And since every terrorist obviously carries nukes, well hey!
I vaguely appreciate his honesty.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 15 January 2005 03:27 (twenty-one years ago)
It certainly suggests the orders for abuse and torture in cuba,afghanistan and Iraq HAS come from the top. Whilst saying the guilty soldiers acted on their own.
― Alsi, Saturday, 15 January 2005 03:31 (twenty-one years ago)
What I mean J, is that its the closest we've had to official confirmation of it instead of the usual "guilty parties acted of their own accord".
― Alsi, Saturday, 15 January 2005 03:46 (twenty-one years ago)
The only way I can keep this from ruining my faith in everything is to think of that scene from
Teenagers From Outer Space, chortling for a moment, then going back to feeling miserable.
― What's this place, Biblevania? (natepatrin), Saturday, 15 January 2005 04:45 (twenty-one years ago)
Yeahhh, torture motherfucker what?
(Torture nigga what?)
What?
I'll fuckin
I'll fuckin tie you to a fuckin bedpost
with your ass cheeks spread out and shit
Right?
Put a hanger on a fuckin stove and let that shit sit there
for like a half hour
Take it off and stick it in your ass slow like
Tssssssss
Yeah, I'll fuckin
Yeah I'll fuckin lay your nuts on a fuckin dresser
Just your nuts layin on a fuckin dresser
And bang them shits with a spiked fuckin bat
Ooooohhhh
Whassup? BLAOWWW!!
I'll fuckin
I'll fuckin pull your fuckin tongue out your fuckin mouth
and stab the shit with a rusty screwdriver, BLAOWW!!
I'll fuckin
I'll fuckin
I'll fuckin hang you by your fuckin dick
off a fuckin twelve sto-story building out this motherfucker
I'll fuckin
I'll fuckin
sew your asshole closed, and keep feedin you
and feedin you, and feedin you, and feedin you
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 16 January 2005 03:51 (twenty-one years ago)
Gee, Mr. Ridge. I'm just wondering out loud, but wouldn't here political assassination also be justified on the same grounds? I mean, sometimes political assassination could
save tens of thousands of lives!
For example, for the sake of argument, let's assume a certain sitting President of the USA were contemplating invading and occupying a country, and killing upwards of 100,000 people in the process, but (NB: here's the catch) you knew the reasons for the invasion were wholly specious and false?
Wouldn't it be okie-dokie to cap that bastard? Purely to save thousands of lives, of course.
I tell you what, Mr. Ridge. Don't answer quickly. Think about it first. OK, everybody, surf's up!
― Aimless (Aimless), Sunday, 16 January 2005 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)