Sunday, 9 January 2005 12:32 (twenty years ago)
― RickyT (RickyT), Sunday, 9 January 2005 13:11 (twenty years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Sunday, 9 January 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)
he doesn't believe in death though.
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Sunday, 9 January 2005 14:19 (twenty years ago)
― oldlib, Sunday, 9 January 2005 14:22 (twenty years ago)
oh wait
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Sunday, 9 January 2005 14:24 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Sunday, 9 January 2005 14:34 (twenty years ago)
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Sunday, 9 January 2005 14:39 (twenty years ago)
― thee music mole, Sunday, 9 January 2005 20:07 (twenty years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 10 January 2005 11:52 (twenty years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 10 January 2005 11:53 (twenty years ago)
this is fair comment. but on the other hand, i don't think darwin posited evolution on that kind of a time scale. putting it mildly.
― henry miller, Monday, 10 January 2005 11:57 (twenty years ago)
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Monday, 10 January 2005 13:02 (twenty years ago)
I agree henry, one hundred years is hardly room for evolutionary improvement.
― Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 10 January 2005 13:21 (twenty years ago)
well we still haven't got a "later" link on ilx...
kiddin'!!
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 10 January 2005 13:41 (twenty years ago)
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Monday, 10 January 2005 13:56 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 10 January 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)
― Aimless (Aimless), Monday, 10 January 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)
― Sasha (sgh), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 00:41 (twenty years ago)
Serious question - how do mutations that lead to a different number of chromosomes perpetuate? Surely they couldn't breed with any other living animal, even if it was an advantageous mutation?
― Gravel Puzzleworth, Saturday, 8 May 2010 18:01 (fifteen years ago)
I don't really know, but it kind of seems like if you can make gametes that aren't missing any big chunks of information it doesn't matter much if your mate has the same number of chromosomes. The offspring's chromosomes might not pair up nicely but everything would still be there in some form. Just wikipedia, but this seems sort of relevant.
― circles, Saturday, 8 May 2010 19:11 (fifteen years ago)