http://www.bethshort.com/uniphoto.htm
― trappist monkey, Thursday, 7 April 2005 23:12 (twenty years ago)
― anthony, Thursday, 7 April 2005 23:58 (twenty years ago)
― trappist monkey, Friday, 8 April 2005 00:05 (twenty years ago)
― anthony, Friday, 8 April 2005 00:18 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Friday, 8 April 2005 00:22 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Friday, 8 April 2005 00:23 (twenty years ago)
― does that make you want to touch yourself? (nordicskilla), Friday, 8 April 2005 03:23 (twenty years ago)
― anthony, Friday, 8 April 2005 03:26 (twenty years ago)
― does that make you want to touch yourself? (nordicskilla), Friday, 8 April 2005 03:28 (twenty years ago)
― anthony, Friday, 8 April 2005 03:36 (twenty years ago)
it took me years before i realised there was a movie
― anthony, Friday, 8 April 2005 03:42 (twenty years ago)
― does that make you want to touch yourself? (nordicskilla), Friday, 8 April 2005 03:43 (twenty years ago)
i can't wait for the de palma black dahlia, though i'm disappointed that the ellroy-fichner collaboration on it never got completed (they were working on that back in 99 or so).
― Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Friday, 8 April 2005 03:46 (twenty years ago)
― does that make you want to touch yourself? (nordicskilla), Friday, 8 April 2005 03:55 (twenty years ago)
― Jimmy Mod Knows You Eat Your Own Farts (ModJ), Friday, 8 April 2005 04:15 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2005 15:58 (twenty years ago)
OMG so true.
Anyway, I finished the Hodel book. It was compelling, but not quite compelling enough.
― European Samuel Glickstein (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 14:50 (twenty years ago)
― Eric von H. (Eric H.), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 15:13 (twenty years ago)
― Shatterproof Glass (dymaxia), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 15:18 (twenty years ago)
― Masked Gazza, Wednesday, 20 April 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)
― European Samuel Glickstein (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 15:45 (twenty years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 15:46 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 15:47 (twenty years ago)
― European Samuel Glickstein (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 16:48 (twenty years ago)
This story reminds me of other unsolved crimes -- The Boy in the Box, "Sharon Marshall", the seemingly endless list of missing children, some missing for well over 60 years. All of these mysteries that haunt and caution, reminding us of how unsafe the world can be, has been, for as long as the world's been here, it seems.
Anyway. I wonder if that man in the photo linked to up on top is that limping man alluded to in the site. Or, if he isn't, who he is and whether he might be the key to solving this case.
― The Spirit of Sam Endicott (Dee the Lurker), Thursday, 21 April 2005 07:15 (twenty years ago)
― Jimmy Mod Knows You Eat Your Own Farts (ModJ), Thursday, 21 April 2005 09:12 (twenty years ago)
At a Court TV dinner, Ellroy said he’d seen three hours of unedited footage from “Dahlia,” a hardboiled thriller loosely based on the infamous 1947 murder case, and starring Scarlett Johansson, Hilary Swank, Aaron Eckhart and Josh Hartnett. While Ellroy wouldn’t hazard a guess as to how it would cut together, he described the footage as “…fucking gorgeous.”
Ellroy said DePalma wasn’t present when he watched the footage a few months back. “One of his people put me in a screening room and showed what they had. The compositions are amazing. I’ve seen enough cop movie squadroom scenes to think I’d never see another scene set in one that didn’t bore me, but the way De Palma shoots a squadroom, it’s like you’re seeing it for the first time…The clarity of the images is unreal.”...
“It’s a reduced version of my book, but a very cohesive one,” Ellroy said. “It’s the first person narration of the young officer who eventually solves the case, the Hartnett character.”
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 19 January 2006 16:44 (twenty years ago)
― adamrl (nordicskilla), Thursday, 19 January 2006 20:25 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 19 January 2006 22:55 (twenty years ago)
― adamrl (nordicskilla), Thursday, 19 January 2006 22:55 (twenty years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 19 January 2006 22:56 (twenty years ago)
― adamrl (nordicskilla), Thursday, 19 January 2006 22:56 (twenty years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 19 January 2006 22:58 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 20 January 2006 00:52 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 20 January 2006 00:58 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 20 January 2006 01:01 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 20 January 2006 01:02 (twenty years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 20 January 2006 01:05 (twenty years ago)
― Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Friday, 20 January 2006 01:16 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 20 January 2006 01:22 (twenty years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Friday, 20 January 2006 01:24 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Friday, 20 January 2006 01:26 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Friday, 20 January 2006 01:27 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 January 2006 04:43 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 January 2006 04:45 (twenty years ago)
spot on!!!
― stockholm cindy (winter version) (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 20 January 2006 05:18 (twenty years ago)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i'll take anything, anything by de palma over that piece of shit. wiseguys. raising cain. -- s1ocki (slytus...), January 20th, 2006.
http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/movie/coverv/34/177834.jpg
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 20 January 2006 09:29 (twenty years ago)
I remember there was a Black Dahlia TV film in the '70s starring Lucie Arnaz!
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 20 January 2006 14:14 (twenty years ago)
― Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Wednesday, 11 October 2006 19:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 11 October 2006 19:26 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 11 October 2006 19:29 (nineteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Wednesday, 11 October 2006 19:36 (nineteen years ago)
― pinkmoose (jacklove), Sunday, 7 January 2007 23:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Sunday, 7 January 2007 23:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Sunday, 7 January 2007 23:22 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Sunday, 7 January 2007 23:26 (nineteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Sunday, 7 January 2007 23:31 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Sunday, 7 January 2007 23:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Monday, 8 January 2007 01:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Monday, 8 January 2007 01:18 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Monday, 8 January 2007 01:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Monday, 8 January 2007 01:26 (nineteen years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 8 January 2007 01:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 8 January 2007 06:29 (nineteen years ago)
*made-up "variety" slang
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 8 January 2007 06:30 (nineteen years ago)
1) de palma works better when he doesnt have a studio fucking his shit up, and this thing had like 13 people as producers (!?)2) i was really looking forward to how this could have been a hyped up, trashed up, rococo genre peice like femme fatale or snake eyes, and there was potential.3) it still had two or three fantastic shots/scenes, and half a dozen good ones.4) i mourn for its potential.
― pinkmoose (jacklove), Monday, 8 January 2007 07:46 (nineteen years ago)
It does if you don't much like De Palma.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 8 January 2007 07:50 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 8 January 2007 13:53 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Monday, 8 January 2007 13:56 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 8 January 2007 14:16 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Monday, 8 January 2007 14:19 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 8 January 2007 14:25 (nineteen years ago)
uh, but at least she LOOKS like her. i mean, ffs, swank looked NOTHING like her.
such a horrible horrible movie.
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 8 January 2007 14:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Monday, 8 January 2007 14:45 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Monday, 8 January 2007 18:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 8 January 2007 18:50 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 8 January 2007 18:56 (nineteen years ago)
― cousin larry bundgee (bundgee), Monday, 8 January 2007 18:58 (nineteen years ago)
Fine with me. I "like" them all as well, even this one.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 8 January 2007 19:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 8 January 2007 19:11 (nineteen years ago)
― N.i.c.o.l.e (Ex Leon), Monday, 8 January 2007 19:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 8 January 2007 19:18 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 8 January 2007 19:29 (nineteen years ago)
-- Eric H. (ephende...), January 8th, 2007 7:10 PM. (Eric H.) (later)
why did you put like in quotes?
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 8 January 2007 19:30 (nineteen years ago)
Okay, I did like the morricone. And Tim Robbins exploding.
― N.i.c.o.l.e (Ex Leon), Monday, 8 January 2007 21:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 00:03 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.cinematk.tv/docs/ficheros/200410270003_91_4_2.jpg
― Frogm@n Henry (Frogm@n Henry), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 05:03 (nineteen years ago)
Even if it was Morricone ripping off his own score to The Thing.
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 05:56 (nineteen years ago)
I don't know. Do you like every De Palma movie for real? I was probably lying a little when I wrote that, because I'm more mixed on The Untouchables than actually liking it.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 06:04 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 06:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 07:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 07:26 (nineteen years ago)
Dreary--even Vilmos Zsigmond gets uglified. Also found it incomprehensible, but I haven't read the book, and didn't care enough to double-back whenever I missed something.
― clemenza, Thursday, 15 November 2012 03:57 (thirteen years ago)
SHE LOOKS LIKE THAT DEAD GIRL!
― One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:14 (thirteen years ago)
Did anyone watch "I Am the Night"?
I have not, but I've been listening to the accompanying podcast "Root of Evil," about the Hodels.
I've never known quite what to make of the George Hodel theory (and find the idea that he was the Zodiac completely ridiculous) but the Man Ray / Surrealism connection does seem to gesture towards an answer that bothers me even more than Who -- which is Why?
― ryan, Thursday, 7 March 2019 17:29 (seven years ago)
just read about that. I totally missed this series but I'll try to catch it. Intriguing.
― akm, Thursday, 7 March 2019 18:55 (seven years ago)
I watched it, it was good enough for me to stick with it but I wouldn't call it "good."
― nickn, Thursday, 7 March 2019 22:27 (seven years ago)
watching again and its great fun
― godfellaz (darraghmac), Sunday, 30 June 2019 21:18 (six years ago)