CIA contractor who beat Afghan prisoner to death claims he was only following orders

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
...and as such should be immune from prosecution:
Lawyer: Contractor Beat Afghan As His Duty
Fri Feb 11, 6:08 PM ET

White House - AP Cabinet & State

By WILLIAM L. HOLMES, Associated Press Writer

RALEIGH, N.C. - A CIA (news - web sites) contractor charged with beating an Afghan detainee who later died was protecting the nation against terrorists and should not be prosecuted because he was following directives from the president and his administration, his lawyers argued in filings released this week.

Lawyers for David A. Passaro, a former Army Special Forces soldier from North Carolina who was hired as CIA contractor, also contend that the alleged beating of Abdul Wali occurred outside the jurisdiction of U.S. courts.

[...]

In it, McNamara points out that Bush said on Sept. 12, 2001, a day after terrorist attacks in the United States that resulted in the deaths of 3,000 people, that the nation "will use all our resources to conquer this enemy." He also cites remarks by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and White House officials that he argues immunize Passaro from prosecution.

McNamara wrote that the laws under which Passaro was charged were "not designed for application to the front lines of battle."

Passaro was charged in June with four counts of assault, accused of beating Wali with his hands, feet and a flashlight as he tried to get information about rocket attacks on U.S. forces.

Prosecutors say Wali died June 21, 2003, after two days of interrogations and beatings by Passaro. Three paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne Division will testify that they witnessed the beating, prosecutors said. Passaro is not charged in his death.

[...]

A response filed by federal prosecutors remained under seal Friday. Assistant U.S. Attorney James Candelmo has asked that a defense motion that argues that U.S. courts have no jurisdiction over the case be rejected. Both he and McNamara have declined to comment on the case.

...never mind that this goes against the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the guy was only EX-Army Special Forces, and not technically an active duty soldier, so I guess it's alright then...

Kingfish MuffMiner 2049er (Kingfish), Saturday, 12 February 2005 03:26 (twenty-one years ago)

so, to sum, the world is still fucked.

Kingfish MuffMiner 2049er (Kingfish), Saturday, 12 February 2005 03:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Wow, that lawyer should be sacked.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 12 February 2005 03:51 (twenty-one years ago)

no, the president should be sacked.

hstencil (hstencil), Saturday, 12 February 2005 08:19 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.