Lesbian Until Graduation (LUG): Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I say classic.

shookout (shookout), Sunday, 13 February 2005 00:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought the common term was dug, not lug?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Sunday, 13 February 2005 01:02 (twenty-one years ago)

As opposed to smug (Spurning Men Until Graduation) or drug (Duping Radicals Until Graduation).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 13 February 2005 01:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Lesbian Users Group

Drake Beardo (cprek), Sunday, 13 February 2005 01:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh man, total dud. Purchase College is full of 'em.

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Sunday, 13 February 2005 01:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I've never heard of this. What the hell.

Mickey (modestmickey), Sunday, 13 February 2005 03:57 (twenty-one years ago)

No, LUG is the term I've always heard.

jaymc (jaymc), Sunday, 13 February 2005 05:09 (twenty-one years ago)

But never actually among people I've known, perhaps tellingly: only in the media.

jaymc (jaymc), Sunday, 13 February 2005 05:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I've always heard "Bisexual Until Graduation," which is more accurate, in my experience. The girls who are lesbians are lesbians. It's the ones who just try a little of everything, just because it's college, and after that they get married like everybody else.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Sunday, 13 February 2005 05:46 (twenty-one years ago)

And it's neither classic nor dud. It's just something some girls do, and good for them, but whatever.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Sunday, 13 February 2005 05:49 (twenty-one years ago)

And anyway, what's with the labelling? I was "bisexual" myself in college, in that I toyed with the idea, explored a couple options, and found them conspicuously erectionless. I imagine that's exactly what these girls are doing, and why not? Doesn't make them lesbians for whatever period of time, and it doesn't really even make them bisexual. It makes them experimental, which is a great part of the sexual learning process that our parents' generations didn't have the nerve and/or the social permission to get into.

On second thought, classic.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Sunday, 13 February 2005 05:55 (twenty-one years ago)

"...sexual learning process that our parents' generations didn't have the nerve and/or the social permission to get into"

This statement is everything wrong with America right now. It takes 'nerve' to be promiscuous and sexually irresponsible, eh? Gee, it's really unfortunate, then, that our dads were such scaredy cats that they managed to raise families and own homes and never end up in jail or a VD clinic. What a bunch of squares.

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:16 (twenty-one years ago)

wow. Ok. Picking a fight tonight, are we?

Jail? Are you kidding?

I don't even know where to start with that.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:18 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost - that whole statement is fucked. just because someone is with a same sex partner means they're promiscuous and sexually irresponsible? and this leads to jail and VDs? i hope you're kidding.

Tito JaXoN (JasonD), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:19 (twenty-one years ago)

It may be everything wrong with America, but it's everything right with Canada ;-)

David A. (Davant), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:20 (twenty-one years ago)

(Sorry. Just trying to defuse the tension.)

David A. (Davant), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:21 (twenty-one years ago)

xxpost

Maybe I'll start with your disgusting assumption that anyone who dabbles in homosexuality -- or, by extension, is homosexual -- is promiscuous and irresponsible. I never said I had a metric ton of sex in college, only that I tried it different ways.

Jail or a VD clinic. My God.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Roger I'll have you know that my dad ended up in jail MANY times, thank you very fucking much. Are you really turning into the prudish dolt that you get mad at people for calling you?

The Obligatory Sourpuss (Begs2Differ), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:24 (twenty-one years ago)

You misunderstand - I - like many self-defined 'queers' - resent the tag 'bisexual' and all that it implies. I'm with Dan Savage 100% on this (if for different reasons, natch).

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Is it just me, or do only people either in or just out of college give a shit about this? I mean, when you're young, you do a lot of things that you wind up not doing again later in life. That's called growing up and grown-ups tend to accept that and move on.
It's not entirely analoguous, but close enough, to BWUPS (Bed-Wetting Until Pre-School) or GHOST (Getting High Often as a STudent).

Huk-L, Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:27 (twenty-one years ago)

You're all still so full of teen angst.

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:29 (twenty-one years ago)

haha and you're still full of parrotted talking points of luv handles!

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Roger's drunk. I say we ignore him.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:30 (twenty-one years ago)

dudes I just came here for the hot girl-on-girl talk and suddenly everyone's either trying to pick a fight or get all humorophilosophical

The Obligatory Sourpuss (Begs2Differ), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:30 (twenty-one years ago)

'drunk'

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:30 (twenty-one years ago)

in my college there was a lot of talk about experimenting but everyone who did just did and everyone who didn't just didn't, I know more women who "became" lesbians after college was over

The Obligatory Sourpuss (Begs2Differ), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:31 (twenty-one years ago)

STUT
(Suckle Tits Until Toothed)

Huk-L, Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Bisexuality is mostly used as a cop-out, my friends. For most, it's not about being polyamorous - it's about being ugly and lonely and settling for whoever - or whatever - will have you. And, naturally, those who CAN actually get laid eventually choose sides, leaving the trendy hippy shit to the dorm rooms and dining halls. You all know this alreday - I mean, I didn't start this thread.

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:35 (twenty-one years ago)

It sounds like Rog asked for a threesome and wound up in a sausage party.

Huk-L, Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:37 (twenty-one years ago)

it sounds like he's my alcoholic uncle who proves how smart he is by taking the opposite side of any argument at thanksgiving, all this "my friends" business; GET ONE RADIO SHOW

The Obligatory Sourpuss (Begs2Differ), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:40 (twenty-one years ago)

You still haven't explained how bisexual experimentation leads to VD and jail. Or what is wrong with it. Even accepting your mostly asinine argument against bisexuals in general, that's not even who you're talking about.

Why gay men resent bisexuals is a whole other thread, and one that shouldn't even be started.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:40 (twenty-one years ago)

that's not even who you're talking about

who WE'RE talking about, should read. You're invoking the thread quaestion while talking about something else.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:42 (twenty-one years ago)

my random talk about Roger aside, I think the only people who are upset about this are people who ain't getting any of it and it SHOULD be a non-issue for both sides; libertarians are supposed to keep their fucking noses out of other people's bedrooms

The Obligatory Sourpuss (Begs2Differ), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:43 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't know, i think um, DAN SAVAGE, is right in that "kids" nowadays (my sister's roomies at least haha) don't even think of it as experimenting, i don't know if i know anyone who selfidentifies as "bi" but i definitely know alot of people who sleep with people of both genders and don't think anything more of it than sleeping with people of different races or religions or hairstyles or whatever. there's definitely perhaps a 'this is a phase of my life' aspect to it for many/most but um i'm not marrying the first/only girl i kissed/fingered/fucked either and unless you are guess what you went thru this 'phase' too. casual sex is alive and well, vd hardly the problem it was during, say, the fifties, thanks to better sex ed though rog's gop buddies are looking to put a stop to that and maybe we can be back to the glory days (cuz obv it was this 'culture of permissiveness' that made people want to have sex, god knows it's not natural, no "fucking" haha way, we've been PROGRAMMED to desire da titties, da ass, da cock, etc.) haha "people are still having sex".

xpost - rog isn't a libertarian matt!

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:45 (twenty-one years ago)

blount I'm over the roger thing, I'm just talking in general

The Obligatory Sourpuss (Begs2Differ), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Not at all. By the way, why shouldn't a thread about gay people who hate bisexuals be started? You mean Mumia can have a march and I can't speak freely about good ol American hatred here on ILX? (that's just me being mean, sorry)

re: VD and jail - I was merely responding to your celebration of being 'loose' and all that it implies. I tend to think the generation you seem to find such a bunch of prudes (and, if we're talking post- Civil Rights, really weren't prudes at all) had a much better handle on things, and to dismiss them as somehow not having any 'nerve' is preposterous and worth challenging


Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:46 (twenty-one years ago)

haha i'm tempted to post the lyrics to "pink triangle"

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:46 (twenty-one years ago)

haha "re: that completely full of shit thing i said i was merely responding to something you didn't actually say but i'll pretend you did so i can dodge the question at hand. ps: if i hate girls who eat pussy it's becuz you see i'm a pussy myself. AND I DON'TS WANTS TO GET EATEN!!!' < / "libertarian" > < / fraud >

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:49 (twenty-one years ago)

your celebration of being 'loose' and all that it implies

But that's the whole problem with your argument. You're equating bisexuality or homosexuality with being loose. Actually, you're being a big fat biggot.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:49 (twenty-one years ago)

This thread has really come alive. I kinda feel like the Eminem of ILX tonight, only white.

blount - from what i can gather from your incomprehensible post, you're accusing me of hating lesbians. Is that it? Because I really don't.

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:50 (twenty-one years ago)

One 'g' in bigot, genius. And no, that's not what I'm doing. I already explained myself. Have you read all the posts?

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I knew you wouldn't understand how you're being a big(g)ot. I don't know why I bothered.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:53 (twenty-one years ago)

show me where you explained yourself. or you gonna wimp out on this thread and whip out your persecution complex on this thread too?

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:54 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, some of your best friends are lesbians, we know, you pull that one out of your ass all the time. but honestly why should we care, roger? why does that make your argument that Fine Upstanding House-buying Citizens like your parents would never be bisexual sluts valid in the least?

and as far as you being the eminem of ILX: does that mean you're happy about being increasingly shrill and unpopular and irrelevant?

The Obligatory Sourpuss (Begs2Differ), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:54 (twenty-one years ago)

show me rog

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:56 (twenty-one years ago)

no it means it'd be so empty without moi, bitch

hahahah ok one at a time - i never said 'my best friends are lesbians' - my best friends are commies, jews and Krazy Katholics - everybody knows that. and I explained myself with the following, upthread, which I will repeat for those with scrolling difficulties:

re: VD and jail - I was merely responding to your celebration of being 'loose' and all that it implies. I tend to think the generation you seem to find such a bunch of prudes (and, if we're talking post- Civil Rights, really weren't prudes at all) had a much better handle on things, and to dismiss them as somehow not having any 'nerve' is preposterous and worth challenging

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:57 (twenty-one years ago)

no it means it'd be so empty without moi, bitch

This is true enough. A lot less irritating, too.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:58 (twenty-one years ago)

had a much better handle on things

very clear and specific. Thanks.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Discourse is healthy. What is it with you lefties and needing everyone to AGREE with you all the time? I laugh as I type these posts - you all sound like you're white-knuckled and weeping.

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Sunday, 13 February 2005 07:00 (twenty-one years ago)

You're actually starting to have Calumesque delusions of grandeur, dude. Check yourself.

Huk-L, Sunday, 13 February 2005 07:00 (twenty-one years ago)

CLASSIC!!!

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 13 February 2005 16:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Shookout, all academic areas are ideologies by that measure. Political Science departments are massively Republican and conservative, for example, and the ideology of the status quo is in operation. "Objectivity" also suggests the ideology of the status quo as the ;objective view' is actually that perspective of the dominant ideology in the Social Sciences. Women's studies produces both qualitative and quantitative research and is no more a political indoctrination than other social sciences, it's just that it's not the indoctrination that you're used to. At leaste it teaches critical and analytical thinking so that students (the fish) can at least recognize the ideologies (water) that they are swimming in.

Orbit (Orbit), Sunday, 13 February 2005 17:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Heaven, I need a HUG.

R. Kelly (Mert), Sunday, 13 February 2005 18:30 (twenty-one years ago)

You're actually starting to have Calumesque delusions of grandeur, dude. Check yourself.

Haha, "starting"!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 13 February 2005 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)

"strong values" = "everyone must want for themselves precisely what I want for myself"

Douglas (Douglas), Sunday, 13 February 2005 20:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Douglas, I want you to agree with me on that point.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 13 February 2005 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, but he should only agree until he graduates.

David A. (Davant), Sunday, 13 February 2005 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.clubclassic.net/servizi/fashion/tatu/video5.jpg

It had to be done.

sugarpants (sugarpants), Sunday, 13 February 2005 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)

in my day we called it alcohol

come on sock it to me (kephm), Sunday, 13 February 2005 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm guessing that most men wouldn't be bothered by a female companion's bisexual history

Most men. I know that I would probably feel very insecure about it if I dated a bisexual girl. I don't know, maybe not. But it kinda hits off a lot of irrational insecurity buttons in my head when I think about it.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 13 February 2005 22:22 (twenty-one years ago)

It must be the scene I've been in all these years, but almost everyone I know is ... well, kinda pansexual, they've all tried a bit of everything - some of my friends are actively poly, some are bi, some straight but have experimented for fun, some gay and ditto.

Its never been an issue, it just is. *shrug*

Trayce (trayce), Sunday, 13 February 2005 22:37 (twenty-one years ago)

matthew OTM except replace the word "insecure" with "horny."

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 13 February 2005 22:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm looking forward to Roger's return to the thread. I expect he will be full of waffle.

estela (estela), Sunday, 13 February 2005 22:47 (twenty-one years ago)

http://home.comcast.net/~mr.write/waffle.jpg

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Sunday, 13 February 2005 22:58 (twenty-one years ago)

"Oh man, total dud. Purchase College is full of 'em."

Why does it just seem like this whole dud-thing for Roger stems from his inability to get any college tail on the side and his inability to recognize that this might stem from the fact that he's an overweight goatied fuckhead--shit I might claim I was a lesbian just to let the loser down easy. . . maybe there should be a new acronym like LURGA aka Lesbian Until Roger Goes Away? I can't think of any other reason why a guy whose so adamant that folks should be keeping the fuck out of his house would give a shit what and when other folks do on there own time.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Sunday, 13 February 2005 23:29 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.ycdtotv.de/woyc_img/woy1_446.jpg
Alex, don't encourage your Roger...

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 13 February 2005 23:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha who the hell is that?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Sunday, 13 February 2005 23:35 (twenty-one years ago)

To go back to the original thread subject, if it's not too late, surely the term refers to people who aren't actually lesbians at all? As in people who say they are bi/gay and only ever kiss guys.

I know at least one person whom I suspect fits this description , not that I can be 100 percent certain. Though the fact she describes herself as a lesbian and denies being bi, while hooking up with guys on a regular basis, strikes me as odd.

Of course why people care about someone elses sexuality is probably a good question, but if people are lying about things for image's sake or whatever reason then it's understandable that this would rankle. It's also kind of insulting to feel you're being lied to by a friend, about their sexuality, a matter of actual gravitas and surely a fairly big deal for most people.

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 13 February 2005 23:42 (twenty-one years ago)

well actually I guess the term doesn't refer to people who aren't lesbians at all, but I wanted to bring that idea up anyway.

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 13 February 2005 23:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah I'll address the actual subject too.

To be honest I've never heard about LUGs much in school, but BUG was a big term when I was in school and it always used to describe women. I know a lot of gay people who were really pissed off at these folks, some because they felt like they had gotten burned by them, BUT mostly it seemed more like they felt that these flighty women were simply taking advantage of certain sexual freedoms post-Stonewall without any of the political committment and the long term social disadvantage and they resented the fact that bisexuals (of both gendrs) could flit so easily between worlds. And bisexuality was definitely a word which carried a lot of negative connotations then and I think now it may be completely out of fashion--replaced by polyamory or whatever. So I can see why people who were curious about relationships (sexual or long-term) with the same sex would be more inclined to call themselves lesbian or gay rather than bisexual or whatever else. It's probably not particularly honest, but when people are young and in college I don't think they are particularly honest about much when it comes to relationships.

Anyway I think sexual curiousity is completely classic. I also think calling yourself gay or lesbian when you aren't is probably kind of dud, BUT I also think that giving people who are young and curious and probably slightly confused (as I certainly was at 18-19) shit about how they label themselves or the fact that they are young, curious and confused is really truly dud.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Sunday, 13 February 2005 23:58 (twenty-one years ago)

I also think calling yourself gay or lesbian when you aren't is probably kind of dud, BUT I also think that giving people who are young and curious and probably slightly confused (as I certainly was at 18-19) shit about how they label themselves or the fact that they are young, curious and confused is really truly dud.

I agree, I think if the person isn't actually confused though it's particularly bad to label themselves one thing or another, especially when you can be fairly sure the lie isn't displayed for the benefit of their families etc.

I mean sure, on one hand I think an over-abundance of cynicism about peoples sexual preferences is extremely unhealthy, but I do think that people pretending to be gay is something which happens, for whatever reason. And this surely only adds to cynicism about sexual freedoms.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 14 February 2005 00:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh actually I don't want to sound like "some of these young people say they're gay but really it's just a fashion thing!", it's probably a really tiny minority of people that flat out say they are bi/gay in the knowledge that they aren't, do you think, fellow ILXers?

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 14 February 2005 00:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, I dont think I know *anyone* who has actually claimed to be flat out gay, and was not. If anything I know some friends recently have had an enourmous struggle coming to terms with coming out, so yeah.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 14 February 2005 00:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I think an over-abundance of cynicism about peoples sexual preferences is extremely unhealthy

Ronan OTM

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 14 February 2005 00:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I think one problem is that there is always this pressure to label yourselves which can be a difficult because quite often the labels are either inadequate or so stigmatized that no sane person wants to use them. So people tend to just stick with the most comfortable term to use for the MOMENT even if that moment is indeed fleeting and accept for themselves that what might be a completely honest assessment one moment, might not be two weeks from then or whatever. Or they just refuse to label themselves at all (which is probably wisest and most honest thing to do, but it can expose you to a lot of scrutiny/pressure which a lot of people aren't comfortable with.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 14 February 2005 00:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I know a guy who came out as bi but has been exclusively gay for a couple of years, which is the other end of the spectrum from saying you're gay when you're not. I think it's pretty understandable, it's hard to make huge declarations like that.

General experimentation is really NOT prevalent at my college. I'd hate to come out here as bi or gay. Not that people are homophobic or overly conservative, I just don't think a lot of them are quite as comfortable with it as my friends from high school, for multiple reasons.

Maria (Maria), Monday, 14 February 2005 00:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I think that it is very unfair to be dismissive of people who go through a period of sexual experimentation before settling on a sexual identity (if they ever do at all.) Not everyone is secure in knowing who they are, and it's definitely better for people to try some things out rather than go through their lives secretly doubting themselves - I think that repressed sexual confusion tends to fuck people up a lot more than some dilettantish bisexuality can.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 14 February 2005 00:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I've dated people who identified as "lesbian" rather than "bisexual"; one of them explained it, concisely, as "I like girls, and I like you." Worked for me.

Douglas (Douglas), Monday, 14 February 2005 00:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I know a lesbian who has married a man. She still considers herself a lesbian. I also have a gay male acquaintence whose longest relationship since coming was with a woman who knew he identified as gay before they started dating. It's really not a static thing.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 14 February 2005 01:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I think humans probably weren't hardwired to like the opposite gender like we've all been conditioned to think is the case. Look at the Ancient Greeks, they didn't even have words for it, they just loved whomever they loved.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 14 February 2005 02:00 (twenty-one years ago)

"...stems from his inability to get any college tail on the side and his inability to recognize that this might stem from the fact that he's an overweight goatied fuckhead--shit I might claim I was a lesbian just to let the loser down easy. . . maybe there should be a new acronym like LURGA aka Lesbian Until Roger Goes Away? I can't think of any other reason why a guy whose so adamant that folks should be keeping the fuck out of his house would give a shit what and when other folks do on there own time"

I've loomed but really have nothing to contribute to this thread, which has become boring since I went to the Waffle House, but to quickly address Alex's summation of my inner workings: if you knew anything about Purchase, you'd know that 'college tail,' like heroin, was in no short supply at any time - it's practically Sodom and Gomorrah o'er there. I don't have a goatee, but an impressive neckbeard, and, while still proudly in possession of a mighty tank, have lost 12 pounds by accident merely by cutting out soda (or, as they call it down south, 'coke'). I'd resort to childish namecalling and make fun of YOUR appearance, but the truth is, I'm man enough to admit that I envy your vaguely "sophisticated Die Hard criminal nemesis hell bent on world domination and beating Bruce Willis's ass with his MIND not his gun" look

Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Monday, 14 February 2005 02:08 (twenty-one years ago)

i went to women's college. the idea of lugs always bugged me (heh). i used to think it was so phony and patronizing to 'real' lesbians whose girlfriends could leave them when they found a man again. plus identifying queer when you are in the safety of a liberals arts campus allows you to think of yourself as controversial and challenging without the risk involved.

but looking back i think any kind of experimentation or promiscuity or casual superficiality having to do with sex bothered me. i always knew i only wanted big, intense, soul connections (of the heterosexual variety). but i hate myself for it cuz it involves a lot of waiting and lonliness and self-doubt and utter lack of control. i could never relate to people who could make do with whatever. and they always made me bitter with envy.

lolita corpus (lolitacorpus), Monday, 14 February 2005 02:10 (twenty-one years ago)

I also have a gay male acquaintence whose longest relationship since coming was with a woman...

Hi Dan!

Aaron A., Monday, 14 February 2005 02:11 (twenty-one years ago)

OUT. COMING OUT. OH NOES

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 14 February 2005 04:19 (twenty-one years ago)

LOUISVILLE, KY—Describing himself a "going through a little phase," 26-year-old heterosexual Michael Litwin has been experimenting with homosexuality for the past eight years.


Above: Self-described "open-minded" heterosexual Michael Litwin.
"I'm a very open, curious person, and right now I'm in a bit of an exploratory phase, sexually," Litwin said. "The woman I marry will definitely have to be okay with my past."

Since first deciding to "open up and try new things" in 1992, the "99 percent straight" Litwin has had 23 male sexual partners and one female partner. And though he said that "having a wife and kids and the house out in the suburbs with the white picket fence" is his eventual goal, Litwin is currently dating "a real mix of people."

"Before I do settle down with one woman for the rest of my life, it's important for me to 'do a little exploring,' so to speak," Litwin said. "And part of that process, for me, involves trying out some new things. Again, though, I must stress that it's temporary: Dating people of my own gender is not something I see myself doing in the long run."

Though Litwin has many gay friends and possesses "a certain appreciation for gay culture," he can't see himself in a permanent same-sex relationship.

"I just can't get used to the idea of only having sex with men," Litwin said. "The truth is, I simply adore women." As evidence of his attraction to women, Litwin pointed to the copy of the Madonna book Sex on his coffee table and a framed poster of Audrey Hepburn on the wall.

"I have absolutely nothing against homosexuality," Litwin added. "Some of my best friends are gay."

Of these friends, Litwin has had at least limited sexual contact with nearly all. Among them is Peter Skye.

"I met Michael at an art opening a few years back and, boy, did we hit it off," said Skye, 27, a waiter and part-time actor. "It's too bad he's not gay, because he was incredible in bed."

After dating Skye for seven months, Litwin ended the brief flirtation with homosexuality in favor of a period of experimentation with restaurateur Tyler Randolph. According to Litwin, he "sort of saw" Randolph on a strict "no promises" basis for two years.

"I was living in Chicago when Michael and I met at a party," Randolph said. "Right from the start, there was amazing chemistry between us. We started seeing each other every weekend. But eventually, the strain of the long-distance thing got to be too much. That's why we broke up. That and Michael's inability to keep his cock out of my roommate Bruce's mouth."

According to Litwin, he has only had one serious relationship in his life: a three-year romance with high-school sweetheart Jenny Tankart that ended during the pair's sophomore year of college.

"I simply haven't had enough experience to really know what I want yet," Litwin said. "What I do know is that I don't need to be seriously involved with anyone right now. I've really enjoyed being single all these years. I like having my own place, with my own TV and my own leather five-piece sectional. Things were just way too claustrophobic with Jenny."

Now married with children, Tankart looks back fondly on her relationship with Litwin.

"Michael was a really nice guy—and a real gentleman, too," Tankart said. "He was always very supportive about my wanting to wait until marriage. So many of the guys I used to date just wanted one thing. Not Michael."

Litwin said he has been searching for the right woman for years, but every time he thinks he has found "the one," something goes wrong.

"My first few dates with Rachel went great, but then I found out she has a dog," Litwin said. "Then there was Annette a few years later, but there was just something about the way she dressed that turned me off. And Julie was terrific, but she lived all the way over in the next town. I wonder if I'll ever find true love."

While no woman has yet won Litwin's heart, women have taken an interest in him.

"When Michael started working here, I thought he was really cute," said Samantha Ringley, a coworker of Litwin's at Yellow Moon Graphic Design. "I didn't want to be wasting my time, so I asked him outright if he was gay. He started laughing and said, 'No, no, no!' After laughing for a long time, he said, 'I guess you could say I'm straight but not narrow.'"

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 14 February 2005 06:38 (twenty-one years ago)

The last guy I dated was (and is) straight. It's all good.

Casuistry (Chris P), Monday, 14 February 2005 09:26 (twenty-one years ago)

three years pass...

"My first few dates with Rachel went great, but then I found out she has a dog," Litwin said. "Then there was Annette a few years later, but there was just something about the way she dressed that turned me off. And Julie was terrific, but she lived all the way over in the next town. I wonder if I'll ever find true love."

Oh man this guy is excellent.

Abbott, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 00:31 (seventeen years ago)

i can't believe he's actually real!

s1ocki, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 02:42 (seventeen years ago)

that's clearly an Onion article, a good one too

Just got offed, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 07:57 (seventeen years ago)

Kind of surprised at the level of nastiness on this thread. Most odd.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 08:14 (seventeen years ago)

I really like Doug Stanhope.

bingolola, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 08:18 (seventeen years ago)

I just read the last chunk of it, so I guess nastiness avoided.

Mark G, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 08:33 (seventeen years ago)

two years pass...

Hipster women wish they were lesbians.

thirdalternative, Sunday, 15 May 2011 21:25 (fourteen years ago)

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORING

and can i get those tips frosted, please? (Z S), Sunday, 15 May 2011 21:48 (fourteen years ago)

"I know which thread I'll wake up...this awful one. I'll just bring a really challenging opinion to it, that'll shake up the status quo around here. I bet everybody'll hate it when I show 'em I'm not afraid to be...POLITICALLY INCORRECT"

...wouldn't need the talcum powder (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, 15 May 2011 22:05 (fourteen years ago)

Actually it's a secret message to max.

thirdalternative, Sunday, 15 May 2011 22:14 (fourteen years ago)

"god, that politically incorrect guy is so COURAGEOUS"

and can i get those tips frosted, please? (Z S), Sunday, 15 May 2011 22:25 (fourteen years ago)

nobody said challops yet so i said challops

Britain, the 51sb State (darraghmac), Sunday, 15 May 2011 22:30 (fourteen years ago)

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/414N8XHYQWL._SL500_.jpg

buzza, Sunday, 15 May 2011 22:41 (fourteen years ago)

Hipster women women who meet thirdalternative wish they were lesbians.

congratulations (n/a), Sunday, 15 May 2011 22:46 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.