I recently received a nice pinhole camera as a gift & I would like to start taking/developing my own photos with it.
I picked up some Ilford HP5 Plus B&W paper, but I can't find any information about what chemicals I need to develop it. Any ideas?
(Also, does anyone have any experience with the Polaroid 4x5 film for pinhole cameras?)
― jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Sunday, 27 February 2005 20:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 27 February 2005 20:36 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.kodak.com/global/images/en/professional/products/chemistry/packShots/kodafixSolution.jpg
caitlin is correct.
you also need darkness.
― Jimmy Mod Has Returned With Spices And Silks (ModJ), Sunday, 27 February 2005 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)
If you want to go the Polaroid route, I'd suggest looking at the Polaroid 405 holder ($50-75 on Ebay) and using their packfilm (Type 665 is the only number I know off the top of my head). It's a slightly smaller negative or image (3x4 instead of 4x5, I think), but also $1/shot.
I assume you're talking about HP5+ 4x5 film, no? Do you have sheet film holders (~$25 apiece new for 4x5)?
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Sunday, 27 February 2005 21:45 (twenty-one years ago)
Or nothing-but-red-light for B/W paper, at least.
― caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 27 February 2005 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Monday, 28 February 2005 02:52 (twenty-one years ago)
When I turned on the lights I had a near transparent gray sheet of plastic. What am I doing wrong?
― jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Thursday, 3 March 2005 02:08 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm a little confused about the setup - how does the film going in the camera? Is there a slot toward the back for a film holder, or do you put the film in and seal the box? (if the former, it would look something like these: http://www.pinholecamera.com/)
Film developer is different, I've never heard of using Dektol (usually used for print developing)(I just now noticed that the image above was Dektol, I would have mentioned that earlier). That's an incredibly strong developer and even for prints has to be diluted (3:1 water:developer, if I recall). Each developer and film combination requires a different amount of developing - http://home.pacbell.net/mkirwan/Film%20Developing%20Chart.htm
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 3 March 2005 03:01 (twenty-one years ago)
You did nothing wrong -- you just have to fuck with the exposures a bit. Also, instead of doing a dark room, try something with a little more contrast -- like a hallway with a few windows in it or something similar. The idea being to be able to see what you SHOULD be getting, so that you know when you get it. Dark rooms are hard to gauge, even wif a "real" camera.
Also, I got confused with the orig. Illford paper/film thing up top so I posted paper chem, rather than film chem.
In terms of film chem, I go with d-76 because I am a film school classisist.
― Jimmy Mod Has Returned With Spices And Silks (ModJ), Thursday, 3 March 2005 03:15 (twenty-one years ago)
(I'm speaking from experience here - pouring the two down the sink together also not recommended)
― caitlin (caitlin), Thursday, 3 March 2005 10:18 (twenty-one years ago)
milozauckerman, you mentioned diluting the Dektol. I bought a small bag (as shown above) & mixed it with 1L of water--does it need to be further diluted? Considering I had a clear piece of plastic & dark pink developer after the process, I'm guessing this is the case.
― jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Thursday, 3 March 2005 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:11 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html - Look up HP5+ in the list of films there and it has the proper development times for most developers along with the dilution. (All based on an assumed water temp of 20 degrees celsius, I believe). I'd recommend D76 too, it's a fairly cheap developer and has been around forever. With a 1:1 mix ratio, you're looking at a 13 minute developing time for HP5+.
I'll see if I can find a detailed guide to film processing online (my instructions would suck - "put the thing in the thing and flip it, uh...").
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:24 (twenty-one years ago)
The timing depends completely on the developer you use and its dilution - the times on the developing timing chart posted above vary from 5 to 25 minutes.
The only experience I have with HP5+ is with 35mm film, developed in a developing tank rather than trays. The process, though, is something like this:
a) load film into developing tank (a tub with a light-trap so it can be filled and emptied without light fogging the film)
b) dilute developer. Check temperature, making sure it's at least 20 degrees.
c) Pour developer into tank. Agitate gently. Keep doing it, for appropriate time
d) Empty out developer and rinse thoroughly, filling and emptying the tank with water several times.
e) Pour in fixer, agitating again, for at least five minutes.
f) Rinse thoroughly again. This is even more important the second time, because fixer leaves nasty brown stains behind when it dries. You can do this step with the lights on, though - leave it in the sink under a fast-running tap for five minutes or so.
g) Get rid of excess water and peg it up to dry. Try not to get dust on it.
You will probably be able to get a developing tank to fit the film you've got; it depends whether you can be arsed spending money on it or not.
― caitlin (caitlin), Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:26 (twenty-one years ago)
I have no idea what this is (some old Navy manual for photographers?), but that page gives a pretty decent guide to exactly how tray development works, and the previous pages are about developing in general.
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:43 (twenty-one years ago)
Caitlin, what kind of photo paper would you recommend? (Brand & Product number would be great).
― jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:52 (twenty-one years ago)
Paperwise, you'll probably want variable-contrast (really only important if you have an enlarger to use contrast filters) resin-coated paper. Resin-coated isn't as archival as fibre paper, but it's easier to process and dry. I like pearl, halfway between matte and glossy - http://www.freestylephoto.biz/sc_prod.php?cat_id=501&pid=383
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 3 March 2005 21:03 (twenty-one years ago)
A medium-sized city library should have one of the older editions (ain't nothing changed about black and white in 20 years), every once in a while I see a copy in Half Price Books for $10. I do not recommend paying $90 for it.
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 3 March 2005 21:11 (twenty-one years ago)
anyway, havent seen this posted on the thread yet:
http://www.photo.net/learn/pinhole/pinhole
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Thursday, 3 March 2005 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)
Again, a nearly clear piece of plastic, but this time with a bit of an image in the center. The image was the objects directly under a light. So what I'm gaining from this is 1) I'm close with my developing recipe 2) I'm not exposing long enough. I'm using a super-wide fisheye camera that recommends a 2 second exposure in bright sunlight, so I tried 12 seconds in a room lit by only a overhead stove light. My guess is that it needed at least 25-40 seconds to properly expose.
I'll try more tests tonight & let you know the results.
― jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― S!monB!rch (Carey), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)
Light levels are deceiving. Indoors 400-speed at f/16 (with only one overhead light) is about a half-second to a full second, where outdoors in sunlight it would be ~1/250 or 1/500 of a second.
http://pinhole.fatboab.org/technique/exposure/index.shtml - this has photos showing the difference in exposure times (and a little guide for roughly how long the exposure needs to be). HP5+ is very forgiving, I'd aim long for my tests - maybe a full two minutes and go from there.
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jimmy Mod Has Returned With Spices And Silks (ModJ), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 10 March 2005 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)