Taking Sides on Films of the 90s Pt.5: "Trainspotting" vs. "Pulp Fiction"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.moviehole.net/img/trainspotting.jpg http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/miramax_films/pulp_fiction/_group_photos/john_travolta15.jpg

Do I even need to bother describing either? Have at it.....

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 8 April 2005 18:55 (twenty years ago)

Shallow Grave is better than either, but of these two films I'd say Pulp Fiction is the one I am less conflicted about (there are some suspicious differences between the book and film with Trainspotting.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)

*Some*?

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 8 April 2005 19:20 (twenty years ago)

Pulp Fiction is more fun.

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 8 April 2005 19:21 (twenty years ago)

(xpost)Haha I was being kind.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2005 19:22 (twenty years ago)

again I say, pulp fiction.

happy fun ball (kenan), Friday, 8 April 2005 19:24 (twenty years ago)

I was a bit worried when I realised that the chapter that gives the book its name - is it the one with Begbie's father in? - isn't in the film at all.

On the other hand, it's a bit unfair to say "Trainspotting loses because it's nothing like the book it's adapted from" when you're comparing it with something that wasn't an adaptation anyway.

Pulp Fiction would be a better film if it was half an hour shorter.

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 8 April 2005 19:28 (twenty years ago)

Pulp Fiction.

Sausages taste good. Pork chops taste good. (Jeanne Fury), Friday, 8 April 2005 19:29 (twenty years ago)

And that half hour would come from the taxi ride and from Mr. Wolf.

Pulp Fiction is better, but they're both two really good teams who came out tonight to play. You can't fault either one of them.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Friday, 8 April 2005 19:31 (twenty years ago)

Trainspotting the movie : Trainspotting the novel : A Clockwork Orange the movie : A Clockwork Orange the novel, except that in both cases the latter was better.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2005 19:33 (twenty years ago)

except ACO the movie didnt have that dumb new chapter added.

there are some nice moments in Pulp Fiction that still make it worthwhile after all the hype, such as when travolta blows a kiss to uma's back as she walks away after their date.

ryan (ryan), Friday, 8 April 2005 19:40 (twenty years ago)

Well technically neither did ACO when I first read it.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2005 19:43 (twenty years ago)

I'll take Trainspotting - I think its paced better. Pulp Fiction really is a little too long for what its trying to accomplish, whereas Trainspotting maintains a sort of breathless forward momentum throughout the entire film, no scene is wasted or extraneous. They're both great, but I guess I like the visual loopiness and, I dunno, "moral center" of "Trainspotting" a bit more.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 April 2005 20:01 (twenty years ago)

I much preferred Trainspotting as movies go. Tarantino is the fast food of cinema as far as I'm concerned. It looks appetizing. It's fun to watch but has no nutitional benefit and leaves me feeling sick.

M. White (Miguelito), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:04 (twenty years ago)

Trainspotting was the vehicle that carried New Order, Brian Eno and Underworld (British pop music and electronic music in general) into my young world thereby changing the course of my entire life.

Pulp Fiction? I enjoyed it, but I don't really have any desire to see it again. Trainspotting is more visually interesting to me.

So, for purely subjective reasons, Trainspotting be winning this one.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:07 (twenty years ago)

2 Godard rips, both great, Trainspotting more openly political, Pulp Fiction got greater individual scenes, I'd give it to Trainspotting for pace and "We were colonised by wankers."

Ferlin Husky (noodle vague), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:14 (twenty years ago)

I love the look of both movies, but PF has more replay value to me. TS is heavier, I suppose, but that's sort of the problem. So much of what happens in it is just so godawful unpleasant.

happy fun ball (kenan), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:15 (twenty years ago)

taking sides: blowing someone's brains all over the back seat vs. covering a family eating breakfast in runny shit.

Call me callous, but I find the brains much easier to take.

happy fun ball (kenan), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:16 (twenty years ago)

Not to mention the rape.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:17 (twenty years ago)

Pulp Fiction, no contest.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:17 (twenty years ago)

Tarantino's just a far better director/filmmaker... just compare the 2 stills from the OP... one's flat and muted, one's utterly 3D and vivid. I hate most of what QTar stands for but PF is the better film, yeah, easy.

Aaron A., Friday, 8 April 2005 20:23 (twenty years ago)

muted = bad, vivid = good?

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:24 (twenty years ago)

that's a stupid measuring stick - the Trainspotting shot above isn't even in the film.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 April 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)

I so disagree with that. Pulp Fiction looks lurid to me. Trainspotting looks really alive in a kind of pale, pastel way that I find really beautiful.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)

I don't mean to be rude Aaron, but that's bollocks. Those are stills cropped and out of context. The whole point of the train-ride out into the country in Trainspotting is to spoof classical identifications of Scottishness/Britishness with "the beautiful countryside" ("Blood and Soil", man). Sure there's loads of room to debate the merits of the two films, but the point you're making is dumb.

Ferlin Husky (noodle vague), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:26 (twenty years ago)

Well I'm saying the two pics serve as a metaphor for how I perceive these films (or how they were shot and directed)-- one vivid and exciting, another just meh.

Aaron A., Friday, 8 April 2005 20:27 (twenty years ago)

the colors in Trainspotting are super-saturated, and there are tons of visual tricks - the sinking into the carpet, the toilet-diving scene, etc.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 April 2005 20:30 (twenty years ago)

This is tougher

Trainspotting:

Pro:

1. Brilliant Opening, lust for life right before it became a cruise ship commercial jingle combined with the "choose life" monologue

2. Talking like Sean Connery, is always funny. Always.

3. IT'S SHITE BEING SCOTTISH!!!!!!!!!!!

4. Well acted and well thought out

Con.

1. As will be repeated 700 times in this thread, the book was better.

2. The baby creeped me out, I realize it was supposed to, this does not change it's con rating.

Pulp Fiction

Pro.

1. There may never be a movie character that is more fun to quote as Jules:

I'm a mushroom cloud layin' muthafucka, muthafucka!!

That is some fucked up, repugnant shit

Chill that bitch out!!! Tell that bitch to chill!!!!

2. I love Quentin Tarantino movies, largely because I love Quentin Tarantino movie soundtracks. Pulp Fiction was the best soundtrack I had ever heard at the time, I think the two Kill Bill soundtracks are even better.

3. I have an image of thousands of people opening the Bible for the first time in years (or ever) to find that the actual text of "Ezekiel 25:17" is "And I will execute great vengeance upon them with furious rebukes; and they shall know that I am the LORD, when I shall lay my vengeance upon them" and going...huh? (Fun Fact, Tarantino did not make the speech up, he took it off the opening crawl from a Sonny Chiba movie from the 70s, CLEEEECK.)

4. Walken!!!

5. Pulp Fiction was the first movie I ever saw which caused me to leave the theater going "wow." I realize its a little indulgent and overlong and blatantly cribbed from Tarantino's influences, but I was hugely entertained by it, and I cannot imagine going past it if I found it while flipping channels.

Con:

1. Tarantino the Screenwriter, excellent, Tarantino the Director, Very Good, Tarantino the Actor...embarassing. Embarassing for all involved (except when he gets shot in the face in Desperado, one of my favorite movie scenes ever).

2. Tim Roth annoys me, he just does. I was actively rooting for Jules to blow Ringo's head off.

3. Did I mention Tarantino can't act?

I like Trainspotting a lot, but typing this out has reminded me that I really love Pulp Fiction. It might be my favorite movie of that decade, though I'd need to see a list of prominent flicks to make sure.

Ash (ashbyman), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:31 (twenty years ago)

but look at that afrosheen and those chrome guns and those suits it's awesome baby! xp

Aaron A., Friday, 8 April 2005 20:32 (twenty years ago)

Pulp Fiction. I think the film of Trainspotting is nice enough in its own way, but to anyone who read the book first it will always seem like a kind of Trainspotting Lite.

The Horse of Babylon's Butler (the pirate king), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:33 (twenty years ago)

The only scene in Pulp Fiction I find truly weak is Julia Sweeney's cameo. Keitel, Travolta and Jackson are too good during the QT scenes for me to be bothered by him much.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)

Also, I'm not that big a fan of Mr Welsh's writing, he does good set-pieces but I think he's inferior to and derivative of Iain Banks and James Kelman, amongst others. And a film's being different to its source text is never a reason of itself to criticise the film.

Ferlin Husky (noodle vague), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:39 (twenty years ago)

" but to anyone who read the book first it will always seem like a kind of Trainspotting Lite. "

and to anyone who saw all of Tarantino's reference points first....

I dunno, this seems like a moot point to me, the "novel is better" bit.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 April 2005 20:39 (twenty years ago)

The novel is better in a way that really makes you wonder why they bothered making the movie they did at all. I think that's a fair cop.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:44 (twenty years ago)

Pulp Fiction suffers when you compare the individual films to their directors' body of work. Tarantino has made 3.5 films better than Pulp Fiction, pretty much everything Boyle has done since is terrible (the Beach) to mediocre (A Life Less Ordinary, which I actually kind of like).

I'd say Trainspotting is a much deeper film, with some truly disturbing and enthralling scenes (dead baby detox, falling into the carpet, the squalor of the junkie with AIDS) that PF never approaches (or tries to), just as much quotable (if not great) dialogue, though the "Choose Life" monologue got run into the ground almost as much as "Royale w/ Cheese" or the faux-Bible quotations. The framing and palette is much livelier in Trainspotting, Tarantino seems weighed-down by his desire to be a super-cinematic director in the Scorsese sense. (I guess a common criticism of Tarantino is that he turns pulp into white elephants?)

Trainspotting successfully managed to equate Ecstasy with "Born Slippy" in my head. I don't know if that's a positive or a negative.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:45 (twenty years ago)

2. The baby creeped me out, I realize it was supposed to, this does not change it's con rating.

I once had a flatmate who regularly had nightmares about that baby.

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:45 (twenty years ago)

The biggest problem with Trainspotting was that a lot of my friends who saw it went and pretty immediately afterward became junkies.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:53 (twenty years ago)

I'm afraid of needles and veins because of Trainspotting. Even thinking about giving blood makes me nauseous, the film was much more successful about making the act of shooting up visual and terrifying/exciting than, say, Requiem For A Dream.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:54 (twenty years ago)

xpost

Seriously? Isn't that like walking out of Jaws thinking a shark would make a nice pet?

happy fun ball (kenan), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:55 (twenty years ago)

Not really.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:56 (twenty years ago)

xpost
I'm surprised at that, I consider Trainspotting very effective as an anti-drug film if you want to look at it that way. One-sided preaching and terror doesn't work (RFAD) but seeing the horrors and the pleasures works well.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:56 (twenty years ago)

Alex you have (had?) stupid friends. sorry.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 April 2005 20:56 (twenty years ago)

Had. I'm pretty sure they were bound to become junkies anyway, but I don't think Trainspotting is anywhere near the anti-drug flick that you guys seem to.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:58 (twenty years ago)

I'm not even sure the book is really an anti-drug book either, actually, but it does avoid glamorizing these characters (esp. Renton) to the degree the film.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:00 (twenty years ago)

(sidenote: maybe its cuz I live next to the methadone clinic, but I have very little sympathy for junkies these days.) I don't think heroin comes off particularly well in the film, myself, tho the initial "rush"/opening sequence of the film does tie a fairly visceral sense of excitement, escapism, etc. to the drug.

(Renton is way more of an asshole in the book, yes - his "redemption" doesn't really happen until "Porno")

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 April 2005 21:01 (twenty years ago)

You'd have to be awfully fucking naive if Trainspotting presented you anything negative about drug abuse that you didn't already know.

Trainspotting shows you cool funny and good-looking people doing heroin and not working!!!11

Aaron A., Friday, 8 April 2005 21:04 (twenty years ago)

Well the problem with drug films is that for the most part the junkies in them never look anywhere near as bad as junkies in real life look. They always look like beautiful actors playing at being junkies so now matter how hard you try to make a junky film look really really really ugly and gritty it still comes around to a little bit of "wow, those people are kind of hot"

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:04 (twenty years ago)

Making something look awful doesn't mean you don't glamourize it. Movie definitely sold heroin as one HELL of an experience.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:05 (twenty years ago)

Miccion OTM.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:06 (twenty years ago)

mmm, I think the soccer player that dies approximates the junkie look pretty well in his handful of "death by AIDS" scenes

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 April 2005 21:07 (twenty years ago)

The "Choose Life" speech is pitched as a junkie manifesto, though it clearly isn't. Of course there's no reason why the movie should be "anti-drug", but it feels dishonest about addiction.

Ferlin Husky (noodle vague), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:10 (twenty years ago)

ok i know i'm not the only person whose fave tarantino is 'jackie brown' but am i the only person whose fave boyle is 'a life less ordinary'?

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:14 (twenty years ago)

probably...?

that film was frightfully unmemorable.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 April 2005 21:16 (twenty years ago)

why frightfully unmemorable?

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:18 (twenty years ago)

See, this is a tough one, eh?

I'll say this: the soundtrack to Trainspotting -- in my opinion -- takes a giant, runny, post-heroin-comedown shite all over the soundtrack to Pulp Fiction. Shove yer Dusty Springfield.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:22 (twenty years ago)

A Life Less Ordinary never seemed to cohere to me, the star-crossed lovers plot seemed half-assed w/no real tension, Ewan was miscast... it was bland and tasteless, like a plain, uncooked rice cake.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 April 2005 21:25 (twenty years ago)

xpost

yep.

happy fun ball (kenan), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:26 (twenty years ago)

tough one in the same way that answering 'what's the best sitcom on abc?' is a tough one


how is that 'frightful' shakey?

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)

uh, cuz of the severe drop-off in quality? because its so many miles away from Trainspotting? because it was a huge disappointment? because it was a waste of my $8?

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 April 2005 21:34 (twenty years ago)

and that frightens you?

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:34 (twenty years ago)

wtf blount get one dictionary.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 April 2005 21:38 (twenty years ago)

fright·ful
adj.

1. Causing disgust or shock; horrifying.
2. Causing fright; terrifying.

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:42 (twenty years ago)

shakey did you really think shallow grave or trainspotting were that great? i mean if so fair enough.

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:43 (twenty years ago)

I think Shallow Grave is pretty great actually.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:46 (twenty years ago)

I was pretty surprised by how bad A Life Less Ordinary was.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:46 (twenty years ago)

it's been ages since I saw any of them but I definitely enjoyed Shallow Grave the most when I saw it. Was not feeling A Life Less Ordinary at all.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:49 (twenty years ago)

yes, I do think there was a precipitous drop in quality from their first two films, uhm hence my original comment. I don't see what's so confusing about my position here.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 April 2005 21:50 (twenty years ago)

i don't know shallow grave and trainspotting both seemed just so obvious somehow, in the same way tarantino is but without the followthru on execution that makes tarantino worth it for some (including me half the time). 'a life less ordinary' probably was pretty bad (i haven't seen it since 97) but riffing on 'stairway to heaven' seemed fresher or at least slightly more unexpected (maybe even lighter and more humane) than just another 'monkey's paw' rehash (see every other boyle flick except 28 days later).

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:59 (twenty years ago)

i'm just wondering how somone can be frightened by a lukewarm director turning into a mediocre director. what were you afraid of? 'dear god if it could happen to danny boyle that means NO ONE IS SAFE!'

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:01 (twenty years ago)

i like both movies a lot, but it feels wrong comparing them

latebloomer: strawman knockdowner (latebloomer), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:02 (twenty years ago)

Shallow Grave probably is obvious, but it's well acted and I quite liked the Hitchcockian sadism of the whole thing. I also saw it before I saw any of the other stuff though. I don't know what I would think about it if I saw Trainspotting first (cuz obv the same theme gets riffed ON again in that movie.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:04 (twenty years ago)

i do have some sentimental feelings towards trainspotting though, it definitely reminds me of a specific place and time in my life (thankfully having nothing to do with heroin or scots), on personal associations alone i could see siding with trainspotting.
but then i remember the broadcast network version of pulp fiction. pf in a landslide for me.

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:08 (twenty years ago)

I'm afraid of needles and veins because of Trainspotting

Speaking of which, I can't remember another movie that made me hold my breath so many times than Pulp. The scene where Vega plunges the needle into Mrs. Wallace and the moment where Butchie has one foot out the door, but turns around to save his nemesis both took years off of my life.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:14 (twenty years ago)

dear blount:

I humbly apologize for my abuse of the word "frightfully". In the future, I will endeavor never to confuse you with hyperbole, sarcasm, or other exaggerations for effect. Please let me know if there are any other words I should avoid that might alarm you or make you uncomfortable.

sincerely,
Shakey Mo

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 April 2005 22:15 (twenty years ago)

You'd have to be awfully fucking naive if Trainspotting presented you anything negative about drug abuse that you didn't already know.

Isn't that the case with just about everything that could be described as anti-drug?

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:16 (twenty years ago)

dear shakey:

don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk.


sincerely,
blount

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:18 (twenty years ago)

Shallow Grave just appealed to the middle school Hitchcock nut in me (who grew into a DePalma nut). Trainspotting required me to like techno, drugs and British people more than I do.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 8 April 2005 23:28 (twenty years ago)

though I remember thinking it was pretty funny

miccio (miccio), Friday, 8 April 2005 23:29 (twenty years ago)

the dead baby cracks me up every time

latebloomer: strawman knockdowner (latebloomer), Friday, 8 April 2005 23:42 (twenty years ago)

My best friend at the time saw Trainspottingafter going 2 days without sleep...in addition to demanding that she sit on her own in the front row, she cried the whole way through the dead baby scene, and walked out saying it was the worst movie she ever saw. a year later we finally convinced her to see it again without being sleep-deprived, and she ended up loving it. But I digress. Pulp Fiction wins overall...the narrative, the stylised dialogue, the direction, the performances, plus the fact that neither Willis nor Travolta had been that good on screen in a DAMN long time...there's just too many things running in its favor against Trainspotting which while innovative, stylised & totally cool, didn't punch me between the eyes the way Pulp Fiction did.

VegemiteGrrl (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 9 April 2005 02:06 (twenty years ago)


I never really weighed in here, so here goes....

Trainspotting
Probably not as fun as Pulp Fiction (and yes, it's not as good as the book -- everyone agrees, right?), but it's still a great film. Not sure everyone agrees, but I certainly didn't see it as a glorification of heroin. More squeamish moments than Pulp Fiction, but I suppose that's to be expected. I thought the dead baby on the ceiling during Renton's home-bound withdrawl looked laughably fake, incidentally. The discovery of the dead baby is indeed harrowing. Welsh himself makes a cameo -- in an Exploited t-shirt!

Pulp Fiction
More laughs. More quotable lines. More story threads. More bullets. Great fun, but not as visceral. Lots of filler. Lots of crap cameos (why is Julia Sweeney in the film? She serves no purpose). Revitalized Travolta's career (ummmm....in retrospect, probably not a good thing).

Trainspotting wins.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 9 April 2005 02:21 (twenty years ago)

I quite enjoyed both films, probably "Pulp Fiction" a little more, despite the awful excruciating scene w/tarantino attempting to act. I dunno, they were bot a bit laddish, I thought. I'd probably enjoy watching "Pulp Fiction" again, though I wouldn't make the big attempt to see it, whereas I'd actually actively avoid watching "Trainspotting". Once was enough.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 9 April 2005 08:51 (twenty years ago)

FWIW I don't think Irvine Welsh acts very well in his brief scene in Trainspotting.

The Horse of Babylon's Butler (the pirate king), Saturday, 9 April 2005 09:39 (twenty years ago)

Yeah well that was at least "brief", unlike Tarantino's scene.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 9 April 2005 09:56 (twenty years ago)

Irving Welsh also has a great face. It makes up for one or two poorly delivered lines.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Saturday, 9 April 2005 14:47 (twenty years ago)

this was way up the thread but, except ACO the movie didnt have that dumb new chapter added.

that's the way the book ended, it wasn't a new chapter, except in US printings.

anyway, trainspotting is significantly less played out for me so I choose that one. also, it isn't as long as Pulp Fiction which is always good. However, Tarantino never went on to make anything as bad as Millions, so I'd still give him the edge as far as a director whose work I enjoy.

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 9 April 2005 15:06 (twenty years ago)

everyone seems to think Pulp Fiction is impossibly cool, but i don't see it - it's goofy and awkward, which i always thought was part of the point. Jackson and Travolta are dorkiest assassins of all time, and their dialogue is a junior high schooler's idea of toughness, full of cuss words and empty bluster. the Willis section might be stoic and lightly tinged with melancholy, except for the nagging fact that keeps yanking you back to the present: it stars BRUCE GODDAMN WILLIS, so you just can't take it seriously. it's funny as hell and fun to watch, but 'cool' is the last word i'd use to describe it.

i'm a Trainspotting devotee, but defending it is hard to do without invoking my own anglophilia. it was my first exposure to junkie culture, and still the poppiest and shiniest example i can think of (my intense flirtation with it encompassed Burroughs, Trocchi, Velvets et al, and still Trainspotting ranks as the most seductive)

Dave M. (rotten03), Saturday, 9 April 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

Does it say anything that there were far more "Pulp Fiction" rip-offs than "Trainspotting" rip-offs? The former is a brilliant melange of homage that begets more homage. The latter ... more unique in the way it captures a time/place/lifestyle?

Re: "Shallow Grave." Haven't seen this since a few weeks before it was released and hated it. If you have a pair of lunatic, murderous roomates sequestered in the attic ... leave!!! It's the "Amityville Horror" falacy. "Get out. Get out!!!" OK, i'm out.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Sunday, 10 April 2005 20:20 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...
you cant compare the two movies. Pulp fiction vs Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels would be better.

stan the man3

Stan Mallon, Sunday, 23 April 2006 19:24 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.