could this ever change in our culture? would people ever be able to stop referring to each other as 'cocks' or 'cunts' because those things were no longer considered shameful or worthy of resentment, or at least the residue of this belief evaporate fully?
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 14:55 (twenty years ago)
― NRQ, Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)
― peepee (peepee), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:03 (twenty years ago)
― Some Dadaismus Implied (Dada), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:05 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)
― Johnney B (Johnney B), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)
― Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:13 (twenty years ago)
― Some Dadaismus Implied (Dada), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)
it just occurred to me how illogical it all is though...
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:17 (twenty years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:21 (twenty years ago)
― Some Dadaismus Implied (Dada), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:23 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:24 (twenty years ago)
but you don't necessarily want to BE the wrinkly bit at the end of a penis, the hole in the buttocks and have poo being pushed through you, be the actual piece of poo etc.
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:26 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)
not necess. true - what about feet and armpits?
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)
(x-post)
― miccio (miccio), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)
xpost
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:33 (twenty years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:34 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:39 (twenty years ago)
― Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:43 (twenty years ago)
― alix (alix), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:44 (twenty years ago)
just because of the stigma regarding sex organs no? this stigma resulting from much spouting in the name of religion through the ages?
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:45 (twenty years ago)
hmm, example? we know the most offensive word you can use on TV is a reference to female genitalia after all...
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:47 (twenty years ago)
― alix (alix), Thursday, 3 March 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:00 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:01 (twenty years ago)
― alix (alix), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:04 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:04 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:07 (twenty years ago)
I actually do think of a guy if someone refers to an 'asshole' or a 'fucker'.
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:08 (twenty years ago)
― Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:11 (twenty years ago)
― alix (alix), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:11 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:14 (twenty years ago)
read somewhere that the genitalia thing for insults isn't universal - other countries prefer words for sexual acts or disparaging remarks about family members.
― koogs (koogs), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:14 (twenty years ago)
haha, of course an evening out involving whores, tarts and slags will be considered a good thing by some
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:15 (twenty years ago)
another good point. but perhaps this is because genitalia is still considered too 'shameful' to even use as insults in certain places/cultures?
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:16 (twenty years ago)
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:18 (twenty years ago)
― alix (alix), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:20 (twenty years ago)
it's just because having your cock sucked is like, pleasurable maybe, whereas ordering someone to lick your armpits is just weird!!
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:24 (twenty years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:26 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:26 (twenty years ago)
― alix (alix), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:29 (twenty years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)
― alix (alix), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:36 (twenty years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:38 (twenty years ago)
― alix (alix), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:40 (twenty years ago)
Have "bodily functions" in general been used as insults, throughout the histoire, Lixi? Or did they for all intents and purposes start circa Victoriana - I doubt that but wd be interested to kno
― Lucretia My Reflection (Lucretia My Reflection), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)
― alix (alix), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)
― Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:45 (twenty years ago)
― alix (alix), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:46 (twenty years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:51 (twenty years ago)
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:51 (twenty years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:52 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)
― BARMS, Thursday, 3 March 2005 16:55 (twenty years ago)
I cunt believe it.
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 3 March 2005 17:01 (twenty years ago)
― koogs (koogs), Thursday, 3 March 2005 17:13 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 17:18 (twenty years ago)
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 3 March 2005 17:19 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)
― alix (alix), Thursday, 3 March 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 3 March 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 3 March 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)
what's the technical term for this 'mis-appropriation'?
― smee (smee), Thursday, 3 March 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 3 March 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)