there are plenty of ebay sellers from hong kong and china who ask $6 or even $10 for shipping one cd or dvd.
see also, columbia house music club (in fact, they lost a class action suit on this very basis).
obviously this is a case of "let the buyer beware," and obviously any intelligent person can figure out the scam right away and decide if it's still worth it. but it still seems like a fundamentally shady thing to do, if you ask me.
so: dud.
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 26 February 2005 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 26 February 2005 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Saturday, 26 February 2005 16:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 26 February 2005 16:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 26 February 2005 16:48 (twenty-one years ago)
her: "let us not talk about what is right and what is wrong!"
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 26 February 2005 16:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― ambrose (ambrose), Saturday, 26 February 2005 16:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 26 February 2005 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)
Inflated shipping does suck and it probably most often affects inexperienced and/or careless eBay buyers, but ultimately: no one's obligated to buy from such Sellers and if $80 seems a fair price to one Buyer and not another so be it.
I once pulled the trigger too quickly on a CD purchase which was listed at $9.99 - only to turn out to have $7.00 of Argentinian shipping tacked on to it (oh, and they didn't take PayPal, so I had to pay extra to wire them money, too...). But it's just that sort of "learning experience" that has made me pause before nailing the "Buy It Now" button and refuse to buy from any such seller ever again.
It's the free market, ladies and gentleman. You don't give such Sellers your money and they won't survive on inflated shipping rates alone.
― nader (nader), Saturday, 26 February 2005 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)
nader: yeah, that's what i meant when i mentioned above that it's sort of a "let the buyer beware" situation. i still think it's sort of scummy to knowingly pad (sometimes enormously) your shipping costs to make back the money you will have "lost" by keeping your nominal actual-costs looking real low.
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 26 February 2005 17:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Saturday, 26 February 2005 17:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 26 February 2005 17:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Curious George Rides a Republican (Rock Hardy), Saturday, 26 February 2005 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― daria g (daria g), Saturday, 26 February 2005 20:20 (twenty-one years ago)