So, this is the thread where you say "A personal ad? Are you mad?" and tell me all your horror stories.
― caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:19 (twenty years ago)
― Actor Sizemore fails drug test with fake penis (jingleberries), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:38 (twenty years ago)
I will find tonight's copy and post some example ads here, so you can see what sort of people advertise in it.
― caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:43 (twenty years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:43 (twenty years ago)
― phil-two (phil-two), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:45 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)
― phil-two (phil-two), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:48 (twenty years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:49 (twenty years ago)
"ISRAELITE MAN, 57, 6'1", 165 lbs., dark red hair, hazel eyes, quiet, 21 years praying for answer to the vision of a beautiful loving relationship with a special slender lady, light hair only, name of Glenda. Please write Ollie P.O. box 91, Pyatt Ark. 72672"
― andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:52 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reply to: anon-6#######@cr@igslist.orgDate: 2005-04-18, 10:22AM PDT
Thank you for looking at this posting. I love the company of older women. Always have and always will. I appreciate the life experiences, the accomplishments, and everything else that goes along with it. I'm a 36 year old, that looks great, is in great shape, socially and culturally aware, stable in all respects and ready to get to know and possibly (if we connect, if not we can be friends)start a companionship with the right woman. The ocean is an important part of my life, I'm in it and around it most everyday. It is a sensual and essential part of my existence. If you understand this we already get along great. I am generally attracted to women between 36-60ish (little younger, older not a big deal), attractive(even in her own right), active(physically)and for the most part enjoys just being. If you have a/or kid(s), that is totally fine, I get along great with them. The only thing that is really important to me is that you live close to SM,(between Marina DR area- Malibu area) I feel that accessability is important for both sides. Pretty much covered all the bases. If you feel you fit or think you kinda fit, email me! Send a picture if you want!
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:57 (twenty years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:59 (twenty years ago)
― $V£N! (blueski), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:03 (twenty years ago)
Women:Separated 52 year old female, medium build, 5ft 2ins, seeks an honest male for days out, friendship and possible relationship.35 yr old female likes pubs clubs, single mum of 3 looking for friendship at first.Claire 22, easygoing and fun loving, likes cuddles and kisses, mother of one, seeks a male for friendship, maybe more
Men:26 yr old male looking for an older lady, 40-55, to share good times.Caring male, 39, 6ft 3ins, brown hair, blue eyes and medium build seeks a female, 27-43.Slim male, 31, 5ft 9ins, attractive, looking for an older woman.Single dad of 3, 28, seeks caring loving honest lady.Andy 35, working, likes going out at weekends and seeks good times. Single mums welcome.
Needless to say, they don't have MfM or WfW sections.
― caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:08 (twenty years ago)
― jill schoelen is the queen of my dreams! (Homosexual II), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:08 (twenty years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)
― jill schoelen is the queen of my dreams! (Homosexual II), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:12 (twenty years ago)
esp. if that phrase is accompanied by a winky face
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:12 (twenty years ago)
personal ads seem the worst idea actually. they *seem* easy - you just state what you want and someone answers, but 99% are form letters from someone who only got as far as 'female' and thought 'perfect!'.
― lolita corpus (lolitacorpus), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:27 (twenty years ago)
― andy --, Monday, 18 April 2005 17:56 (twenty years ago)
― Dave B (daveb), Monday, 18 April 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 18 April 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)
― jill schoelen is the queen of my dreams! (Homosexual II), Monday, 18 April 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)
― Candicissima (candicissima), Monday, 18 April 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Monday, 18 April 2005 18:47 (twenty years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:19 (twenty years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:24 (twenty years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:36 (twenty years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)
― Terrence, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 01:58 (twenty years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 02:04 (twenty years ago)
― jill schoelen is the queen of my dreams! (Homosexual II), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 02:32 (twenty years ago)
I would say that, if you have any major self-esteem issues about your looks/physical self, then it's probably a good idea to think twice about trying online dating. I went through a period a while back of trying my luck at it, and in fact, all of the women I met were intelligent, attractive (even beautiful), and basically "as advertised" (awful phrase, but you know what I mean I'm sure). With any one of them, I would've been interested in *exploring* something, at least -- but none of them reciprocated my interest*.
It was hard not to feel that the dealbreaker for all of them was the way I look. I think I can be pretty charming with the written word; out of all the women I wrote to while I was dating online, I got interested responses from all but one or two, which I think is a pretty good %. The phone conversations I had with each of these women, prior to meeting in person, were thoughtful, fun, and felt good. (I'm told I have a nice voice, too.) The dates themselves even went well -- well, the very first one was a little strange, but after that, they were good.
But without exception, when it came time to take things beyond the platonic...nothing. All the while telling me, mind you, how smart I was, how "much we had in common"...one woman went so far as to say that if she were only physically attracted to me, I'd have had to fight her off to keep her away, she liked me that much "as a person". (A backhanded compliment if there ever was one.)
To be fair, I didn't have a picture posted on my profile, partly because I didn't have a good (or even passable) one, partly because the idea skeeves me out a bit (what if my ex sees? what if my friends see and make fun of me? etc.) and partly because, quite frankly, I generally find looking at pictures of myself to be a painful experience. So these women didn't really know what they were getting, physically speaking (though, to some degree, neither did I: actually, most of them were *prettier* than their online picture!).
But if anything, that makes it worse...maybe I can't relate to the female perspective, but in my universe, if I were that into someone as a person -- their mind, their humor, their spirit -- then they'd have to be pretty UN-attractive for me to not even want to consider being romantically involved with them, to categorically rule it out. Which, consequently, makes me feel pretty shitty about the way I look.
The thing is, in real life I've done rather better (though not anything near as well as I'd like). It's not that I don't think people are attracted to me; sometimes -- once in a while -- they are. But I think that my appeal is a rather niche one at best, and people who know they want what I have will seek me out (well, they used to, anyway), whereas if I present myself "blind", I'm going to strike out for the most part.
Also, I think people are more charitable in real life, in a way...it's a terrible analogy, but I find myself thinking of buying CDs online vs. in a physical store: you tend to be much pickier about what you buy online, whereas sometimes in a store, you can make a blind impulse purchase, buying a CD that you might not have guessed you would've enjoyed, but that turns out to be unexpectedly dear to you. Plus there's the whole element of serendipity -- people like to see their lives in terms of narratives of lucky chances, things that could've come THIS close to not happening. Online dating lacks that element to some extent; it has a self-consciousness that can inhibit people, a presumption of romance that colors your interaction with a person. (How many of us have come to see someone in a completely different light after months, years of knowing them? Waking up one day and realizing, "My God, how did I never realize that ______ is so beautiful?" I certainly have.)
(Plus, there are a lot of terrific people in the world who can't write or spell very well!)
One more thought: when I'm not beating myself up about my looks, another possibility that comes to mind is that online dating seems to attract people who have a very specific vision of what they want. Sometimes this is tied in with their own self-esteem issues, or sometimes they just prefer to live in fantasy ("Someday I'll find a guy on one of these things who looks just like Johnny Depp"). The sad truth is that the older we get, the more likely it is that the "good catches" -- beautiful, intelligent people who are emotionally ready for a relationship -- will have already found someone to be with, leaving a dating pool that's peopled heavily (I don't claim exclusively) by individuals who have major physical or personal flaws that help to explain their singlehood.
*[Well, I did make out with one of them, but she called me a week later, in lieu of a proposed third date, to say that she "wasn't feeling the spark" and was bailing out. Unfortunately, she was the one I liked best out of all of them -- not to mention the fact that she was the first new person I'd kissed after ending a five-year monogamous relationship. I was pretty much crushed -- I *really* liked her...]
― logged out at the moment, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 03:56 (twenty years ago)
On the other hand, it may well be that by putting oneself into the meat market, it creates the possibility of getting spotted by the person who goes, "Aha, I've been looking for someone with a glass eye, dark brown teeth, and a complexion that looks like raw salmon! We will go yachting together, make love for hours, count my millions, and play backgammon!"
Also, if you're not very proficient at reading people's cues, or if social situations are generally difficult for you, the written word may be a more comfortable place from which to begin. Me, I'm reasonably comfortable in those contexts, so...
― still logged out, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 04:09 (twenty years ago)
I also disagree with "the good ones being taken" thing. Maybe that's true if you're looking for people who are either lucky or easily satisfied.
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 06:11 (twenty years ago)
― Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 06:19 (twenty years ago)
Even a bad picture is way, way better than nothing.
― Chris H. (chrisherbert), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 07:25 (twenty years ago)
* admittedly, this was a few years ago, when I didn't actually live here
― caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 07:38 (twenty years ago)
What especially depresses me is the amount of women who advertise for "tall" men ahead of any other characteristic they might possess. Makes personal columns read like recruitment adverts for the Metropolitan Police.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 07:49 (twenty years ago)
the first is pretty straightforward. twice i've moved to new cities and known nobody. both places (chicago and london) had the advantage of having tons of listings in different magazines/websites, so i had my pick. i went on several dates in each place, some were not great, some were really cool. BOTH times, though, once i got out of the 'i don't know anyone here and i'm feeling slightly sorry for myself' mode, i met someone else in real life that was even better than anyone i'd met through an ad (by this i mean things 'clicked' better, not that they had a nicer car, in case callum is reading this), and we dated for a while. i think it was just that being out and social and happy was a good thing generally, and made me more attractive/confident/approachable or something.
the other way i've used the ads is when i've been in the mindset similar to the thread about thinking nobody will ever want to date you again. just seeing lists of hundreds of people that are looking for someone to date sometimes made me feel better that maybe just one of them would want to date me, and i him. which sounds weird, i suspect, but i guess it was when i wasn't ready to actually date anyone, but just felt better that there were options.
i don't know if either of these will help you. i agree with what other people have said, that it's important to have your confidence up before you can expect anyone to love you (that sounds so self help i'm making myself sick, but it's kind of true). but there's loads of ways of doing that, and maybe going out on a date or two will be the way to do that? i guess a big problem will be if there's not many places you can look around you, although i second the onion/nerve personals as a good first choice.
― colette (a2lette), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 09:13 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:06 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:11 (twenty years ago)
― shine headlights on me (electricsound), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:11 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:20 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:22 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:23 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:24 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:26 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:28 (twenty years ago)
― shine headlights on me (electricsound), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:29 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:31 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:38 (twenty years ago)
― ()ops (()()ps), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:41 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:42 (twenty years ago)
― ()ops (()()ps), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:43 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:44 (twenty years ago)
― ()ops (()()ps), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:46 (twenty years ago)
― happy fun ball (kenan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:48 (twenty years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 06:02 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 06:58 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 06:59 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:00 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:01 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:02 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:04 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:05 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:06 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:07 (twenty years ago)
― kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:13 (twenty years ago)
This isn't particularly intended as a recommendation to you, Caitlin, but if you are interested I highly recommend www.loveandfriends.com.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:31 (twenty years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:35 (twenty years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)
Some of us have had affairs some of us haven’t... the insentive that is.
F.A.P anyone?
― Hello, Tuesday, 26 April 2005 00:51 (twenty years ago)