david byrne-i --heart---powerpoint

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
at berkeley now, he's about to give a lecture on whatever in a few minutes. there's a link to the webcast here---> http://webcast.berkeley.edu/events/details.html?event_id=184

i admit that i'm a little excited about this. perhaps we can discuss david's presentation afterwards.

kack, Tuesday, 8 March 2005 03:22 (twenty years ago)

I don't whether what i'm watching is the presentation or the warm up.

kate/baby loves headrub (papa november), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 03:30 (twenty years ago)

awesome, thanks!

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 03:30 (twenty years ago)

haha, 155 Dwinelle!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 03:33 (twenty years ago)

this is ridiculous.

cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 03:35 (twenty years ago)

it's lovely! and lastread is back!

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 03:38 (twenty years ago)

I miss Dwinelle and Wheeler, which were my two homes for four years.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 03:38 (twenty years ago)

PowerPoint, the software application developed by engineers at Microsoft Corporation, has become the ubiquitous standard for presentations on topics ranging from business to academia to charity fund-raising.
The structure and features of PowerPoint were designed assuming a specific world view. The software, by making certain actions easier and more convenient than others tells you how to think as it helps you accomplish your task. Not in an obvious way or in an obnoxious way or even in a scheming way. The biases are almost unintentional; they are natural and well integrated. It is possible that the engineers and designers have no intention of guiding and straightening out your thinking; they simply feel that the assumptions upon which they base their design decisions are the most natural and practical. You are thus subtly indoctrinated into a manner of being and behaving, assuming and acting, that grows on you as you use the program.

Let us imagine, then, that PowerPoint and its attendant softwares are actually a means to a positive emotional and philosophical end, a path towards a goal that is easy to reach and available to all. The billions of people who use it are on their way to happiness, contentment and a feeling of belonging to a society that thinks and feels the same way and shares their values.

"Rather than resist, I decided that I must surrender and learn to use this software myself, for, like everyone, I long to belong. I have a long way to go: my presentations are sometimes unclear and confusing. But I have made huge advances and I feel myself more at ease with each new presentation." - David Byrne


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

David Byrne, best known as one of the Talking Heads, has been making visual art for more than 25 years and is represented by Pace/MacGill Gallery in NYC. He has been working with PowerPoint as an art medium for a number of years. What started off as a joke took on a life of its own as Byrne realized he could create moving pieces, despite the limitations of the medium. His new book of artwork done with PowerPoint is "Envisioning Emotional Epistemological Information." http://www.davidbyrne.com

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 03:43 (twenty years ago)

From The Onion:

Project Manager Leaves Suicide PowerPoint Presentation

PORTLAND, OR—Project manager Ron Butler left behind a 48-slide PowerPoint presentation explaining his tragic decision to commit suicide, coworkers reported Tuesday.

"When I first heard that Ron had swallowed an entire bottle of sleeping pills, I was shocked," said Hector Benitez, Butler's friend and coworker at Williams+Kennedy Marketing Consultants. "But after the team went through Ron's final PowerPoint presentation, I had a solid working knowledge of the pain he was feeling, his attempts to cope, and the reasons for his ultimate decision."

"I just wish he would've shot me an e-mail asking for help," Benitez added...

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 03:48 (twenty years ago)

man do I love david byrne. thanks again kack!

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 03:53 (twenty years ago)

This is so f'in great. Good stream, too.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 03:54 (twenty years ago)

Wow, it's just like being in class but funny, and interesting.

kate/baby loves headrub (papa november), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 03:56 (twenty years ago)

Argh it needs Realplayer and buggered if I'm installing it.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 03:56 (twenty years ago)

To be or not to be:

Options One "To Be" || Option Two "Or Not To Be"

Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 03:57 (twenty years ago)

Pros:
nobler in the mind

Cons:
slings
arrows

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 03:57 (twenty years ago)

Get real alternative Trayce. It actually works!

http://www.free-codecs.com/download/Real_Alternative.htm

kate/baby loves headrub (papa november), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:00 (twenty years ago)

this is quite fun.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:04 (twenty years ago)

I've tuned in just as he seems to be stuttering and er'ing and uhhhh'ing a lot. Is this part of the schtick, or is he just going through a rough patch?

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:20 (twenty years ago)

He seems to have developed this in the last 10 mins or so.

kate/baby loves headrub (papa november), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:21 (twenty years ago)

Ooh thanks Kate.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:22 (twenty years ago)

He's been doing it on and off the whole time.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:25 (twenty years ago)

he's nervous.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:26 (twenty years ago)

I thought it had become particularly pronounced just now, but I probably didn't notice before.

kate/baby loves headrub (papa november), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:27 (twenty years ago)

he's always like this, he gets more stammery and distracted the longer he talks.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:28 (twenty years ago)

It does seem like he's rambling a lot. There's definitely humour in there but it seems like he's losing the track in a lot of places, and laughing at himself to diffuse it. It seemed like someone in the audience started applauding when he said he was going to move on.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:37 (twenty years ago)

Yeah entertaining for sure, but I'm not sure what the point is. I'm hoping I'll figure it out when he sums up.

kate/baby loves headrub (papa november), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:38 (twenty years ago)

no, they were applauding at a slide I think.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:40 (twenty years ago)

oh man answers at the end is a horrible idea, he's going to get so impatient with the audience.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:46 (twenty years ago)

I'm a little overprotective of david you know.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:46 (twenty years ago)

I wanna go play with powerpoint after this is done!

kate/baby loves headrub (papa november), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:47 (twenty years ago)

I paused this to watch the Daily Show, so I'm half an hour behind you guys. I think this is completely fascinating, though, as media theory among other things -- critique of style over substance, questioning the function of design and especially information architecture, etc. Great stuff.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:48 (twenty years ago)

I hope this is available for download after it's over.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:50 (twenty years ago)

haha politics of montage!

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:51 (twenty years ago)

I like the idea that if you come at something like a product, process or whatever, without any of its usual recieved knowledge, you'll use it in innovative ways. Its easy to just go "oh blech ppt files" but its refreshing to see this enthusiastic "hey look what it can do!" thing. Fab :)

I love modern technology! I am still stoked I can click a button and a lecture from Berkley comes up on my pc, instantly. Wow.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:52 (twenty years ago)

Me too. I wish I could stay at home and have all my lectures this way.

kate/baby loves headrub (papa november), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 04:53 (twenty years ago)

You already can in some places. In the future, all places. Go to class in your pajamas!

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 05:04 (twenty years ago)

I like the idea that if you come at something like a product, process or whatever, without any of its usual recieved knowledge, you'll use it in innovative ways.

Hm. See, I think he learned to use it like everyone else does, and learned to use it in innovative ways because he thinks like an artist. Part of the art is the usual received knowledge that everyone has, or at least that everyone else has.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 05:07 (twenty years ago)

I mean, you can put a bullet point in front of anything. It takes a certain kind of mind to relize that, though. The rest of us are stuck trying to make things look important, instead of trying to deconstruct the idea of "important."

I really, really love David Byrne, btw.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 05:10 (twenty years ago)

Yeah good point. I guess thats what makes a real artist - the lateral/different thought process, the innovation.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 05:12 (twenty years ago)

wild. cool, a few people watched. i dug his schtick and thought there was a lot of fascinating content there. now i want to investigate powerpoint even more.

and i think his slightly apparent nervousnous at times was kinda cute.

i found out about this broadcast half an hour before it happened, and i was in berkeley until 3:30 today, damnit. i could have been there(155 dwinelle, i took a spanish intensive course there). well, coulda woulda shoulda. i just saw the webcast my comfy room in el barrio mission, west of berkeley. good enough.

kack, Tuesday, 8 March 2005 05:18 (twenty years ago)

now i want to investigate powerpoint even more.

Why? It's easy and dull. That's kind of why he used it.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 05:25 (twenty years ago)

is this down now or is there a link i'm not seeing?? (yes i do see the obvious message)

f--gg (gcannon), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 05:29 (twenty years ago)

it's true powerpoint and it's clones are standard for today's simple, effective, low-cost multimedia presentations, it's almost democratic tech, I'm interested to see how ideas from these wares will eventually crossover on interweb communications.

Most of us did not grow up with the internet, we came at it with old ways of communicating and with the hands we were given
56k = txt+ images pwn
dsl = mp3 pwn
cheap storage = avi pwn
... = ?

I guess the generation that will grow up with simple, effective, low-cost online hypermedia communication tools will be better at expressing themselves @ teh contemporary soc, network of networks, and have a better mastery of this fluid universe of communication.

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 05:30 (twenty years ago)

Some thoughts on David Byrne, who is truly one of my favorite people:

Byrne distills everything down to its essence, even art, even his own function as an artist. To some degree, the function of all art is to shed new light on the banal, just like the function of all therapy is to acclimate you with the fact that you, too, are banal. But Byrne is an odd kind of purist.

I do not know what David Byrne thinks of other modern artists -- I'd be very interested to accompany him to a gallery sometime. It's a fantasy, and probably not true at all, but I can imagine him dismissing all other art as not banal enough. I think of the story about Sid Caesar, yelling at his writers for The Show of Shows. "NOT FUNNY ENOUGH!" he would scream, and throw the script across the table. Byrne could do that with art and banality. Nothing is banal enough for David Byrne. He is only fascinated by what is everyday, because only in that does he see the keys to the what we really are. I think he's definitely on to something.

The idea is that we all take certain things for granted, and what one takes for granted is the measure of the man (or woman, or whoever). It runs through all his lyrics and all his visual art. The only thing he thinks is not subject to the ordinary rules of banality is music. Music is special, because it reaches around what we think and touches us in ways we can't even begin to intellectualize or flatten. Everything else... well, that's what he must strive to make art of.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 05:34 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.