Pinhole Cameras

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
A question for the photographers among us--

I recently received a nice pinhole camera as a gift & I would like to start taking/developing my own photos with it.

I picked up some Ilford HP5 Plus B&W paper, but I can't find any information about what chemicals I need to develop it. Any ideas?

(Also, does anyone have any experience with the Polaroid 4x5 film for pinhole cameras?)

jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Sunday, 27 February 2005 20:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Developer and fixer. You're also supposed to use stop bath, but you can get away with using water instead

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 27 February 2005 20:36 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.kodak.com/global/images/en/professional/products/chemistry/packShots/dektolDev.jpg

http://www.kodak.com/global/images/en/professional/products/chemistry/packShots/kodafixSolution.jpg

caitlin is correct.

you also need darkness.

Jimmy Mod Has Returned With Spices And Silks (ModJ), Sunday, 27 February 2005 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Polaroid 4x5 requires a special Polaroid holder that will run you $90 (on Ebay for a Polaroid 545) to ~$200 (new Polaroid 545 Pro). The film itself is expensive, $65-70 for a box of 20.

If you want to go the Polaroid route, I'd suggest looking at the Polaroid 405 holder ($50-75 on Ebay) and using their packfilm (Type 665 is the only number I know off the top of my head). It's a slightly smaller negative or image (3x4 instead of 4x5, I think), but also $1/shot.

I assume you're talking about HP5+ 4x5 film, no? Do you have sheet film holders (~$25 apiece new for 4x5)?

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Sunday, 27 February 2005 21:45 (twenty-one years ago)

you also need darkness.

Or nothing-but-red-light for B/W paper, at least.

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 27 February 2005 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

thanks everyone!

jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Monday, 28 February 2005 02:52 (twenty-one years ago)

ok, I tried this but no luck. I'm using HP5 Plus, 400 speed B&W. Placed the film in the camera, exposed in a nearly dark room for 7 seconds. Took the film out in a dark room, immediately placed in the Dektol for 4 minutes. Removed, placed in the Fixer for five minutes. Rinsed under cold water for 1 min.

When I turned on the lights I had a near transparent gray sheet of plastic. What am I doing wrong?

jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Thursday, 3 March 2005 02:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Pinholes take forever to expose. In a nearly dark room, you might be talking an hour or longer for exposure - 400 speed film in bright sunlight requires one to four seconds of exposure.

I'm a little confused about the setup - how does the film going in the camera? Is there a slot toward the back for a film holder, or do you put the film in and seal the box? (if the former, it would look something like these: http://www.pinholecamera.com/)

Film developer is different, I've never heard of using Dektol (usually used for print developing)(I just now noticed that the image above was Dektol, I would have mentioned that earlier). That's an incredibly strong developer and even for prints has to be diluted (3:1 water:developer, if I recall). Each developer and film combination requires a different amount of developing - http://home.pacbell.net/mkirwan/Film%20Developing%20Chart.htm

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 3 March 2005 03:01 (twenty-one years ago)

ok, I tried this but no luck. I'm using HP5 Plus, 400 speed B&W. Placed the film in the camera, exposed in a nearly dark room for 7 seconds. Took the film out in a dark room, immediately placed in the Dektol for 4 minutes. Removed, placed in the Fixer for five minutes. Rinsed under cold water for 1 min.

When I turned on the lights I had a near transparent gray sheet of plastic. What am I doing wrong?

You did nothing wrong -- you just have to fuck with the exposures a bit. Also, instead of doing a dark room, try something with a little more contrast -- like a hallway with a few windows in it or something similar. The idea being to be able to see what you SHOULD be getting, so that you know when you get it. Dark rooms are hard to gauge, even wif a "real" camera.


Also, I got confused with the orig. Illford paper/film thing up top so I posted paper chem, rather than film chem.

In terms of film chem, I go with d-76 because I am a film school classisist.

Jimmy Mod Has Returned With Spices And Silks (ModJ), Thursday, 3 March 2005 03:15 (twenty-one years ago)

One other thing - rinse the film (or paper) well between developing and fixing - otherwise, they'll react, and (depending on the combination of chemicals you're using) you could stink out your darkroom with ammonia.

(I'm speaking from experience here - pouring the two down the sink together also not recommended)

caitlin (caitlin), Thursday, 3 March 2005 10:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks, but I'm still pretty confused. Could someone please post a step-by-step of how they would do this, what chemicals they would use (product #'s would be helpful) & for how long in each tray (based on using the 400 speed HP5 Plus?

milozauckerman, you mentioned diluting the Dektol. I bought a small bag (as shown above) & mixed it with 1L of water--does it need to be further diluted? Considering I had a clear piece of plastic & dark pink developer after the process, I'm guessing this is the case.

jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Thursday, 3 March 2005 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)

please?

jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, mixing it with 1L should just make the Dektol solution itself. From there you'd have to dilute it further for a working solution, but I have no clue whatsoever about the right mix.

http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html - Look up HP5+ in the list of films there and it has the proper development times for most developers along with the dilution. (All based on an assumed water temp of 20 degrees celsius, I believe). I'd recommend D76 too, it's a fairly cheap developer and has been around forever. With a 1:1 mix ratio, you're looking at a 13 minute developing time for HP5+.

I'll see if I can find a detailed guide to film processing online (my instructions would suck - "put the thing in the thing and flip it, uh...").

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)

That sounds like a good handbook milo though! kind of Tep-style (by which I mean good!)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:24 (twenty-one years ago)

One problem you might find with using HP5+ is that is has to be developed in complete darkness, because (unlike paper) it responds to red light; processing it in trays is therefore going to be a bugger unless you get the full-enclosure trays designed for hand-printing colour prints. I'd recommend that you try using photographic paper instead of film, because then you can develop in red light, and can watch the image developing.

The timing depends completely on the developer you use and its dilution - the times on the developing timing chart posted above vary from 5 to 25 minutes.

The only experience I have with HP5+ is with 35mm film, developed in a developing tank rather than trays. The process, though, is something like this:

a) load film into developing tank (a tub with a light-trap so it can be filled and emptied without light fogging the film)

b) dilute developer. Check temperature, making sure it's at least 20 degrees.

c) Pour developer into tank. Agitate gently. Keep doing it, for appropriate time

d) Empty out developer and rinse thoroughly, filling and emptying the tank with water several times.

e) Pour in fixer, agitating again, for at least five minutes.

f) Rinse thoroughly again. This is even more important the second time, because fixer leaves nasty brown stains behind when it dries. You can do this step with the lights on, though - leave it in the sink under a fast-running tap for five minutes or so.

g) Get rid of excess water and peg it up to dry. Try not to get dust on it.

You will probably be able to get a developing tank to fit the film you've got; it depends whether you can be arsed spending money on it or not.

caitlin (caitlin), Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:26 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.tpub.com/content/photography/14209/css/14209_258.htm

I have no idea what this is (some old Navy manual for photographers?), but that page gives a pretty decent guide to exactly how tray development works, and the previous pages are about developing in general.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks everyone; I'm going to try it again tonight.

Caitlin, what kind of photo paper would you recommend? (Brand & Product number would be great).

jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:50 (twenty-one years ago)

It's so long since I've done any photography that I can't actually remember any product numbers. Just get a medium-grade glossy paper, and be aware that the exposure time will need to be *much* longer than for film.

caitlin (caitlin), Thursday, 3 March 2005 20:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Are you in the US, Jay? If so, I like Arista products, the house brand of Freestyle Photo (www.freestylephoto.biz). Arista is re-packaged Ilford (such as your HP5+, which becomes Arista 400 and about 40-45% cheaper), Arista.edu is a European brand about as good and even cheaper.

Paperwise, you'll probably want variable-contrast (really only important if you have an enlarger to use contrast filters) resin-coated paper. Resin-coated isn't as archival as fibre paper, but it's easier to process and dry. I like pearl, halfway between matte and glossy - http://www.freestylephoto.biz/sc_prod.php?cat_id=501&pid=383

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 3 March 2005 21:03 (twenty-one years ago)

This is the book they made us buy when I took intro to photography - overpriced but it has a lot of info on different methods of developing and printing.

A medium-sized city library should have one of the older editions (ain't nothing changed about black and white in 20 years), every once in a while I see a copy in Half Price Books for $10. I do not recommend paying $90 for it.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 3 March 2005 21:11 (twenty-one years ago)

ive purchased the arista brand in the past, and even though its repackaged ilford, ive had fairly disappointing results.

anyway, havent seen this posted on the thread yet:

http://www.photo.net/learn/pinhole/pinhole

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Thursday, 3 March 2005 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Getting there...I tried a quick test last night using the Dektol mixed 1 part with 3 parts water. Kept the HP5+ in the developer for about 5 minutes, rinsed with water then placed in the fixer for about 5 minutes.

Again, a nearly clear piece of plastic, but this time with a bit of an image in the center. The image was the objects directly under a light. So what I'm gaining from this is 1) I'm close with my developing recipe 2) I'm not exposing long enough. I'm using a super-wide fisheye camera that recommends a 2 second exposure in bright sunlight, so I tried 12 seconds in a room lit by only a overhead stove light. My guess is that it needed at least 25-40 seconds to properly expose.

I'll try more tests tonight & let you know the results.

jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)

i remember when I used to use my oatmeal container and ilford box pinhole cameras, I would have to expose the sheets of paper inside for like 2 minutes in bright sunlight.

S!monB!rch (Carey), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)

It could be a bit longer than that, depending on light levels and reciprocity failure. Your pinhole is equivalent to ~f/175 to f/200 (a 35mm camera and lens stops at f/16 or f/22).

Light levels are deceiving. Indoors 400-speed at f/16 (with only one overhead light) is about a half-second to a full second, where outdoors in sunlight it would be ~1/250 or 1/500 of a second.

http://pinhole.fatboab.org/technique/exposure/index.shtml - this has photos showing the difference in exposure times (and a little guide for roughly how long the exposure needs to be). HP5+ is very forgiving, I'd aim long for my tests - maybe a full two minutes and go from there.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:51 (twenty-one years ago)

What does this thing (camera) look like, BTW?

Jimmy Mod Has Returned With Spices And Silks (ModJ), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)

How goes it, Jay?

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 10 March 2005 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.