I thought she was very cute right away, then it ends up she's going to the same place as me, and she's also a reporter, for a really really good newspaper no less. She starts a conversation with ME after I'm deliberately avoiding it because my usual attitude is that it's better not to even start these things in my position. Of course, I'm stuck needing to make dozens and dozens of copies right next to where she's doing her work, so I end up talking to her for about 20 mintues as I struggle to remove staples with my jittery hands. She's smart as fuck, went to Princeton, seems to really like her job and has a good sense of humor AND seemed to like me. I should add that the whole Princeton thing gives it this added dimension because I went to Rutgers, which is like the public, middle-class rival of private upper-class Princeton.
What the hell do I do? I felt weird when I got home, tried to casually mention that I met some other reporter to my girlfriend, who proceeded to figure out that I thought she was cute (luckily she didn't get too upset about it). I'm probably going to run into this girl again, and, today at least, she made me weak in the knees in a way I haven't been in a long long time.
― Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 16 April 2005 03:39 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 16 April 2005 03:47 (twenty years ago)
first, figure out what you want with your current gf. and if so/not, then what and why. after that, maybe you'll be perfectly ready for princeton hottie.
haha, or maybe not, sorry. i am drunk and cryptic and you are young, yes? i'm sorry, i have no good answers for anyone.
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Saturday, 16 April 2005 03:51 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 16 April 2005 03:53 (twenty years ago)
2) it is natural to feel this way about someone with which you have so much in common
3) if you can't get it out of your head after a while (this is still fresh and new and of course you are going to be thinking about it right now), maybe take a little time and evaluate it. why is it so exciting? does she offer more than current girlfriend? also, remember that she is new and you know relatively nothing about her. she could be insane and just comes of ass normal at upon first meeting (a good skill for a reporter that she may have practiced).
― tehresa (tehresa), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:01 (twenty years ago)
If there are problems with your relationship, then you need to figure out what you want to do about them -- that's a potential problem that isn't going away. The fact that you just met Princeton Girl while you've been having these doubts (?) about your gf is merely a coincidence.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:01 (twenty years ago)
Theresa is right -- I don't know this girl and what I saw was only her best self put forward, which can't really be compared with the knowledge of my girlfriend I have from three very close years with her.
― Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:07 (twenty years ago)
1) Breathe.
2) Wait until you've had more than one conversation with Ms. Hottiepants. Be a work acquaintance and nothing more, for now at least.
3) Realize that it's a huge gamble if you leave your current girlfriend. You may end up not catching the hottie, or you may just have a short-lived fling that REALLY breaks your stride (and makes working with her rather difficult). Think about the possibility that you may end up alone (for a while).
4) No fucking around behind anyone's back.
― Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:07 (twenty years ago)
― tehresa (tehresa), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:11 (twenty years ago)
#3 has also crossed my mind, as I tend to be pretty pessimistic about my chances with women, even when they make it pretty obvious that they are interested. For example, here I keep thinking, "Well, sure, she seemed eager to talk to me and to KEEP talking to me, but maybe she's just friendly and likes to talk a lot because she's a reporter."
― Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:12 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:13 (twenty years ago)
― tehresa (tehresa), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:14 (twenty years ago)
― Volker Schlöndorff (Jody Beth Rosen), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:28 (twenty years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:33 (twenty years ago)
― luna's e, Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:36 (twenty years ago)
-- luna's e (lunace...)
Well yeah, sure. I get that from time to time, but it doesn't usually come on this strongly.
― Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:37 (twenty years ago)
while i have never done anyone at work, i have done someone from work, and let me tell you, that is one bad idea!
― tehresa (tehresa), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:38 (twenty years ago)
― luna's e, Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:39 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:43 (twenty years ago)
I've done both! Who's with me here?
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:45 (twenty years ago)
― luna's e, Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:45 (twenty years ago)
It will not surprise anyone when I raise my hand.
― luna's e, Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:46 (twenty years ago)
-- luna's e (lunace...), April 16th, 2005.
Ha, no I'd say it's afterwards that you have the problems. While you're doing it, you don't have a problem in the world.
― Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:47 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Saturday, 16 April 2005 05:02 (twenty years ago)
― luna's e, Saturday, 16 April 2005 05:07 (twenty years ago)
― Tyrone Willie Demetrius DeAndre DeShawn (deangulberry), Saturday, 16 April 2005 05:10 (twenty years ago)
― luna's e, Saturday, 16 April 2005 05:13 (twenty years ago)
On a lighter note, sign me up for the done someone from/at work column.
― Ferlin Husky (noodle vague), Saturday, 16 April 2005 06:37 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Saturday, 16 April 2005 06:45 (twenty years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Saturday, 16 April 2005 09:56 (twenty years ago)
You'd think so, but actually it's not. (sighs)
― m coleman (lovebug starski), Saturday, 16 April 2005 10:01 (twenty years ago)
Ha, no I'd say it's afterwards that you have the problems. While you're doing it, you don't have a problem in the world. -- Hurting (Hurtingchie...), April 16th, 2005 5:47 AM. (Hurting) (later)
and then only a ever problem afterwards if you forget to turn the machine off, and it starts creating photographic evidence
― ken c (ken c), Saturday, 16 April 2005 11:23 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Saturday, 16 April 2005 11:24 (twenty years ago)
Because what if you act on the desire, enter the relationship and meet someone else who also creates the same feelings? A vicious circle, no?
― nathalie doing a soft foot shuffle (stevie nixed), Saturday, 16 April 2005 11:29 (twenty years ago)
a) life's necessarily cruel like thatb) emotional conservatism is the best policyc) a lot of people have learned feelings that make life unnecessarily crueld) my thinking is skewed and screwed
― Failin Husky (noodle vague), Saturday, 16 April 2005 11:35 (twenty years ago)
-- happy fun ball (fluxion2...), April 16th, 2005.
I've been trying to read her articles to see if maybe they're just not that good. Truth be told, they are a bit cheesy, but newspaper feature writing is always cheesy -- that's the style.
― Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 16 April 2005 12:27 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 16 April 2005 12:30 (twenty years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 16 April 2005 12:49 (twenty years ago)
― Failin Huxley (noodle vague), Saturday, 16 April 2005 12:51 (twenty years ago)
are you john cusack??
― Volker Schlöndorff (Jody Beth Rosen), Saturday, 16 April 2005 13:51 (twenty years ago)
― Stephen X (Stephen X), Saturday, 16 April 2005 15:02 (twenty years ago)
Yeah. You should just let me make you a mix.
― happy fun ball (kenan), Saturday, 16 April 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 16 April 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)
I've struggled with this one too. The taste of forbidden fruit can, on occasion, be very hard to turn down.
What's kept me on the straight & narrow has been:
a) the possibility of getting caught and having two women pissed off at me (thank you, Chris Rock)b) the thought of just how hurt I'd be if I knew that someone I really cared for fucked around on me.
― Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Saturday, 16 April 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)
What most people are suggesting -- figure out where things stand with the gf, don't hurt her no matter what, reminding Hurting that he barely knows Princeton Girl and therefore jumping to conclusions about what might or might not happen to her would be rash -- is exactly the opposite of denial and avoidance.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 16 April 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 16 April 2005 16:29 (twenty years ago)
― Failin Huxley (noodle vague), Saturday, 16 April 2005 18:22 (twenty years ago)
― kelsey (kelstarry), Saturday, 16 April 2005 18:39 (twenty years ago)
OK, now you've got me curious. What do you say to potential bedmates? "I don't date, I just fuck"? Not trolling or flaming, I'm just wondering how you avoid the whole sleeping-with-someone-who's-expecting-a-partner fiasco.
― Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Saturday, 16 April 2005 19:18 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Monday, 18 April 2005 04:08 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 18 April 2005 04:10 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Monday, 18 April 2005 04:12 (twenty years ago)
I've been knawing over this for tewnty minutes. It stings the shit out of me. I don't think she does that. I think she keeps me from doing things I would otherwise be doing, and I think I do the same to her. We enable each other to do many things that we want to do, financially ferrinstance. I don't know how either of us would pay rent without the other one. But we don't like each other's friends, don't do all that much together, and don't really care about each other's interests. I was an aspiring rock critic when I met her -- now I hardly listen to music at all. I was a habitual neat-freak and aesthete when I met her, now I'm a slob and I sleep all the time because I don't want to live in this apartment any more.
Oh, boy, am I ever a mess. And it has nothing to do with this girl I met at a party. I don't even think she liked me all that much.
― happy fun ball (kenan), Monday, 18 April 2005 04:48 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Monday, 18 April 2005 04:50 (twenty years ago)
But we don't like each other's friends, don't do all that much together, and don't really care about each other's interests.
This is the most worrisome-sounding thing to me. If it was just one of these three problems, I might say "Well, it's ok to have your own separate friends" or maybe "it's good to have your own lives." But if you're not doing things together and don't care about each other's interests, and it's not just a rut you're in, that sounds like a serious problem that won't get fixed.
I'm probably not in the best position to give you advice, especially since you're older than me, but I don't think financial dependency is a very good reason to stay with someone at all. You'd be better off getting your shit together so you aren't dependent on her, which will also make it much easier to evaluate your relationship otherwise.
― Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 18 April 2005 04:56 (twenty years ago)
ok, this might sound dumb, but out of everything written in the original post, this is what jumped out at me screaming REACHING!
i can't empathise with you that much, because i've never been in a relationship for that long. but i do know all about crushes and things, and i really think that's all this is. the fact that you're reading 'added depth' to the situation because you went to different but 'similar' colleges? um, yeah. ask her if she feels the same connection because you went to rutgers, and i'll bet she'd be confused.
basically what i'm saying is that i agree with luna. you think she's cute and clever. you've spent just enough time with her so you fancy her and imagine kissing her and stuff. that's a crush, which is ok when not acted on (and i think it's especially good that you didn't keep her existence secret from your gf)
the problem is that you're creating these imaginary connections that build her up into your perfect woman. like other people have said, you haven't seen her flaws, you have no idea what she's actually like. you've had the chance to create her almost from scratch, so OF COURSE she's better than your girlfriend, who is real.
i don't think you've done anything wrong yet, but i actually think starting a thread like this is only going to make things worse, by making her a real presence in your life (even though she probably has no idea of your 'feelings')
sorry if that sounds harsh, i just wanted to remind you that this is all pretty one-sided so far, and therefore makes it impossible to use the 'she's my soulmate' excuse. so if you're going to end things with your gf, do it for your own reasons and then try it out with princeton girl, don't use PG as an excuse.
― colette (a2lette), Monday, 18 April 2005 09:12 (twenty years ago)
"Are we getting along here really superbly, or are you a naturally outgoing person?"
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 18 April 2005 09:42 (twenty years ago)
sorry, but i think this is propaganda for dating. ive been single for over six years and i've never needed a significant other to improve my general wellness. if you want to wander through life clueless to its wonders, thats your problem and shouldnt be solved by having a boyfriend or girlfriend.
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Monday, 18 April 2005 12:28 (twenty years ago)
― LeCoq (LeCoq), Monday, 18 April 2005 12:30 (twenty years ago)
― NamC., Monday, 18 April 2005 12:44 (twenty years ago)
1) I need to sort some things out with my gf,
and
2) I should probably talk to this other girl more so I get this silly idealized picture out of my head.
And as for the free-love advocates here, I do not agree with you AT ALL, and I doubt you've ever been in a fulfilling relationship.
And Maria, I don't mean to imply at all that I'm miserable without a girlfriend. I didn't have a serious relationship for a long time before I met my girlfriend. Not to be cliched, but it was only in becoming a happier person myself that I was able to start a relationship. That said, there are certain ways in which a relationship makes life better (otherwise we wouldn't get into them.)
― Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 18 April 2005 14:12 (twenty years ago)
its that sort of rationale that breeds *unhealthy* codependency - the kind of stuff that keep people clinging onto relationships that are failing and putting themselves in serious psychological pain. even i have fallen prey to that kind of thought. back in high school i thought it was better to stick with an abusive boyfriend than to be alone.
before i even could think of diving back into relationships and dating, i had to deprogram that stuff from my system; to be OK knowing that being alone does not equate being lonely, and to know that i shouldnt settle for less.
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Monday, 18 April 2005 14:25 (twenty years ago)
― kelsey (kelstarry), Monday, 18 April 2005 14:43 (twenty years ago)
*tries manfully to crowbar this salient advice into own cranium once and for all...
that really is so incredibly wise. and also, i'm ashamed to say, something of a revelation to me, despite being so logical and obvious.
― stevie (stevie), Monday, 18 April 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)
Isn't that a bit patronising? Also, wrong.
― Failin Huxley (noodle vague), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:37 (twenty years ago)
― di, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 02:57 (twenty years ago)
-- Failin Huxley (noodle_vagu...), April 18th, 2005.
Maybe it is, but I find it hard to believe you'd be against long-term relationships if you had had a really really good one.
― Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 02:58 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 03:16 (twenty years ago)
― di, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 03:23 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 03:26 (twenty years ago)
but i'm not going to be much use on this thread, i'll let the monogamous people help you.
― di, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 03:27 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 03:30 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 03:32 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 03:44 (twenty years ago)
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 03:47 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 03:51 (twenty years ago)
I don't know about that. Slippery slope there. I believe in divorce.
― happy fun ball (kenan), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 03:59 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 04:00 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 04:02 (twenty years ago)
No, it's not. Polyamory means never limiting oneself to a single partner. Serial monogamy means limiting yourself to one partner at a time. If things don't work out with that partner (for whatever reason), you move on to being monogomous with someone else.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 04:04 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 04:07 (twenty years ago)
The relationship can end when either person no longer wants to restrict their behaviour in that fashion. But for instance, suppose you're with partner #1 and you meet future partner #2 at work. You decide to end things with #1 and sometime later, move on to #2. There's often a stigma attached to that because you knew #2 while still with #1. However, if #2 was somebody who you met after already ending things with #1, then there is no stigma. But in both cases, you were completely faithful to both partners.
One of FH's points (if I interpret him correctly) is that neither situation should carry any stigma.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 04:22 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 04:39 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 05:06 (twenty years ago)
I call grey area.
― happy fun ball (kenan), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 05:25 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 14:28 (twenty years ago)
she is, uncannily, there every single time i go out by myself.
i have been with my girlfriend for going on 4 & a 1/2 years. she hasn't paid rent or for groceries or bills or whatever in a very long time. we've lived together for 3 years.
my girlfriend/wife will aslo reach that same boiling point. we talk ourselves down... to be honest, though, you've got it worse than i do, or he does, or the public does.
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Sunday, 29 January 2006 11:51 (twenty years ago)
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Sunday, 29 January 2006 21:13 (twenty years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Sunday, 29 January 2006 21:14 (twenty years ago)
haha, hurting, ever think of this lady?
― bobby bedelia, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 05:24 (eighteen years ago)
Good grounds for ogling (and cheating).If you do bring it up, it's a very crappy thing to use. You should have confronted her with the fact you want her to contribute financially. Kind of shows you are shoving the blame on her shoulders.
― nathalie, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 07:45 (eighteen years ago)
seems strange that it turned out Hurting (Hurting)'s girl was also into film and music
― RJG, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 07:50 (eighteen years ago)
keep the good relationship and go fuck the new one as well
― 696, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 08:58 (eighteen years ago)
... and fuck up the good one.
― nathalie, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 09:15 (eighteen years ago)
makes life interesting!
― 696, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 09:17 (eighteen years ago)
... much like "Daaaze of our Lives" (I typed lices first)
― nathalie, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 09:21 (eighteen years ago)
kevin from wonder years to thread.....
― darraghmac, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 09:27 (eighteen years ago)
haha, i thought the revival might be Hurting saying:
Reader, I married her.
or similar...
― CarsmileSteve, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 11:40 (eighteen years ago)
1) I never saw this woman again and soon forgot her.
2) I married my then girlfriend.
So, thanks for the good advice, ILX!
― Hurting 2, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 12:12 (eighteen years ago)