RFD: WordPress 1.5

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Just installed it (available via wordpress.org) - I was looking to reboot / shitcan my old website (mostly because of COMMENT SPAM), and start a not-so-secret not-so-tilda site, and conveniently enough WP announced this new version. I haven't really done much w/ it yet, but the interface is much improved. Very swank.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I downloaded it the other day, but haven't installed it. I want to set up the template function properly instead of circumventing it and using my old index page.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:17 (twenty-one years ago)

But yes -- it's quickly becoming the best blog CMS I've ever used. It's all about how many people are developing it, I guess. I wavered back and forth between this and Movable Type until WP started really addressing issues like comment spam (which it now does just as well as MT Blacklist, IMO) and templating, which seems to be vastly more flexible now in 1.5.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:22 (twenty-one years ago)

New rule that I'm just discovering: the more you can lean on php, the better. You can't hack a Perl script. Well, you *can*, but you need ten years of college first.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Ok, so I installed the new version. I went with the default template because the guts of the thing are different enough that using my old template didn't make very good sense. I will now start all over, tweak it to no end, and it will be glorious fun.

Anyway, David R., I notice your site is gone. Is this for good? Has it moved? How are you doing with the new Wordpress version?

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Saturday, 26 February 2005 22:08 (twenty-one years ago)

You can't hack a Perl script. Well, you *can*, but you need ten years of college first.

I wouldn't say that - I managed to learn enough Perl to hack on other people's complex programs in about two or three months.

The main choice between MT and WP comes down to server resources and page views: do you want your server to have to generate the page every time it's viewed, or only when the page changes?

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 26 February 2005 22:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought kitten's spaminator was going to be a regular feature of this release, a plugin that came standard with the install. I had great luck using that for 1.2/1.3.

teeny (teeny), Saturday, 26 February 2005 22:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I thought it would be standard now, too, or at least a version of it. Hey, whatever. I still have it installed, like always. Still words great. Spaminator + Spam Words.

The main choice between MT and WP comes down to server resources and page views: do you want your server to have to generate the page every time it's viewed, or only when the page changes?

Very true. There are undeniable advantages to having a static index page. For archive pages, dynamic generation wins every time. With MT, you can mix 'em up and do both, and that's very nice. Then again, MT is complicated both in the user interface and in the back end, and I've has problems with it that I can't even fathom the reason for, much less fix myself.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Saturday, 26 February 2005 22:54 (twenty-one years ago)

That said, I've also run several sites with it, and it does do a lot more than blog.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Saturday, 26 February 2005 22:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm trying this out. Maybe it will make me want to start up my own site again.

Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Sunday, 27 February 2005 00:32 (twenty-one years ago)

ooh... do tell about your first impressions. I think most of the rest of us are just upgrading, not using it for the first time.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Sunday, 27 February 2005 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Well I've been out of the CMS fun zone for a while now since I stopped doing people talk too loud, but first glance it's pretty slick. Haven't explored everything yet though.

Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Sunday, 27 February 2005 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)

With MT, you can mix 'em up and do both, and that's very nice.

Mmm, I like the fact that MT lets you generate PHP or HTML according to whatever's most suitable.

(I do that myself, but only for semi-pointless eyecandy like random image rotation. Oh, and changing cardinal numbers to ordinals - I was a bit annoyed that MT's date function didn't do ordinals, so I wrote a PHP func to fix that)

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 27 February 2005 11:16 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, help me!

I have MT installed on herjazz.org but i want to switch to WP. can i install this in the same directory i have MT installed, or do i have to start a new one?

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Sunday, 27 February 2005 17:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyway, David R., I notice your site is gone. Is this for good? Has it moved? How are you doing with the new Wordpress version?

It's sort of gone. I'm hiding it for the time being, if only because (like I said in my 1st post) the amount of comment / trackback spam I've rec'd recently has gotten unmanageable (1000+ POSTED spam comments in the past week, never mind the stuff that's posted but not showing to visitors because of my comment word watchlist), and because of how or where I had WP located in my web directory, stuff like spaminator didn't seem to work (and I'm never in the mood to monkey w/ that stuff). Also, I just needed a clean break from the "history" of popshots (which, of course, is why my new blatherlog is a sub-directory of popshots).

David R. (popshots75`), Sunday, 27 February 2005 18:25 (twenty-one years ago)

can i install this in the same directory i have MT installed, or do i have to start a new one?

MT is likely installed in your cgi bin -- that's not necessary with php. It runs from anywhere on the server. What you want to do is install all the WordPress files in your main directory, in this case /mt/. Maybe make a new root folder called "maria" instead? At any rate, you just upload everything to that folder. Boom.

You will likely need to create a new database and export everything from MT. You can find instructions for that on the Wordpress support forum.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Monday, 28 February 2005 02:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Whole buncha themes for Wordpress 1.5. Many of them stink to high heaven, but it's early yet.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Monday, 28 February 2005 02:53 (twenty-one years ago)

it's absurdly easy to install. I have a lot of template tinkering to do, but i needed to make the site less drab anyway.

badgerminor (badgerminor), Monday, 28 February 2005 03:45 (twenty-one years ago)

i have a test blog set up to get the feel of things but i dont really understand PHP enough to use this.

in order to have more than one blog on the site, i have to install mulitple versions of WP? doesnt that just seem like a bit... much?

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Monday, 28 February 2005 17:33 (twenty-one years ago)

That does seem like a bit much but I'm not quite sure what you're doing--could it be accomplished with different categories? as I understand it, this version gives a lot more flexibility with categories and the new 'page' feature, where you create different pages. I think maybe you could configure multiple users to only have privs to post in one category (they can make subcategories), and those categories only appear on respective user pages. You really don't need to know much about php I don't think.

teeny (teeny), Monday, 28 February 2005 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.herjazz.org/

i use this space to host mine and someone else's blog. it is not a group blog. originally i wanted to upgrade MT to its current release but i cant warrant spending 70$. so i thought id switch to wordpress [since a lot of people like it] and run a test blog. I want to switch both of our blogs to WP but it just feels like a lot to have two separate databases / applications running on the same site.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Monday, 28 February 2005 18:24 (twenty-one years ago)

originally i wanted to upgrade MT to its current release but i cant warrant spending 70$

You don't have to pay.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Monday, 28 February 2005 18:37 (twenty-one years ago)

i have to install mulitple versions of WP? doesnt that just seem like a bit... much?

Maybe, but it's really small. It's a matter of installing about 500k worth of files in two different directories. Not at all like installing MT twice, which would of course be a monster.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Monday, 28 February 2005 18:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Woo hoo! It was down all weekend, but the WP codex is back.

http://codex.wordpress.org/Main_Page

Everything you need to know is here somewhere.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Monday, 28 February 2005 18:52 (twenty-one years ago)

originally i wanted to upgrade MT to its current release but i cant warrant spending 70$

You don't have to pay.

-- James Mitchell (jame...), February 28th, 2005. (James Mitchell) (link)

if you want more than one user, yes you do.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Monday, 28 February 2005 19:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe, but it's really small. It's a matter of installing about 500k worth of files in two different directories. Not at all like installing MT twice, which would of course be a monster.

when you put it that way, you're right. so i think i will do this.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Monday, 28 February 2005 19:22 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, kenan's on the money, now that I understand what you want to do...the install's not huge nor hard so go for it. For regular bloggy type things, I'm a big big fan of WordPress.

oops xp yeah!

teeny (teeny), Monday, 28 February 2005 19:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I probably shouldn't say this, but, as far as I remember, Movable Type trusts you to pay when you create more authors. As in, you can create another author from the your main /cgi-bin/mt/mt.cgi page without limitations and you're supposed to pay if you use that feature. That said, I've got a paid-up version running.

It's a question of morals, I guess.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 03:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Another reason to use WordPress. You get to keep your honor.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 04:00 (twenty-one years ago)

"It's a question of morals, I guess"

if you've got an older version, you're good as well cause i believe the user license is fairly open ended at that version. (< 3.0) i run an MT site right now... the site was my custom perl script, then moved through a couple versions of MT and a couple hosts. our install is older. we use blacklisting stuff as well as this image number code that makes it really, really annoying for a comment-spammer to try to spam our site. it still happens, but it's like two spams instead of hundreds. they usually see their scripts don't work and give up.

we may switch to wp. i'm excited about some things, but not so excited about multiple installs. like maria, i've got multiple blogs running and i'll have to do some fudging to crank out some of our custom hacks. but php can be cake once you've had some xp with it. after churnin out perl code for years, php looks and feels very cozy.

i'm a little here or there on the static vs. dynamic issue. you never know when some random page on your site gets linked by the wrong site and suddenly your site is getting it's ass kicked, etc.

BUT, i'd take free, up-to-date software over stuff that's getting older and older. our MT install will only get more vulnerable over time. perhaps i'm paranoid. yeah, probably. that and we have just enough authors and blogs to push us to the $99 price, which isn't a lot, but our site generates little to no revenue so... that comes outta burrito funds, etc.

ANYWAY, question for you WP users... would you say changing the look/feel of different blogs is fairly easy for html knowledgable folks? we're hoping it'll be easier for other peeps with less coding knowledge to make easy changes to their look.

any thoughts?
m.

msp (msp), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 05:50 (twenty-one years ago)

It's as easy or hard as you make it, I guess, just like any template. You can change the CSS any ol' time and shuffle everything around, of course. Many of the template sets (um... "themes") that I've downloaded have split the templates in several components (header, footer, sidebar, etc), which is great for some purposes, but probably confusing for someone who only wants to move things because first you have to figure out where everything already is, if you see what I mean.

One thing that's pretty cool with the theming system is it makes it very easy to apply user themes -- give your users a choice between not just different stylesheets, but whole different functions that are included in this or that theme. One index page could have a sidebar and another would not, for example. You could have two completely different looking, working, and feeling sites that share a database. I'm too much of a control freak to just let users choose between any of the pre-made templates out there -- I won't put any kind of "switcher" up until I've written all the themes myself. BUT... I have this habit of redesigning my blog for fun, so this is perfect. A gallery of blog designs.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 06:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I am not as cozy with php as I'd like to be. I'm just now figuring it out. Actually, I'm having trouble with it. I want to call a variable from the url for a more dynamic index page that displays the content OR the blogroll OR the archive list, etc... So say I link to index.php?id=links. Then do I just say

if ($id == "links)
(do this)
elseif ($id == "categories")
(do this)
elseif ($id == "archives")
(do this)
else
(do what you'd normall do)

Is that more or less correct? And do I need to wrap the "do this" in any special kind of syntax? The php manual gets the basic idea across, but uses "echo" in every example everywhere, and I don't see a single echo in the current template, so obviously I don't need to wrap whole sections of the page in quote marks, do I? And other php functions won't execute inside an echo will they?

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 06:28 (twenty-one years ago)

make sure you close that "links..... "links"... and the (do this) blocks (as they're called in programming parlance)... should be wrapped in "{" and "}" if they're more than one line/statement. (okay, i hope this works... i'm not sure what ilx will do when i try to post some code.)

<?
if ($id == "links) {
echo $myvariable;
echo myfunction($myvariable);
?>
here is some static text that never changes.
<?
} elseif ($id == "categories") {
echo $myvariable2;
echo myotherfunction($myvariable2);
} elseif ($id == "archives") {
echo $myvariable3;
echo myfunction($myvariable3);
} else {
echo $myvariable;
echo myfunction($myvariable);
?>
this is the else clause... i hope this example helps you.
<?
}
?>

does that make some sense? echoes aren't always needed if other functions call echo, etc inside of them and many do. you can call functions in an echo statement, but the echo will print their return value... and as i said... if functions echo, then there will be printed output there as well.

i just need to install WP and get playing around.
m.

msp (msp), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 06:46 (twenty-one years ago)

rock.

Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 07:22 (twenty-one years ago)

OK. ive got some questions for everyone...

first off, here's my blog:

http://herjazz.org/maria/

the thing im having troubles with, is getting a link to the main page on individual entries. you know, it normally looks like this:

blashlafdfsjkdfhhj | main | oiertuioeutoertoeio

what tag do i need for this and where should it go?

im using the default [kubrick] template.

any other hints / advice would be useful as well!

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 05:37 (twenty-one years ago)

A natural place to put a link back to the main page is in the header. In fact, it would be best to make the header itself a link back to the main page.

Right now you have a div (called "headerimg") that has a background of your main image. The easiest way to turn this into a link back to your main page is to put the link on the page instead of in the background. So the HTML on the main page would read:

<div id="header">
<div id="headerimg">
<a href="/maria/"><img src="/maria/wp-content/themes/default/images/personalheader.jpg"></a>
</div>

Then add this to your stylesheet:

#headerimg img {border="0"}

And that should do it.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 05:52 (twenty-one years ago)

im a bit confused by what youre talking about, and im not sure if its properly answering my question. ill worry about the header one later, right now i want one thats a link in the individual entries.

http://herjazz.org/maria/uncategorized/2

as you can see in this link, there's no "main" in between the navigation for the previous and next posts.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 05:55 (twenty-one years ago)

i just figured it out. OK, now about making the header image clickable. what php do i need to change for this?

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 05:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Right. What I meant was that that's not necessary if you make your whole top banner a link back to your main page.

However!

If you go into you index.php template for Kubrick, you'll see a line (probably lines 26-29) that says:

< div class="navigation">
< div class="alignleft">< ?php posts_nav_link('','','« Previous Entries') ?>< /div>
< div class="alignright">< ?php posts_nav_link('','Next Entries »','') ?>< /div>
</div>

That's your navigation top bar. Without messing with what's there, you want to add:

< div class="aligncenter">< a href="/maria/">Mainlt; /a>< /div>

Then add to your stylesheet:

.aligncenter {float:left; textalign:center;}

This may or may not put it in the center -- I didn't try it.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 06:08 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 06:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Whoa! Your page is now a 404 error. Undo whatever you just did.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 06:09 (twenty-one years ago)

i think you caught me when i was saving something.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 06:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Correction:

< div class="aligncenter">< a href="/maria/">Main< /a>< /div>

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 06:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I did. It's right now. Excellent.

What I meant about the header was to take the image out of the stylesheet as a background and put it on the main page as an image, linked back to your home page, and with a border set to zero to avoid any ugly link borders that a browser will impose.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 06:14 (twenty-one years ago)

No php is required for that, to answer your question more specifically.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 06:15 (twenty-one years ago)

This, btw, is what I love about the template system -- the idea of a "plugin temple" is hugely broadened. It's not just a stylesheet, it's another index page, another images folder, all of it. So your "plugin template" can be *completely* different in form and function than mine.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 06:21 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah... i'm jazzed with wp now that i've taken the plunge. we've currently got a half-wp/half-mt install as i get more comfy with wp, we'll ditch the mt install. (most likely) we have multiple blogs, so this works out that i could have both going at the same time.

greentrack is one of my favorite themes. i have changed a bunch of things on it and soon, i'll probably just create my own custom theme with an entirely different layout.

so far so good tho.
m.

msp (msp), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 21:39 (twenty-one years ago)

two weeks pass...
OK, here's another weird quirk. when i write things in caps, such as the call letter for a radio station, the type switches to a different font and looks weird. not only that, when i roll my mouse over it, the cursor switches to a question mark. [you can visit my site to see it in action]

how can i make it stop doing this?

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Monday, 28 March 2005 14:21 (twenty years ago)

Sounds like a plug-in of some sort. You should probably check out which plug-ins you have & see if any of them cause that to happen. If that's not the case, then it might be your style sheet (or, possibly, the style sheet you modified).

I didn't see any examples of this when I went to your site, though! I did get some JS error, though, which might be WHY I'm not seeing anything. Can you link to a specific post? (I ain't blaming you for the JS error, BTW; I blame IE.)

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 28 March 2005 14:27 (twenty years ago)

Hm. Yeah, I don't know why or how WP is putting in the "caps" span automatically when you type a string of caps, but you can easily stop it from looking all weird by taking the "caps" class out of the stylesheet.

acronym, abbr, span.caps
{
font-size: 0.9em;
letter-spacing: .07em;
}

Take out "span.caps" and leave the "acronym, abbr."

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Monday, 28 March 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

huh? i don't understand, maria, everything looks fine as it is. but maybe like david says: plug-ins. on the forum they suggest trying to deactivate the plugins to check if that's the cause. you can also change the settings: for example deactivate the smileys. (i know i know not much help... but check their forum, it's quite good.)

(me, i'm trying to install coppermine photogallery but apparently i am not the geek i thought i was *sigh*)

nathalie doing a soft foot shuffle (stevie nixed), Monday, 28 March 2005 14:46 (twenty years ago)

I'm guessing whoever did the css for your template was trying to improve usability through the acronym/abbr tag and included that functionality in that caps class.

http://www.netmechanic.com/news/vol8/usability_no1.htm

teeny (teeny), Monday, 28 March 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)

kenan, thanks. you were correct.

FYI: if you're using kubrick as your base template, you'll need to go all the way down to the bottom of the stylesheet and change/remove the code for acronym, abbr, span.caps in the "Begin Various Tags & Classes" section to make this thing go away.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Monday, 28 March 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)

i mean, in addition to the suggestion kenan made above

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Monday, 28 March 2005 15:31 (twenty years ago)

nine months pass...
So what's the consensus on WP 2.0 if, let's say, I were going to start a blog?

Aaron W (Aaron W), Thursday, 29 December 2005 19:46 (twenty years ago)

two years pass...

is this the only wordpress thread? man alive, editing things is still such a chore. they need a better posting/editing system for starters (inc better html tools (e.g. click one button to apply a h1 tag etc.)

any new exciting wordpress rivals worth looking at?

blueski, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 13:15 (seventeen years ago)

I think this is why I wanna shut down my website. That and I don't have anything interesting to say anymore. :-(

I always loved greymatter. Was that the name? That's what I used way back hwhen I started my first site/blog.

stevienixed, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 13:39 (seventeen years ago)

+1 blueski. wordpress looks nice but editing the fucker is so daunting and frustrating i pretty much stopped keeping my blog.

the next grozart, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 14:27 (seventeen years ago)

I dunno -- should I give WP another shot? I haven't been back to it in a couple years, but I was turned off by the page structure. One of the main things I like to do with my blog is redesign it a thousand times, and WP has done a fantastic job of widget-izing every possible element of every page, and it's not awfully malleable -- at least, not in the way I'm thinking. Movable Type 4 has the same problem. Before you can really redesign the thing, you have to figure out how it's put together in the first place, so it's a lot of working backwards, and fuck it. It's the kind of thing that makes perfect logical sense if you write it yourself, but I'm not going there just now. I'm sure I could cobble together some poopy, totally insecure php that would make perfect sense to me, but that would take even longer, and anyway it would be a waste of my better energy.

So I'm a dinosaur. I use MT 3.6. I know it pretty much top-to-bottom, and I can throw it up on a site in five minutes and then open Photoshop and get right to the fun part.

kenan, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 14:59 (seventeen years ago)

Meh, I don't like it. I also hate that you have two options (HTML and just plain text) which confuses the fuck outa me. Also I prefer Greymatter cause it had a much bigger text box instead of WP which is pretty tiny, I think. That said, you have a gazillion layout options which you can pretty much tweek at pleasure until the year 48484.

stevienixed, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 15:04 (seventeen years ago)

One of the main things I like to do with my blog is redesign it a thousand times

this is the first time i've integrated a blog with my site which I rejig the look of with the seasons but it seems versatile enough to withstand future rejiggery. it's all in the css i guess. i agree tho that to do anything big takes a lot of working backwards and i am pretty tired of it.

really want to move a casual client's site from MT to WP (or a better newer equivalent) but too much work for too little reward frankly.

blueski, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 15:13 (seventeen years ago)

editing the fucker is so daunting and frustrating

Uh? I've never had a problem with that at all!

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 15:14 (seventeen years ago)

Is Greymatter still developed and/or supported? Anyway, I'm kinda cringing at that option. It's open source, yeah, and I'm all for that, but MAN does their webpage look the part. There's no mistaking that "designed by programmers" look.

kenan, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 15:18 (seventeen years ago)

i was trying to do a cut post so you click 'read more' for the whole thing but it wouldn't work and just wiped the cut text completely. this is easier to do on freakin' livejournal.

blueski, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 15:18 (seventeen years ago)

i find it's a lot to do with what natalie said about there being two ways of editing things. it looks fine in the editor but when you see the final thing there can be huge paragraph lines that the editor insists on adding to it or the pictures are all in the wrong place.

the next grozart, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 15:19 (seventeen years ago)

xpost to ned

the next grozart, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 15:20 (seventeen years ago)

I thought you just had to put in a "!more" tag that inserts the "CLICK HERE" link and hides the subsequent text for you? What version are you using, blueski?

I'm 2nding Ned's WTF wrt people complaining about WP's text-editing ease -- if anything, it's uploading PICTURES through the interface that's a bitch.

David R., Tuesday, 12 August 2008 15:21 (seventeen years ago)

well, i dislike its complexity. yes, i find the two options complex. *shrug* i keep being confused and will put html code in the first box which leads to a fucked up entry. also, I CANT GET PICS TO BE CENTER. i think what i mean is that it has too many "bells". fuck it, i like simplicity.

also, i have a massive migraine so this entry might come across... whatever.

stevienixed, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 15:26 (seventeen years ago)

I CANT GET PICS TO BE CENTER

<img src="foo,jpg" style="display:block; margin:auto;" />

kenan, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 15:28 (seventeen years ago)

kenan, that didn't help my migraine. ;-)

stevienixed, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 15:29 (seventeen years ago)

I'm sorry. :(

kenan, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 15:31 (seventeen years ago)

foo,jpg

libcrypt, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 15:31 (seventeen years ago)

one year passes...

i can't even work out how to change the fucking font or alignment in fucking stupid wordpress

lex pretend, Thursday, 13 August 2009 11:06 (sixteen years ago)

ok what the hell do i have to know "css"???? fuck. that. shit.

lex pretend, Thursday, 13 August 2009 11:11 (sixteen years ago)

body {
font-face: whateveryouwant;
}

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 13 August 2009 11:22 (sixteen years ago)

lol sorry, i mean --

font-family: whateveryouwant;

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 13 August 2009 11:22 (sixteen years ago)

i don't understand what you mean at all!

lex pretend, Thursday, 13 August 2009 11:26 (sixteen years ago)

is that something i type? where?

lex pretend, Thursday, 13 August 2009 11:27 (sixteen years ago)

Look for "body {" in the style.css template and add the line "text-align: justify/left/right/whatever;" if it's not there.

James Mitchell, Thursday, 13 August 2009 11:27 (sixteen years ago)

alignment didn't work

don't know what the font i want is called

lex pretend, Thursday, 13 August 2009 11:35 (sixteen years ago)

seriously why is it like this? totally impossible to figure out or navigate

lex pretend, Thursday, 13 August 2009 11:36 (sixteen years ago)

because making a fully featured n00b-friendly idiot-proof web publishing system is non-trivial.

ledge, Thursday, 13 August 2009 12:24 (sixteen years ago)

one year passes...

how can i make my wordpress blog start with the oldest post at the top and list my posts chronologically as you go down the page, with the very newest right at the end?

seems like something real simple but im having no luck finding an option for this, is there a plugin?

kidna matters with this as my first post explains everything, important to read that first. so it runs like a standard narrative. would tumblr or something be better for this?

NI, Saturday, 28 May 2011 13:53 (fourteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

So my wordpress blog was just deactivated. I imagine this is a mistake, but its obviously very annoying. Anyone have this happen to them before? How long does it take before you get any sort of response? Why does this even happen in the first place?

EDB, Thursday, 16 June 2011 03:37 (fourteen years ago)

thirteen years pass...

I don't really do webdev anymore so I haven't paid any attention to the Mullenweg vs. WPEngine fight but I thought this article about it was pretty good
https://tedium.co/2024/09/25/wordpress-wp-engine-open-web-negative-effects/

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 28 September 2024 03:56 (one year ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.