I got a survey from the Republican Party ....

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Apparently I am among a select* group of Republicans who have been chosen to take part in the official CENSUS OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.

(*group of Republicans selected by randomly selecting non-Republicans)
Here are some of the questions:

Do you support President douchebag's initiatives to promote the safgety and security of all Americans?

Should the Inheritance or "Death Tax" be permanently repealed?

Do you support president clusterfuck's pro-growth policies to create more jobs and improve the economy?

Do you agree that teaching our children to read and increasing literacy rates should be a national priority?

Should students, teachers, principals and administrators be held to higher standards?

Do you support President head-up-his-ass's initiative to allow private religious and charitable groups to do more to help those in need?

Do you think US troops should have to serve under United Nations' commanders?

...
And then of course, they asked for money...

--------------------------

The only thing I wrote on it before I returned it was:
This "survey" is as disingenuous as the Bush Administration, and demonstrates just how little the RNC is willing to change.

dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)

..of course, it will probably be shitcanned .. there was no place to write extraneous comments .. just "Agree" or "Disagree"

dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:48 (twenty years ago)

Picture you giving a DAMN, I said never.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:51 (twenty years ago)

ha ha, AGREE or DISAGREE doesn't even make any grammatical sense with like almost all of those questions!

known vaginatarian (nickalicious), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 19:05 (twenty years ago)

My dad got some letter asking for money from the RNC last summer, and he wrote a lengthy response in return, in which he detailed all of the Bush administration's failures. He then got a letter back thanking him for his support and a full-size 8x10 photo of a grinning George and Laura, which he ironically put up on the fridge immediately.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 19:11 (twenty years ago)

My mother-in-law wrote to the RNC telling them that she didn't agree with their position on abortion. They sent back a form letter explaining the president's position (i.e. "he is against it" - no arguments given for why..) I imagine they put her letter up on the RNC fridge, ironically.

dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 19:14 (twenty years ago)

I received a questionnaire from the Conservatives the other day. I haven't filled it out yet. An example question:

"We have identified five key areas for action for the next Conservative government. In your view, which one thing would make the biggest difference to:
a) Crime: More police / Tougher sentences / More CCTV
b) Schools: Cut teachers' paperwork / Fewer exams / Stronger discipline policies
c) Hospitals: More new hospitals / Cleaner hospitals / More nursing staff
d) Immigration: An annual limit / ID cards / 24-hour surveillance at ports
e) Tax: Scrap inheritance tax / Raise higher rate thresholds / Double Stamp Duty threshold"

Note how *all* the policies you get to choose from are favoured Tory ones - particularly, you get to pick which of three tax-the-rich-less policies you'd prefer.

caitlin (caitlin), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 21:42 (twenty years ago)

How will increasing close-captioned television decrease crime? Are most British criminals pissed-off hearing-impaired folk taking out their rage at not being able to hear "Eastenders" on an unsuspecting and unprepared public???

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 21:46 (twenty years ago)

Closed-*circuit* TV - in other words, security cameras. They've become very common in British town and city centres in the last five or so years. Some places have even tried running facial-recognition software, but none have ever admitted getting it to work yet.

caitlin (caitlin), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 21:54 (twenty years ago)

Closed-circuit security cameras tied into police networks... I think I read somewhere that the UK had this insanely high ratio of CCTV's to citizens...? Far higher than any other country...

xpost

DougD, Wednesday, 9 February 2005 21:55 (twenty years ago)

yeah, there were a good amount of articles that came out in the last years in america(especially in late 2001) about UK CC cameras. one bit was that they're always touted as a means to prevent or combat terrorism, yet are usually employed just to enforce traffic laws, or with bored employees zooming in to stare at the asses of attractive passersby.

Kingfish MuffMiner 2049er (Kingfish), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 22:04 (twenty years ago)

(Wow, was my joke THAT unfunny?)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 22:08 (twenty years ago)

Heh, it wasn't any worse than most of mine

caitlin (caitlin), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 22:09 (twenty years ago)

According to the surveillance network, no one reading it laughed. Shall I have them brought in for questioning?

DougD, Wednesday, 9 February 2005 22:28 (twenty years ago)

I thought it was funny, Dan.

Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 23:16 (twenty years ago)

I haven't seen "Eastenders", so i didn't want to comment

Kingfish MuffMiner 2049er (Kingfish), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 23:19 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...
AHA - so, as noted on another thread i got one of these too! my theories on why are
1) someone being funny like when i put my friends name on this 'yes definitely send me catalogs, etc.' list at this confederate dorkshop
2) pure demographics - white male, veteran, working class, lives in rural area: probably bushco
3) write yr congressman and senators enough letters and if they're all republicans your name goes on a list of 'guider of republican policy'.


anyhow one thing that cracks me up about this is that even in literature to themselves, to the followers, they still have to be coy about what they mean, that even in a republican mailing by and large the have to hide the policy in vague 'do you like charity: yes or no' or 'should the govt waste yr money: yes or no' or 'should america be defended: yes or no', even the one time they show their cards sorta 'should partial birth abortions be legal: yes or no' it's still a way of them avoiding 'should abortion be legal: yes or no', republicans know that their policy and their actual ideology is still unpopular by and large. even with the alito debate, which the right painted as finally abortion put on the table, we finally had the debate out in the open, their guy couldn't say 'yes, you're damn right i'd overturn roe v. wade, it's bad law and abortion should be illegal' they still had to cloak themselves.

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 00:17 (nineteen years ago)

this is probably a test to see if you make it onto a list of people who will be receptive to the mailer's message.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 00:31 (nineteen years ago)

it's mainly a cash hitup i think, if it were more venal i'd suspect it was the old gop trick of negative campaigning via 'polling' a la 'what's yr take on john mccain's black baby?' south carolina 2000 or 'what's yr take on hillary clinton's hiring al qaeda to murder vince foster?' ohio 2008. i'm totally sending in my responses though, although it does have this little plea below the big 'just put yo credit card info here comrade' saying 'at least send in $11 dollars to cover the cost of tabulating yr responses' which i'm like it takes ten minutes to tabulate my response, where the fuck can i get this job entering gop poll results for six hundred bucks an hour?

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 00:37 (nineteen years ago)

I get shit from the GOP all the time even though I've never registered as a Republican (ever), never given to a Republican (or even conservative) cause. I've always suspected it's a zip code thing, and to me it's like call screening: I don't answer the phone unless I recognize the number on Caller ID--like Rahmneb alludes, I fear that any response at all will validate their records somehow.

I get shit in the mail from liberal causes, too. But I'm pretty sure that's a result of the Sierra Club and Trout Unlimited selling me down the river.

don weiner (don weiner), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 01:59 (nineteen years ago)

...in order to keep it clean

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 02:15 (nineteen years ago)

few of the insanely many closed-circuit TVs have film in em after the first few weeks

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 02:23 (nineteen years ago)

There's no cameras in most of those black domes at Wal*Mart either.

I get calls periodically from the NRA, especially during election years, also probably because of my zip code. The operator would ask if she could play a recorded message from Wayne LaPierre or whomever and then get my reaction. The message would be something along the lines of "Why do politicians want to infiltrate our homes and take our guns away?" The operator would come back on and ask if I strongly agree, agree, was undecided, disagree, or strongly disagree with the comment or question. The one time that I bothered to stick around to answer, I said that I strongly disagreed ("Put me down for that one!"), and the operator said thank you, goodbye, *click*. I get the feeling that if I had answered anything undecided or better, I may have been able to stick around and get an autographed Chuck Heston photo.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 05:34 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.