― NamC, Wednesday, 13 April 2005 22:08 (twenty years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 22:11 (twenty years ago)
― ryan (ryan), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 22:13 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 22:13 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 22:52 (twenty years ago)
Keep me out of your S&M fantasies, wouldya?
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 22:54 (twenty years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 22:56 (twenty years ago)
― g e o f f (gcannon), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 23:01 (twenty years ago)
― NamC, Wednesday, 13 April 2005 23:13 (twenty years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 23:41 (twenty years ago)
― ------, Thursday, 14 April 2005 00:02 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Thursday, 14 April 2005 00:07 (twenty years ago)
― Namc, Thursday, 14 April 2005 00:09 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Thursday, 14 April 2005 00:20 (twenty years ago)
― NamC, Thursday, 14 April 2005 00:37 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Thursday, 14 April 2005 00:39 (twenty years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 14 April 2005 01:02 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 14 April 2005 01:27 (twenty years ago)
― Allyzay Subservient 50s-Type (allyzay), Thursday, 14 April 2005 01:32 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Thursday, 14 April 2005 01:32 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 14 April 2005 01:34 (twenty years ago)
1) You don't bother me at all, or haven't since a thread sometime in August (I think). But I do bristle at the personal snipery in which you seem, frequently, to engage.
2) In my observation the nasty, moralizing judgements you make of political opponents (Dworkin, f'rinstance) completely and systematically undermine any (often) valid point you may wish to convey. That she may have needed to lose weight is true, and I have no problem with the fact that you consider she should be told. However: there is an order-of-magnitude difference between a family member telling her to slim-down and a kid on the internet comparing her to a troll.
3) It can be bristling to me a lot of other regulars when you presume to be sticking-up for a politically-justifiable position by acting like a lunatic. On the thread in which we - you and I - argued, I made a joke about shooting animals with a blunderbuss. You took no time in attacking me as a purveyor of heartless douchebaggery and felt justified in a knee-jerk personal assault even though I explained I was kidding. So I ask you: would you please read the posts with a critical eye before responding in a fly-off-the-handle manner?
Sincerely,
Remy and the concerned legions of fed-up posters.
― Remy (x Jeremy), Thursday, 14 April 2005 01:34 (twenty years ago)
They're all about the strawman right-wing version of Andrea Dworkin, which gives her zero credit and assumes the worst of her. It's ugly.
― happy fun ball (kenan), Thursday, 14 April 2005 01:35 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 14 April 2005 01:36 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 14 April 2005 01:36 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Thursday, 14 April 2005 01:39 (twenty years ago)
― LeCoq (LeCoq), Thursday, 14 April 2005 01:40 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 14 April 2005 01:42 (twenty years ago)
The situation is posit that 1) By not being hard, a person is anti violence.2) Conversely, if you are, violence is a handy weapon, therefore 'pro-violence if the situation calls for' and all that bollox.
I don't think this is an unreasonable question...
I'm not a hard. But also, the idea of 'smacking one' who was annoying/irritating/threatening is not something I desire...
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 14 April 2005 09:15 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 14 April 2005 09:41 (twenty years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 14 April 2005 09:58 (twenty years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 14 April 2005 10:02 (twenty years ago)
hey man, are you startin'??
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 14 April 2005 10:05 (twenty years ago)
yeah come 'ere motherfuckin' ken c, i'll sort you out.
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 14 April 2005 10:16 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 14 April 2005 10:22 (twenty years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 14 April 2005 10:24 (twenty years ago)
― $V£N! channelling Mark S aka Dr Hoo (blueski), Thursday, 14 April 2005 10:45 (twenty years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 14 April 2005 11:39 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 14 April 2005 14:31 (twenty years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 14 April 2005 14:56 (twenty years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 14 April 2005 18:09 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Friday, 15 April 2005 08:26 (twenty years ago)
― $V£N! (blueski), Friday, 15 April 2005 08:55 (twenty years ago)
― $V£N! (blueski), Friday, 15 April 2005 09:00 (twenty years ago)
it doesn't even have to be a painful fight you know, you can submit anytime!
― ken c (ken c), Friday, 15 April 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)
do you think fist fights with your friends would always harm a friendship? even if there is arrangment beforehand to say that it's just a fight, no strings attached?
i'm starting a new thread about this, actually
― ken c (ken c), Saturday, 16 April 2005 06:40 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 16 April 2005 06:42 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 16 April 2005 06:43 (twenty years ago)
maybe the winner can go on to fight Martin!
― ken c (ken c), Saturday, 16 April 2005 06:45 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Saturday, 16 April 2005 12:56 (twenty years ago)
Am I going to have to show you my muscles sometime, Ken?
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 16 April 2005 14:41 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Saturday, 16 April 2005 15:05 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Saturday, 16 April 2005 15:13 (twenty years ago)