Personal Ads: C/D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Today, the Office Gossip has been trying to persuade me all day that taking out a personal ad is the Ideal Way to get rid of all my "i'm going to be single for the rest of my life feelings". Frankly, though, all I can see is that it would be a recipe for even more humiliation.

So, this is the thread where you say "A personal ad? Are you mad?" and tell me all your horror stories.

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:19 (twenty years ago)

In the newspaper?

Actor Sizemore fails drug test with fake penis (jingleberries), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:38 (twenty years ago)

Yes, in the local newspaper

I will find tonight's copy and post some example ads here, so you can see what sort of people advertise in it.

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:43 (twenty years ago)

Based on what I know from my female friends who have done it, and based on my own infamous experiments, I would avoid craigslist. I hear match.com sucks, too.

nerve.com/theonion.com/salon.com personals seem like the best bet. But be careful about who you meet, write back and forth a few times before giving out your contact info, and if it feels "off", don't meet 'em.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:43 (twenty years ago)

my female friend went on craigslist and posted how she wanted a fuckbuddy. she got like 400 responses and we had so much fun sifting through the photos to pick one out. they met and she had a good time!

phil-two (phil-two), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:45 (twenty years ago)

"good time"?

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)

multiple good times.

phil-two (phil-two), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:48 (twenty years ago)

The problem with, say, nerve.com, is that last time I looked on it there were only about 2 or 3 people on it within 50 miles of here.

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:49 (twenty years ago)

maybe if you're real specific, like this one in our paper today, it could be an answer to your prayers:

"ISRAELITE MAN, 57, 6'1", 165 lbs., dark red hair, hazel eyes, quiet, 21 years praying for answer to the vision of a beautiful loving relationship with a special slender lady, light hair only, name of Glenda. Please write Ollie P.O. box 91, Pyatt Ark. 72672"

andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:52 (twenty years ago)

(xpost) nice.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)

OCEAN SENSUALITY w/ an OLDER WOMAN - 36

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: anon-6#######@cr@igslist.org
Date: 2005-04-18, 10:22AM PDT


Thank you for looking at this posting. I love the company of older women. Always have and always will. I appreciate the life experiences, the accomplishments, and everything else that goes along with it. I'm a 36 year old, that looks great, is in great shape, socially and culturally aware, stable in all respects and ready to get to know and possibly (if we connect, if not we can be friends)start a companionship with the right woman. The ocean is an important part of my life, I'm in it and around it most everyday. It is a sensual and essential part of my existence. If you understand this we already get along great. I am generally attracted to women between 36-60ish (little younger, older not a big deal), attractive(even in her own right), active(physically)and for the most part enjoys just being. If you have a/or kid(s), that is totally fine, I get along great with them. The only thing that is really important to me is that you live close to SM,(between Marina DR area- Malibu area) I feel that accessability is important for both sides. Pretty much covered all the bases. If you feel you fit or think you kinda fit, email me! Send a picture if you want!

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:57 (twenty years ago)

...Remy?

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Monday, 18 April 2005 16:59 (twenty years ago)

one thing it might be worth bearing in mind: tho it's kind of a vicious circle, maybe it would be better to build confidence via counselling (if needed) and finding new friends who share some interests before looking for someone via personal ads as in romantic pursuit. it sounds like this is the ultimate goal (tho it's not necess. the guaranteed key solution to all problems) but one step at a time and all that...

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:03 (twenty years ago)

It turns out, the local paper claims to have a dating website as well as print ads - but if you look at the website, it's actually common to all Daily Mail-owned local papers. Here are a few samples of the print ads, though.

Women:
Separated 52 year old female, medium build, 5ft 2ins, seeks an honest male for days out, friendship and possible relationship.
35 yr old female likes pubs clubs, single mum of 3 looking for friendship at first.
Claire 22, easygoing and fun loving, likes cuddles and kisses, mother of one, seeks a male for friendship, maybe more

Men:
26 yr old male looking for an older lady, 40-55, to share good times.
Caring male, 39, 6ft 3ins, brown hair, blue eyes and medium build seeks a female, 27-43.
Slim male, 31, 5ft 9ins, attractive, looking for an older woman.
Single dad of 3, 28, seeks caring loving honest lady.
Andy 35, working, likes going out at weekends and seeks good times. Single mums welcome.

Needless to say, they don't have MfM or WfW sections.

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:08 (twenty years ago)

all the people within 50 miles of me on personal ad sites are AWFUL.

jill schoelen is the queen of my dreams! (Homosexual II), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:08 (twenty years ago)

I'm kind of suspecting that the same applies to me, Mandee.

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)

they all want to grab life by the horns. I'm not into that.

jill schoelen is the queen of my dreams! (Homosexual II), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)

"grab life by the horn" has worrying connotations in the personal ad context, i feel

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:12 (twenty years ago)

I've made a fair attempt at online dating, but I've had nothing come of it except for a couple of very good friends and the memories of loads of people who misrepresented themselves, although it was probably unintentional.

esp. if that phrase is accompanied by a winky face

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:12 (twenty years ago)

i totally agree with stevem. it might be hard or seem pointless because it's not a direct way to what you want, but you have to just start doing what you can and have patience.

personal ads seem the worst idea actually. they *seem* easy - you just state what you want and someone answers, but 99% are form letters from someone who only got as far as 'female' and thought 'perfect!'.

lolita corpus (lolitacorpus), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

Hurrah! Good reasons not to do it are exactly what I need! :-)

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 17:27 (twenty years ago)

I'm always impressed by how many women refer to themselves as a 'goddess.' "Lovely Ebody Goddess," "Spiritual Goddess seeks Hero for Life Journey," etc. Confidence is sexy, true; but if these women were truly goddess material, would they be haunting singles message boards?

andy --, Monday, 18 April 2005 17:56 (twenty years ago)

The essential point that judges stigma towards personals. I think there a valid argument that this is an argument that is less and likely since there are good reasons why a goddess is using such means other than 'because she's not really a goddess'.

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 18 April 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)

Most gay men I know have gotten laid off them. More than that, not often.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 18 April 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

i think i have a personal up on some site, BUT ITS HIDDEN!

jill schoelen is the queen of my dreams! (Homosexual II), Monday, 18 April 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)

Eh. Maybe I'm in a minority, but personal ad type deals really aren't the end of the world. I mean, what do you think things like myspace and Friendster are when you're meeting new folks off them? Finding true love off of one...probably not going to happen. A new friend or someone you can hook up with and never see again if you want...more likely.

Candicissima (candicissima), Monday, 18 April 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

isnt that really what the whole internet is anyway?

AaronK (AaronK), Monday, 18 April 2005 18:47 (twenty years ago)

my entire run on ILX has been a thinly veiled attempt at pwning wank material.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:19 (twenty years ago)

Does that include the anal sex thread?

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:24 (twenty years ago)

yeah, that backfired

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:36 (twenty years ago)

no pun intended

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)

Deny it all you would like, but this whole site and the like IS/ARE, in whatever guise, a singles page.

Terrence, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 01:58 (twenty years ago)

no.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 02:04 (twenty years ago)

i disagree.

jill schoelen is the queen of my dreams! (Homosexual II), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 02:32 (twenty years ago)

Caitlin,

I would say that, if you have any major self-esteem issues about your looks/physical self, then it's probably a good idea to think twice about trying online dating. I went through a period a while back of trying my luck at it, and in fact, all of the women I met were intelligent, attractive (even beautiful), and basically "as advertised" (awful phrase, but you know what I mean I'm sure). With any one of them, I would've been interested in *exploring* something, at least -- but none of them reciprocated my interest*.

It was hard not to feel that the dealbreaker for all of them was the way I look. I think I can be pretty charming with the written word; out of all the women I wrote to while I was dating online, I got interested responses from all but one or two, which I think is a pretty good %. The phone conversations I had with each of these women, prior to meeting in person, were thoughtful, fun, and felt good. (I'm told I have a nice voice, too.) The dates themselves even went well -- well, the very first one was a little strange, but after that, they were good.

But without exception, when it came time to take things beyond the platonic...nothing. All the while telling me, mind you, how smart I was, how "much we had in common"...one woman went so far as to say that if she were only physically attracted to me, I'd have had to fight her off to keep her away, she liked me that much "as a person". (A backhanded compliment if there ever was one.)

To be fair, I didn't have a picture posted on my profile, partly because I didn't have a good (or even passable) one, partly because the idea skeeves me out a bit (what if my ex sees? what if my friends see and make fun of me? etc.) and partly because, quite frankly, I generally find looking at pictures of myself to be a painful experience. So these women didn't really know what they were getting, physically speaking (though, to some degree, neither did I: actually, most of them were *prettier* than their online picture!).

But if anything, that makes it worse...maybe I can't relate to the female perspective, but in my universe, if I were that into someone as a person -- their mind, their humor, their spirit -- then they'd have to be pretty UN-attractive for me to not even want to consider being romantically involved with them, to categorically rule it out. Which, consequently, makes me feel pretty shitty about the way I look.

The thing is, in real life I've done rather better (though not anything near as well as I'd like). It's not that I don't think people are attracted to me; sometimes -- once in a while -- they are. But I think that my appeal is a rather niche one at best, and people who know they want what I have will seek me out (well, they used to, anyway), whereas if I present myself "blind", I'm going to strike out for the most part.

Also, I think people are more charitable in real life, in a way...it's a terrible analogy, but I find myself thinking of buying CDs online vs. in a physical store: you tend to be much pickier about what you buy online, whereas sometimes in a store, you can make a blind impulse purchase, buying a CD that you might not have guessed you would've enjoyed, but that turns out to be unexpectedly dear to you. Plus there's the whole element of serendipity -- people like to see their lives in terms of narratives of lucky chances, things that could've come THIS close to not happening. Online dating lacks that element to some extent; it has a self-consciousness that can inhibit people, a presumption of romance that colors your interaction with a person. (How many of us have come to see someone in a completely different light after months, years of knowing them? Waking up one day and realizing, "My God, how did I never realize that ______ is so beautiful?" I certainly have.)

(Plus, there are a lot of terrific people in the world who can't write or spell very well!)

One more thought: when I'm not beating myself up about my looks, another possibility that comes to mind is that online dating seems to attract people who have a very specific vision of what they want. Sometimes this is tied in with their own self-esteem issues, or sometimes they just prefer to live in fantasy ("Someday I'll find a guy on one of these things who looks just like Johnny Depp"). The sad truth is that the older we get, the more likely it is that the "good catches" -- beautiful, intelligent people who are emotionally ready for a relationship -- will have already found someone to be with, leaving a dating pool that's peopled heavily (I don't claim exclusively) by individuals who have major physical or personal flaws that help to explain their singlehood.

*[Well, I did make out with one of them, but she called me a week later, in lieu of a proposed third date, to say that she "wasn't feeling the spark" and was bailing out. Unfortunately, she was the one I liked best out of all of them -- not to mention the fact that she was the first new person I'd kissed after ending a five-year monogamous relationship. I was pretty much crushed -- I *really* liked her...]

logged out at the moment, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 03:56 (twenty years ago)

I guess my point is this: I've seen you post things before indicating that you had deep insecurities about your looks. I've never seen a picture of you, but no matter what you look like, I can guarantee you that there's someone out there -- many someones, I think -- who will be able to look into your eyes and find you beautiful, and vice versa. But for those of us who are "unconventionally attractive", personals dating may be an experience more brutal and disappointing than it's worth; it may be better to take that energy and put it into counseling, or into meeting with someone who can speak frankly to you about what you're doing that does and doesn't work, on whatever level.

On the other hand, it may well be that by putting oneself into the meat market, it creates the possibility of getting spotted by the person who goes, "Aha, I've been looking for someone with a glass eye, dark brown teeth, and a complexion that looks like raw salmon! We will go yachting together, make love for hours, count my millions, and play backgammon!"

Also, if you're not very proficient at reading people's cues, or if social situations are generally difficult for you, the written word may be a more comfortable place from which to begin. Me, I'm reasonably comfortable in those contexts, so...

still logged out, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 04:09 (twenty years ago)

Some of the most beautiful women I've ever met have been so insecure about their looks that their POV infected mine to the point that I wound up not being into them, in "that" way, at all. So however fantastic you imagine your personality to be, logged out, keep in mind that your fixation on good looks and how you supposedly don't have them will shine through. Remember the story of the ugly casanova who could talk any woman "past his face" in 15 seconds flat. The reverse happens, too!! You have no control over the actual form of your face so just fucking forget about it or you'll be doomed to turning off people who might have been interested.

I also disagree with "the good ones being taken" thing. Maybe that's true if you're looking for people who are either lucky or easily satisfied.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 06:11 (twenty years ago)

Good's subjective.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 06:19 (twenty years ago)

Whether you are truly ugly or not (and you probably aren't), every online personal ad should include a picture. That's 99% of the medium's advantage over newspapers. And really, looks are important! I'm attracted to certain "types" more than others, and I don't mean fat vs. skinny, or anything like that. I don't like big gummy smiles, for example. That's stupid, but it's true. But lots of people must love them, or else Julia Roberts wouldn't be around.


Even a bad picture is way, way better than nothing.

Chris H. (chrisherbert), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 07:25 (twenty years ago)

That reminds me: the last time I looked on nerve.com for people in this area,* the only one with a picture was a surgeon who lived 40 miles away and had posted a picture of himself stroking his very expensive car. I didn't think it put a good shine on his personality, frankly.

* admittedly, this was a few years ago, when I didn't actually live here

caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 07:38 (twenty years ago)

Personal ads depress me because they remind me that essentially we are all beasts of the field, noses in the trough, attracted to uncontrollable primeval attributes.

What especially depresses me is the amount of women who advertise for "tall" men ahead of any other characteristic they might possess. Makes personal columns read like recruitment adverts for the Metropolitan Police.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 07:49 (twenty years ago)

i'm not anti personal ads at all. in the past, i've used them for two reasons, one of which will probably come off as shallow/strange.

the first is pretty straightforward. twice i've moved to new cities and known nobody. both places (chicago and london) had the advantage of having tons of listings in different magazines/websites, so i had my pick. i went on several dates in each place, some were not great, some were really cool. BOTH times, though, once i got out of the 'i don't know anyone here and i'm feeling slightly sorry for myself' mode, i met someone else in real life that was even better than anyone i'd met through an ad (by this i mean things 'clicked' better, not that they had a nicer car, in case callum is reading this), and we dated for a while. i think it was just that being out and social and happy was a good thing generally, and made me more attractive/confident/approachable or something.

the other way i've used the ads is when i've been in the mindset similar to the thread about thinking nobody will ever want to date you again. just seeing lists of hundreds of people that are looking for someone to date sometimes made me feel better that maybe just one of them would want to date me, and i him. which sounds weird, i suspect, but i guess it was when i wasn't ready to actually date anyone, but just felt better that there were options.

i don't know if either of these will help you. i agree with what other people have said, that it's important to have your confidence up before you can expect anyone to love you (that sounds so self help i'm making myself sick, but it's kind of true). but there's loads of ways of doing that, and maybe going out on a date or two will be the way to do that? i guess a big problem will be if there's not many places you can look around you, although i second the onion/nerve personals as a good first choice.

colette (a2lette), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 09:13 (twenty years ago)

i've got a condom in my pocket.

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:06 (twenty years ago)

no shit.

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:06 (twenty years ago)

i'm so wet.

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:06 (twenty years ago)

it hertz.

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:06 (twenty years ago)

daddy's chair, j.r. lewd

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:11 (twenty years ago)

take me

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:11 (twenty years ago)

i'm a frequent flier millionaire

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:11 (twenty years ago)

you're australian, aren't you?

shine headlights on me (electricsound), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:11 (twenty years ago)

i just pissed

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:20 (twenty years ago)

"sugar cane alley" imdb

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:22 (twenty years ago)

sugar walls

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:22 (twenty years ago)

such tilework

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:22 (twenty years ago)

such greed

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:22 (twenty years ago)

such escrow

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:23 (twenty years ago)

such escrow

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:23 (twenty years ago)

ethan dork hawking directed that. i didn't see it

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:24 (twenty years ago)

was it good?

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:24 (twenty years ago)

got a/c to work :D

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:24 (twenty years ago)

acdshe

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:24 (twenty years ago)

Clearly there is nothing to do but abandon this thread completely. I don't know if you'll get any satisfaction out of my saying this or not, kacka, but you're an idiot and an asshat.

happy fun ball (kenan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:26 (twenty years ago)

My guess: kacka is a noize dude. Fuck every single one of them in the nostril, ferreal, except for JW, who seems pretty decent, surprisingly.

happy fun ball (kenan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:28 (twenty years ago)

nar it's not noize dude style

shine headlights on me (electricsound), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:29 (twenty years ago)

Isn't it? Perhaps there were innovations of asshattery that we were not informed of.

happy fun ball (kenan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:31 (twenty years ago)

Or perhaps I've grown overly suspicious...

happy fun ball (kenan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:38 (twenty years ago)

don't leave me hanging! you've grown overly suspicious what?? tumors? magnolias?

()ops (()()ps), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:41 (twenty years ago)

Penises. Extra penises.

happy fun ball (kenan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:42 (twenty years ago)

and here I was secretly thinking it was testicles. what i fool am i.

()ops (()()ps), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:43 (twenty years ago)

a picture of a penis

happy fun ball (kenan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:44 (twenty years ago)

thanks for the aide but i'm familiar with what a penis looks like

()ops (()()ps), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:46 (twenty years ago)

Just making extra sure.

happy fun ball (kenan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 05:48 (twenty years ago)

my thread has died :-(

caitlin (caitlin), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 06:02 (twenty years ago)

holy fuck

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 06:58 (twenty years ago)

i saw the german!

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 06:58 (twenty years ago)

that german!

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 06:58 (twenty years ago)

that german holy fuck!

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 06:58 (twenty years ago)

GOOD NEWS is on NPR!!!!

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 06:59 (twenty years ago)

the NPR/NPC merger is ON!!!!

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 06:59 (twenty years ago)

ahhhhh!!!!!!!

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 06:59 (twenty years ago)

arrrrghhgaougaeroitjraelffhhhhhhhhhhhhhhahhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:00 (twenty years ago)

OMG i just came so hard

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:00 (twenty years ago)

my cake has come undone

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:01 (twenty years ago)

its gluten is intact

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:01 (twenty years ago)

it is.

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:02 (twenty years ago)

send it to the softserve.

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:02 (twenty years ago)

i just pasted an amtrak pamphlet to the wall.

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:04 (twenty years ago)

people.

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:04 (twenty years ago)

banter!

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:04 (twenty years ago)

i need banter!

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:05 (twenty years ago)

give me marin canter from the loveless

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:05 (twenty years ago)

she's 40+ now and i bet her titties are still great

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:06 (twenty years ago)

i ate spiky beef today.

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:06 (twenty years ago)

www.albion.edu

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:07 (twenty years ago)

127 Jump Street

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:07 (twenty years ago)

doods?

kacka thompson (kacka), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 07:13 (twenty years ago)

I know this thread has been damaged, perhaps fatally, by multiple postings from an asshole and an ill-judged picture, but I wanted to say that I've found online dating sites really good. I'm not attractive, and have had experiences like those of the logged out poster, but by no means every time - I do always include a picture of me, as I figure that if someone is going to find me unattractive, I'd rather filter them/myself out at the start than after several emails and meeting.

This isn't particularly intended as a recommendation to you, Caitlin, but if you are interested I highly recommend www.loveandfriends.com.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:31 (twenty years ago)

Was that the site you couldn't remember the address of when we were talking on AIM at the weekend?

caitlin (caitlin), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:35 (twenty years ago)

ha, no - that was quite different!

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)

Oh, hang on a moment. This place is COMPLETELY different to any other web site on the intraweb in that WE only try to get into each others knickers because we attempt to speak intelligently about current affairs... err, music and shit.

Some of us have had affairs some of us haven’t... the insentive that is.

F.A.P anyone?

Hello, Tuesday, 26 April 2005 00:51 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.