I couldnt resist. Do you do this sort of thing?
― Ronan, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Graham, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― katie, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Jonnie, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ellie, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Emma, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Will, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Menelaus Darcy, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nick, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tim, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Bill, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I think that's how my writing got so bad, I had to be so serious and humorless in all of the essays and papers I wrote that the humor and creativity kind of got pummeled out.
― Nicole, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― alix, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sterling Clover, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Favorite moment of critique: a professor writing in large block capitals "I CANNOT PARSE THIS SENTENCE." Neither could I, likely enough.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Alan Trewartha, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I failed, it was Linear Algebra not logic.
― Mr Noodles, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
was this to the detriment of my grades?
well it seems not. i'm an archaeologist you see, and the people who write the textbooks and mark the papers fill their publications with similar, or in many cases worse material. got a 2.1 in the end, so humour in accademic work = classic. (take it to the bridge ronan).
― another james, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― bnw, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Maria, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― anthonyeaston, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Paul Barclay, Thursday, 6 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tadeusz Suchodolski, Friday, 7 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Paul Barclay, Friday, 7 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― maryann, Friday, 7 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I once started an essay on Principia Mathematica: '"What's it all about, Alfie?" was almost definately uttered Sixties years before Cilla Black had a hit with theme to to popular Michael Caine movie. However in this case it was uttered by Bertrand Russell, and the subject was not the intricate complexities of relationships but instead the formalisation of mathematics into a single, logical foundation. However like the Liverpudlian chantuse - both Russell and Whitehead were not to find a satisfactory answer to their question.'
When I worked for the London Exam Board we once got a fantastic exam paper in Politcs & Governement which somone compared Churchill's wartime record with that of Sir Alex Fergusson. It showed a very deep understanding of Churchill so the examiner passed it - despite its idiosyncracy. The comment at the end said it would be a crime to make someone that bored to do resits.
― Pete, Friday, 7 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― nickn, Friday, 7 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― spaztik who needs a joke, Sunday, 17 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― ethan, Sunday, 17 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
A: This is.
― Prude, Sunday, 17 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
People can always get away with jokes in their papers if it is relevant to the work. If not, teachers know a bullshitter or wordcount beefer when they see one. And if you're considering journalism, rest assured that if you've made a joke in the article and you really think it's amusing, without even being privy to this information, your editor will snip it out. It's a homing instinct we have. You could have other jokes in the piece but we always go for the one that makes you feel *really* chuffed.
― suzy, Monday, 18 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jon D, Wednesday, 20 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 20 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ally C, Wednesday, 20 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― N., Thursday, 21 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jonnie, Thursday, 21 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sarah, Thursday, 21 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― pete s, Wednesday, 3 March 2004 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Elliot (Elliot), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 20:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― dean! (deangulberry), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 21:05 (twenty-one years ago)
-- Nicole (ndwillet...) (webmail), December 6th, 2001.
Same here. Years of academic writing did nothing for my prose. It became pale and starved. Humourless. I'm still recovering.
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)