― Guymauve (Guymauve), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:06 (twenty years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)
― Guymauve (Guymauve), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:12 (twenty years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:13 (twenty years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:17 (twenty years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:21 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:22 (twenty years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:23 (twenty years ago)
― andy --, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:24 (twenty years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)
― Mog, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)
― andy --, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)
What I find interesting is that this fits into some more general scheme of Manchester's recent attempts to market itself as England's great cultural centre (Urbis does this as well).
― Guymauve (Guymauve), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)
Oh, the alcoholic afternoons, etc...
― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:33 (twenty years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:47 (twenty years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)
― andy --, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:55 (twenty years ago)
― Ian John50n (orion), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)
― donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:11 (twenty years ago)
I'm a fan but...
(It does sound like a really cool conference though. I just thought that claim was pretty wild.)
― the fucker that will burn you (sundar), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:12 (twenty years ago)
― donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)
― Guymauve (Guymauve), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)
― laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:52 (twenty years ago)
― andy --, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 17:14 (twenty years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 17:18 (twenty years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 17:19 (twenty years ago)
― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 17:20 (twenty years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)
Andy, come to downtown Santa Ana and shout that. I dare you.
That said, while The Smiths completely ruled England, they were not ignored in the U.S. at all. "How Soon Is Now?" did break them beyond college radio, and their shows thereafter in the U.S. were immediate sell-outs. (Either that, or they were just big in California?)
And, yes, there is something specific about southern California Morrissey/Smiths worship that is highly unignorable. Listen to the phone calls on the "Morrissey at KROQ" CD-single.. (Actually, eat something comforting first. the sycophantism is ulcer-ific)
― donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)
ROFLLING -- and no need to fill in the punchline.
― N_RQ, Wednesday, 6 April 2005 07:41 (twenty years ago)
academics missing the only interesting issue shocker
however i, for one, welcome the academic reification of the smiths. I hope the 'keen insights' presented at the conference are as invigorating and useful as i suspect they may be.
― debden, Wednesday, 6 April 2005 07:58 (twenty years ago)
I think my issue with the conference (I have no trouble with academics studying popular music, but then that's my field) is that it is so Manchester-centric, at the expense of what makes the Smiths/Morrissey interesting as embodying a certain kind of "Englishness." This means neglecting to understand how they, and he, were perceived outside of England, as well as how they've both been taken up by non-Anglos elsewhere.
If anyone cares, I'll be reviewing it for the academic journal Popular Music, and you should be able to find a review of it over at: http://www.iaspm.net sometime in the next couple of weeks.
― Guymauve (Guymauve), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 08:07 (twenty years ago)
From the titles alone, I think the conference looks like missing the point, big time.
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 08:14 (twenty years ago)
On Saturday, when I have to come in to work for a bit.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 08:42 (twenty years ago)